- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
I'm late to the party but I work with these NetApps as part of my day job so here's some thoughts;I don't know much about this kind of stuff so I'm looking forward to someone who does breaking down just how stupid it might be.
- He bought the 3 Gbps shelves (DS4243) and is an absolute moron for doing so. I believe you can replace the IOM3 controller with an IOM6 to bring it up to 6 Gbps but there's a good reason why the guy accepted the ultra lowball offer, these things are basically e-waste in this configuration.
- His explanation of the difference between a NAS and SAN in terms of discussing SMB file locking is moronic and shows Linus and crew have no clue what they're doing. They also describe slicing up the storage for VMs in a way that creates a 1:1 relationship between LUN and VM which is not how it's done usually.
- LOL this line from Linus at ~9:30: "Also because you're not using TCP/IP, you guys I'm assuming were just plugged in using iSCSI over Ethernet? You're using a completely different protocol!" Gee Linus I wonder what "i" in iSCSI stands for. Retard. Personally I've only ever seen these things connected with fiber channel though.
- Pedo stash talking about installing Linux on the controller at ~17:30. He's going to be very disappointed, I looked at buying a NetApp HBA gutted from a FAS and it turns out only a few revisions may work and they're way more trouble than they're worth. The way most people use these is with a normal external LSI SAS HBA in a server and a special QSFP to SFF-8088 cable.
- 18:00 did they do literally any research? You can put SATA drives in DS4243/4246 shelves and tonnes of people do this. NetApp even supplied SATA drives with interposers as an option but you don't generally need interposers if you're a normie.
- 20:00 the guy mentions the 520 byte sectors. This is a total nightmare with NetApp, one issue I have at work is we have 512-byte formatted disks but the idiots keep sending us 520-byte warranty replacements.
- 21:00 LOL it was listed for $500, they misread it as $5000 and accidentally offered $1000. Fucking idiots.

In my view they'd be suicidal to actually use ONTAP. Also, from what I gather, they're expecting to create a bunch of iSCSI LUNs and plug a bunch of Windows PCs into them as an alternative to SMB? You can do this in the sense that the volume will probably mount but you'll very rapidly experience disk corruption.
Windows does support clustering NTFS with "Cluster Shared Volumes" but this is a server feature designed for high availability of services like MSSQL, file sharing, etc.
What a disaster.