Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[northstar747]

- The judge in the case is the judge in his current case.

I dont know how things work in his state but couldnt nick have papered the judge asking for a different one?

 

[Strix454]

It's always been my understanding that the chance to make the "Colorado argument "was the reason why Randazza even took Rekieta's case. The idea was that Randazza was going to perform a legal coup by grafting Colorado's anti-SLAPP onto Minnesota's jurisprudence.

That is an excellent point. But it wouldn't be about grafting Colorado's anti-SLAPP law onto Minnesota. Its about using the rare circumstances of Nick's case to create a test case that allows for re-litigation of the issue of anti-SLAPP being constitutional in Minnesota.

If the state courts allowed the Colorado law under the logic of Randazza's plea, they would create a template by which an anti-SLAPP law could be passed in Minnesota.
In normal circumstances, it would be nearly impossible to re-litigate the anti-SLAPP minnesota decision. You couldn't get the courts to accept it. But Nick's case would allow it to happen because of one of the parties being from a different state.

If this is indeed true, I would expect an appeal from Nick. Randazza will appeal this all the way to the State Supreme Court even if it doesn't serve any of Nick's interests or that of his case.

And the best part for Randazza is that Nick is paying all the bills for Randazza's law nerding.

 

[AnOminous]

Hey Clip This Too (in place of Hey Clip This since the channel got a harassment strike, out till next week) and Elissa Clips.
Made it a spoiler since a bunch came down today...

Dunford more or less calls this. About the only thing I disagree with is that the case is actually frivolous, at least with regard to the more specific allegations of illegal conduct. I think this comes in somewhere in the territory of Elon Musk's "pedo guy" lawsuit, i.e. not a terribly strong case but probably presents a colorable claim.

I definitely agree this is where a sane person contemplates settling.

I also definitely agree that an interlocutory appeal is a fool's errand but Nick could insist on it.

I dont know how things work in his state but couldnt nick have papered the judge asking for a different one?

Yes but if you shoot at the king/queen you'd better hit.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

You got facts wrong on most if Schneider and twisted with his case before this judge.

Look at the recent responses to Null for out of order facts--at least how Nick gave them across multiple tellings.

Whoever is behind the Clip This channels has some editing skills. I would love to see them do a concise timeline.

I might effort post if Tor is up and collect the clips from around January and April. I think that’s when he talked about Schneider.

The rough idea I get is that Nick made an ass of himself to Schneider and then actually pissed him off. Schneider also seems to be a community figure in the law community around Minnesota, so Nick likely is fucked reputation wise if he does pursue Law as his actual career.

 

[Not Who You Think]

Yup! Pippa is creepy and weird, and her fans are even creepier and weirder. But Nick and Coom were being malicious, disingenuous retards because they were spurned by a creepy weirdo anime rabbit. Also, Nick's a hypocrite (as usual) because he was actively going out of his way to fuck with Pippa's business when that was his number one complaint against us and why he felt justified in spreading outright lies about us, as well as justifying the suppression of our free speech by troons. The fact that he kept bringing it up over and over again way after Pippa started ignoring him is the cherry on top.

Nick clearly only cares about free speech and harming businesses when it is in his brand's best interest (all while while playing victim to his own tactics).

Decided to make this today. Got a bit carried way with the references on the lower portion, but it illustrates what a mess Nick is these days: only caring when it suits his grift (with or without evidence).



Not perfect, but it was fun to make.

 

[Captain Manning]

I dont know how things work in his state but couldnt nick have papered the judge asking for a different one?

Actual bias or prejudice is cause to ask for a new Judge in Minnesota, yes.

However, I think that would be a hilarious motion to make here given the subject matter of the case.

"Defendant respectfully motions for the assignment of a new Judge, on the basis that he shit-talked the currently presiding Judge in relation to a prior case, and the instant case concerns allegations that the Defendant has shit-talked somebody. Therefore, the Defendant has good cause to believe the presiding Judge may be bias against his shit-talking ways."

Basically, I am at a loss as to how you write such a motion without admitting to the court you are an asshole with a propensity towards shit-talking. Any replacement judge is gonna have access to the motion as well.

And the best part for Randazza is that Nick is paying all the bills for Randazza's law nerding.

For now. I'm curious to see if Randazza loses interest as the well runs dry. That crowdfunding campaign of Nick's ain't exactly a stellar success. I'll guess we'll wait and see.

Yes but if you shoot at the king/queen you'd better hit.

Moreover, I would think that the Chief Judge (if it ever got that high, see link above) would presume that Judge Fischer is professional enough to rise above whatever Nick said in the elevator. Judicial officers tend to get the presumption of impartiality absent compelling evidence to the contrary.

