Culture Surrogate claims gay dads told her to terminate pregnancy at 24 weeks on finding out she had cancer and barred her from having baby prematurely - or putting it up for adoption because 'they didn't want their DNA out there'

Surrogate claims gay dads told her to terminate pregnancy at 24 weeks on finding out she had aggressive cancer and barred her from having baby prematurely or putting it up for adoption because 'they didn't want their DNA out there'

Archive
  • Brittney Pearson, 37, told DailyMail.com that she was threatened with legal action by the prospective parents after receiving a breast cancer diagnosis
  • The mother-of-four, from Sacramento, said she felt like 'a rented-out uterus'
A California mother has claimed she was told to terminate her surrogate pregnancy at 24 weeks by the child's prospective fathers after she was diagnosed with breast cancer.

Brittney Pearson, 37, from Sacramento told DailyMail.com that she was diagnosed with breast cancer in May at 22 weeks.

She says that after a full body MRI revealed the extent of the disease, the gay couple who were paying her to carry their child used legal threats to pressure her into terminating the pregnancy.

Initially, Pearson claims, doctors at Sutter Health Medical Centre in Sacramento, believed she would be able to have a form of chemotherapy treatment compatible with pregnancy, and would then be induced at 34 weeks gestation.

The prospective fathers, who haven't been named but are from Southern California, were allegedly happy for her to receive treatment and continue with the pregnancy.

However, when medics realized the HER2+ cancer had spread further than expected and that more aggressive chemo would be needed to combat it, relations between Pearson and the prospective parents broke down.

The unnamed gay couple, Pearson claims, wanted the baby 'immediately terminated' and 'erased' as they believed it had no chance at life.

They did not want a baby born before 34 weeks because they allegedly feared the infant would have considerable health problems, it is claimed.

The Center for Bioethics and Culture Network, an anti-surrogacy group which first reported on Pearson's case, claims the prospective fathers also sought to bar Pearson from carrying the child to term, then giving it up for adoption.

They're said to have told her that they didn't want their 'DNA out there', being raised by someone else. DailyMail.com has been unable to contact the prospective dads to verify that claim.

Pearson told DailyMail.com of the distress she felt after the prospective fathers allegedly 'threatened everyone they could with a lawsuit' including Pearson, her agency and Sutter Health.

At one point, she claims, her oncology team, after being threatened with legal action, said they were not sure they could give her chemo and would need to consult their own lawyers.

'It was frustrating because I wanted to give them a family' she told DailyMail.com, 'they said they cared but they didn’t. I felt betrayed and heartbroken.'

The mother-of-four, who had already successfully completed one round of surrogacy before, said she was left feeling like 'a rented-out uterus'.

'The first thing I thought after I was diagnosed was I want to keep this baby safe and bring it earthside' she said.

'I would have been there, I would have given him every chance of survival , I had people ready to help' she claimed.

Pearson told DailyMail.com she found a hospital that would deliver her baby, but would not elaborate on whether or not the procedure was inducement or termination, and whether or not the fetus was born alive.

She would only confirm that it has since died.

'The baby was born on Father’s Day, my mother got to hold him and take pictures but he did not survive' she explained.

Pearson felt further upset by the prospective parents decision to take the fetus' remains and cremate them.

'I would have done things differently, I didn't understand it since they didn't see him as a baby at all.'

Pearson said she is speaking out about her experience because she 'never wants anyone else to feel like this'.

Despite her harrowing account she has not changed her mind about surrogacy: 'I wouldn't do it again, but I still think surrogacy has a great time and place but [prospective] families need to be screened a little more.'

Pearson said her surrogacy agency, who she did not want to name, were 'very supportive and still are' but that the fathers had not contacted her since she had the baby.

Jennifer Lahl, president of The center for Bioethics and Culture Network said of the case: 'I often say, there are plenty of reasons to get people to see how surrogacy is wrong, is harmful, and is bad for women and for children.

'This case highlights many of the problems with contracted, largely commercial, pregnancy.'

Pearson, who has four of her own children 3, 5, 12 and 13 years-old, is currently unable to work while receiving treatment.

Her sisters Courtney and Ashley Pearson set up a Go Fund Me page to accept donations to see her through this difficult time.

'Britt was recently diagnosed with HER2+ breast cancer. Britt and her family need our love and support during this heartbreaking time' the sisters wrote.

Adding: 'She is the main provider for her family of 6 and is unable to work during her cancer treatments. Please help share this so that they won’t have any added stress!'

Sutter Health declined to comment when approached by DailyMail.com.

