- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
The article on the Jan 6th "insurektiun" is longer than the article on WW2, or the Holocaust.
It's Wikipedo delusion at it's best.
It's Wikipedo delusion at it's best.
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2021
The article Racial views of Donald Trump is also longer than both of those.
Trump being racisss has 457 footnotes, vs. WW2's 452.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Imagine being this mad a bunch of boomers basically loitered somewhere illegally for a couple hours. Some people did commit actual crimes like fucking with people's mail, but on the whole, there was less violence and property destruction than you'd see from a bunch of hockey fans celebrating a victory.
If anything, the St. Floyd riots, the 2015 Paris attacks, the 2017 Las Vegas shooting and especially the Elliot Rodger sorority row massacre are more violent than the Jan 6th insurrection, and the articles on these respective tragedies are horrifyingly, yet unsurprisingly biased with leftist views.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
The way Jan 6 is still talked about you'd think it was worse than the 2015 Paris attacks or that terror attack at that one concert in England. I dread the fact that the history books are likely to treat Jan 6 as worse than 9/11 somehow (I guess all the security state shit that will be implemented might make them slightly comparable).
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2021
More generally, there is every reason to think that what Wikipedia says about events we are living through now is a preview of what history books will say. History may portray BLM as peaceful and heroic, Trump as a hateful racist who threw brown children in concentration camps, and the rowdy Capitol protestors as a white supremacist attempted coup. The narrative of events such as the Charlottesville rally, only 6 years ago, have already crystallized around complete falsehoods.
Watching the spin and lies happen in real time should make anyone question what the history books say right now about the past. For example, the 1960s civil rights movement bore little resemblance to the sanitized story we're fed today. Here's one article about it: https://www.amren.com/archives/back-issues/may-1995/
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2023
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
"He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past."
Why do you think these people are so angry towards "alternative media" and places like KiwiFarms? Muddles the waters, ruins the perfect little record they have going.
Why do you think these people are so angry towards "alternative media" and places like KiwiFarms? Muddles the waters, ruins the perfect little record they have going.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
Reminds me how much sperging there is over "history is written by the victors"
The Romans literally wiped out all Carthaginian records so all we know of them and countless other cultures is from the Roman perspecitve, the Christians sacked and burned countless pagan temples so all we know of those paganist societies is from a Christian perspective, in neolithic times entire villages would be wiped out in tribal warfare leaving the stories forgotten. The Civil War's entire narrative is permanatently written from a Northern perspective with the few South apologia having to walk eggshells to avoid being slandered as neo-confederate and all sorts of bullshit, Just look at how WW2 and the Holocaust have become the modern foundation myth of the west.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
It's because for WW2 and the Holocaust, Wikipedia is just citing what history books say. But for January 6, there are no history books yet, but there is a dire need to establish a narrative. Therefore, Wikipedia becomes the history book, where using its prominent SEO, researchers from journos writing more shitty hit pieces on the event to actual historians (shoddy as they may be) will be expected to use Wikipedia as a starting point. It's well-known that the global elite highly value Wikipedia for its ability to influence narratives and views by virtue of its popularity, scope, and reach, hence why they've devoted so much effort to controlling it (i.e. driving out Jimmy Wales and getting the Wikimedia Foundation deeply involved in the incestuous network of NGOs).
This is why January 6, Covid, Floyd Riots, anything related to Donald Trump, and anything Current Year are so overdetailed focus with giant sections devoted to "Conspiracy Theories" and "Misinformation." It is intended to set a narrative, not describe the event or put it into context, and to a degree it is intended to substitute for the lack of volumes of books on the subject. It's pure information warfare.
Ifollowrivers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2021
I know Wikipedia is a lost game. It's impossible to make any corrections to it, no matter how much time and money one might spend on such an endeavor. Just a retard with an agenda can erase year's worth of work, as happened at the articles of famous Nazi generals.
Almost all professional encyclopedias have failed and in hindsight we should have seen it coming.
Almost all professional encyclopedias have failed and in hindsight we should have seen it coming.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
There's a bit more to it than that - but it's also worth noting that, just like tribes in America, many pagan tribes in Europe just had little to no written languages. So Christianity "won" by default being a culture WITH writing so it got to do all the recording.
The 2017 Las Vegas shooting was more of a 9/11-level attack, yet people put that under the rug and in favor of calling Jan 6th the new 9/11. Remember, the Vegas shooting was the second biggest, most violent tragedy of the 21st century after 9/11 before the St. Floyd riots when that took over aas the second most violent tragedy in America. Jan 6th was less violent, yet people wrote it off as the new 9/11 despite that there is less killings than the actual Elliot Rodger massacre.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
This behavior started in Rome in early Church history. The term "iconoclast" even comes from the habit of Christians attacking the temples of other religions and smashing up their "idols," the most famous being defiling some of the statues in the Parthenon. (Also Christians were blamed for all kinds of unsolved crimes they probably had nothing to do with.)
In any event, the current history often presented is that the early Christians were persecuted for no reason other than blind bigotry, even though early Christians could be real assholes at times.
There were less killings than in even one of the daily gang shootouts in Chicongo.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
There was only one death on Jan 6th and that was a single protestor being shot by a cop who had no reason since there was a massive solid wood door in the way. The other "deaths" all happened after the fact from cops who either had "health issues" or "committed suicide" in one case.
Meanwhile Las Vegas shooting had dozens of dead.
Meanwhile Las Vegas shooting had dozens of dead.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
All humans in all places can be assholes. But when Arminius defeated the Roman legions in Germany there was a period of time where the Roman people would hurl rocks (and swears) at the temples of their gods for failing them. So it's not like the pagans were perfect at keeping their stuff intact either. They could be just as destructive without Christian influence.
There were a couple of other protestors who died but other than Ashley they were all cases where the person had medical complications and couldn't get through the crowd to reach medical services in time.
Which wouldn't make Jan 6th any different from big concerts or other protests.
I mean everybody EVERYBODY - even the most normie of normies, knows that it was all a plot. EVERY Congress who matches the party of the president will lose seats and flip in the next election. The SOLE exception were the republicans retained the house in...2002.
Thus Jan 6th was entirely Nancy Pelosi attempting to hang onto power by drumming up a 9/11 equivalent in the hopes that dems could break the rule of house flips.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
Yeah I vastly oversimplified it and on a cultural and technological level the pagans were never going to win out, but ultimately they were culturally imperialized by missionary activities. I was mostly referring to the Christianization of the Roman Empire in that statement, however.
Again, Elliot Rodger had killed 6 people, while the Jan 6th insurrection had only one death.
At the time of my post, 60 deaths (the last few were from after the shooting were they failed to recover). During that time, it was recorded as the biggest mass shooting in America and the second worst American tragedy after 9/11. That (as well as the St. Floyd riots) was considered more of a 9/11-esque tragedy than Jan 6th.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2023
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2021
Here's the AfD:
It wasn't deleted as such but redirected to the War on Donbas article. The main reason is lack of reliable sourcing.