 

[trash cat]

Spent 19 minutes and 29 seconds of my life watching Little Piggy and the Umbrella Man by Montegraph.

I watched Little Piggy and Umbrella Man too, and it was torture all its own! I had to skip forward and yeah it's an uncomfortable watch. More or less I agree with your characterisation of the film.

The common narrative is that Nick announced a secret-and-much-speculated "worst day of his life" event in Spring 2022 after his financial success from the Johnny Depp trial had just concluded.

Lots of speculation whether it was a revelation of his wife's infidelity, a personal medical diagnosis, being formally excommunicated from his family's oil money trust, etc.

But whatever it was, Nick announced he no longer gave a fuck/cared what others that controlled him for decades thought and jumped straight into daily degeneracy.

Wow that is interesting. I'd love to know what this recent pivotal event in Nick's life was.

Certainly some of those revelations are more understandable and sympathetic than others, but at a certain point your character is forged in the hard times not the easy ones. Recently it's become more obvious that Nick thinks he's better than everybody, and is always the smartest guy in the room.

For me the turning point was when Ty Beard fumbled Vic's case after talking shit for months and taking huge sums of money. I was shocked when I found out that Ty Beard was Nick's family probate attorney. Wtf.

The comical level of failures in Vic's defamation case really exposed the laziness, nepotism, and incompetence in hindsight.

 

[Maude Snew]

The common narrative is that Nick announced a secret-and-much-speculated "worst day of his life" event in Spring 2022 after his financial success from the Johnny Depp trial had just concluded.

Lots of speculation whether it was a revelation of his wife's infidelity, a personal medical diagnosis, being formally excommunicated from his family's oil money trust, etc.

But whatever it was, Nick announced he no longer gave a fuck/cared what others that controlled him for decades thought and jumped straight into daily degeneracy.

Teacher came back and stole his other Transformer toy.

 

[clipartfan92]

I want to live long enough to see the "in minecraft" pleading actually spelled out in a legal argument.

It has shown up in legal paperwork before, although I don't think anyone has actually tried to argue it. In footnote 1 of page 3:

Minecraft is a video game. Based on information provided by the FBI, the government understands that it is common for persons discussing criminal activity online to refer to such activity as occurring “in Minecraft” to conceal the true nature of the activity.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/20685237/govuscourtsdcd228300450pdf.pdf (archive.org)
I'm pretty sure that it would work about as well as calling cocaine "chicken" and trying to argue that you were actually talking about chicken when you told Ramon to bring over "two birds" when they play the wiretap in court.

 

[AnOminous]

Basically, I am at a loss as to how you write such a motion without admitting to the court you are an asshole with a propensity towards shit-talking. Any replacement judge is gonna have access to the motion as well.

You don't get to act like an asshole and then claim this is evidence of the judge being biased. Smarter people have tried the "shit-talk the judge then call them mad and try to recuse them" trick than Nick. It requires the judge actually to do something to indicate bias, and no, just ruling against you doesn't count.

You're also a lot less likely to be granted such a motion if you wait until they deny your motion to dismiss and the case is headed toward trial. It implies you only decided the judge was biased after they decided against you.

 

[Joggin Noggin]

Nick addressed the issue of "per se" defamation by saying that other jurisdictions don't apply it in the case of pedo. Nick also says the minnesota case law doesn't count because its old.

The Pat the Pedo case had it's last run up to the Minnesota Court of Appeals in 2007. Longbehn v. Schoenrock, 727 N.W.2d 153 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). That, in the legal world, isn't old by any stretch of the imagination. Also, it's still precedential and the District Court can't, or shouldn't at least, just disregard it since there is nothing, at least to my knowledge, to indicate that these types of claims are being looked at as not defamation per se by the Court of Appeals or the MN SC

Nick just hand waving away caselaw on point because it goes against your current position is not just lazy, but actively stupid. Either distinguish it from the current case, give examples of higher courts seeming to move away from that case's position, or say why that case's argument was wrong. You can't just be like "It's 16 years old. Therefore it doesn't count."

 

[Clipuoka]

@Null has a new phone that doesn't get Nick's messages?

And @Null, did you break up with Rekieta or did he break up with you? Asking for a lolcow...

 

[talk talk talk]

I dont know how things work in his state but couldnt nick have papered the judge asking for a different one?

Yes! But he would have had to be quick. A party has ten days from notice of the judge assignment to exercise a free strike. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/cp/id/63/#63.03

If Nick had a problem with the judge, he could have struck her.

He's just coping and seething and dilating (with a balldo).

