Business The World’s Empty Office Buildings Have Become a Debt Time Bomb - Boo hoo, did someone get addicted to rent and taxes?

Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...sing-distress-from-san-francisco-to-hong-kong
Archive: https://archive.is/ttnne

The World’s Empty Office Buildings Have Become a Debt Time Bomb​

From San Francisco to Hong Kong, higher interest rates and falling property values are bringing the commercial real estate market to a perilous precipice.
By Natalie Wong, John Gittelsohn, Jack Sidders and Shawna Kwan
June 23, 2023, 4:01 AM UTC


In New York and London, owners of gleaming office towers are walking away from their debt rather than pouring good money after bad. The landlords of downtown San Francisco’s largest mall have abandoned it. A new Hong Kong skyscraper is only a quarter leased.

The creeping rot inside commercial real estate is like a dark seam running through the global economy. Even as stock markets rally and investors are hopeful that the fastest interest-rate increases in a generation will ebb, the trouble in property is set to play out for years.

After a long buying binge fueled by cheap debt, owners and lenders are grappling with changes in how and where people work, shop and live in the wake of the pandemic. At the same time, higher interest rates are making it more expensive to buy or refinance buildings. A tipping point is coming: In the US alone, about $1.4 trillion of commercial real estate loans are due this year and next, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. (Other estimates are a bit lower.) When the deadline arrives, owners facing large principal payments may prefer to default instead of borrowing again to pay the bill.

Major institutional owners including Blackstone, Brookfield and Pimco have already chosen to stop payments on some buildings because they have better uses for their cash and resources. “There’s significant stress,” says Harold Bordwin, a principal in New York at Keen-Summit Capital Partners LLC, which specializes in renegotiating distressed real estate. “People don’t give up assets so easily unless they just don’t see any hope and they recognize that they’re pretty well underwater.”

The number of transactions is plunging—and when deals do happen, the price declines are stark. In the US, where return-to-office rates have been lower than in Asia and Europe, values for institutional-quality offices are down 27% since March 2022, when interest rates started going up, according to data analytics company Green Street. Apartment building prices have declined 21%, and malls are off 18%. Office prices are expected to fall more than 25% in Europe and almost 13% in the Asia-Pacific region before hitting a trough, PGIM Real Estate, a unit of Prudential Financial Inc., forecasts.

What PGIM analysts have called “the great reset” of values is likely to be agonizingly slow. It took six years for US office prices to recover after the 2008 financial crisis, even though that episode was centered on residential real estate. “This time we think it’ll take 10 years,” says Richard Barkham, global chief economist for CBRE Group Inc.

Commercial real estate’s woes will add to the stress on a financial system that’s already reeling from this year’s crisis in regional banks. And as the downturn deepens, it stands to have a transformational impact on some cities as they contend with empty buildings and lower property tax revenue.
The question is whether the commercial property correction will be big enough to destabilize the wider economy. As broad as the forces arrayed against the real estate sector may be, it’s also very local business, encompassing not only urban skyscrapers but small-town shopping centers, suburban apartment buildings and sprawling warehouse parks.

“Cities all have different stories to tell,” says Peter Hayes, a managing director of investment research for PGIM Real Estate in London. “They’ve all been changed by different localized shocks. You end up in a world where investors have to think more about geography than they have.”

Already, debt distress has stretched from Los Angeles to Sweden and South Korea. Here’s how the troubles are unfolding in some major financial and business centers around the world.

San Francisco
Nowhere in the US is the crisis more pronounced than in San Francisco, where a downward trend is gathering momentum as one building after another slips into default. Property prices in the tech hub reached record heights in the past decade, so they had a long way to fall. The city boomed with hot startups—Airbnb, Twitter, Uber Technologies—along with established giants such as Salesforce. Now many of them have cut jobs and office space.

The downtown is struggling to re-attract employers and employees who flourished working remotely. The area consists largely of office towers, leaving it feeling particularly empty. Those workers who do come in endure among the nation’s longest average commutes. San Francisco’s homelessness crisis is also concentrated downtown, and highly publicized retail theft has led to some stores closing.

In the once-fashionable Union Square district, the owners of the city’s largest mall, Westfield San Francisco Centre, in June essentially handed the keys over to holders of a $558 million mortgage. The move came after Nordstrom Inc. announced it was shutting its department store in the complex. With tourism slow to rebound from the pandemic, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. has stopped payments on $725 million in debt tied to two of the city’s biggest hotels, Hilton San Francisco Union Square and the Parc 55 San Francisco. Veritas Investments Inc., a major local landlord, defaulted on $675 million in debt on a portfolio of apartments valued at more than $1 billion in 2020. The loans are now on the market.

