Eli Erlick / elierlick - Litigious trans activist, consent disrespecter, Ariana Grande hater

Also lmao at Eli's dumbass losing that lawsuit. We all knew she didn't have enough ground to even walk on yet she insisted on running with her dumbass accusation. If anything, she should sue Danie for defamation. She would have the same amount of success.
Well, it wasn't entirely a "loss" was it, assuming Eli kept his cut?
1687666132898.png

1687666163651.png1687666225279.png
 
"PhD Candidate" level stuff here.

Screenshot 2023-06-27 120905.png


Ok, good. So you agree that there is no legal basis for opposition to the troon bans and you agree that troonism is not protected by the constitution. BTW... you are still not a woman.

Screenshot 2023-06-27 121118.png



Eli is a "woman" and a "PhD candidate" to the same extent that Alex Caraballo is a "Harvard Law Professor" and Tony Reed is a "journalist."
 
"PhD Candidate" level stuff here.

View attachment 5181358

Ok, good. So you agree that there is no legal basis for opposition to the troon bans and you agree that troonism is not protected by the constitution. BTW... you are still not a woman.

View attachment 5181361


Eli is a "woman" and a "PhD candidate" to the same extent that Alex Caraballo is a "Harvard Law Professor" and Tony Reed is a "journalist."
I'm sorry, Doctor Fister, but what is your dissertation on? The effects of forceful digital intrusion on vaginal wall tissues? Cock-chopping as a lifestyle choice?
 
Blaire White Motion to Dismiss Eli's Troonsuit


There is really a lot to unpackage here. The only statement that Eli alleges is defamatory is the statement that Danie committed suicide. Eli DOES NOT allege the numerous comments about rape and sexual assault victims are defamatory.
"Your honor, everyone knows my client did indeed do horrible sexual things to those women. And that she is illegally sending hormones. BUT she did NOT make her troon GF play russian roulette with a 9 mil. That is just false!!!!"
 
everyone knows my client did indeed do horrible sexual things to those women. And that she is illegally sending hormones.
My suspicion has been for awhile that Erlick does not actually send any hormones to anyone underage, and that he merely claims to do so online in order to chase that social-media/troon-activist clout (so important to Eli). Not that I would put such a thing past him, mind you, but knowing as we do that people like Matt Walsh and Libs of TikTok reported him to the relevant authorities, I suspect that they cannot actually find any evidence of him having sent drugs to anyone. Also, the fact that Erlick is such a careerist (involved in highly-organised activism from a very young age; involved in voice-over acting and a frequent Dr.Phil guest; collects degrees) tells me that he would never risk his professional ambitions by actually doing such a thing.
 
My suspicion has been for awhile that Erlick does not actually send any hormones to anyone underage, and that he merely claims to do so online in order to chase that social-media/troon-activist clout (so important to Eli). Not that I would put such a thing past him, mind you, but knowing as we do that people like Matt Walsh and Libs of TikTok reported him to the relevant authorities, I suspect that they cannot actually find any evidence of him having sent drugs to anyone. Also, the fact that Erlick is such a careerist (involved in highly-organised activism from a very young age; involved in voice-over acting and a frequent Dr.Phil guest; collects degrees) tells me that he would never risk his professional ambitions by actually doing such a thing.
I don't think he does it just because he's a braggart that never actually does anything. Look at how many times on the 17 pages of this thread alone he's bragging about something someone else did and claiming credit based on things like living in the same largest metropolitan area in the country.
 
It is hilarious to me how the extent of his 'phd' research seems to be playing around with graphics programs, 'colourising' photos, and little else
And yet he's responsible for the GLSEN curriculum that Safe Spaces uses in public schools. As much as "educational researchers" get dragged for Common Core and anything else influencing practices in schools, at least actual teachers, other educators, and researchers are involved.
Barely 20 years old and his shit *snap* adopted like that. I've complained about him before. Drives me fucking nuts.
 
Why are troons all so bad at basic math? Professor Erlick, how many signs are in Times Square compared to how many MILLIONS of private citizens drawing on the grid with consumer electronic devices and appliances?

View attachment 5211645
What class is "billboard sign owner"? What class is "Manhattan property owner wanting to microwave his Hungry Man dinner"?

More importantly a billboard would be a constant drain on the grid while a million people microwaving is a sudden spike. That's part of why they don't tell you to turn off your lights and sit in the dark.
 
Last edited:
More importantly a billboard would be a constant drain on the grid while a million people microwaving is a sudden spike. That's part of why they don't tell you to turn off your lights and sit in the dark.
This, maybe a bit of a power level (pun not intended), from what I learned in college there's base load and peak load on the grid. The billboards are on 24/7 and are baseload, which the coal fired and nuclear plants which can't react as fast as other means of electricity production are feeding, to scale up or scale down their production is an hours long process. Most likely the peaker plants using natural gas or other means of production that can react in a matter of minutes/seconds are near 100% load.

It makes sense to tell normies to watch their electricity usage, while keeping the billboards on. Turning them off doesn't solve this problem. But what does Eli know, his brain is gone from all the fucking HRT.
 
It's actually weird that power companies don't tell people that because it's such an easy thing to understand and it's why all the summer stuff they ask customers to do or charge for because they have to up the base load during the day for all the ACs turning on. People believe some hilarious shit about electricity to explain things power companies say without explanation, I've had lots of people tell me you need to make sure everything is off if the power goes out because if it surges back on everything will blow up. Even though this has never happened since people don't actually do this (especially not turning off their furnace and fridge and etc.) and they tell you that to lessen the immediate load when it comes back up since that might trip safety things to take it back down. Surges are real things obviously but the power company doesn't just fire a giant ball of random electricity at your house when the power comes back on hoping it's enough power for everything you want to turn on immediately. I think they might think there's some actual guy at the other end of the wire turning a dial for each house. It obviously would be a very big room with a lot of dials so he understandably makes mistakes.
 
Back