Megathread The Handmaidens - Dedicated to the women dedicated to serving their misogynistic transgender masters

Pick me girl brain rot really is something isn't it? "To deny cross-dressing males experience womanhood is to deny that woman is a social category" is what she's saying lol.

View attachment 5185444
If Gender is a social construct then here's my offer bitch.

All men worldwide will agree to be identified as women and then the matriarchy can finally run the world it will just be women with cocks running it.
 
Sam, your cohosts are being retarded again: Emma edition #4911235 (archive)
View attachment 5203872
No, its just reality. Men are men, women are women. Nothing anyone can do to change that. All attempts are merely cosmetic window dressing and do nothing to change the immoveable reality. All "validation" comes from either a desire to be "nice" and avoid distress or the unwillingness to deal with an "IT'S MA'AM" tard rage attack.
The thing that really burns trannies and their Handmaidens asses is that biological reality is absolute.
To turn a man into a woman or vice versa would require completely disassembling them at the molecular level and reassembling them. Until and unless we develop literal Star Trek level transporter tech (and this leads onto to the "does a transporter kill you?" debate, if it does then there would still be no way to turn a man into a woman because you're creating an entirely new person, albeit with the memories of the original) "transgenderism" is a fantasy.
 
After a troon won the Netherlands beauty pageant, I tried to discuss this with a relative whom I knew as a feminist. Guess what...

She turned out to be a troon defender. Called me a homophobic rightist for telling her that men can wear dress but they can never be women. She compared me to islamists, said that I was "standing with patriarchy" (lol). She insulted me during the whole discussion despite me talking very calmly and respectful. She was talking like a 12 year old, no exaggeration.

She is like... 50 years old. All troon defenders are retarded. TTD should include handmaidens and chasersoys.
 
I think this one fits here. Whenever I see the word "wife" mentioned, I start to feel bad. But then, more often than not, you get reminded how they are cheering it on. This guy is all over, the last place he should be is in a marriage.
hm1.png
And of course, the woman who almost seemed to have pushed him (if you read between the lines above) is bi with a fetish for TIMs. Must be a rare specimen but fully a headcase.
hm2.png
 
I think this one fits here. Whenever I see the word "wife" mentioned, I start to feel bad. But then, more often than not, you get reminded how they are cheering it on. This guy is all over, the last place he should be is in a marriage.
View attachment 5215939
And of course, the woman who almost seemed to have pushed him (if you read between the lines above) is bi with a fetish for TIMs. Must be a rare specimen but fully a headcase.
View attachment 5215940
I typically think cucking is pathetic, but honestly MtFs married to women who transition in the middle of their marriage deserve to be cucked by a true and honest man.
 
"Pregnant person" isn't a synonym for mother, it's a description for a person who has a baby inside them. That's all it means. I hate this bullshit newspeak.
That's why they also use "birthing person". Babies are ejaculated from the bonus hole and sustained by chest-feeding.
 
handmaiden uses retarded marxist terms to explain why misandry hurts TIMs. she does it in response to a woman talking about becoming misandrist due to being hurt by men.

she admits that men are more violent due to their biology, but #notallmen! suddenly every woman’s concerns about violent males go out the window once they start dressing in drag and growing out their hair

- “genuine misandry leads to TERFism”
- “misandry leads to bioessentialism”
i always hear trannies and handmaidens throw that term around, i don’t fucking know what that word means but whenever i hear it i know it’s gonna be followed up with some bullshit
- “the misandrist belief that men are inherently violent and aggressive leads to bioessentialist views”
what % of rape and violent crimes are committed by men?
- “men DO have a hormonal predisposition to be violent but it can be counteracted through socialization”
no it can’t, and also even if it could it hasn’t been. so why not resocialize a whole new generation of men BEFORE even considering letting them into female spaces?
-“you’d have to assume that every time testosterone spiked that males would be more aggressive”
but she refuses to factor in how this would affect the mind of a porn addicted and mentally ill male. a mentally healthy man would not go into a fit of rage from having his testosterone spiked, that same mentally healthy man would not troon out either.
- “we might not have these ideal forms of socialization now”
so again why are we letting “improperly socialized” males into women’s spaces?
-“we need to advocate for dismantling social structures like the patriarchy”
she says as she advocates for the patriarchy. also instead of trying to turn society upside down how about just don’t bend to mentally unwell male’s demands?
-“instead of trying to exclude a *miniscule* population from bathrooms”
-“READ THEORYZ instead of trusting your instinct and logic”

and the perfect ending :story:
“where are all these terfs coming from? it’s genuine misandry”
 
