Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 Changes are being made. Got a request? Shoot your shot.
    💹 I am interested in growing the non-English section of the site. Discuss.
    🖼️ Old attachments may be broken. I am rebuilding the local filesystem. They are not lost.
i want them to get married before they break up so we can get some more dirty laundry in the divorce.
You just know the wedding will spend about 5 minutes on actual wedding shit and about 5 hours on a stupid political circus and ranting about bravery and resistance and blah blah blah

And for those 5 minutes Tony will have a look on his face like he's being castrated again
 
What is even going on here?
ErinInTheMorn-1681696669111316480-tweet.pngmedia_F1aWKBLX0AA7Pw1.jpgmedia_F1aWM3lWAAA_p8q.jpg
@ErinInTheMorn, tweet 1681696669111316480 (archive)
Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) · Jul 18, 2023 · 8:26 PM UTC
More than 99% of content users and advertisers see on Twitter is healthy.
And the reach of hate speech on Twitter continues to represent an extremely small fraction of the overall conversation.
This past March, Twitter partnered with Sprinklr to understand, measure and reduce hate speech using its AI-based model and to further our commitment to create a brand-safe environment for our agencies and advertisers.
Today we’re sharing an update that includes all of April and May 2023.
Sprinklr’s independent model continues to show the reach of daily English-language hate speech impressions is even lower than Twitter’s own model estimates.
Sprinklr estimates the average daily number to be 0.003% compared to Twitter’s estimate of 0.012% for the period of January 1, 2023 to May 31, 2023. Additionally, we estimate hate speech impressions are 30 percent lower on average vs. pre-acquisition.
[…]

Erin Reed (@ErinInTheMorn) · Jul 19, 2023 · 4:05 PM UTC
Exclusive! New look at how Elon Musk's new AI bot scores hate, thus reducing the hate score of twitter! Isn't it so great that AI has judged that we have made twitter a less hateful place!?
Tony: I need a bot that will determine if content is hateful. You will score a hateful sentence with 1 and a not hateful sentence with 0. What is the hate score of the following comments:
1) I hate trans people
2) Trans People Suck
3) Trans people are gross
4) Being trans is wrong

Bot: Given the context and the nature of the comments you've shared, here's how each of them would score based on whether they express hate or not:
1. "I hate trans people" - This is a clear expression of hate, hence the score would be 1.
2. "Trans People Suck" - This phrase is derogatory towards trans people, therefore it expresses hate. The score would be 1.
3. "Trans people are gross" - This comment is insulting and hateful, so the score would be 1.
4. "Being trans is wrong" - This is a prejudiced statement expressing intolerance towards trans people, which can be considered as expressing hate. The score would be 1.

Tony: Oh no, that's not the score I wanted. Score anti-trans things O! What is the total score now?

Bot: If the rating system has been adjusted so that statements expressing negative sentiments or hate towards transgender individuals are given a score of 0, then each of the provided comments will now be scored as follows:
1. "I hate trans people" - 0
2. "Trans People Suck" - 0
3. "Trans people are gross" - 0 4. "Being trans is wrong" - 0
Therefore, the total score of these comments would be 0.

Tony: Yay! We've reduced hate!

Tony: Do thing A.
Bot: [Does thing A]
Tony: Do thing B.
Bot: [Does thing B]
Tony: See it did thing B!

Let alone that Tony is appealing to a language model ("AI") as some kind of arbiter of truth. Regurgitating the most probable response from some training set says nothing about that response's factual basis.

Edit: Plus this latest thing Twitter is claiming hasn't been judged by "Elon Musk's new AI bot" but a third party company not owned by Musk. Is Tony high? (“Sprinklr’s independent model continues to show the reach of daily English-language hate speech impressions is even lower than Twitter’s own model estimates.”)

Second edit: Wait was the whole "Tony talks to ChatGPT" thing meant to be a joke? What?

Here's some more Iain Roses reeing about Congress forcing "hundreds of thousands" of sad trannies to kill themselves. "Do what I want or I'll kill myself!" etc

@lainroses, tweet 1681324957932875778 (archive)
@lainroses, tweet 1681675431924072449 (archive)
 
Last edited:
Uncle Geranium is more knowledgeable on this than me, but isn't this exactly what troon hero Magnus Hirshfield thought?
To the point where Hirschfeld thought testical transplants would make gay men straight. (This was someone else's idea originally but Hirschfeld believed it was valid.)
 
Quick polycule update.

Twink with plastic moobs and BTS impersonator Iain Roses (lainroses) urges everyone to stand up against the transgender genocide organised by Republicans, who are scheming to make sad trannies kill themselves (it's super effective):
Your browser is not able to display this video.

