Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Diamond Homonculus]

Have you guys noticed Rackets has been sniffing a lot and laughing nervously the last two shows? Whats up with that?

 

[Scarlett Johansson]

This whole thing is a damn mess. Wow. Just...wow.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Have you guys noticed Rackets has been sniffing a lot and laughing nervously the last two shows? Whats up with that?

His last interview stream he was also darting his eyes around while the guest was talking far more than what I would expect. I know he has something like 3 chats to keep track of, but it still felt excessive.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Have you guys noticed Rackets has been sniffing a lot and laughing nervously the last two shows? Whats up with that?

His last interview stream he was also darting his eyes around while the guest was talking far more than what I would expect. I know he has something like 3 chats to keep track of, but it still felt excessive.

His excuses are 'multiple chat windows' (forget that he used to have YouTube, Rumble, and Oddysey, and now Youtube, Rumble, and LOCALS), allergies, and being under the weather because of 'these damn kids'.

I think it is still in the realm of speculation, but I do believe that he has been experimenting with substances.

At the very least alcohol use has finally caught up with him. He used to seem to drink a lot, and still be sharp-ish, but he has lost a few IQ points. He is no longer witty or as quick in exchanges. His new default is anal/sex/dick joke or to use some prude/incel/cuck/retard/faggot insult to keep things going with forced laughs. I used to like his interviews, and the repartee he would engage with a good guest. Now he seems mentally lugubrious. The first interview that really drove this home was the Rittenhouse interview. It did NOT seem like Nick at all.

 

[Sheogorath]

The curse of Vic Lasagna.

Looks like Rekeita's wife isn't going to be able to afford to have her holes drilled out by exotic niggers and will have to settle for domestic american born pavement apes. How embarrassing.

 

[Sperglord666]

I used to watch Nick's stream and pretty much all the legal info I can remember I learned from him has turned out to be true, so what's the deal? Is he proficient with his legal knowledge, but he just sucks at execution? OR is the info he gives out during streams just basic bitch shit every law student learns on his first day?

 

[AnOminous]

I used to watch Nick's stream and pretty much all the legal info I can remember I learned from him has turned out to be true, so what's the deal? Is he proficient with his legal knowledge, but he just sucks at execution? OR is the info he gives out during streams just basic bitch shit every law student learns on his first day?

He always shot off the cuff but now he's saying outright stupid shit on a near daily basis, like that precedents don't matter because they're "old" (even when they aren't). Just nonsensical cope claims.

 

[JudyGemstone]

Side note: He was pondering that it seems hypocritical that Rekieta invoked anti-SLAAP after personally saying it's unconstitutional. And was asked, "why don't you ask Nick yourself?" His response, "None of your business. Maybe I should. Go fuck yourself, we don't want you here."

Oh Kurt.

I just watched Kurt's analysis on Nick's motion.... TWICE.... and guys.... Kurt isn't buying into the bullshit.
Hear me out.... (I've made it a spoiler to keep the thread clean)

Spoiler: Uncivil Law Analysis of Rekieta Law's Denied Motion

Kurt reads through the motion and immediately comes up on the Anti-SLAPP argument that's used. Say what you will about Kurt, the dude is on the spectrum and doesn't forget shit. He states that he knows Nick has always been Anti-SLAPP and that Nick always said it was unconstitutional. He says he remembers this because they both agreed on this.

He is very subtle in the way he progresses through that particular argument, but he basically questions Nick's ethics as a lawyer and someone who preaches about the constitution. He uses the phrase, "Rules for thee but not for me." He tries to keep the peace by asking, "I wonder if this was a Randazza move where Nick didn't want to but his attorney said this would win, or if Nick actually thinks this, I don't know"

Kurt then seems really put off by the whole situation all together.... calling Monty a pedophile and "sucking little boy cock" didn't physically sit well with him AT ALL (this can be seen just on his body language alone when reading it, seems and looks very uncomfortable.) He then brings up hypocrisy AGAIN. Brings up that Nick knows the difference between defamation, defamation per se, and "it's just a joke." Kurt questions his legal understanding of the three, but then tries to brush it over with, "I guess I'll have to have him on my show and we both can debate our differences."

There is a point in the stream where it buffers. He immediately stops mid-sentence when giving Nick a critique, then comes back and says he's going to say his analysis in full again so that there's no confusion. TLDR: He says trying to use Colorado law in Minnesota was a shot in the dark, Nick should know this, Nick should have realized this wasn't going to work with how tight Minnesota law is when it comes to defamation cases with a recent law that was just passed in Minnesota.

He then laments that he can already see the floods of emails Nick is going to get on how "Kurt disagrees with Nick!" "Kurt said Nick doesn't know the law!" "Kurt is bad mouthing Rekieta!"

If there was anyone to look at this case and call it for what it is.............. IT'S KURT. He was not very complimentary towards Nick from the start of the read, and frankly, the judgment I felt from Kurt was, "Well Nick, ya fucked around and found out."

