Baldur's Gate III Announced - ...and it's coming to Google Stadia and PC

View attachment 5198077

a bear fucking a vampire, just what i was looking for in my Baldur's Gate II sequel
Annnnnnnnnnnnnnd now I'm taking the game off my wishlist. Fuck this degenerate shit. This is just someone's fetish and I'm getting so tried of devs inserting their fetish into games. I'm also disgusted with what D&D has become. It is just about shipping and slash instead of RPG's elements and adventure. This is what happens when you let troons and furries into your community. Your community becomes gross and degenerate.
 
I see this comic is still relevant somehow

9da.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yay, finally fucking Dragonborns!!! *Look like badly modded Argonians*, oh no.
Maybe there more things to do, right? right?! *The double faggot elf vampirespawn is fucking a fucking bear* Jesus Christ, i'm fucking degenerate and that is all fucking wrong.
When the Neverwinter MMO, which is a game made on a budget, does a better job then a big budget studio.
  • Has Dragonborns actually look like Dragonborns.
  • Has the female characters look attractive. Even Half-Orcs and Giths.
  • Only 2 genders in character creator.
  • No pronoun shit.
  • No gay and degenerate shit in the game. Not even during pride month.
  • Has campaigns written by celebrated D&D writers like R.A Salvatore and Ed Greenwood.
  • No romances.
  • None of the devs fetishes are in the game.
  • Game is more concern with adventures and exploring then degenerate shit.
Absolutely shameful that a Free to Play MMO is a better D&D game then the sequel to one of the greatest D&D games ever made.

Edit: Looking at Steam and gamers are having none of this. They are extremely disgusted with the inclusion of the devs fetish. What is funny is that many of the gamers are saying that if bestiality is okay than it is only a matter of time before pedophilia is too. Larian and WoTC defenders are saying in the discussion that pedophilia is okay so long as it is actually a 1000 year old vampire with the body of a child or is a 25 year old sorcerer who shapeshifts into a 12 year old. The absolute state of the D&D fandom.
 
Last edited:
When the Neverwinter MMO, which is a game made on a budget, does a better job then a big budget studio.
  • Has Dragonborns actually look like Dragonborns.
  • Has the female characters look attractive. Even Half-Orcs and Giths.
  • Only 2 genders in character creator.
  • No pronoun shit.
  • No gay and degenerate shit in the game. Not even during pride month.
  • Has campaigns written by celebrated D&D writers like R.A Salvatore and Ed Greenwood.
  • No romances.
  • None of the devs fetishes are in the game.
  • Game is more concern with adventures and exploring then degenerate shit.
Absolutely shameful that a Free to Play MMO is a better D&D game then the sequel to one of the greatest D&D games ever made.

Edit: Looking at Steam and gamers are having none of this. They are extremely disgusted with the inclusion of the devs fetish. What is funny is that many of the gamers are saying that if bestiality is okay than it is only a matter of time before pedophilia is too. Larian defenders are saying in the discussion that pedophilia is okay so long as it is actually a 1000 year old vampire with the body of a child or is a 25 year old sorcerer who shapeshifts into a 12 year old. The absolute state of the D&D fandom.
It's no Neverwinter Nights.
 
Is there any truth to the rumor I heard about a killer urge perk? Where you can voice your desire to kill anybody and everybody and act upon it? Because that actually would be a great way to roleplay this filth.
 
Last edited:
It's no Neverwinter Nights.
True but I think that is for the best. The Neverwinter MMO is probably the only thing that isn't degenerate filth that has come out of D&D. Could you imagine if WoTC, as they are now, were to make a Neverwinter Nights sequel? I rather not think about that.
 
To think that Kotaku and other journoscum rags trashed the gay romance in Final Fantasy 16 saying that it "wasn't good enough" but praise this shit. Maybe if Dion was fucking a 500 year old vampire that looked like a 5 year old boy who also shapeshifts into a bear cub Kotaku would have praised the game. I'm so tired of this shit.
 
I'm really glad I decided to wait until the full release, because I would have been pissed if I bought it and this shit came up.

I guess I'll stick to 1&2, and maybe Icewind Dale and NWN for D&D stuff.
There are plenty of fan made campaigns for Neverwinter Nights that put modern RPGs to shame. Aielund Saga and Swordflight alone are worth it. There's also the Persistant Worlds offering many different flavours of MMO. I frequent the Star Wars and Ravenloft ones which are both RP focused. But there's full loot PvP servers too.

And no freak shit. Which is nice.
 
When you typed up that comment did you consider that you're defending bestiality? No "it's fiction" isn't a deflection. It's bestiality regardless. It being a joke doesn't change that it's a graphic scene of a man fucking a bear.
Damn, I didn't know Jack Thompson was a Kiwi Farms poster. Small world.

I realize this response may seem overly flippant to some, so let me outline my position more clearly. This is another episode of the generations—perhaps centuries—long debate over creative freedom and public morality. For video games in particular, the discussion has typically revolved around the depiction of violence, and more recently more progressive liberal subjects such as women and cultural minorities.

A majority of posters in this thread appear to disagree with the content featured in this trailer, so my point of contention is this: How does the depiction of a humanoid character having sexual relations with a bear differ morally from, say, giving the player the ability to beat hookers to death in GTA, or graphically decapitate innocent bystanders with a shotgun in Postal?

For roughly a decade, give or take, gamers and others have stood in opposition to advocates for the banning or censoring of violent video games on the grounds that the mere depiction of a thing is not morally equivalent to the thing itself. It took a lot of arguing and even a disbarment to make that point.

You may very reasonably find a dude shagging a bear to be gross, degenerate, or what have you. God knows there is plenty of media that I personally find disgusting. However, to argue that the developers should not be allowed to have that content in their game is to betray the key principle of creative freedom that allows us to enjoy the hobby that we do. The realm of fiction should be 100% free, and I'll die on that hill.
 
Last edited:
Back