I hate the Internet and the people who own it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
View attachment 5209248
(L)(A)

I think they're on to the mean comments guys...
:stress:
I just saw that forum and thread for the first time today. That sir foxy guy is a flaming faggot and anything he says should just be mocked and ignored. He says he tried to interview Null for his "article" and Null called him a furry and the conversation was over. Based Josh. :story:
 
I am Joshua Moon, and I'm here to ask you a question. Is a man not entitled to the sneed of his posts? 'No!' says the admin on reddit, 'It violates ToS.' 'No!' says the moderator on Discord, 'Memes don't belong in #general.' 'No!' says the man at Cloudflare, 'It's an imminent threat to human life.' I rejected those answers; instead, I chose something different. I chose the impossible. I chose... Kiwi Farms, a site where the shitposter would not fear the censor, where the racist would not be bound by petty morality, Where the American would not be constrained by the Yuropoor! And with the sneed of your posts, Kiwi Farms can become your site as well.
 
Earlier today I had to jump on Tor. Now I am back on clearnet. Life feels weird when I don't ping-pong between two browsers to access this site.
There is a way to open .onion websites in the same exact clearnet browser you've been normally using (even in the same exact browser window as your clearnet links), but there's a bit of additional prep work you'll need to do:
https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...ervice-for-the-kiwi-farms.33217/post-16420768
Also, this method is less safe that opening .onion links in Tor Browser, for obvious reasons, so I actually wouldn't recommend opening any other .onion links except KF in your clearnet browser. But ultimately that's up to you.
 
Indeed. Liz-Fong Jones, field CTO of honeycomb.io (a front for funding criminal practice if their money is used for DDOS) and self admitted rapist, lists his #dropkiwifarms efforts on his LinkedIn profile as Volunteer Work, apparently.
Odd listing your criminal career as an Internet terrorist in your resume.
 
View attachment 5209248
(L)(A)

I think they're on to the mean comments guys...
:stress:
Now tell them they'll deliberately deplatform a site with those kinds of comments and even outright lie about it and call for crimes to be deployed against it while protecting actual criminals, terrorists, rapists, animal torturers, furries, Disney fans, etc. That's the game you want to play SoFoxy, right? You want to centralize and monopolize power as much as possible so there's only one chokepoint to control, are you sure you can keep it?
 
There is a way to open .onion websites in the same exact clearnet browser you've been normally using (even in the same exact browser window as your clearnet links), but there's a bit of additional prep work you'll need to do:
https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...ervice-for-the-kiwi-farms.33217/post-16420768
Also, this method is less safe that opening .onion links in Tor Browser, for obvious reasons, so I actually wouldn't recommend opening any other .onion links except KF in your clearnet browser. But ultimately that's up to you.
On mobile, Torbot makes that much simpler: In the settings is an “onion only mode” that routes all regular traffic through your normal connection, while the onion sites are on Torbot. Obviously would not recommend using any other onion site (or doing it at, like, a workplace where they’ve blocked KF, on that note), yet using Onion Only and Smart Connect makes it genuinely feel like clearnet in like 97% of cases.
 
Archives of the thread:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

Highlights, in no particular order, quotes contain text from images for those who struggle to load them on TOR.

1689322387888.png
JoshuaMoon said:
It is surreal to see so many people actively following the minutia of every move I make as if it were a very important large scale enterprise.

We've got real journalists writing big hit pieces, full-blown social media trends, in real life protests, antifa affiliates tracking my bitcoin wallets, twitter feeds with tens of thousands of followers doing real-time updates every time my DNS changes, Discord bots doing uptime checks on my site, and a guy on LET starting threads about my LLC's standings to try and persuade businesses here against offering me transit.

You would be forgiven for thinking it was more than just one guy's Internet gossip forum.
1689322763496.png
neckbreaker said:
People have a right to say whatever they want, whether you like it or not.
And how does a public chat anyone can join represent KiwiFarms being "alt-right". Because people say things you don't like? You are out of luck.
this is why i prefer talking to proper nazis over these people, they have the balls to admin their beliefs, instead of whining over someone calling them alt right. are your values so weak that you cant admit it to others?


That's the game you want to play SoFoxy, right? You want to centralize and monopolize power as much as possible so there's only one chokepoint to control, are you sure you can keep it?
1689321706108.png
SirFoxy said:
It would imply I used to be young and wishful, just like many KiwiFarms users until experiencing enough mental growth to learn concepts like true free speech or free markets are only ideal and unrealistic.
Humans require regulation because of the nature of humanity.
1689321816827.png
SirFoxy said:
"It’s entirely up to Joshua Moon to decide how he wants to draw that line and moderate it, but he chooses to simply not draw that line at all. That’s where the issues come from.

You could make the argument laws should exist to enforce hate speech on the internet like Frederick was suggesting earlier, but…
That comes down entirely to perspective, too.