POINT TO NOTE:
Kurt is on the fence in the "lawtube sphere." Kurt is very very very close with Legal Bytes, Law & Lumber, Runkle, and Hoeg. However, he also goes on with Nick, Legal Mindset, Legal Vices, Good Lawgic, and Branca. He doesn't take sides in Rekieta V Legal Bytes, and he's very analytical in his decisions. He's got a lot of experience at the appellate level and how motions/appeals go, and for him to repeatedly say throughout the stream, "Nick's my friend, but I don't know what he was thinking on this one," was extremely telling.

Just my two-cents................

EDIT: Grammar

 

[AirdropShitposts]

I used to watch Nick's stream and pretty much all the legal info I can remember I learned from him has turned out to be true, so what's the deal? Is he proficient with his legal knowledge, but he just sucks at execution? OR is the info he gives out during streams just basic bitch shit every law student learns on his first day?

Rekieta's relative legal accuracy is less a measure of his own than it is a measure of just how bad most people who play lawyer on the internet are at basic competency. He seems to have abandoned what once was one of his key advantages over the rest: actually reading things rather than imagining what he wants it to say and/or mean.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

Rekieta's relative legal accuracy is less a measure of his own than it is a measure of just how bad most people who play lawyer on the internet are at basic competency. He seems to have abandoned what once was one of his key advantages over the rest: actually reading things rather than imagining what he wants it to say and/or mean.

Nick also misrepresented his amount of IRL legal experience and covered for his status as strip mall lawyer with less than 3 years in practice with cocksuredness and bravado.

 

[AltisticRight]

View attachment 5210224

This has nothing to do with Mutt's Law, it's an established fact.

Post 1: Nick Rekieta follows Ricardo and Romaine, two award-winning star employees of Hedonism II known for their build and dexterity.
https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...a-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-16410045

Post 2: Kayla follows Ricardo and Romaine, the two before mentioned award winning bulls of Hedonism II.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-16411067

Post 3: Nick Rekieta follows a bodybuilder called Omar.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-16447306

With Energii King and 12 Actions spiced up by Masterelite, what's the place for "Mutt's Law"?

Ricardo and Romaine can better Lawsplain the Rekieta arrangement.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

Oh my god, 3 hours 47 mins into the stream right now. I don't have the setup to clip immediately...but some DEEP DEEP irony here. This is prime clip material.

 

[Joggin Noggin]

Oh my god, 3 hours 47 mins into the stream right now. I don't have the setup to clip immediately...but some DEEP DEEP irony here. This is prime clip material.

You gonna give us a teaser as to what it is, or just tickle our balls like Nick does to Ricardo and Romaine and make us have to wait

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

You gonna give us a teaser as to what it is, or just tickle our balls like Nick does to Ricardo and Romaine and make us have to wait

He was blasting on liberals how most conservative don't actually care about what people do in regards of sex activities, they just don't want to know about it and don't want it shoved in their faces.

Where did the button go? Is there a time limit to edits?

Anyway, here you go. It got clipped by Elissa.

 

[Spaded Dave]

He was pondering that it seems hypocritical that Rekieta invoked anti-SLAAP after personally saying it's unconstitutional. And was asked, "why don't you ask Nick yourself?" His response, "None of your business. Maybe I should. Go fuck yourself, we don't want you here." What a fucking baby.

Jesus Christ, Kurt is such a bitch. All he had to say is "This is my first time reading it, I probably will ask him and let you guys know the answer" without the venom. It's not even an aggressive question but Kurt is so ready to be offended by every little thing. That's why I can't watch him. I used to be subscribed because he does give good breakdowns of interesting shit, but he's such a little bitch that it wore on me quickly.

Why does anyone need a sex dungeon?

Better question, how does he have TIME for a sex dungeon when he's just oh so busy with everything else all the time. He doesn't even have time to write and mail a check for his ticket he's so soooo busy. I agree with the theory floated that he's just being a whiny child by not paying it because "time" isn't a concern. I got a ticket for letting my inspection expire and it was like $140. I'd consider that more bullshit than a speeding ticket, and it annoyed me, and I wrote the check as soon as I got home to make sure I didn't forget because I'm not a child.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

TWICE.... and guys.... Kurt isn't buying into the bullshit.
Hear me out.... (I've made it a spoiler to keep the thread clean)
Kurt reads through the motion and immediately comes up on the Anti-SLAPP argument that's used. Say what you will about Kurt, the dude is on the spectrum and doesn't forget shit. He states that he knows Nick has always been Anti-SLAPP and that Nick always said it was unconstitutional. He says he remembers this because they both agreed on this.