Last edited:
- “men DO have a hormonal predisposition to be violent but it can be counteracted through socialization”

The whole point of trooning out as a guy is no longer having to follow the rules of male socialization. They do it precisely because males are socialised to minimize their misogyny. They don't want to have to join in on that. They want to be women so that when they treat women like shit they have the shield of being just one of the girls. I wish people like this would spend a little bit of time observing spaces where it's just troons talking to each other. They don't try to hide it when they don't feel they are under observation.
 
The whole point of trooning out as a guy is no longer having to follow the rules of male socialization. They do it precisely because males are socialised to minimize their misogyny. They don't want to have to join in on that. They want to be women so that when they treat women like shit they have the shield of being just one of the girls. I wish people like this would spend a little bit of time observing spaces where it's just troons talking to each other. They don't try to hide it when they don't feel they are under observation.
with people like this woman i believe the reason they’re handmaidens is because it’s the “in thing” in their social groups and ideologies and they don’t look further into what they support. this woman is a self proclaimed marxist

the general reason men support trannies is that they are GAMPs, and for women it’s because it’s what’s socially acceptable. obviously not all women are swayed by being socially accepted, there are tons of women on the farms with independent beliefs, but all throughout history female socialization has been very impactful on what women think and believe, partially as a survival mechanism. body language and social cues affect women more than men, honestly i’ve always been jealous of how male friend groups operate for this reason.

i think it’s the reason a lot of women, especially in college, will buy into a whole ideology and not pick and choose which specific parts they agree with. just supporting the current thing because it’s socially acceptable. if leftism went out of style tomorrow and conservatism was the new in-thing, you’d see thousands of people flip a switch practically overnight and go along with their new programming. one of the reasons why the two-party wingcuck state is a total failure, there’s no nuance on either side.

if these handmaidens started reading the stinkditch subforum or going to trans subreddits, there’d be a stronger chance that they denounce troonery. that’s how a lot of formerly liberal/leftist people have peaked, by taking off the rose tinted glasses and seeing the unfiltered reality. or some of them have children, particularly daughters, and realize who alot of these activist groups are truly after. it’s sad though that mostly women buy into it, but i’ve seen men with too much emotion buy into it as well. for this reason the pro trans groups will always use emotion based arguments to get people on their side
 
if these handmaidens started reading the stinkditch subforum or going to trans subreddits, there’d be a stronger chance that they denounce troonery. that’s how a lot of formerly liberal/leftist people have peaked, by taking off the rose tinted glasses and seeing the unfiltered reality. or some of them have children, particularly daughters, and realize who alot of these activist groups are truly after. it’s sad though that mostly women buy into it, but i’ve seen men with too much emotion buy into it as well. for this reason the pro trans groups will always use emotion based arguments to get people on their side
The typical handmaiden profile I have observed is one of or some combination of the 3: tumblrinas, feminists, and/or moralfags. I think we have a slim chance at peaking the last category, and is reliant on them opening their eyes to the truth, but the first two, I'm skeptical.

Strangely enough, actual faghags I know of aren't into this.
 
the general reason men support trannies is that they are GAMPs, and for women it’s because it’s what’s socially acceptable.

Only a tiny minority of men who support trannies are GAMPs. Men support trannies because thats the “right” socially acceptable thing to do according to their political team.

Men dont have to think about sex pests in their private spaces or even things like sexual assault in general. They dont need to fear pooners jerking off in their restrooms, and they’re not going to lose to trannies in their sports leagues. Men are blissfully unaffected by the worst behaviors of trannies.
 
The typical handmaiden profile I have observed is one of or some combination of the 3: tumblrinas, feminists, and/or moralfags. I think we have a slim chance at peaking the last category, and is reliant on them opening their eyes to the truth, but the first two, I'm skeptical.

