Baldur's Gate III Announced - ...and it's coming to Google Stadia and PC

fsfeg.jpg
Jesus Christ! We may need to make a subforum dedicated to documenting the degeneracy of D&D.
 
I can't see normal female gamers being comfortable with this.
Sorry to bust your bubble but "homo werewolf" is so popular with winemoms it's a category on Amazon books.

The only red lines today is having a stay at hometown NPC and the 500 year old vampire girl (and only if it's a girl) solely due to being associated with the "wrong" political spectrum.
 
Sorry to bust your bubble but "homo werewolf" is so popular with winemoms it's a category on Amazon books.

The only red lines today is having a stay at hometown NPC and the 500 year old vampire girl (and only if it's a girl) solely due to being associated with the "wrong" political spectrum.
When young girls who grew up on Beauty and the Beast develop a yaoi and bestiality fetish into their womanhood. Disney and its consequences have been a disaster for the female sex.
 
Last edited:
When young girls who grew on Beauty and the Beast develop a bestiality fetish into womanhood. Disney and it's consequences have been disaster for the female sex.
Nah, this is on sexual liberation and critical theory demanding you challenge conventional wisdom. Because the Beast eventually became a very handsome prince, it's basically a more complicated Princess and the Frog.

[insert Family Guy cutaway where Belle loses any and all interest in Beast after he becomes a prince]
 
Nah, this is on sexual liberation and critical theory demanding you challenge conventional wisdom. Because the Beast eventually became a very handsome prince, it's basically a more complicated Princess and the Frog.

[insert Family Guy cutaway where Belle loses any and all interest in Beast after he becomes a prince]
What is funny is that I used to hear young women saying that they always found Prince Adam to be hotter as a beast than as a human and their happy ending is always having Adam remain as the beast. I am not going to go into the Freudian ramifications of this as it will be very long and drawn out so make of that what you will.
 
Also there's a "the PHB is such a shitty sourcebook they filled the empty space with sex" joke somewhere but it hasn't been errata'd yet.

And for people that want to use cleansing fire to clean this game don't. Sacred Flame is a shitty cantrip.

This is why you don't preorder, my dude.
I was expecting SOMETHING good from Larian too, but whatever fuck this. Wait no fucking is the source of the concerns. Fuck I can't bear th- FUCK.
 
This is why you don't preorder, my dude.
This is why Early Access should allow refunds until day of completion. Because they went three fucking years with no inkling of this bullshit. A metaphor they'll understand: Three years they edged themselves until they blew their load in our faces. Everyone was complacent and then BAM! And given how many EAs just fail they really need to revamp the entire system.

The only warning sign was that the characters were your typical That Guy tier stuff. That was about it.
 
Also there's a "the PHB is such a shitty sourcebook they filled the empty space with sex" joke somewhere but it hasn't been errata'd yet.

And for people that want to use cleansing fire to clean this game don't. Sacred Flame is a shitty cantrip.
Would Meteor work? I'm starting to realize why Sephiroth was so intent on his ridiculous ritual overcast of that spell.
 
There's an option for murderhobo
From what I hear the game encourages you to be evil and punishes you for going the "good alignment route". Almost all your companions are evil or chaotic neutral who encourage you to do evil deeds and indulge in evil and selfish actions. While I don't mind an evil route and evil companions, however, when almost all your companions are evil and the game punishes you for being good it is clear that the devs have a bias. Once again this is woketard Leftists who hate good characters and actions and can only sympathize with evil because evil characters and stories are more interesting and "relatable" in their eyes.
 
Last edited:
From what I hear the game encourages you to be evil and punishes you for going the "good alignment route". Almost all your companions are evil or chaotic neutral who encourage you to do evil deeds and indulge in evil actions. While I don't mind an evil route and evil companions, however, when almost all your companions are evil and the game punishes you for being good it is clear that the devs have a bias. Once again this is woketard Leftist who hate good characters and actions and can only sympathize with evil because evil characters and stories are more interesting and "relatable" in their eyes.
Basically every fucking stereotype of the worst players you come across in D&D wrote this game.
 
From what I hear the game encourages you to be evil and punishes you for going the "good alignment route". Almost all your companions are evil or chaotic neutral who encourage you to do evil deeds and indulge in evil and selfish actions. While I don't mind an evil route and evil companions, however, when almost all your companions are evil and the game punishes you for being good it is clear that the devs have a bias. Once again this is woketard Leftists who hate good characters and actions and can only sympathize with evil because evil characters and stories are more interesting and "relatable" in their eyes.
It doesn't really punish you for being 'good'. It's just that in the early access version the only companions you really had were all either evil or just assholes, so they didn't really respond well to good actions. In the final version you'll have a big roster of companions (and they've reworked a few of the EA companions, with making Shadowheart less bitchy and more agreeable and completely rewriting another one).
 
It doesn't really punish you for being 'good'. It's just that in the early access version the only companions you really had were all either evil or just assholes, so they didn't really respond well to good actions. In the final version you'll have a big roster of companions (and they've reworked a few of the EA companions, with making Shadowheart less bitchy and more agreeable and completely rewriting another one).
Will all this polyamory shit be in the final product too or just limited to the evil characters?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dude Snakes
From what I hear the game encourages you to be evil and punishes you for going the "good alignment route". Almost all your companions are evil or chaotic neutral who encourage you to do evil deeds and indulge in evil and selfish actions. While I don't mind an evil route and evil companions, however, when almost all your companions are evil and the game punishes you for being good it is clear that the devs have a bias. Once again this is woketard Leftists who hate good characters and actions and can only sympathize with evil because evil characters and stories are more interesting and "relatable" in their eyes.
Please, you can't make me wanna play lawful good any more than it already is. And funny that you mentioned wrath of the righteous before. There you can be as good or bad as you want, max level is 20 with 10 mythic levels or 20 extra if you cast out your mythic powers. And no cuckolding or animal buggery. Plus, you even can redeem characters like Greybor and Venduag (somewhat. She still an evil, but it's tamed), if romance her(as a man. Fuck dykes and fags)
 
Back