Are you the prospective fathers? Please get in touch at alice.wright@mailonline.com
 
this is one of those stories were 1 single party only wants you to have extremely specific information
nice try journo scum, theres something fishy about this article, maybe its because theres 2 gays in it and thats throwing me off but somethings not right
also, the word "claim" is repeated so frequently that im starting to think theyre trying to tell me something
 
Regardless of the facts in this case, the people who use these kinds of services are among the most depraved on the planet. Zoosadist babyfurs look like fucking normies in comparison.

I've seen some porn stars become surrogates and then use that opportunity to do a pregnancy fetish photoshoot. I was like wow. Most Men don't even get to that level of objectification.
 
I've seen some porn stars become surrogates and then use that opportunity to do a pregnancy fetish photoshoot. I was like wow. Most Men don't even get to that level of objectification.
I was about to comment on the article, but your post left my brain reeling in disgust... :O

There are no fucking words to express how depressed and disgusted reading that has left me.
 
are we getting the full story? I'm not sure how a surrogate can be forced to terminate. Wouldn't that be a violation of rights in some way? You cannot force a woman to have an abortion against her will. Since she's not elaborating on what happened it's hard to tell if she was induced at 34 weeks or she aborted at 24 over legal fears. If that was me I'd tell the fag couple to go stick pineapples up their asses leaves first. Of course, they're probably into that anyway.
 
I really don't see how anyone could think otherwise. Paid surrogacy is literally renting out your womb.
I think it's about her perception of herself based on how they treated her. - She doesn't base her self-worth on her actions, but rather on how the actions of other people make her feel.
In other words, she's a morally-relativistic (i.e. bankrupt) moron.
 
'It was frustrating because I wanted to give them a family' she told DailyMail.com, 'they said they cared but they didn’t. I felt betrayed and heartbroken.'
Gee, two homosex faggots wanted a child and not a family. ALMOST AS IF. Honestly the baby got off lucky. It probably would have been molested for decades.
Despite her harrowing account she has not changed her mind about surrogacy: 'I wouldn't do it again, but I still think surrogacy has a great time and place but [prospective] families need to be screened a little more.'
Women not learning their lesson and in fact, supporting the thing that made their life hell. I guarantee you she supports trannies and shit too. When it comes time for her to suck the girldick, I hope she chokes on it.
Wouldn't that be a violation of rights in some way?
They're in California. Faggots trump women. The only things higher are trannies, and then black trannies.
 
I agree with the other posters that this is a one sided story.

Regardless of the prospective parents' input or actions, the baby is dead. She says the baby was born, so I don't think she aborted it.

In that case its just a tragedy. I hope she beats the cancer, weird that the article doesn't follow up to say how she's doing with that.
 
Further evidence that gay adoption has never been about kids or parenthood but has always been about subverting the natural family. The baby was never a human to them; it was just a sociopolitical tool. Hang these faggots. TFD. And while we're at it, dismantle the surrogacy industry.
 
Further evidence that gay adoption has never been about kids or parenthood but has always been about subverting the natural family. The baby was never a human to them; it was just a sociopolitical tool. Hang these faggots. TFD. And while we're at it, dismantle the surrogacy industry.
:story: Most western men are too weak to handle their niggers, let alone to throw their faggots off buildings.
 
I really don't see how anyone could think otherwise. Paid surrogacy is literally renting out your womb.
Perhaps she prefers to think of it as an extended, full service bed and breakfast business. So much classier than rent-a-womb

That said this story doesn't make sense from a common sense or a legal point of view. No way it could have gone down the way she claims
 
It's already bad enough two faggots called a baby "DNA", but I can't imagine having to tell your young (three and five years old) children to not get attached to the baby in your belly because it's not their actual sibling but a different couple's baby altogether. That's literally impossible for a child to comprehend that pregnant Mommy's not having your baby brother or sister whom you're not allowed to ever interact with.

Norm MacDonald has the right idea in that everyone in this story should die.
 
It's already bad enough two faggots called a baby "DNA", but I can't imagine having to tell your young (three and five years old) children to not get attached to the baby in your belly because it's not their actual sibling but a different couple's baby altogether. That's literally impossible for a child to comprehend that pregnant Mommy's not having your baby brother or sister whom you're not allowed to ever interact with.

Norm MacDonald has the right idea in that everyone in this story should die.
The situation is fucked beyond belief. Another reason fags shouldn't have kids. They have no stake in their lives, literally treating them like livestock to slaughter. Fuck them, fuck the mom for inviting this trouble into her and her family's life, fuck them all
 
Back