Forget tumblrinas, but feminists? The F in Terf literally stands for feminists pissed off by the trans movement. Feminists are (supposed to) embrace gender nonconformity for both sexes, protect women where there’s a biological vulnerability, and celebrate women’s voices, achievements and lives. The trans movement as it currently manifests embraces
  • rigid gender roles
  • penises in women’s spaces
  • trans women pushing us out of sports
  • women’s awards going to trans women
  • rapists preying on women prisoners
  • fetishisation of our messy biological reality such as menstruation (funny it’s never menopause for older troons)
  • dehumanising language such as womban, bonus holes
  • a trivialisation of women - we’re just spinny skirts, fuck-me heels and makeup
  • rape threats
  • silencing women
  • erasing women (because the inclusive language calls us cervix-havers, but men are never prostate-havers. See also lesbians defined as non-men attracted to non-men)
  • claiming non-conforming historical figures as „really” trans men
  • attempting to eradicate tomboys.
What have I missed?

Any feminist on board with the TRA agenda is an Auntie Tom.
 
Forget tumblrinas, but feminists? The F in Terf literally stands for feminists pissed off by the trans movement. Feminists are (supposed to) embrace gender nonconformity for both sexes, protect women where there’s a biological vulnerability, and celebrate women’s voices, achievements and lives. The trans movement as it currently manifests embraces
  • rigid gender roles
  • penises in women’s spaces
  • trans women pushing us out of sports
  • women’s awards going to trans women
  • rapists preying on women prisoners
  • fetishisation of our messy biological reality such as menstruation (funny it’s never menopause for older troons)
  • dehumanising language such as womban, bonus holes
  • a trivialisation of women - we’re just spinny skirts, fuck-me heels and makeup
  • rape threats
  • silencing women
  • erasing women (because the inclusive language calls us cervix-havers, but men are never prostate-havers. See also lesbians defined as non-men attracted to non-men)
  • claiming non-conforming historical figures as „really” trans men
  • attempting to eradicate tomboys.
What have I missed?

Any feminist on board with the TRA agenda is an Auntie Tom.
There are many flavors of feminism. I was exposed to such feminists when I was in college. Nearly everyone thought they were nuts. The few that didn't, ironically enough, generally came from all women's schools which were the same places that spawned the faculty teaching this stuff.

This was before the year of Gamergate, 2014, and they were already using buzzwords like Critical Theory and similar terms that only picked up in the past few years. It's like they're some kind of virus that leaked from a lab.
 
Only a tiny minority of men who support trannies are GAMPs. Men support trannies because thats the “right” socially acceptable thing to do according to their political team.

Men dont have to think about sex pests in their private spaces or even things like sexual assault in general. They dont need to fear pooners jerking off in their restrooms, and they’re not going to lose to trannies in their sports leagues. Men are blissfully unaffected by the worst behaviors of trannies.
Generally agree, but I would also note that beyond just hyper progressive morons, there's a broader collection of men who support troonery because they've been persuaded by all the mainstream propaganda about how troonery typically manifests.

So they're imagining: sad gay man, really a woman on the inside, just wants to get their dick chopped off and get married and adopt some kids.

The main reason some guys (again, just beyond hyper progressive morons who are compelled to anyway because of political alliances) believed this story is the dickchop aspect.

A guy hears that some sad guy man is making wild claims about being a "woman on the inside" (whatever that means), and he's so serious about it that he's willing to pay the ultimate price and chop his dick off? That's batshit insane and that'll convince a decent chunk of guys.

At least it did for awhile. That's kinda crumbling now.

(Ignoring how very few troons get the dickchop, and a lot of them aren't really gay)
Forget tumblrinas, but feminists? The F in Terf literally stands for feminists pissed off by the trans movement. Feminists are (supposed to) embrace gender nonconformity for both sexes, protect women where there’s a biological vulnerability, and celebrate women’s voices, achievements and lives. The trans movement as it currently manifests embraces
  • rigid gender roles
  • penises in women’s spaces
  • trans women pushing us out of sports
  • women’s awards going to trans women
  • rapists preying on women prisoners
  • fetishisation of our messy biological reality such as menstruation (funny it’s never menopause for older troons)
  • dehumanising language such as womban, bonus holes
  • a trivialisation of women - we’re just spinny skirts, fuck-me heels and makeup
  • rape threats
  • silencing women
  • erasing women (because the inclusive language calls us cervix-havers, but men are never prostate-havers. See also lesbians defined as non-men attracted to non-men)
  • claiming non-conforming historical figures as „really” trans men
  • attempting to eradicate tomboys.
What have I missed?

