Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 105 34.4%

  • Total voters
    305
I scraped Balldo's Instagram again. It's time to compare to my previous list here:
Onion link

The way Instagram sorts out followers is very convenient. They simply add to the list rather than having it sorted say, alphabetically.

Here are the accounts Balldo is now following, in addition to the previous list. I will also include a list of accounts that he no longer follows.

(As usual, if you want to see their profiles, just add the @ name behind https://www.instagram.com/

New following:
@Display NameidPrivateTick
energii_kingenergii_king
3556314875​
FALSE​
FALSE​
romaine12actionRomaine James
50191374395​
FALSE​
FALSE​
sweetivoryStarry Tiberio Leone
24869994​
TRUE​
FALSE​
chechuniaDaniela
1561321​
FALSE​
FALSE​
laurendelagunaLauren DeLaguna
15028254136​
FALSE​
FALSE​
o.clarke_mastereliteOmar Clarke
49443180311​
FALSE​
FALSE​
cockykidPierce
583013666​
FALSE​
FALSE​

Our two Jamaican friends come first, we are all too familiar with them. Meet @energii_king
1688139622883.png

@romaine12action
1688139688751.png

@sweetivory
1688139756419.png

@chechunia
1688139883155.png

@laurendelaguna
Nick... she's married with children.
1688139937706.png

Good lord, did we find our third bull?
@o.clarke_masterelite
1688140047992.png

@cockykid is an odd one, he appeared in the middle of the list as a new following.
1688140149827.png

No longer following:
@Display NameidPrivateTick
fifigigantorSara
409324528​
TRUE​
FALSE​
infowars._1776_Banned.Video45393853191FALSEFALSE
ohthatkatherineohthatkatherine41940140FALSEFALSE

@fifigigantor
1688140235379.png


@infowars._1776_ is gone.

@ohthatkatherine is also gone, but there is one image under the same hashtag. Appears to be unrelated as it was from nearly 10 years ago.
 
Someone threw a 5$ dono to Pippa. Called Phase Connect pussies or stupid for blocking Nick-Pippa collab. Pippa brushed it off with: "Seems like I dodged a bullet on that one "
Made me chuckle
Sounds like Pippa's management company "saying no" might have been Pippa saying no and it flying over Rekieta's intoxicated head.

The old "I'd love to Mr. Customer, but the head office said no and I could get in trouble" cover story.
 
Sounds like Pippa's management company "saying no" might have been Pippa saying no and it flying over Rekieta's intoxicated head.

The old "I'd love to Mr. Customer, but the head office said no and I could get in trouble" cover story.
No, the initial attempt to set up a collab happened before Nick's public fall from grace and Pippa has specifically credited her manager "Fishman" as taking the win.

Given that Pippa recently collaborated with Coomalot of all people (which is what caused this kerfluffle in the first place) I think its more likely Pippa was open to a collab, management was iffy because of troon controversy, and now her sentiments have reversed given Nick's bitchy and tone deaf behavior.
 
- Nick is proud of not knowing anything about the popular cases people care about. He has the training to understand and follow law, but he only likes to do it when it is interesting, entertaining, or has a novel argument.

More proof he does not want to be a real lawyer.
Nick boasting at the start of his show about how little he knew about the case because he doesn't care about "true crime" or whatever was weird.

He did a very similar thing during the Murdaugh trial, you may recall. His panel were all flabbergasted Emily Baker might think the guy was guilty and I recall there was an the implication that the reason might be that she was pandering to true crime loving wine moms. It wasn't bitterness that Baker was utterly eating Nick's lunch. Of course, the guy got convicted after very limited deliberations.

Isn't Andrea a public defender? If you thought you were too good for "true crime content", you could pretty easily steer the conversation in the direction of how you ethically represent someone who almost certainly committed a terrible crime.

But the idea of Rekieta being "too good" to cover anything is so laughable at this point when he's now known for getting drunk and creepily lusting over fans, or getting drunk and shouting epithets at people and getting sued for defamation afterwards, or getting drunk and telling people Rekieta Law was never a law channel.

Good Lawgic is now pulling in twice the amount of superchats and almost twice the chat count as Nick.
I get that Rekieta is also pulling in some from Rumble but man that's bad.

I dare say that Nick killed the golden goose, he can't pull up even if he wants to now. He'll have to stab in the dark in hopes he can latch onto a popular topic.
Rekieta's problem is that he was doing so well that he had more or less maxed out on the number of people interested in his old content, though he could have shifted into something else and become even bigger. But most of those people now have some awareness of what he's been up to over the past year.

