Rackets is just lighting money on fire. If Monty wins in the end Rekieta may be so broke that to cover the damages a portion of every superchat gets siphoned by the court to service it
Rackets come have made this whole thing disappear right at the very start with a retraction and an apology. He refused to do that, despite obviously knowing that what he'd said would be defamatory per se and could result in his losing a very expensive action for defamation.
I think there were a couple of reasons for this.
First, he's a bully. He thought, "I'm much richer than Monty. No way can he outlast me in court. He'll go pro se, he'll make mistakes, I'll fucking hammer him to widespread applause from the peanut gallery."
Secondly, he spends way too much time huffing his own farts. When the audience started to tell him those farts smelled of Chanel No. 5, he started to believe them.
"I'm a principled first amendment warrior. I'm not letting some jumped up pervert tell me what I can and can't say on-line. Even if that dirty melon fucker does try to sue me, hundreds of thousands of people who support free speech will be falling over themselves to spunk money into my bank account to fight the good fight. Even if I lose, I'll win."
And that narrative might have had some traction a year ago. Today though, we know way too much about Rekieta to be falling for that bullshit. This nigger has the money to be spunking $200k on new cars, he can fund his own vanity lawsuit. He thinks it's an 'investment in his channel and his reputation?' Well, he's the one who would be reaping the benefits of any such investment, he should be using his own money to invest.
One thing is for sure though. This is going to be a damn sight more interesting than Pippa fucking Pipkin. Be interesting to see how much commentary this case gets from other lawtubers for a start.