Any feminist on board with the TRA agenda is an Auntie Tom.
That's the reality of it that you and I are aware of. But the troons have had a deathgrip stranglehold over the media for quite awhile.

Your typical airheaded, college aged libfem doesn't know anything about that.

Libfems are morons, but they're still a type of feminist.
 
I think your average "libfem" is unaware - there's hardly any awareness to be had from a thot flinging her ass around on tiktok with a post captioned "I am a feminist - stop telling women to cover up." But the problem is deeper than that.

I dunno if there's some twisted logic (there's probably non) behind all this, but I think it starts when you divorce behavioral characteristics from biological reality. Everything is a social construct after all.

Once you embrace a world view like that, and there were and still are many who do so, then you will see nothing wrong with cutting up a baby boy and telling his parents to raise him as a girl. It's just a matter of living it.

The next step you can take from that is if a man feels strongly enough that he's a woman, then he can be one. It's all made up, right? It's just a matter of living it.

But it's not. That castrated baby will grow up exhibiting male typical behaviors. That man with the inverted penis will brag about his "depth" just like a man will brag about his length. Reality creeps in, and eventually they will both sing into Kurt Cobain's microphone.
 
Last edited:
Forget tumblrinas, but feminists? The F in Terf literally stands for feminists pissed off by the trans movement. Feminists are (supposed to) embrace gender nonconformity for both sexes, protect women where there’s a biological vulnerability, and celebrate women’s voices, achievements and lives. The trans movement as it currently manifests embraces
  • rigid gender roles
  • penises in women’s spaces
  • trans women pushing us out of sports
  • women’s awards going to trans women
  • rapists preying on women prisoners
  • fetishisation of our messy biological reality such as menstruation (funny it’s never menopause for older troons)
  • dehumanising language such as womban, bonus holes
  • a trivialisation of women - we’re just spinny skirts, fuck-me heels and makeup
  • rape threats
  • silencing women
  • erasing women (because the inclusive language calls us cervix-havers, but men are never prostate-havers. See also lesbians defined as non-men attracted to non-men)
  • claiming non-conforming historical figures as „really” trans men
  • attempting to eradicate tomboys.
What have I missed?

Any feminist on board with the TRA agenda is an Auntie Tom.
Most people aren't hardcore autists like us who entertain themselves by observing insane people interacting with each other in places where they don't feel like they are under observation. Troons have done a good enough job to make sure this side of things isn't what the general public sees when they interact with them. The fact that the official canon is that AGP isn't real is insane to me given how obviously false that is if you look at literally any forum full of TiMs.
 
Most people aren't hardcore autists like us who entertain themselves by observing insane people interacting with each other in places where they don't feel like they are under observation. Troons have done a good enough job to make sure this side of things isn't what the general public sees when they interact with them. The fact that the official canon is that AGP isn't real is insane to me given how obviously false that is if you look at literally any forum full of TiMs.

The gay community did an infinitely better job at that.

The troons are too autistic and stupid to pull it off. The best they can do is to gaslight anyone who sees them for what they are.

Let's be real, the troon community is the biggest reason why the alphabet soup brigade is suffering its first losses since 1990.
 
The gay community did an infinitely better job at that.

The troons are too autistic and stupid to pull it off. The best they can do is to gaslight anyone who sees them for what they are.

Let's be real, the troon community is the biggest reason why the alphabet soup brigade is suffering its first losses since 1990.
The gays actually understood the concept of opsec. They learned how to stick to being degenerate when they actually weren't under observation. The troons don't hide it as well, but most people (especially the mainstream media and academia) aren't looking for it anyway so they don't need to hide it all that well.
 
Back