- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
It seems that the video has been available on the Internet Archive since 2020: https://archive.org/details/little-piggy-and-the-umbella-man.Generally speaking, I think with defamation, you have to prove a "reasonable person" would be able to believe that Montegraph "probably always liked sucking little boy cocks" - probably, in this case, for his involvement with Little Piggie and the Umbrella Man, a movie nobody seems to know anything about.
The oldest extant source I could find for the claim that the "Umbrella Man" video was potentially real and featured a child came from a November 2016 blog post (archive link) from a guy who later posted something on one of his blogs that an organization known as "The Firm" wants to wipe his brain because he "knows more than most humans". He apparently believes that because a comment stating as such was allegedly posted to one of his blogs (more info in quoted posts).
It does appear that the oldest extant evidence of an accusation of the video potentially featuring a child is from this guy who fears brain wiping. The only extant evidence I can find that the video was being distributed by Montagraph past 2010 comes from the same guy. From what I can gather, the main controversy over the video was that some conspiracy theorists in the mid-2010s believed that the video contained a checkerboard pattern or something which was a winking reference to the Ramsey murder case in Colorado, suggestive of Monty's involvement in the crime, which is both insane and not something Rekieta brought up.
One clarification: I now see there's an unlisted video from 2019 which I think was Monty reuploading the film and arguing with people in the comments; I'm guessing this was done because of the emerging rumors about the video featuring a child. Holmseth (the brain wipe fearer) is referenced in at least one comment.For instance, in footnote 7 of the reply filed by Randazza yesterday notes that 'others have characterized The Umbrella Man as a "snuff" film.' The link goes to some random obscure Wordpress blog and instead of describing it, I'll just screenshot part of its homepage:
Actually, let me scroll down and screenshot a little more. Here's where the proprietor of this esteemed news outlet announces that because he "Knows More Than Most Humans", "The Firm", whatever that is, is going to "Erase [his] Brain" :
![]()
Of course, since at one point Monty apparently tried to scrub the video off of anywhere it was uploaded online, these claims may have originated in places that ended up deleted (YouTube comment sections, for instance).
Also, FWIW, the way in which Spectre inserted himself into the lolsuit was that Monty threatened to sue him for defamation as well. This gave him an excuse to call Schneider and then pivot to discussing Rekieta's case.The fact that Spectre is a big enough retard to do that, and Nick is a big enough retard to not immediately question literally everything Nick was relayed is frightening
Even Spectre managed to discover he was wrong and retracted his claim (clips in quoted post).
As far as I know he was not sued.I love that Schneider is taking calls from the chad Spectre after ghosting the virgin Rekieta. Literally confesses to Spectre like a school girl.
Part 2: wherein Spectre apologies for saying that Montagraph has a felony conviction for soliciting a prostitute / underage minor. He claims this was a deep fake gay op and is sorry. He says Montagraph threatened him with a lawsuit. He called Schneider and told him to tard wrangle his client, but in a professional respectful way. The conversation was very "amicable".
Does that mean that @Spectre_06 is less of a retard than Rekieta?
It's all in the LawTube thread.I'm interested in the details, does he have a thread here yet?