Would there not have been some evidence for this? I get why Byuu wouldn't but he could have easily presented receipts of such events but he just didn't and blamed it on the thread. It happening through Discord means it was barely related to KF directly if at all.
Lots of demented shit goes on in discords that never comes to light, and byuu wouldn't be the first person with a thread to get harassed and gay-opped by people from his own social circles who claim to be Kiwi Farms despite being completely unrelated to us in any way.
The word they're using for "Kiwi" is composed of the character for sandpiper/snipe followed by the character for ostrich, so when translation software fucks up and splits the word in the wrong place (there are no spaces in Chinese, so the software largely has to guess at word breaks) it suddenly sees sandpipers and snipes, and presumably ostriches, instead of kiwis.
We like them more than they like us. It's a shame that they're still assmad about Null kicking them out. Feels like having a falling out with family members.
People formed a certain impresson of onaforums because Quasi fought Tomlinson in court. However the site tends to be much more cautious about fucking with non retards who actually have the means to do push back.
I have to agree with his take on chat being filled with faggots and everyone sucking Null's dick clean, regardless of how shit his takes may be.a range of opinions, e.g.
Running a forum has an unhealthy dynamic of having a gaggle of yes-men follow you around chasing clout and cheer you on or sometimes lame trolls jockey your dick at every turn. It puts you between two extremes of behavior which are both obnoxious (and unless you know the posters you can't tell whether they just care that you're big forums admin person or they're just treating them like another user.)
Who told them about my Tesla?
What is "information laundering"?
Wait isn’t the point of pol is to be incorrect
4chan really is the last place to complain about any of that.
It's the attempt to spread a story or narrative while obscuring its source because the source might raise doubts about its legitimacy. An example would be the line that gets repeated every time Kiwi Farms is in the news: "[Kiwi Farms] has been called the world's largest community of stalkers." The origin, as far as I can tell, is one article which quotes a bunch of trannies without providing evidence. All other journos then quote that article or articles that quoted it. They never have to provide any actual evidence because they are quoting a 'reputable paper' and the normie who reads the paper is completely unaware that the original source is a tranny who provided no real evidence and has a motive to shut down the Farms to stop discussions about their crimes.
Way to indicate that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about (as do most people who hate Kiwi Farms). Pretty much nothing in this entire screed is accurate.
I think that's what Kraut & Tea's discord was attempting to do, wasn't it? The idea is you leak information to the Kiwi Farms, thus obscuring that it came from, say, the discord.
Even when it's leaked, we're usually good enough to track it back to its source and publicize it. Think of the Isabella Loretta Janke leaks, or this absolute doozy of a thread on a pay-for-SWATing group. The problem is journoscum (among others) are too lazy to read our carefully made threads, or they have an axe to grind against us. Usually it's both.