The office-vacancy and availability rate has tripled from pre-pandemic days. In one of the city’s few office deals, Wells Fargo & Co. recently sold a 13-floor tower at 550 California St. for about $200 per square foot, down from the 2019 market peak of more than $1,000, according to Newmark Group Inc., a real estate services company. Lower prices are getting some investors to consider potential opportunities. “We’ve never bought in San Francisco,” says Mike Pestronk, chief executive officer of Post Brothers, a developer in Philadelphia with $4 billion in multifamily property. “But it seems like it’s getting very interesting.”

But what’s interesting to an outsider is excruciating for owners. “There’s no way to avoid the price reset that’s coming,” says David Bitner, an analyst in San Francisco for Newmark. “Office is bearing the brunt, but there’s also older retail and more recent multifamily that’s being affected.”

The city’s coffers are taking a hit, with Mayor London Breed projecting a $780 million two-year budget deficit. She’s proposed diversifying the downtown, including the conversion of more buildings to housing, and suggested the Westfield mall could be used in other ways, reflecting a “new vision” for the property. For now, there’s a lot of empty space to fill.


New York
Although New York City’s streets are bustling with tourists and residents, only about half of office workers are back at their desk, according to building security company Kastle Systems. Scores of buildings are struggling with the loss of tenants and the need for upgrades. As employers work out their updated office needs, they can choose spaces in newly built towers in such areas as Hudson Yards or near Grand Central Terminal rather than aging properties.

These choices helped put even iconic buildings in the world’s financial capital into troubled situations. At the Seagram Building, a 1950s skyscraper in Midtown that’s renowned architecturally for its modernist design, owner RFR Holding had to negotiate a one-year extension on $1 billion of debt set to mature this year after failing to secure financing. RFR spent $25 million on upgrades, including a vast sports complex and a wellness center, and the property was 95% leased as of earlier this year. Still, it lost Wells Fargo to a newer development prior to the pandemic, while private equity firm Clayton Dubilier & Rice is relocating to a renovated Madison Avenue tower.
Developer GFP Real Estate received a two-year extension on the DuMont building, an art deco tower on Madison Avenue, after being unable to repay the $103 million mortgage when it came due. To hash out the deal, GFP had to commit capital for helping to boost its future leasing prospects in the building.

Mayor Eric Adams has called for a wider return to the office, urging Wall Street leaders to enforce more in-person work. Offices, expected to reach a record 22.7% vacancy rate this year, typically account for about 20% of the city’s property tax revenue. A joint study from researchers at New York University and Columbia University found that offices in the city will lose 44% of their pre-pandemic value by 2029 because of the impact of remote work.

“The landlords are really seeing a real witches’ brew of obstacles right now—they’ve got problems on every side,” says Ruth Colp-Haber, CEO of brokerage Wharton Property Advisors. “The best buildings with the top owners are going to hang on, and they’re going to get through this. But for the buildings that have a large vacancy and also need a lot of work, the economics just aren’t going to pan out.”

Atlanta and Other Boomtowns
Cities beyond the US coastal financial centers are feeling the pain, too. Atlanta’s office availability rate for lease and sublease climbed to 31% in the first quarter, almost double the pre-pandemic level, according to British real estate services company Savills Plc. Companies are looking for smaller spaces in hotter neighborhoods.

Tenants vacated an additional 290,000 square feet in downtown Atlanta “class A” office space in the first quarter, according to Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. Some demand shifted to Midtown, where asking rents are 44% higher than downtown and tenants added a net 32,000 square feet. Landlords are facing a wall of balloon payments: Almost 30% of the Georgia capital’s office space has debt maturing between now and 2025, more than any US metro area, according to Yardi Systems Inc., which makes property management software.

There are similar stories across the Sun Belt and the mountain West, where many workers and companies relocated during the pandemic. Even Austin, which emerged as a low-cost alternative to Silicon Valley, now faces surging vacancies that will make it harder for landlords to raise rents. Space available for sublease more than doubled in the Texas capital since June 2022, to 5.9 million square feet, the fastest rise of any US metro area, according to CoStar Group Inc. Only San Francisco and San Jose have higher shares to sublet. “Austin has had a breathtaking increase,” says Phil Mobley, CoStar’s national director of US office analytics. “Tech companies definitely have a propensity to work remotely.”

