"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

I agree with you up to here but all the other austistic shit... i don't know about that. He's like the right wing version of keffals, drugged up sped poster grifting what he can before a collapse.
He already grifted from the 2016 era youtube drama/bullying audience though. Keffals also doesn't fedpost overtly.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: yydszmiteg2
yo jersh related to the lord bung shit.

member Somethingawful's shmorky s smurf porn?

What is all artist are just perverts who learn draw to make their custom coom material?

Does the rise of AI image creation mean their will be no more artists?
That has always been the primary incentive for men getting into art. Back in the stone ages they squashed berries so they could draw some booba on the wall of the cave, in ancient greece men spend 20 years carving marble statues just to see a naked lady and now they have involved to drawing furry fart inflation porn on a tablet. There is not a single man that does art that doesn't also draw naked people for his own sexual pleasure.

This is why only women can create true art.
 
That has always been the primary incentive for men getting into art. Back in the stone ages they squashed berries so they could draw some booba on the wall of the cave, in ancient greece men spend 20 years carving marble statues just to see a naked lady and now they have involved to drawing furry fart inflation porn on a tablet. There is not a single man that does art that doesn't also draw naked people for his own sexual pleasure.

This is why only women can create true art.
As we all know no woman has ever been horny in the history of ever.
 
As we all know no woman has ever been horny in the history of ever.
He never said that. He simply stated within the context of art that men as a whole are coomers and women generally are not, which is true. The approach you took falls into the same fallacy as the people who just need to point out that women can be sexpests too, knowing that those are exceptions to the rule. Though I disagree that only women can create true art. Love me some wholesome Bob Ross and his happy little trees.

~
@Null Please please, play Everybody Wants to Rule the World for Ted. The timing is just too freaky; I promise I had no idea until today when I saw it at the top of the homepage.
 
He simply stated within the context of art that men as a whole are coomers and women generally are not, which is true.
The whole thing about Grug smushing berries on cave walls or Greeks carving up some juicy statues speaks more to the general differences in gender dynamics regarding the proliferation and consumption of pornographic art; men, generally being more crude and focused on the visual, whether that's proto-Playboy centerfolds published on cave walls to hardcore gangbang videos shot in 1080p sitting on a Pornhub server for all to enjoy. If the written word is to be considered an art form, which I assume most do, one could point to all of the "Romance" novels*** consumed by women or the phenomenon that were the Fifty Shades of Grey movies (based on the books) and how well they do with women.

I'm not arguing that men may not have more of a "coomer" tendency even (and it's a whole other topic as to why that probably is) since we probably do, but also that there's a certain tendency for some people (I immediately think of someone like Brittany Venti's rhetoric) to treat men's sexuality as wrong and shameful by acting like there's no middle ground between GOON CAVE CUM CANNON and chaste monk, much like capital I Incel rhetoric treats women's sexuality with no middle ground between uwu pure virgin in a wheat field and the town bike with "Lucky you" tattooed on her asshole.

***For True & Honest Retards, no I'm not saying that smut books are the equivalent to 18 year olds getting their holes blown out on film.
 
He never said that. He simply stated within the context of art that men as a whole are coomers and women generally are not, which is true. The approach you took falls into the same fallacy as the people who just need to point out that women can be sexpests too, knowing that those are exceptions to the rule. Though I disagree that only women can create true art. Love me some wholesome Bob Ross and his happy little trees.

~
@Null Please please, play Everybody Wants to Rule the World for Ted. The timing is just too freaky; I promise I had no idea until today when I saw it at the top of the homepage.
Bob Ross basically spend all day painting bush.

there's a certain tendency for some people (I immediately think of someone like Brittany Venti's rhetoric) to treat men's sexuality as wrong and shameful by acting like there's no middle ground between GOON CAVE CUM CANNON and chaste monk
Shaming men for their sexuality is based actually. We need much more shame in this society and put all the freaks back into the closets.
 
We need much more shame in this society and put all the freaks back into the closets.
I completely agree with this except for when people go over the top declaring everything to be in that "Freak" category. The Rekieta thing as an example: talking about your love life here and there with the odd sex joke isn't a big deal. Talking about Balldos every night? Weird.
 
If the written word is to be considered an art form, which I assume most do, one could point to all of the "Romance" novels*** consumed by women
I think I may get what you mean, but the point of those books (AFAIK) is the romance that makes the sex seem worthwhile. The sexual content would be repellent rather than attractive to women without the masses of pages giving context to the intimacy. I don't cosign that material, but I get it. Don't even get me started on that 50 Shades trash written by the author when she was 13 and consumed by sheltered women looking for "romance" different from the failed versions they lived and got bad endings to, Lord help me.

~
 
He never said that. He simply stated within the context of art that men as a whole are coomers and women generally are not, which is true. The approach you took falls into the same fallacy as the people who just need to point out that women can be sexpests too, knowing that those are exceptions to the rule. Though I disagree that only women can create true art. Love me some wholesome Bob Ross and his happy little trees.