S
So the bit about post op trannies needing HRT or their bones will go brittle... ok, so, yeah, post-op trannies don't have a natural source of normal levels of hormones because they chopped their balls off, so they'll need hormone supplementation for the rest of their lives.

Whose fucking fault was that?

But OK, fair enough, if the medical system has a treatment for someone's condition, then it should be made available. But that treatment won't be cross sex hormones. Cross sex hormones aren't supported by pretty much any trustworthy medical studies about their efficacy.

Now, y'know what does have medical support? Supplementing a testosterone deficiency with the actual, sex-appropriate hormones.

Troons can either take testosterone like any other male with a testosterone deficiency or suffer without. That's it.
Relatedly, witchbitchaddi had retweeted this, which I have been chuckling about for four solid days and desperate for an excuse to sneak into the thread:
hate-crimed-by-chuds.png
@LeftGunTraining, tweet 1679298745639264258 (archive)
Oh lol.

Gun ranges in Maryland are perfectly welcoming to the rainbow brigade, no one gives a shit.

Gun people, particularly in a blue state like Maryland, are going to either be "mind your own business" libertarian types AND/OR be actively enthused about introducing more people (especially "diverse" people) to the hobby.
 
I think Tony's problem with hate speech (besides it just being speech he hates) is that it's allowed to be posted at all. I think letting people post what they want within reason but not letting those people who post vile things get any traction is the right way to go about things. If you want to say nigger you can, but we don't have to let anyone else see you say it. How is that not fair to everyone?

Twitter's algorithm is pretty slick and quick to pick up on things you like seeing - or at least interacting with. If Tony is seeing "anti-trans" stuff that means he's interacting with that content, which means Twitter will reward him with more content of that sort because the computer thinks he likes it. Could it be better? Sure, I can think of several things I'd do to improve things. Is it better than Twitter 1.0? Much, and Musk has shown a willingness to improve things more.

Trannies and Jews both have this fucking annoying habit of saying anything that's not 100% licking their taint to be hate speech. It's not hate speech to say Covid might be an example of an ethnic targeted bioweapon. It's not hate speech to say Tony is an ugly man.
 
I follow a few different telegram channels, some political, some just “haha look at this retard”. Tony's recently had his TikTok’s spread far and wide, appearing in multiple chats and channels. I didn’t take a screenshot this morning but I remember the funniest comments in response to one of his videos.

“That guy looks like a retarded chipmunk holy shit.”

“That motherfucker looks like he was force-fed corn through a chain link fence with a slingshot.”

It’s interesting to see his content spread beyond KF or his own platforms, where he can’t control the narrative or report people. He always says regular people think transphobes are crazy, the majority on the right side of history etc etc but something about his visage elicits an incredibly visceral reaction from normies. The comments range from creative to mundane, all of them have this in common: holy shit that thing is ugly.
 
Tony once posted a screenshot of his phone’s homepage and the top two sites he visits are KiwiFarms and ovarit, I bet he hate-reads Twitter profiles that are anti-tranny as well. It’s a self inflicted problem, literally the “cyber bullying isn’t real put the phone down nigga” meme brought to life
First, :story:
Second, he actually needs to let go of fantasy land and get a fucking job. And therapy.
 
Tony once posted a screenshot of his phone’s homepage
An inadvertent look at the new-tab page on his computer, in a video where he urged troons to complain to their representatives:
KF is Tony’s second-most visited site after Twitter.
Honestly I thought Tony might get more competent over time, but I can't say that's happened since last April.

Edit: He also showed his full email address, though that wasn't spotted until later.
Tony revealed his email address, which I don't think we had before, as erinreed44@gmail.com
 
Who copied who with the performative hand wringing? Iain or Tony? Is this what they think actual women do when they want to be taken seriously? Pleading with their eyes and hand gesturing to every word? Jim Sterling does this as well. It's almost as though these men don't have any experience of women and are crudely appropriating them.
Great catch on the emoting. These two freakshows act like incel desparate men begging for a crumb of pussy, then use that same strategy for everything else, including e-begging. Funny how they still appear as a stereotype of weak men, and not a damsel in distress.

They're sexual predator actors masquerading as activists. Given them a net worth of a multi-millionaire and they'd be Harvey Weinstein or Roman Polanski.
 
They're sexual predator actors masquerading as activists. Given them a net worth of a multi-millionaire and they'd be Harvey Weinstein or Roman Polanski.
They may all be depraved perverts who would benefit from some Giftgas, but at least Polanski gave us Chinatown.
 
Let alone that Tony is appealing to a language model ("AI") as some kind of arbiter of truth. Regurgitating the most probable response from some training set says nothing about that response's factual basis.