Elsewhere, new supply is meeting falling demand. In Colorado, a pair of towers built in the late 1970s, formerly the Denver Energy Center, are for sale after lenders seized them. The buildings are only 32% leased. Lenders have also taken over Houston’s Pinnacle at Westchase, a nine-floor suburban office complex whose appraised value is off more than 75% compared with 2012, according to loan documents.

There’s a widening divide between winners and losers, says Doug Ressler, senior research officer for Yardi. “It’s bifurcated,” he says. “The trophies should hold up. The ‘B’ and ‘C’ offices are going to have to look to repurpose.”

But not every old building can find a new purpose. “It’s really hard to turn a 1990s office tower into something other than a 1990s office tower,” says Lea Overby, a commercial real estate analyst with Barclays Capital Inc. “It’s just not cool.”

London
The widespread adoption of hybrid working is hitting London unevenly. Office vacancy rates in London’s West End, home to the city’s buzziest retail and nightspots, are almost at record lows as companies look for space in the best buildings and locations to help lure workers back. Rents are rising, too, because companies are prepared to pay more per square foot, while taking less space overall.

The Canary Wharf district, home to 1990s-era glass-and-steel towers, is in the deepest trouble. The neighborhood, perceived by most as a place built solely for bankers, is having a harder time staying relevant for major office tenants. Law firm Clifford Chance is leaving in favor of a new—and much smaller—office in the more centrally located City of London district. HSBC Holdings Plc is looking for a new headquarters, with most of its shortlisted options in the City as well. The YY building, a recently completed redevelopment of Thomson Reuters Corp.’s former headquarters that occupies the prime site right outside the Canary Wharf tube station, remains entirely vacant.

Two office buildings that were considered “trophy” only a few years ago are now in the hands of lenders. A consortium led by Lloyds Banking Group Plc appointed receivers on 5 Churchill Place and 20 Canada Square after the buildings’ owner, China’s Cheung Kei Group, failed to repay loans secured against them. Both face vacancies and significant costs for refurbishment.

Another issue looming over London’s real estate market is the prospect that hundreds of buildings will be rendered obsolete because they don’t meet UK environmental regulations. Properties are graded on energy performance, from A to G. By 2030 it will be illegal to rent commercial buildings that are ranked below B. That leaves landlords forced to make costly upgrades or risk offices sitting empty. Brexit has also contributed to London losing some of its financial allure, says PGIM’s Hayes. Office buildings are “very, very vulnerable for the near term,” he says.

Stockholm
For Sweden’s property market, the main problem isn’t vacant offices but the sheer amount of debt some property companies amassed during the era of rock-bottom rates. A lot of that financing came from short-term and floating-rate bonds, so yields and costs are going to soar. Landlords in the biggest Nordic nation must roll over or refinance $42 billion of bonds over the next five years, nearly a third of which falls due next year.

No company typifies the problem more than SBB, as Samhallsbyggnadsbolaget i Norden AB is more commonly known. The social housing landlord began to see its $13 billion empire unravel following a downgrade to junk in early May. Asset sales and a scrapped dividend haven’t been enough to arrest a slide in its share price, which is down more than 90% since the end of 2021. SBB is currently the subject of a probe by the country’s financial watchdog into whether it violated accounting rules, and its founder has been ousted as chief executive.

Hong Kong
A 26-floor building with a sweeping view of Hong Kong’s famed Victoria Harbour made headlines in the city in 2015 when China Evergrande Group, not a global name at the time, purchased it for $1.6 billion—more than double the previous record for an office tower. The deal exemplified the property market boom in the Asian financial hub, which in the years that followed attracted ambitious Chinese capital to buy everything from office blocks to land plots, often at record-breaking prices. Investing in offices appeared to be a safe bet in a city with tight space and strong demand from mainland Chinese companies.

Then came antigovernment protests and the strict lockdown measures of Covid-19 in 2020, which made investors rethink Hong Kong’s status as a financial hub. Adding to the turmoil: a Chinese property debt crisis, with Evergrande at the center.

With hundreds of billions of dollars in debt, the developer sought to raise cash in every way possible and, in late 2020, pledged the office building to a bank in return for a HK$7.6 billion ($971 million) loan. Last year a receiver took over the property. The new owner put the building up for sale but failed to get a bid that reached its target. The tower is now only about 25% occupied, in part because prospective tenants are put off by its complicated ownership. It was fully occupied when Evergrande bought it.

Across the city, cost-conscious foreign banks and Chinese companies are no longer taking up space at a time when new supply is increasing. The vacancy rate for top-tier Hong Kong office buildings climbed to 15% in April, more than three times what it was in 2019, data from Colliers International Group Inc. show.

