Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
Applying Colorado law here would contravene Minnesota's interests in fairness and equity. It isn't that Minnesota has never enacted anti-SLAPP legislation; It did. However, Minnesota decided that the statute was unconstitutional. This isn't a case where another state's law can fill a void that was never legislated. Minnesota courts have spoken clearly that anti-SLAPP legislation is unconstitutional, abrogating an individual's right to a trial, when it requires pretrial factual determinations. As such, Minnesota has made a determination regarding the state's interest: anti-SLAPP statutes are suspect.
It's really funny that the same reason why Nick doesn't like anti-SLAPP statutes has also been used to cast the one in his home state down, and that's come to bite him now that he needs to rely on it. He should be happy to live (and be sued) in a place that shares his point of view!

Even though Rekieta acknowledged in his videos that his statements regarding Quest's "kid stuff" were "joke stuff," the strong language of the case law supports construing the accusations of pedophilia as defamation per se and that in almost every circumstance a reasonable viewer would understand these accusations as implications of sexual misconduct and criminal activity. This is a fact question for the jury to determine.
Good job, idiot. I said at the start of this that he had no real to path to victory. With his extremely expensive lawyer, all he's going to do is get drained of more and more money as time goes on, which was probably the whole point.

A judgment is, obviously, a loss. But settlement with Montagraph is also a loss. Spending more money to fight is a slow resource loss. Even winning is a loss, because he isn't going to get any of that money back, it's not going to do anything to further the free speech cause that he no longer cares about, and it's not going to deter any future lawsuits against him.

If anything, now would be a perfect time for the other vultures he's pissed off to come for him now that he's weak.
 
Last edited:
With consideration of front-page Featured Content, is there a basic summary of this case, its history, and who the hell Montegraph is? Especially because any explanation by Nick is obviously going to be colored.
 
With consideration of front-page Featured Content, is there a basic summary of this case, its history, and who the hell Montegraph is? Especially because any explanation by Nick is obviously going to be colored.
There is an entire thread for the case under Lolcow and Lolcow. Quest vs. Rekieta. There is a full summary at the start. Monty has his own thread mostly full of information from years ago.

Montegraph is a conspiracy nut who makes weird/disgusting films/pictures/stuff. He mostly fights among his own kind. But in 2018, he tried to sue someone while representing himself and had an epic failure. Metokur and Nick made fun of him in 2018. Then he went back to his native habitat.

When Nick got kicked off youtube last year, Montegraph showed up in the chats to streams Nick was on taunting him about being kicked off. Nick got mad about it, called him out as a pedo and dared Montegraph to sue him. And he did. But this time he managed to get a real attorney to represent him. Since then, Nick has a made a series of bad decisions about the case.


This is cow vs. cow warfare. There is not much good to say about Montegraph or Nick at this point.
 
Its probably worth saying now that IMO Nick's attorney, for all his reputation and all the money Nick paid him, did a remarkably bad job in all this
I'd almost call it karma for fucking over Vic Mignona with the SUPAR L33T LAWYER who cant even do paperwork on time.

Take a sip, buddy
 
Last edited:
Nick's a jackass but can't help feel a little bad that he's ending up in court because of someone as retarded as Monty.

Monty's not to blame here. The only person responsible for Nick ending up in court is Nick himself. The man professes to be a lawyer, FFS. It says so on the fucking tin. If you're going to hold yourself out as a lawyer, you should at least know the fucking law.
 
I haven't been following the Monty suit practically at all and haven't had time to research Minnesota defamation law, but I do think it's hilarious that Randazza essentially told the court the special motion was practically a motion for summary judgement.

Even with my very limited following of the case, it's laughable to state that there isn't genuine issues of material fact about the claims alleged. With no discovery and not nearly enough undisputed facts (if any aside from Nick saying the allegedly defamatory statements) for a judge to grant it, this felt like pissing away money.
 
I can't imagine losing to a watermelon fucker.

Boy, burning all those bridges in the past few weeks really helping out with sympathy points for support in the upcoming expensive case moving ahead.
But settlement with Montagraph is also a loss.
I cannot see this man settling at all. He wants to drag Nick down to whatever weird pervert hell he's going to with him. It also seems his lawyer Nick did a good job of pissing off as they're happy to give him a death by a thousand cuts too.
 
Back