Rekieta has claimed that his "restructuring" aka "pulling up" has improved his metrics but if they have improved, I haven't seen any improvement posted in the thread.
 
No, the initial attempt to set up a collab happened before Nick's public fall from grace and Pippa has specifically credited her manager "Fishman" as taking the win.

Given that Pippa recently collaborated with Coomalot of all people (which is what caused this kerfluffle in the first place) I think its more likely Pippa was open to a collab, management was iffy because of troon controversy, and now her sentiments have reversed given Nick's bitchy and tone deaf behavior.
Does anyone remember which of Ethan's trip to portugal did Pippa react stream to? The 1st or the 2nd? Her doing that was what got her on most people's radar, including Nick's. That's when he wanted to get her on stream iirc.
 
Flashback Friday Clips*:
Again, for the Kiwi archives and enbedding with what seems most interesting for the thread's current conversation & or my interest.

1. This clipper, Adam Friended: Secret Channel, is active in the comic space across channels. Relevant because Nick is screaming at yet another lawyer, Zade. Reeees about how Zade is a "discredit to the profession" over an email delay issue. Rather familiar. It confirms that Nick's always been unhinged. Original streams date back 4 years. Very entertaining.

REKIETA RAGE!!! My Favorite Epic Unhinged Nick Rekieta Rant 🔥🔥🔥

Screen Shot 2023-06-30 at 12.05.14 PM.png


2. This clipper, The Toxic Male Clips, has lapsed from clipping but this covers Legal Bytes' drama with Nick when she was on Joe's stream. Worthy of a watch or re-watch because Nick's current spiral started 8-9 months ago and this was in the mix. Start at 3:45 if you want a brief take.

LegalBytes admits she’s mad at Nick Rekieta over DUIGuy situation​


* Kiwi's search functionality and user's key words are often inefficient. If I post duplicate clips posted historically, I apologize. However, the Internet's memory is short and some things are worth repeating for the thread's casual readers.
 
Does anyone remember which of Ethan's trip to portugal did Pippa react stream to? The 1st or the 2nd? Her doing that was what got her on most people's radar, including Nick's. That's when he wanted to get her on stream iirc.
I think it was the second cause everyone was watching the video. I don't know if Pippa did but it was when the ralph beating content really hit the mainstream.
 
hecantshow2.JPG

Latest interaction with the Cody guy. Nick seems to claim he has evidence that Pippa really wants to get on stream with him but can't show it to the public?
Do you think it's something recent or it's just her DMs with Nick before this shit show happened and Pippa changed her mind?
And since Pippa probably doesn't talk to Nick anymore right now, he thinks he can just go around showing the old DMs to people like Cody, claiming it's hard proof that phase bad?

Edit: Image was fucked. Fixed now.
 
Now this is even more strange. Because a 137k sub channel on Rumble with 100k views is fucking INSANE.

Pure speculation, but I'd propose that part of the mismatch between subs and livestream view counts for Nick on Rumble can be explained by lurkers who followed Nick to Rumble in fall 2022 but only use Rumble exclusively for Rekieta content.

They watch live or catch the VOD the next day on Rumble out of habit, but don't bother making a Rumble account because they don't chat, superchat or have any interest in watching anyone else on the service but Nick.

They also aren't watching Nick's short form Rumble content because they consume Nick's streams on a schedule by force of habit, while Nick's clips are sporadic, different than his formulaic streams and not as discoverable.

I do agree though that there still must be Rumble inflation.

I was looking at a new vidya streamer's channel on Rumble recently whom had single digit followers but triple digit stream views.


fifigigantor

Isn't this dropped Insta follow a regular Locals sperg in Himedall's logs?

Edit:
And since Pippa probably doesn't talk to Nick anymore right now, he thinks he can just go around showing the old DMs to people like Cody, claiming it's hard proof that phase bad?

Nick's classic strategy whenever he's engaged in friction with a detractor on stream or online is always to try to move the discussion behind closed doors.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 5185817
Latest interaction with the Cody guy. Nick seems to claim he has evidence that Pippa really wants to get on stream with him but can't show it to the public?
Do you think it's something recent or it's just her DMs with Nick before this shit show happened and Pippa changed her mind?

And since Pippa probably doesn't talk to Nick anymore right now, he thinks he can just go around showing the old DMs to people like Cody, claiming it's hard proof that phase bad?

Edit: Image was fucked. Fixed now.
Yes, keep courting more simps-in-waiting by plying them with private DM/texting sessions. Totally neutral parasocial relationship being formed right here.