He is very subtle in the way he progresses through that particular argument, but he basically questions Nick's ethics as a lawyer and someone who preaches about the constitution. He uses the phrase, "Rules for thee but not for me." He tries to keep the peace by asking, "I wonder if this was a Randazza move where Nick didn't want to but his attorney said this would win, or if Nick actually thinks this, I don't know"

Kurt then seems really put off by the whole situation all together.... calling Monty a pedophile and "sucking little boy cock" didn't physically sit well with him AT ALL (this can be seen just on his body language alone when reading it, seems and looks very uncomfortable.) He then brings up hypocrisy AGAIN. Brings up that Nick knows the difference between defamation, defamation per se, and "it's just a joke." Kurt questions his legal understanding of the three, but then tries to brush it over with, "I guess I'll have to have him on my show and we both can debate our differences."

There is a point in the stream where it buffers. He immediately stops mid-sentence when giving Nick a critique, then comes back and says he's going to say his analysis in full again so that there's no confusion. TLDR: He says trying to use Colorado law in Minnesota was a shot in the dark, Nick should know this, Nick should have realized this wasn't going to work with how tight Minnesota law is when it comes to defamation cases with a recent law that was just passed in Minnesota.

He then laments that he can already see the floods of emails Nick is going to get on how "Kurt disagrees with Nick!" "Kurt said Nick doesn't know the law!" "Kurt is bad mouthing Rekieta!"

If there was anyone to look at this case and call it for what it is.............. IT'S KURT. He was not very complimentary towards Nick from the start of the read, and frankly, the judgment I felt from Kurt was, "Well Nick, ya fucked around and found out."

POINT TO NOTE:
Kurt is on the fence in the "lawtube sphere." Kurt is very very very close with Legal Bytes, Law & Lumber, Runkle, and Hoeg. However, he also goes on with Nick, Legal Mindset, Legal Vices, Good Lawgic, and Branca. He doesn't take sides in Rekieta V Legal Bytes, and he's very analytical in his decisions. He's got a lot of experience at the appellate level and how motions/appeals go, and for him to repeatedly say throughout the stream, "Nick's my friend, but I don't know what he was thinking on this one," was extremely telling. Just my two-cents................

EDIT: Grammar

I agree with Kurt. I do so quite often. Maybe we have shades of the same 'tism. He hits that nail on the head:

Nick should have known better, but he walked into the pitfall wyes wide-open. That is what is so disappointing (for .e, at least) and now entertaining ever since I gave up on Nick: he should have known better.

I wonder if Nick will have the balls to go on Kurt's show, or if he will spin his tale privately? I do not think there will be an open rift. Kurt does not have too many friends. He will keep his opinions to himself.

He seems to have abandoned what once was one of his key advantages over the rest: actually reading things rather than imagining what he wants it to say and/or mean.

He has not done that in a long time.

The last time (before his own documents) I recall him doing it was the Florida 'Don't say "gay"' Bill, and he only made it through 15 pages, then rage quit and gave a summary.

It was interesting seeing the whole thing presented. It gave a sense of full consideration, and fleshed put Nick's thoughts. I could agree or disagree, but I felt fully informed.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

I wonder if Nick will have the balls to go on Kurt's show, or if he will spin his tale privately?

I mean, we know the likely answer to this. He'll message Kurt on Signal (or facebag or whatever), promise a "conversation", then promptly ignore him for a good month or two. (Unless he reads this and his "muh ODD" kicks in, causing him to go on Kurt's show. Or more likely, have Kurt on to his show.)

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Jesus Christ, Kurt is such a bitch. All he had to say is "This is my first time reading it, I probably will ask him and let you guys know the answer" without the venom. It's not even an aggressive question but Kurt is so ready to be offended by every little thing. That's why I can't watch him. I used to be subscribed because he does give good breakdowns of interesting shit, but he's such a little bitch that it wore on me quickly.

Did Nick kick back a cut of the donos from the streams Kurt was on? If so he's probably pissed with Nick's public fall too if it's cutting into his own income. At the very least I suspect he was hoping to ride those Balldo coattails a little longer before he slipped into lolcow irrelavance.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

Did Nick kick back a cut of the donos from the streams Kurt was on?

Nick made it clear during Rittenhouse that his guests get paid in "exposure".

Also, when he was actually a draw at one time, Rackets would guest on other people's streams when he wasn't playing amateur chaffeur.

Which was almost never.

 

[Michael Wade]

Well... Nick said he was still trying to build a sex room/dungeon expansion to his house in late May of this year and worded it in a very strange way; "it's a sex dungeon and an extension to my kid's bedrooms". Hopefully his kids will be unaware of it, but hiding an entire room in his house from his kids is unlikely, especially as they age.

Make of that what you will regarding his home life with his wife and kids.

View attachment 5209956

This is not going to end well. It will build and build until explosion or implosion. It's the nature of sin and every lolcow ive seen on here so far.

Perversions need to be controlled and isolated if they cant be eradicated. What happens strictly between two loving married souls is fine, but going out of bounds is a ruinous thing.

I wouldn't be surprised if she leaves him.