- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
What will become of Jezebel, lol?So, just to clarify, does this mean that Hogan is allowed to take shit from Gawker as a company, Denton himself (like his car, for example), or both?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What will become of Jezebel, lol?So, just to clarify, does this mean that Hogan is allowed to take shit from Gawker as a company, Denton himself (like his car, for example), or both?
What will become of Jezebel, lol?
A gaping void of nothingness because their symbiotic partner is dead?
So, just to clarify, does this mean that Hogan is allowed to take shit from Gawker as a company, Denton himself (like his car, for example), or both?
You, the CEO of the company, overstate the value of your OWN shares by 60%, either by gross math error, or deliberate misrepresentation, and it's the COURT that's "got it wrong"?
Gawker Media CEOYou, the CEO of the company, overstate the value of your OWN shares by 60%, either by gross math error, or deliberate misrepresentation, and it's the COURT that's "got it wrong"?
http://nypost.com/2016/07/29/judge-blasts-nick-denton-for-lying-about-gawker-stock-value/
This one explains the judgment better.
It was already a gaping void of nothingness.A gaping void of nothingness because their symbiotic partner is dead?
Boo, Nicky got temporary reprieve.
http://www.adweek.com/fishbowlny/nick-denton-granted-temporary-reprieve/381757
Lol chickenshit coward.
“I have to say that I think the court really got this one wrong,” said Denton on the judge’s decision. “The $81 million company valuation the court relied on was Hogan’s valuation. We told the court they did not know what the company’s shares would be worth… There was no misrepresentation.”
So, just to clarify, does this mean that Hogan is allowed to take shit from Gawker as a company, Denton himself (like his car, for example), or both?
http://nypost.com/2016/07/29/judge-blasts-nick-denton-for-lying-about-gawker-stock-value/
This one explains the judgment better.
Nick better hurry and scurry to get that bankruptcy filing in to stay the proceedings.
Nick himself. Hogan might not want to rip apart the company quite yet because destroying it wouldn't be profitable. He might want to run the Hulkamania Media Empire some day.
I'd really like to see where on paper he said that because it sounds like bullshit to me. If you're putting up something for a certain amount of bond, by definition you're alleging that it's worth that.
Nick himself. Hogan might not want to rip apart the company quite yet because destroying it wouldn't be profitable. He might want to run the Hulkamania Media Empire some day.
He's just trying to pass the buck, or play hair-splitting word games.
Like, you tell your creditors "I'll have your money next week" and next week comes, and you give them $1, and when they get angry you say "I didn't say I'd have it ALL, I need time to get the other $999, what's your problem!?"
Judges HATE that shit, Nick...... more than the average person, even.