~
@Null Please please, play Everybody Wants to Rule the World for Ted. The timing is just too freaky; I promise I had no idea until today when I saw it at the top of the homepage.
Not to expose myself but some of the most extreme Japanese animee porn artists are women. Also lol yeah 50 shades of grey KEK.
The cucumbers left behind in the theaters. The horror.
 
but the point of those books (AFAIK) is the romance that makes the sex seem worthwhile. The sexual content would be repellent rather than attractive to women without the masses of pages giving context to the intimacy.
Absolutely makes sense to me and I don't really disagree with it. As I said, the genders typically see and approach the issue differently in regards to stimuli. On top of that though, as you bring up how women typically need more surrounding sex for it to be palatable. Men, generally, I think don't really need that; the intimacy is often expressed more through the physical whereas for the average woman so much of the intimacy is through the context, if that makes sense how I'm saying it.
 
some of the most extreme Japanese animee porn artists are women.
Don't female hentai artists often not even illustrate genetalia in their works? I recall a trope of beams of light in place of penises, for example. I apologize if I'm mistaken; I'm not exactly someone who consumes that kind of media.
 
Don't female hentai artists often not even illustrate genetalia in their works? I recall a trope of beams of light in place of penises, for example. I apologize if I'm mistaken; I'm not exactly someone who consumes that kind of media.
That's all Japanese artists, because showing uncensored genitalia is illegal in Japan.
 
The whole thing about Grug smushing berries on cave walls or
How do we... know that it was Fred and not Wilma painting the cave way back when? Why not have Wilma be the one to paint? I forgot who once said something like, "why do we assume the cave paintings were some gallery of art and not the equivalent of painting a baby's room colorful images to entertain the child?" (if it was, seems more likely mama)

I'm rather agnostic on the idea it just makes me wonder. Are we just making assumptions that a best guess is 100% true? Or is there more evidence either way?
 
Not to expose myself but some of the most extreme Japanese animee porn artists are women. Also lol yeah 50 shades of grey KEK.
The cucumbers left behind in the theaters. The horror.
Source on that most are women? I assume they are women (male) with very feminine penises. The cucumber thing was a marketing ploy to drum up controversy over that extremely boring movie based on a twilight fanfiction story the author wrote as a teenager. Not real. I also can't think of a single woman I've ever known who unironically read or watched 50 shades of grey. The outrage over it was totally overblown.
 
Don't female hentai artists often not even illustrate genetalia in their works? I recall a trope of beams of light in place of penises, for example. I apologize if I'm mistaken; I'm not exactly someone who consumes that kind of media.
That's Japan's ban on "explicit" porn. Because you wouldn't recognize a dick if it was slightly pixelated or had some black lines going through it. I really don't know what the point is, seems like it only causes more extreme problems if you try to bottle it up. Damned it you do, damned if you dont. At least if you don't, people will enjoy a bit more freedom before the ineviyable collapse.
Turning and turning in the widening gyre. Things fall apart, the center cannot hold... The falcon cannot hear the falconer...
Source on that most are women? I assume they are women (male) with very feminine penises. The cucumber thing was a marketing ploy to drum up controversy over that extremely boring movie based on a twilight fanfiction story the author wrote as a teenager. Not real. I also can't think of a single woman I've ever known who unironically read or watched 50 shades of grey. The outrage over it was totally overblown.
I dont exactly have a statistic based on rigorous analysis of every comiket for the last 20 years but I have seen plenty of pictures of real women back in the day before all this tranny nonsense. Women are people and people are horny. I dont think it's that complicated. Probably "most" is the wrong word. "A considerable amount" might be better.
IDK about the cucumbers, but I read all three books and they are just chock full of sex scene after sex scene. The actual plot is a fucking mess and the prose is to die for (literally) but there is plenty of intercourse. And they were some of the fastest selling books of all time.
 
Last edited:
That's Japan's ban on "explicit" porn. Because you wouldn't recognize a dick if it was slightly pixelated or had some black lines going through it. I really don't know what the point is, seems like it only causes more extreme problems if you try to bottle it up. Damned it you do, damned if you dont. At least if you don't, people will enjoy a bit more freedom before the ineviyable collapse.
I think it's more of a rights thing. With the genitals being censored on websites but if you purchase the work legitimately, it is not censored.

Or so I've heard. Supposedly if you go onto some video sites they'll have things marked as censored and uncensored.
 
I really don't know what the point is, seems like it only causes more extreme problems if you try to bottle it up.
It was essentially legislated from the bench. Japan has a law against publishing obscene material, but the law doesn't actually specify what "obscene" is. Then some supreme court justice in the 50s said that some porno was obscene because the genitals weren't pixellated or some shit like that and it stuck.
 
It was essentially legislated from the bench. Japan has a law against publishing obscene material, but the law doesn't actually specify what "obscene" is. Then some supreme court justice in the 50s said that some porno was obscene because the genitals weren't pixellated or some shit like that and it stuck.
America really is a shining beacon in this world full of retards. Take heart, my fellows, for the night is darkest just before the dawn. And the dawn is coming.
 
Back