Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

This made me think of a book I read back in college after I changed my major from Early childhood education, when I was questioning everything and searching for what do do with my life, and trying to figure out how shit went the way its going, why, and if I should even give a shit anymore (spoiler: I pretty much don't, anymore. But I have started believing in collective guilt and that we all deserve this shit for letting it get this far in the first place. They've mastered the hegelian dialectic and we're all fucked for not realizing what was up, but thats a big digression for another time.)

The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America: A Chronological Paper Trail is a pretty interesting read, but I wouldn't recommend it if you feel blackpilled. I think the author was a little bit of a nutter herself, but it was a compelling timeline of how we got to where we are, and why, and I can't really fault her conclusions. But I read it over a decade ago, and its not very fresh in my mind. Think I'll go see if I can find it on libgen.
 
These industries or ideologies very often do not have concrete guideliens to what is and isnt true in them ( music being a subjective taste type thing ) is what runs rampant.
It's part of the design, a confused population is easier to control by changing the truth to fit preconceived narratives or ideological endpoints. One of the ways that is done is by making truth and objectivity right wing or fascist and trying to eliminate sources and documentation of the truth. Again going back to Orwell "he who controls the present controls the past, he who controls the past controls the future". It's also why there's a lot of historical revisionism, it causes demoralisation.
 
Remember CHAZ? That's what happens when these types try keeping a plant alive.
Oh man that still makes me laugh.

Remember ever the words from "A Message to Garcia."

And this incapacity for independent action, this moral stupidity, this infirmity of the will, this unwillingness to cheerfully catch hold and lift, are the things that put pure Socialism so far into the future. If men will not act for themselves, what will they do when the benefit of their effort is for all? A first-mate with knotted club seems necessary; and the dread of getting "the bounce" Saturday night, holds many a worker to his place.​
Advertise for a stenographer, and nine out of ten who apply, can neither spell nor punctuate- and do not think it necessary to.​
Can such a one write a letter to Garcia?​
EDIT:​
It's part of the design, a confused population is easier to control by changing the truth to fit preconceived narratives or ideological endpoints. One of the ways that is done is by making truth and objectivity right wing or fascist and trying to eliminate sources and documentation of the truth. Again going back to Orwell "he who controls the present controls the past, he who controls the past controls the future". It's also why there's a lot of historical revisionism, it causes demoralisation.

Should really REALLY read The Abolition of Man by CS Lewis.

“For every one pupil who needs to be guarded against a weak excess of sensibility there are three who need to be awakened from the slumber of cold vulgarity. The task of the modern educator is not to cut down jungles but to irrigate deserts. The right defence against false sentiments is to inculcate just sentiments. By starving the sensibility of our pupils we only make them easier prey to the propagandist when he comes. For famished nature will be avenged and a hard heart is no infallible protection against a soft head.”​
 
One of my favorite SJW cows is Courtney Milan, who may of you know. Her current sperg:

Screen Shot 2023-06-08 at 12.09.56 AM.png

Wait...what? I had to read this several times. Normalize people DYING? As in, the totally natural occurrence of death? What is she going on about? So I read further...trying to understand.

Screen Shot 2023-06-08 at 12.10.20 AM.png

Still confused. But then the QTs enlightened me:

Screen Shot 2023-06-08 at 12.11.27 AM.png
I would like to normalize launching these retards into the sun.
 
Today on "Not understanding the point:"
View attachment 5155181

The comments of this thing were worse, moaning about how people blowing their money on Jordans and Gucci Belts does more for the economy than investing, and claiming that the first comment was saying the poor don't deserve money at all.
It's the Vimes theory of economics.
The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles. But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet

Astoundingly the wikipedia article is both fairly direct and on point but includes a reference to an actual decent bit of research being done in that vein.

 
It's the Vimes theory of economics.


Astoundingly the wikipedia article is both fairly direct and on point but includes a reference to an actual decent bit of research being done in that vein.

I am aware of the Boots theory, but the comments felt more like the so-called "velocity of money" theory where money changing hands is more important than that money being used productively. It's Keynesian bullshit used to claim that investing is just hoarding that does nobody good unlike them blowing money on Funko Pops.
 
I am aware of the Boots theory, but the comments felt more like the so-called "velocity of money" theory where money changing hands is more important than that money being used productively. It's Keynesian bullshit used to claim that investing is just hoarding that does nobody good unlike them blowing money on Funko Pops.
Ah fair, I tend to fall back on the Boots theory since it's a catch all. As you posted the people talking about where it is being spent were there too. And unsurprising that people who include an excessive number who are entirely dependent upon the taxes of others for their lifestyle hate those who don't immediately spend their money rather than save.
 
Ah fair, I tend to fall back on the Boots theory since it's a catch all. As you posted the people talking about where it is being spent were there too. And unsurprising that people who include an excessive number who are entirely dependent upon the taxes of others for their lifestyle hate those who don't immediately spend their money rather than save.
I've heard the concept of the "poverty mentality," where people are so focused on immediately satiating their desires with what they have that it keeps them poor. A theory that basically describes why a lot of lottery winners are broke within a decade. The original quote seems to be referring to that, and the responses of thinking only with "literally rich and literally poor" seems to indicate that people with something resembling a Poverty Mentality got mad that they were called out.

I'll admit that a lot of the "poverty is a mindset" types are delusional hustlers, but sometimes you see people get so mad about suggesting that you invest instead of immediately spend that you start to think they might be onto something.
 
NICKMERCS, a Call of Duty player who plays scrims and for money, got pulled from Activision because he stated he wants to have a say in the upbringing of his kid vs the state. This was in connection to the California brawl between Armenian parents and blatant homosexuals. In response, one of the most viral responses to his tweet comes from a guy named Hutchinson, who went from 800k YouTube subscribers before moving to Twitch, where he only gets 230 live viewers from a subscriber base of 320k. His video on the Trump indictment barely got over 300 views.

The tweet in question. Archive.
leave kids alone.PNG
leave kids alone 2.PNG
It's not ideology. It's just them 'existing'. Archive.
we just exist.PNG
It isn't a political ideology, redux. Archive.
we just exist 2.PNG
we just exist 3.PNG
Not teaching kids about the gay from genderqueer teachers is bad. Archive.
bad for kids.PNG
It is 'necessary' to chase another person for clout, because muh homophobia. Archive.
it's necessary.PNG
It is necessary otherwise it is eradication. Archive.
LGBT eradication.PNG
lgbt eradication 2.PNG
Hutch thinks only Christians are opposed to this. Archive.
fucking ridiculous.PNG
Remarks on Alan Turing, without noting that today, Turing would be considered a 'true and honest woman'. Archive.
alan turing.PNG
"We don't want strippers in our schools." "Wow what school did you go to." Archive.
retard juice.PNG
Pulls the Erin Reed/Caraballo book burning schtick. Is unaware their vaginoplasty doctor went on to become a Dachau doctor. Archive.
trans book burning.PNG
trans book burning 2.PNG
An insane, baseless accusation. Archive.
brainless assertions.PNG
And the best part: Hutch states he has 'never seen' a drag queen pedophile, blatantly ignoring all the stories of drag queens coming out as convicted sex offenders. Archive.
drag queen sex abuse.PNG
Only one person in his comments pointed out that public school teachers abuse kids more, but as school teachers are sacred to them, they are not willing to throw them under the bus.

Hutch's twitch has (as of this writing) only 230 live viewers. He is still bitching about the entire Nick drama, and insists that 'the kids are doing just fine'.
 
Back