You have to be careful when you start making laws to censor speech because as we’ve seen time and time again in the past opening the door to a tiny bit of censorship can quickly turn into widescale censorship beyond the original intentions, which, of course… is bad for the people."
1689321992147.png
SirFoxy said:
I never said anything close to that. I simply said true free speech or free markets don't work. They require regulation.
1689322109649.png
SirFoxy said:
So why exactly are you arguing with me about "regulations" being a requirement if you understand there needs to be limit to speech?

Why is it shocking we already require regulation to prevent bad things?

Why is it so shocking to ask Josh to slightly moderate his site to prevent bad things and as a cause and effect likely he could remain on the clearnet?
1689322578642.png
SirFoxy said:
In this case, I'd start with Joshua Moon so his upstream doesn't have to do it for him.
>so his upstream doesn't have to do it for him.
:story:
 
Notice what this weasel does, he declares his superior non-childish position that humans must be regulated through force (by humans that themselves must be regulated creating an infinite regress of regulation but's let ignore that), then when people point to the existing legally binding regulations (aka the law) and companies willing to host by their own further regulations he declares these regulations insufficient and demands regulation that solely meets his undefined standards. He is the one against consistent regulation that provides for due process, he desires arbitrary and capricious rule by fiat by a self-selected elite.
 
Notice what this weasel does, he declares his superior non-childish position that humans must be regulated through force (by humans that themselves must be regulated creating an infinite regress of regulation but's let ignore that), then when people point to the existing legally binding regulations (aka the law) and companies willing to host by their own further regulations he declares these regulations insufficient and demands regulation that solely meets his undefined standards. He is the one against consistent regulation that provides for due process, he desires arbitrary and capricious rule by fiat by a self-selected elite.
The past year of this bullshit has taught me one thing - people like this Furfaggot and the way they think need to be exterminated if we are ever to progress as a species.
 
Sadly its really isn't. Men with the autogynephilia fetish that makes them aroused by pretending to be women tend to be highly aggressive, lacking in empathy, and, interestingly, high IQ: in the 120s in one study. Like pedo's they are highly motivated and laser focuses with nothing else to do.
Elliot could have accomplished so much, but he had to short-circuit himself attacking the Farms.

At this point, it's almost not even fun to mock him anymore, how far he's fallen and what he's thrown away is pushing him out of lolcow territory and closer to the protagonist of a Kafka novel, albeit with his misfortunes completely self-inflicted. Our mocking laughter is the salt in the axe wound.
 
SirFoxy said:
It would imply I used to be young and wishful, just like many KiwiFarms users until experiencing enough mental growth to learn concepts like true free speech or free markets are only ideal and unrealistic.
Humans require regulation because of the nature of humanity.
But trannies and liberals don't need regulation because they are on the Right Side of History and know the meaning of True Free Speech -- indeed they define the meaning of True Free Speech (and Consent Accident).
 
>so his upstream doesn't have to do it for him.
:story:

The question I've got is whether they're compiling information on de facto upstream content moderation policies. I highly doubt Kiwi Farms will be the last target, or that they'll stay satisfied with only going after one high-profile target at a time that has managed to personally piss off a well-connected troon.

In other words, when do they start batch-processing, and deliver to ISPs large lists of websites that have allowed "hate speech," or "COVID-19 misinformation," or "Russian disinformation about the Biden family," or whatever they already establish by precedent various hosting services and providers are willing to ban?
 
The question I've got is whether they're compiling information on de facto upstream content moderation policies. I highly doubt Kiwi Farms will be the last target, or that they'll stay satisfied with only going after one high-profile target at a time that has managed to personally piss off a well-connected troon.

In other words, when do they start batch-processing, and deliver to ISPs large lists of websites that have allowed "hate speech," or "COVID-19 misinformation," or "Russian disinformation about the Biden family," or whatever they already establish by precedent various hosting services and providers are willing to ban?

The moment they can consider this site's destruction a "success" they will flood the zone just like they did with social media and Alex Jones.
Never mind it's a violation of FCC and EU neutrality rules for ISP's to do this.
We're in a new era of fascistic extra-legal remedies against enemies of the state.
 
The question I've got is whether they're compiling information on de facto upstream content moderation policies. I highly doubt Kiwi Farms will be the last target, or that they'll stay satisfied with only going after one high-profile target at a time that has managed to personally piss off a well-connected troon.

In other words, when do they start batch-processing, and deliver to ISPs large lists of websites that have allowed "hate speech," or "COVID-19 misinformation," or "Russian disinformation about the Biden family," or whatever they already establish by precedent various hosting services and providers are willing to ban?
And by upstream they mean to just keep going along the chain with complaints and technical disruptions until someone is willing to break something to appease them, almost as if the goal of the INTER-NET isn't to be an interconnected network with disconnections as a last resort, regulated by laws and due process instead of being a bunch of fragmented networks due to everyone making their own decisions on who to include or exclude in some Fediverse tier defederation slapfight.
 
Back