Unlike landlords in New York and London, Hong Kong’s can’t blame remote work for the slump. The city’s highly efficient public transport system and tiny apartments have given residents fewer reasons to work from home. The city is already back at the office; subway ridership surpassed 2019 levels in March.

But the commercial market slump in a rising interest-rate environment still has property owners such as Evergrande in a tough situation. They can’t refinance buildings because of falling values, nor can they easily find buyers for them. The choice is to sell at a steep discount or stomach interest payments. Instead of providing liquidity and stability, real estate assets have become a burden.


Ed. Note - Related Louis Rossman video:
 
In 1997, the world's smallest guitar — carved out of crystalline silicon and no larger than a single cell — was created at Cornell University to demonstrate a new technology that could have a variety of uses in fiber optics, displays, sensors and electronics. The so-called “nanoguitar” measured 10 micrometers long, roughly the size of an average red blood cell.

Now they just have to start working on the world's smallest violin.
 
Last edited:
Real estate firms are a bunch of vulture faggots, but I can't help blame the city governments here as well. Lots of them pass laws that regulate rent pricing, with the effect that in some cases landlords have a floor on how little they can charge in rent. The same cities happily slurp up property taxes based on these inflated values, and fight like hell if you try to re evaluate them lower. There's a certain point where nobody will rent at prices you're allowed to charge, and you can't make enough to pay the bills - why bleed money more than you have to? At that point it's virtually a negative asset.
 
"Aww man, how come no one wants to work in this giant, shitty building, that's a pain in the ass to get to? We have all the amenities that everyone tells me are a hallmark of culture, feral minorities, drug addicts, no parking and shootings! I can't believe we employ a bunch of racists who don't want a 90 minute commute..."

I am not a fan of work from home, or telecommuting as it used to be called. But I totally get not wanting to make the odyssey into the office. Nothing like spending two hours in traffic a day to rejuvenate your hatred for the human race.
 
Financial parasites learn that charging $1000/sq. ft. is only sustainable when the money printers are working overtime. Unfortunately, they'll probably just get bailed out with taxpayer / printed money.

The damage is already done. A lot of people who don't need to be physically located in their office found out that they don't need to live near it either and physically left the cities.

People cheer this. But to me it just means the insufferable laptop class is fleeing the cities and descending on the rest of the country where they will drive up property values with their paychecks from Globohomocorp. Now local economies will have to deal with wealthy outsiders coming in and throwing money around. That's a shitty thing in my book.
 
Let me guess. They will repurpose them as hive pods.
There's a low income housing project in the works for most of the urban areas in Cali for empty spaces.

I guess the trick is they bulldoze the lot first AND THEN repurpose them into hive pods. I'm pretty sure if you dig enough you'll find one of the construction companies is owned by some dumbass in the council too. Because this shit has been ongoing for years.
 
There's a low income housing project in the works for most of the urban areas in Cali for empty spaces.

I guess the trick is they bulldoze the lot first AND THEN repurpose them into hive pods. I'm pretty sure if you dig enough you'll find one of the construction companies is owned by some dumbass in the council too. Because this shit has been ongoing for years.
We had an article on here about dwellings that they wanted to build with no windows. That’s a consequence of repurposing these huge floored buildings - the units in the middle have no natural light. Expect to see more pressure relax code
 
So let's say I want to sell my house and buy a new house with cash in a different state. Would a real estate crash be good or bad for that endeavor? Like sure my house is increasing in price right now, but everything on the market elsewhere is expensive as fuck.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
Let me guess. They will repurpose them as hive pods.
I guess the trick is they bulldoze the lot first AND THEN repurpose them into hive pods. I'm pretty sure if you dig enough you'll find one of the construction companies is owned by some dumbass in the council too. Because this shit has been ongoing for years.
I'm thinking it's the second, but even that feels optimistic these days.
If you tell someone "Hey, we can't renovate this office building into apartments; there isn't enough plumbing in place for everyone to have a bathroom." they're likely to get back to you with "Why does everyone need their own bathroom?"