He has publicly raged he will not tolerate working under elses conditions and needs to be free of management, so we know it's a lie. As was mentioned prior, his interview with Kyle should've been enough to show his inability to work within established social boundaries and stay professional. What he wants most is to be surrounded by enablers.
Isn't this dropped Insta follow a regular Locals sperg in Himedall's logs?
They were a Locals regular, but I can't remember the context.
 
Last edited:
They watch live or catch the VOD the next day on Rumble out of habit, but don't bother making a Rumble account because they don't chat, superchat or have any interest in watching anyone else on the service but Nick.
Yeah, that crossed my mind too. But that's not a good thing. In fact it's really fucking terrible because the point of his contract was to convert the audience into a signed up rumble user that pays money for the rants. That's what even Nick admits (super chat expert), and probably how he was able to leverage the deal to get what he wanted (free rein). If his rumble short video is a more faithful indicator to his rumble channel's health (130k sub but only 5% activity), then rumble is not getting their money's worth. Not even close.
 
Eric Hunley gave Nick top billing on his Friday panel show.

Over 90 mins in, no sign of Nick on quick scan through.

Seems like essentially all the rest of Lawtube popped in and out.
Not surprisingly, he was just on twitter and retweeting JK rowling after replying to Cody. So he's probably just browsing instagram to coom over thots like he said he does and can't be bothered showing up to Hunley's show.
 
Isn't this dropped Insta follow a regular Locals sperg in Himedall's logs?

Yeah, this lady:

FifiGigantor​
Hey guys, don't ever make the mistake of crying about a potentially dead cat at the hospital, while youre there for colitis. They'll put you on a 5150 physically preventing you from searching for said animal thus basically gauaranteeing its death.

The cat was later found & was fine. She also went to the Vegas meet up.
 
Not surprisingly, he was just on twitter and retweeting JK rowling after replying to Cody. So he's probably just browsing instagram to coom over thots like he said he does and can't be bothered showing up to Hunley's show.
Is it possible that Nick's relations with lawtube are more strained than they appear on the surface as well? He rarely seems to get more than one on at a time now.
 
Is it possible that Nick's relations with lawtube are more strained than they appear on the surface as well? He rarely seems to get more than one on at a time now.
Of course it has. Nick was supposed to be their trickle down cash cow. Now he has debased himself to be worse than them but somehow they can't outgrow him. Lawgic, mindset, vice, his 3 closest ballsack guarders are stuck in the 100k zone (vice is even only at 40k) and they got no one to latch on to for a good growth and have been complaining about YT oppressing them for a while now. Lawgic especially got disrespected with no shows on his monday collab streams with Nick. They may be all smiles with each other, but I want to remind that 'grifting' is a joke that isn't a joke. As indicated by Nick's behavior in the pippa drama, shekels comes first, friendship is an excuse for shekels. There is no doubt in my mind that all these law tubers think the same way.
 
I just googled this a minute ago so I'll defer to anyone more knowledgeable or if it's been posted earlier in the thread, search has been super slow for me today.

My reading is Rumble counts any impression, not needing to be unique, with no minimum length of viewing required. So if you refresh the homepage 5 times in a row, that's 5 views. And if they allow 3rd party embedding in the same way Twitch did, you can have 1 pixel wide videos being embedded on sites so people don't even know they are being counted as viewers. That creator request rumble cites for the change was more like wall street investors won't take a look at the fine print and will hopefully believe Rumble is anywhere in the same league as YouTube.


Change to View Counts on the Rumble Platform
10/27/2022

Longboat Key, FL, Oct. 27, 2022 – In response to creator requests, we are updating the methodology for counting views of videos on the Rumble platform. In the past, view counts represented the number of unique views for a particular video. Going forward, view counts will represent the total number of times a video has been viewed, both on the Rumble platform and embedded on third-party websites that use Rumble’s video player. We believe this shift will more accurately reflect the relative popularity of Rumble videos and allow content creators to understand their audiences better.

I couldn't find a clear answer from YouTube directly but multiple sites report a view is counted after only 30 seconds of watching and there is built in limiting of unique viewers being counted multiple times with a limit of 5 views counted per unique person in 24 hours.
 
Yeah, that crossed my mind too. But that's not a good thing. In fact it's really fucking terrible because the point of his contract was to convert the audience into a signed up rumble user that pays money for the rants. That's what even Nick admits (super chat expert), and probably how he was able to leverage the deal to get what he wanted (free rein). If his rumble short video is a more faithful indicator to his rumble channel's health (130k sub but only 5% activity), then rumble is not getting their money's worth. Not even close.
The whole plan was stupid from the start. He had already converted all his nighttime regulars when he had gotten banned on youtube. His refusal to do cutoffs during daytime streams meant the siphon from YT simply wouldn't happen.
 
Back