 

[Michael Wade]

Wow.... I didn't think he would become that fucked up with sexual stuff...

I hate to ask but what happened to his kids and wife?

 

[Joggin Noggin]

Wow.... I didn't think he would become that fucked up with sexual stuff...

I hate to ask but what happened to his kids and wife?

His wife seems to be on board with all his coom brained antics, attending the swinger resort Hedonism II with him at least once (likely twice) and following the same two buff black male workers from there on social media like Nick did.

Who knows with his kids. Every once in a while he'll air something out that makes it seem like they're a drain on his coom lifestyle, but hopefully they are blissfully unaware of their dad's antics and just think that him spending more time in the vault drinking and being on Locals 24/7 isn't a terrible thing.

 

[northstar747]

Yes! But he would have had to be quick. A party has ten days from notice of the judge assignment to exercise a free strike. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/cp/id/63/#63.03

If Nick had a problem with the judge, he could have struck her.

He's just coping and seething and dilating (with a balldo).

Thank you we call it something else in my state.

I would say nick should have seen who it was assigned to and out of caution because of his trial in front of her and his running his mouth on stream about her done the strike thing

 

[talk talk talk]

Thank you we call it something else in my state.

I would say nick should have seen who it was assigned to and out of caution because of his trial in front of her and his running his mouth on stream about her done the strike thing

That county only has three judges. We don't know if he's pissed off the other two as well.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Here is his LOCAL chat from the night of his interview when he ignored his MTD denial.

Honestly, LOCALS is slowing down. Lingering on bland topics, SPAM sessions, and slapfights that are not entertaining.

Here is why Nick losing was GOOD!

firePA498​

Rackets case going to discovery… welp Nicks getting more quality content

sophia1320​

Dumb ass judge

DnLMentors​	something about the pedo charges being serious
firePA498​	Had a feeling
DnLMentors​	on the defemation side so discorvery will reveal more.
sophia1320​	I feel like she’s just curious
DnLMentors​	defamation and pedo is something that might require a jury to figure out. but i am not a lawyer
firePA498​	Maybe she likes Monty’s Quality melon content

BDE. Much wow:

SirVieVal​

Walk while u can cause I'm gonna fuck ur legs permanently wobbly when we're man and wife. Ain't gonna take months either ill be back to wok on day 2, you'll be gumby

The simp hopes on and gets burnt:

Andrew_Wahoo​

I made Melonie Mac laugh yesterday!

aCompleteRandom​

Not hard. She's a generally happy person with a decent sense of humor.

This would be funny:

ShadowFalls​

So, anyone think Nick will pay his speeding ticket before they take his license?

sanglant​	license isn't gone with less than 10 tickets
ShadowFalls​	His wife going to have to drive him everywhere like Joe.
sanglant​	for speeding
ShadowFalls​	Failure to pay though?

ShadowFalls​	He got a late charge like a couple weeks ago, still shows as it is due
sanglant​	varies by state though, here you hire a lawyer and do the dance to avoid points
ShadowFalls​	It was the second penalty already

Nick responds

RekietaLaw​

I haven't been around to go pay it. This state is gay and can fucking eat my ass

Nick is starving his sycophants of attention:

ReformedConvict​

Your not interacting with the chat i object rackets dont make the show gay ploke all the rest faggot

cooon​

Nick interacts with streams?

Julia543​

Oh, so like how Nick is like talking law is boring

The chat was not tuned into the actual show much.

Here is a retrospective:

havenking​	Sup fuckers, hows was last night streams?
Mad_Amos​	Was good
MrStirFry99​	didnt watch. like the format, didnt care for the guest.

MrStirFry99​

word is its good, and he was a bro and answered Balls or no balls. (word is)

OhmsLawBadger​

I have to say, I really like these Direct Examination shows. As a D&D nerd, I though the Ed Greenwood show was great. I don't know who this Phil guy is but the show seems good so far.

Mad_Amos​

I do like the format where its just conversational. Reminds me just a touch of Craig Ferguson.

 

[feral cat #6385]

That county only has three judges. We don't know if he's pissed off the other two as well.

If he has appeared in front of them he has pissed them off.

 

[AnOminous]

Yes! But he would have had to be quick. A party has ten days from notice of the judge assignment to exercise a free strike. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/cp/id/63/#63.03

If Nick had a problem with the judge, he could have struck her.

He's just coping and seething and dilating (with a balldo).

I assume you have to show cause later, including why you didn't strike right out of the gate. I generally approve of such strikes early on, as it doesn't force a litigant to have to basically call the judge a crook to disqualify them. It's called "appearance of impropriety" but the definition certainly seems to require actual misconduct even if not actual corruption.