We had an article on here about dwellings that they wanted to build with no windows. That’s a consequence of repurposing these huge floored buildings - the units in the middle have no natural light. Expect to see more pressure relax code
1687986269933.png1687986301717.png
See also: The Heap by Sean Adams
 
about $1.4 trillion of commercial real estate loans are due this year and next, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. (Other estimates are a bit lower.) When the deadline arrives, owners facing large principal payments may prefer to default instead of borrowing again to pay the bill.
probably will be another big bailout once that bill comes due and people arnt paying it. i say let the ceo of the real estate companies and banks who finance them jump out of a window, but you know that the feds will print money to bail them out. do you think a 1 trillion dollar bailout will be enough to finally put fire under americans to get them to say no to this stuff? im not optimistic that it will.
 
probably will be another big bailout once that bill comes due and people arnt paying it. i say let the ceo of the real estate companies and banks who finance them jump out of a window, but you know that the feds will print money to bail them out. do you think a 1 trillion dollar bailout will be enough to finally put fire under americans to get them to say no to this stuff? im not optimistic that it will.
At some point, inflation will mean it won't be enough. The fed can bail out all the big banks and REIT corps but they won't be able to print enough money. Thus, the everything bubbles pops. The fed shouldn't have bailed out the banks and wall st in 2008. Sure, another great depression wouldn't be fun. But now we're looking at something even worse.

So let's say I want to sell my house and buy a new house with cash in a different state. Would a real estate crash be good or bad for that endeavor? Like sure my house is increasing in price right now, but everything on the market elsewhere is expensive as fuck.
Probably ask people in the Biz subforum or on the bogleheads forums. idk.

Am I the only one kind of okay with windowless living as long as the fire safety issues can be addressed? I could finally end my ongoing war against natural light.
The last few places I lived, I used blackout blinds to block sunlight. Screwed up my sleep. Hard to go to sleep. At my current place, I didn't put em up. I feel a lot better with natural light coming in at all times. Helps my circadian rhythm.
 
The last few places I lived, I used blackout blinds to block sunlight. Screwed up my sleep. Hard to go to sleep. At my current place, I didn't put em up. I feel a lot better with natural light coming in at all times. Helps my circadian rhythm.
Man, I'm the exact opposite. I have a roughly normal person sleep schedule, and I don't think I'd sleep at all without blackout curtains. One of the best things I ever did for my insomnia. Maybe I'm a freak of nature though.
 
She’s proposed diversifying the downtown, including the conversion of more buildings to housing, and suggested the Westfield mall could be used in other ways, reflecting a “new vision” for the property. For now, there’s a lot of empty space to fill.
I always laugh my ass off at this 'solution.' There were always two reasons for living in the city. High-paying careers which had offices located there, and better shopping/restaurants/nightlife. Covid & WFH have absolutely gutted the draw that the first provides, and the bands of feral nignogs which are allowed to mug, shoplift, and murder their way across even previously nice commercial hubs have destroyed the latter. The refusal to allow rents to drop due to tax revenues even as you see mass layoffs in sectors like tech - plus lax policing - means that you have the added bonus of homeless junkies scattered all over the city. Why on earth would anyone want housing in the cities under these conditions? Even the shitty PMC types have fled to the suburbs. I predict that their masters will try and force them back to the office in these shitheaps that used to be cities, and I relish it personally. They get exactly what they deserve, let them wallow in the results of their smug, bankrupt politics instead of inflicting themselves on rural populations.
 
At some point, inflation will mean it won't be enough. The fed can bail out all the big banks and REIT corps but they won't be able to print enough money. Thus, the everything bubbles pops. The fed shouldn't have bailed out the banks and wall st in 2008. Sure, another great depression wouldn't be fun. But now we're looking at something even worse.
i agree on all of this. the standard course of the us gov has been to always kick the can down the road. do we let the banks fail and have a despression now or do we bail them out and have an even larger depression down the road? they chose the latter. it is unfortunate that they have taken this course for so long and that now we seem to be living in the era when all those cans that kicked down the road just cant be kicked any further. even worse is this is all happening at the same time that im finally getting my life together and on track. i get my shit together only for the feds to break my legs.
 
There were always two reasons for living in the city. High-paying careers which had offices located there, and better shopping/restaurants/nightlife.
"Fine dining" and "upscale restaurants" are a scam anyways. The ingrediants are still the same price, but you pay a fortune for them anyways. Why would I fucking bother with that garbage when I can go to a Mexican or Chinese restaurant in a smaller town and have food that tastes as good (or better) for literally 1/10th the price. As for nightlife, that shit is for coeds and people who aren't in real relationships that just want easy sex with strangers. Like yeah okay, bar hopping and clubs can be fun, but you're not going to drag your SO to them. You're going to do other shit. As for shopping, I like shopping, but smaller towns still have places like Kohl's and you have Amazon to get your less normal stuff.

There's no fucking point to go to a big city at all at this point unless you want to be a tourist. And even then there's better stuff to see in the USA that is not in big cities. It's no wonder the permanent Obama administration wants to increase exporting poor niggers to smaller suburbs.
 
Back