Yeah, it's defamation per se, being called a pedo is just inherently damaging. Monty just has to not be a retard sperg and get together a proper claim and evidence of Nick who apparently is taking every opportunity possible to repeat it.
because labeling someone as a pedo is already enough, it doesn't even have to be about money. so it's defamatory per-se, there's no need to prove damages, this isn't about contracts or jobs, it's about someone saying another person likes to rape little kids.
The backstory on this is:
Arguing inconsistent and conflicting positions from case to case is part of the job.
I don't see how he could get more straightforward than literally saying he sucks little boys' dicks, then following up daring him to sue him.
Monty is going to have an interesting time explaining to a jury the artistic decisions behind his film. Because a jury of randos is going to be creeped the fuck out when they see it.
Well we know Nick has erectile dysfunction so that would limit him to being the power bottom .
No. She is into niggers. Only niggers.
Detractorbros, we eatin' good!
Generally speaking, I think with defamation, you have to prove a "reasonable person" would be able to believe that Montegraph "probably always liked sucking little boy cocks" - probably, in this case, for his involvement with Little Piggie and the Umbrella Man, a movie nobody seems to know anything about.
There are multiple torts. Defamation is per se, but the others are not and need proof of damage.
Mostly dependent on both parties retardation. Discovery from Nick's side will likely be centered mostly around damages so they can contest the amount that is provable at trial.
Depends whether he's being held to an actual malice standard or just negligence. We don't really know because the loljudge gave no reasoning whatsoever.
I can't wait for Nicks deposition. Schneider could make some real money having people superchat questions.
Normally showing actual malice would be hard. Not so hard when the defendant has hours and hours of video ranting like a lunatic.
Nick can finally make good on his promise from the WW days, we can all watch the depo together at the same time. Except this time, instead of being asked questions by a retard with one lung, it'll be by an attorney who hates him personally and has client actively suing him. How fun
I wonder how likely it is that Nick streams it like he had said he would if he were deposed during the Vic case, because "I'muh press cuz muh media company" logic. I'm sure he'd make tens of dollars on it.
I would actually watch a live depo stream tbh. I probably couldn't, cuz it doesn't pay the bills, but I could see Nick or Monty saying something outrageously retarded that would make it worth the watch
So does the plaintiff. They're both lunatic cows.
He should ask him if our wife ever pegs him.
"Mr. Rekieta, I see a chatter on your stream asking about a 'Ricardo and Romaine' and whether you or your wife had sexual relations with them. Did you? Remember now, you're under oath."
