The Caroline Farrow, Adrian Harrop, and Anthony George Halliday / Stephanie Hayden Megathread

I can see your point, but the idea of the fucking cops being able to just demand you turn up for "an appointment" or they turn up at your door and drag you off, when you have done nothing wrong other than speak your mind and refuse to kowtow to troons and lick the stinkditch is fucking horrifying.
It's pure ideological intimidation, a fucking gross abuse of power trying to scare someone into keeping their mouth shut.
Any country where that shit happens and is considered the norm is a fucking authoritarian shithole, no better than fucking Venezuela.
The UK system is deeply unsettling to me. The culture of compliance is eerie.

I visit the UK regularly (personal life reasons) and I'm always very cognizant that I'm leaving freedom behind.

Sorry that's a little dramatic but it sums up my feelings.

I run a private VPN at my home in the US so I can still pretend like I'm at work and access US only stuff.

I worry about what's on my laptop or my phone.

There's tshirts that I don't bring to the UK because they're too spicy.

I don't mean to mischaracterize the UK, I'm sure brits are way less uptight than I am but I just don't feel free there. I'd feel freer in Canada or Mexico.

Anyway to bring this all around to the topic at hand: I distinguish people bucking the British boot for personal advancement reasons and those bucking for liberty reasons. The boot is wrong in all cases but some people are genuine victims while others are opportunists. Count Dankula was absolutely a victim of the boot.
 
He doesn't have a point and he doesn't know anything about how the British Legal system works. The Police have evidence that they won't give to farrow and instead will only release to her solicitor. This incidentally is exactly how the US tried to run the military tribunals at Gitmo.
That's yet another ancient British "tradition" that we literally put something in the Constitution to end it because it's fucking retarded, specifically the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause.

Generally the bar is very, very high for restricting information to counsel eyes only, and even in cases involving national security, the usual result is the court says they either disclose or they can't use that evidence. (Exceptions include the profoundly un-American secret FISA court, which acts as a rubber stamp for often unconstitutional surveillance warrants.)
 
What’s more mismanaged the tranch or the uk
by far it is the uk. the uk is an island with ~67 million which went from the biggest empire on earth to the modern uk. the tranch went from an empty ranch with a handful of troons to an empty ranch full of trash and the bones of many a dead alpaca.
 
Step 1- Be British (rip)
Step 2- Say something "mean" to trans people ("misgendering")
Step 3- Lose access to all computers forever without police monitoring
All right, let me ask a question here as a filthy American pig-dog.

How the cinnamon toast fuck do they enforce this? What, exactly, is stopping someone from say, making a burner account on a burner device and completely sidestepping their restrictions?
 
All right, let me ask a question here as a filthy American pig-dog.

How the cinnamon toast fuck do they enforce this? What, exactly, is stopping someone from say, making a burner account on a burner device and completely sidestepping their restrictions?
Part of the conditions are random spot checks at her house when they feel like it.
 
All right, let me ask a question here as a filthy American pig-dog.

How the cinnamon toast fuck do they enforce this? What, exactly, is stopping someone from say, making a burner account on a burner device and completely sidestepping their restrictions?
Presumably the search of her house at any time between 8AM and 8PM. Although it's on hold, that was just one of the things they threatened her with:
 
So? They aren't fucking omniscient. Nothing is foolproof, let alone motherfuckers this stupid. Fucking find a clever way to hide shit.
And then do what? If she did what she's already done it would be blindingly obvious she was who she was. So she could go do anything, but she certainly couldn't criticize the convicted child molester she's in trouble for criticizing. It would be okay for playing Candy Crush I suppose.
 
What if she has covid and they decide to do a check.

It reminds me of the 80s series Widows. The main character's deceased husband was involved in criminal stuff. So even after he died....in fact after they have funeral even, the police come in and basically destroy house (shelves pulled out couch ripped etc etc)
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Hate to make light of the situation, but at least this gives me another reason to despise British people.

And no, I'm not talking just about the government/police. I'm talking about every British person, because those niggers are the one that let mentally retarded people dictate social life.
 
What, exactly, is stopping someone from say, making a burner account on a burner device and completely sidestepping their restrictions?
Total physical oppression by left-wing police.

Every time any paranoid troon thinks Farrow has posted something on the internet, they'll be able to send the police around to search her.
 

Did you not know his conviction was unanimously overturned on appeal in 2020? He was let out of jail and then went back to the vatican. Not a great example for your case, really.

But back on topic, I’m wondering when conservative commentators in the UK will start taking up this Farrow issue. Even if they don’t like her as a person, it’s a scary road for a country to go down.
 
Looked back at the original Farrow thread to learn who is who. Can't quote a locked thread but some of the posts aged poorly.

CF.png

(/threads/caroline-farrow-cf_farrow-carowiththegoodhair-blondpidge.66957/#post-6111633)

"The Religious Right was relentlessly mocked for correctly predicting the future."
 
Back