US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Ironically, letting Trump back in would be the "safe" bet; both to take the pressure off the nation's neck but also to figure out what the fuck the left is going to do in 2028; especially if they have to find a way to make Newsom palatable to the public.
Close but no cigar, that's why they want meatball to get the nomination and possibly win. Meatball is the real uniparty release valve, can also allow them to tone down the tranny degeneracy just enough to go back into boiling the frog without it noticing but be in lockstep with everything else. Too bad he has done an abysmal job at being a front against Trump.

Trump on the other hand would go an a frothing crusade to fuck them over as much as possible to pay back for a fraction of the bullshit they have put him through. If they thought it was going to be a problem if he won 2020, I expect there to be a lot more heat with 2024 Trump. Too bad I still expect him to lose from "fortification" though.
 
Joe "claims" he wont have trump because and I quote "I m not gonna humanize him"
Lets be real, Trump would probably be a shitty guest on the show. The only way he would be an interesting guest is if Joe could get him talking about real estate in NYC and hi-jinks during the 1980s cocaine power executive days.
 
Trump on the other hand would go an a frothing crusade to fuck them over as much as possible to pay back for a fraction of the bullshit they have put him through. If they thought it was going to be a problem if he won 2020, I expect there to be a lot more heat with 2024 Trump. Too bad I still expect him to lose from "fortification" though.
I assume a Trump term 2 would be more of the same from term 1. Except more frothing at the mouth from the left and the MSM. Trump will get some stuff done. But there's gonna be a lot of upheaval from the establishment. More so than last time. He won't go scorch earth on the establishment. We'll just be kicking the can down the road another 4 years. Some pressure will be released. But not enough to prevent disaster in the future.
 
Peak Anarcho-Tyranny. A person who tries and do the right thing is someone who MIGHT not be complete cattle, and so they are a danger to the system. They need to be stopped, for they are more of a threat to the corrupt ruling class than the thieves. After all the thieves only hurt other plebs, but such a person with a moral compass might end up not voting correctly or worse, protesting the ruling class!
 
This is the true demoralization for the plebs, that cuckservatives will never address.

Peak Anarcho-Tyranny. A person who tries and do the right thing is someone who MIGHT not be complete cattle, and so they are a danger to the system. They need to be stopped, for they are more of a threat to the corrupt ruling class than the thieves. After all the thieves only hurt other plebs, but such a person with a moral compass might end up not voting correctly or worse, protesting the ruling class!
>"the economy's not that bad"
Nah, he deserved it.
 
Uncle Joe got a new nickname, after "Creepy Joe", here come "Angry Joe".

How a person acts in public and how they act in private can differ greatly. In public President Joe Biden portrays himself as a kindly albeit gaffe-prone grandfatherly figure, whereas a different image of the president was reported by Axios. The man behind the curtain is quick to angry outbursts and profanity prone.

Former and current staffers for Biden reported having been witness to and being the target of Biden’s angry admonitions. The 80-year-old president is reported to have said statements like “God dammit, how the f**k don’t you know this?!”, “Don’t f**king bullsh*t me!”, and “Get the f**k out of here!” The tirades have been so potent that some aides refuse to meet the president alone and take a colleague with them when they have to meet him.

One official commented that “No one is safe” from Biden’s ire. Biden’s angry rants were particularly memorable against his former COVID czar Jeff Zients (who is presently Biden’s chief of staff) when back in 2021 there was a shortage of testing kits. A spokesman for Zients who was pressed on the issue commented “I’m not going to speak to what internal convos may or may not have happened between Jeff and the president.” The White House did not comment.
 
Am I the only one that remembers some vapid cunt accidentally speaking in a way that was heard on air on Joe's podcast when he had... Alex Jones? I think it was on? Ordering Joe not to allow Jones to talk about certain topics?

He's absolutely owned. The game is this: He'll pretend to be anti-establishment and open to new ideas and sticking it to the man all that shit, but at the end of the day he'll still draw his audience towards voting for whatever controlled opposition establishment prick they use as a pressure release valve.

He's the 2023 version of BIll Maher. A shepherd for sheep that have deluded themselves into thinking they're too smart to be part of the flock.
Someone here on A&H once described Joe Rogan as "a stupid person's idea of a smart person".

The only thing Joe Rogan will hold firm on is doing drugs.
 
Last edited:
It's even more hilarious to see this guy, who looks like he enjoys watching his wife get fucked by "foreigners," holding up the flag of a violent neo-Nazi organization. No sense of irony.

1688948041598767.jpg
That is not just some random guy, that's James Mason, a notorious neo-nazi pedophile satanist from the 1990s that inspired the atom waffen division.
Screenshot_857.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Statements made by National Security Council spokesman John Kirby on the Sunday news shows have been seized upon by the Kremlin as a clear demonstration the US has 'confessed to war crimes'.

Kirby in a fresh interview with ABC was defending President Biden's approving cluster bombs for Ukraine, which are banned by over 120 countries internationally for being 'indiscriminate' and thus more likely to result in civilian deaths. Kirby at one point told ABC that "we can all agree that more civilians have been and will continue to be killed by Russian forces… than will likely be hurt by the use of these cluster munitions."

The administration's consistent rationale has been to say that while yes - this opens up Ukraine's military to the greater likelihood of committing war crimes - it's essentially OK because Russia is doing it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back