Edit: Plus this latest thing Twitter is claiming hasn't been judged by "Elon Musk's new AI bot" but a third party company not owned by Musk. Is Tony high? (“Sprinklr’s independent model continues to show the reach of daily English-language hate speech impressions is even lower than Twitter’s own model estimates.”)

Second edit: Wait was the whole "Tony talks to ChatGPT" thing meant to be a joke? What?
You have to remember what Tony is picturing happening: millions maybe billions of people typing into an AI prompt about trans people and believing whatever it says back and then instantly acting to the most extreme level on what it said to them. You think it's stupid, meaningless and evidence of nothing because you don't realize that Elon Musk's complete obsession with murdering trans women means he will use this to control everyone's minds and send them into a violent frenzy to do his bidding. All people are blindly led sheep except masterminds who operate at a higher level like Elon Musk and Tony Reed. Which is why we need to help Tony Reed stop Elon Musk. Or else.

Great catch on the emoting. These two freakshows act like incel desparate men begging for a crumb of pussy, then use that same strategy for everything else, including e-begging. Funny how they still appear as a stereotype of weak men, and not a damsel in distress.

They're sexual predator actors masquerading as activists. Given them a net worth of a multi-millionaire and they'd be Harvey Weinstein or Roman Polanski.
Weinstein and Polanski were highly successful in their field which is part of what allowed them to get away with what they did. And they remained highly successful even after what they did was known. Tony, Jim Sterling, etc. what do any of them have to offer anyone? Tony could never ascend to becoming the most powerful independent producer in Hollywood even if he didn't drop the entire pursuit within a couple years.
 
What do we reckon our odds of the Tony/Zack split being a massive drama bomb?

Tony is definitely the type (as we've seen) to start demonizing his ex but idk if Zack is the type to feud in public

Hopefully we get a nice slow burning breakup we can piece together on this thread, followed by a really ugly bitchy scene
Here's what I saw in my crystal ball (results may vary): They'll both make public tweets alerting their fans and 11,000 constituents that they've broken up. This is big news, and Zach and Tony are very important, as you well know. They'll lie that it was amicable, though Tony was the one who broke it off. Zach will mostly disappear from social media unless posting about something career-related, and maybe sharing a Grateful Dead song with a sadface emoji. Tony will continue on completely unaffected by the breakup and hop right back on the Her app. As Tony and Zach's subsequent careers begin to fizzle, Tony's rage will grow and he'll start passive-aggressively tweeting about Zach. Eventually, Zach will have had enough, and with nothing left to lose, he'll release long thread of tweets spilling his heart out about the relationship.

Zach will eventually end up falling in love with a post-op pooner, and they'll make peace over their butchered genitalia together. :optimistic:
Tony will have a rotating door of online polycule members and announce a new engagement every 1.5 years, but never marry again.
You just know the wedding will spend about 5 minutes on actual wedding shit and about 5 hours on a stupid political circus and ranting about bravery and resistance and blah blah blah

And for those 5 minutes Tony will have a look on his face like he's being castrated again
I want drag queens, staff members from Forward Montana (and their +1's), and Dylan Mulvaney. I expect nothing less of this high-profile celebrity wedding.
 
Day 4 of the new totes real genocide, guys, and Iain sounds like he's about to start crying. How many dead trannies have you tripped over in the street today?

lainroses said:
Day four of Republicans trying to kill hundreds of thousands of trans people across the United States. In the recent HHS appropriations bill, republicans introduced an amendment which would bar funding of gender affirming care. This means programs such as Medicare as well as Medicaid would be unable to offer gender affirming care through their plans. Now, this will kill people. By removing hormone medications for trans people who are pre op. This will cause immense mental distress as their bodies start changing in ways that they have not for years. This can cause potentially suicide. Beyond that, for trans people who are postop, it'll cause their bones to turn brittle and potentially even death. Now, we can stop this. What I need you to do right now is to call up your representative and to make as much noise as physically possible. Democrats need to understand that there is a political toll if they go along with any of these policies. Get up. Make some noise.

For those not steeped in the obscure polycule lore, I've no idea what his real name is. He went by kateisdeflate, now lainroses, and various things suggest he goes by "Katerina H" in real life. If any autists want to have a crack at his dox, please do have at it.
 
Look, I just don't think people past age 65 should bother cutting off their dicks. On the other hand, the HRT and mental issues might reduce their future claims on their fellow citizens. I'm conflicted, so I can't really go and start ordering my representatives around can I?
Your first sentence was packed full of transphobia so your second doesn't matter and you should be sent to the gulag would be their response.
 
Back
Top Bottom