Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Markass the Worst said:
Oh and if you don't want to be doxed just get better opsec, simple as that.
Click to expand...
He should get better opsec mostly for the sake of other people. It's me, I'm the other people. Googled his username for shits and giggles some time ago and was immediately assaulted by his lardass mugshot (:_(

5864478c-1ff4-389c-be37-37dc16fa793a.jpeg
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: magnetic field, Drama Fan, Next Task and 6 others
Cuckoman said:
The only problem is that these languages are exceptionally hard to use correctly.
If you are reckless or just a shitty programmer then, sure, you will have issues and security bugs. But if you are inexperienced, careless or just not very good you can create serious bugs in any language no matter what features or tooling it provides.
Click to expand...
no one is forcing anyone to use it. and if you apply for a job without the skills that's not the fault of the language.

any craftsman blaming his tools is a shitty craftsman. programming is a craft, the same applies.

Computer Guardian said:
But SUSE, the company behind it's own Enterpise Linux distro and supporter of the openSUSE Distro has basically decided to invest $10 million just so they can make a fork of RHEL that won't rely on RHEL's new subscription model.
Click to expand...
I knew suse was run by retards, but holy shit nigga wtf you're doing?!
 
  • Disagree
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: WonderWino, JustTheFaxcts, Marvin and 5 others
Rusty Metal Skull Gun said:
Senpai noticed us: (https://digipres.club/@foone/110730422940279486, https://archive.is/ODt1B)

View attachment 5217238

Foone, YWNBAW
Click to expand...
And how many troons died because a website talks about them? Zero.
Imagine being the big bad leftist political larper, but also wanting to kill yourself because a website talks about your freaky behaviour and hurts your feelings. Way to shove it up to the "far right" with two entire subforums on the site, and none of those retards ever considered actually killing themselves despite being doxed into oblivion, harassed in the streets by cowtipping a-logs, and seeing way, way more hate.

The amount of criticism troons get on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc. in totality is far far greater than this site by the sheer number of users alone and infinitely more troons died because of that than our kill count of precisely zero.

ywnbaw
Byuu is still alive because Nintendo actually ruins lives.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwi2Shoes, Pee Cola, Wright and 5 others
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Uncle Ted's Cabin, Peace Or Love, Drama Fan and 15 others
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Peace Or Love, Pee Cola, The Real Slim Shady and 5 others
CrunkLord420 said:
rdrama was talking about this thread on Hacker News where they're talking about KF. I saw this one post by "Evan Byrne" where he's just straight up threatening some random guy he thinks might be a KF user. It's just so unhinged I wanted to post it.
View attachment 5224439
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36805998 / https://archive.vn/IH0cL
Click to expand...
I wonder if Evan Byrne deleted his own post or if it was removed by moderation. It can't be within the SPLC's Corporate Code of Conduct for associates to openly leverage their name to threaten private individuals without basis. I mean, in such a public and incriminating way.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Drama Fan, Pee Cola, clipartfan92 and 4 others
I don't know where else to post this, but doesn't this shit enables web servers to exclude who uses them? https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity

Explained by a github user rfkat [a]:
At its core, it establishes software components called "attesters" that decide whether your device and/or browser is "trustworthy" enough - as defined by the website you are trying to visit. Websites can enforce which "attesters" users must accept, simply by denying everybody access who refuses to bow down to this regime; or who uses attesters that are deemed "inappropriate"; or who is on a platform that does not provide any attesters the website finds "acceptable".

In short: it is specifically designed to destroy the open web by denying you the right to use whatever browser you want to use, on whatever operating system. It is next-level "DRM", introduced by affiliates of a company that already has monopolized the browser market. And the creators of this "proposal" absolutely know what they are attempting here.
Click to expand...

I have also found a blog post [a] by one of the maintainers of the github repo called Yoav Weiss (I wonder where he's from) made only 2 days ago, probably as a preemptive defense when people find out Google's shit stinks to high hell.
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: magnetic field, nah, Lord Xenu and 9 others
Solid Hyrax said:
I don't know where else to post this, but doesn't this shit enables web servers to exclude who uses them? https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity

Explained by a github user rfkat [a]:


I have also found a blog post [a] by one of the maintainers of the github repo called Yoav Weiss (I wonder where he's from) made only 2 days ago, probably as a preemptive defense when people find out Google's shit stinks to high hell.
Click to expand...

Interesting that it's on his personal GitHub account, given that he's a Google employee. You'd like to think that the greybeards at the W3C would reject this on sight.

Also puts Google on dodgy legal ground, given the stranglehold they have over the web. There's only two fully featured browsers in active development, Chrome (100% funded by Google) and Firefox (90% funded by Google).
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Jarry Seinfelt, Pee Cola, clipartfan92 and 1 other person
Solid Hyrax said:
I don't know where else to post this, but doesn't this shit enables web servers to exclude who uses them? https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity

Explained by a github user rfkat [a]:


I have also found a blog post [a] by one of the maintainers of the github repo called Yoav Weiss (I wonder where he's from) made only 2 days ago, probably as a preemptive defense when people find out Google's shit stinks to high hell.
Click to expand...
I am so sick of the Clipper Chip coming back under a brand new euphemism every two years. No, I'm not letting you backdoor my computer so you can show me ads and prevent N-word terrorism, fuck off and kill yourself.

lol.jpg
:story:
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Nitro!, Pee Cola, AltisticRight and 7 others
Panzerfrau said:
He should get better opsec mostly for the sake of other people. It's me, I'm the other people. Googled his username for shits and giggles some time ago and was immediately assaulted by his lardass mugshot (:_(

View attachment 5217960
Click to expand...
Now I have to imagine this obese creature in this context.
gross.jpg
He's an ex-Christian too, of course it's about gay drawings.
christ.jpg

lol
>美国男子兴奋买灵异录影带回家 想验证贞子故事结果更恐怖
>American male purchased haunted VHS tape with excitement, wanting to test out the story of Sadako but it ended up being more scary

>美国加州一位33岁男子Foone喜欢去旧商店随机买东西
He's 33 in 2018 so he's 38 now. It appears that he trooned out in 2022.
dumb.jpg

He looked like a fat effeminate mess in 2018, God knows what he looks like now. Hideous.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Markass the Worst and 306h4Ge5eJUJ
AltisticRight said:
He looked like a fat effeminate mess in 2018, God knows what he looks like now. Hideous.
Click to expand...
I got news for you:
Eden Seeker said:
1689998267000.png

Christ on a stick, man, go back to unreasonable keyboards. This person has scheduled ✨bottom surgery✨ cuz ✨informed consent✨ and ✨no downsides✨. I'm so sad.
Click to expand...
That sad excuse of a grey neckbeard looks like a very bad skin condition at first sight.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Kiwi2Shoes, 888Flux, AltisticRight and 3 others
Solid Hyrax said:
I don't know where else to post this, but doesn't this shit enables web servers to exclude who uses them? https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity
Click to expand...

I've basically outlined how Google achieved this for mobile applications, link to thread:
xn--mck1c said:
If you look at Android, the writing is already on the wall: Google is able to strongarm their way into a privileged position on the device, and act against the user's wishes, enabled by what's essentially a mobile TPM.
(...)
Click to expand...

They're unable to do it for web since a majority or desktops didn't have TPMs until Windows 11 started requiring them.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Pee Cola, Solid Hyrax and Markass the Worst
xn--mck1c said:
They're unable to do it for web since a majority or desktops didn't have TPMs until Windows 11 started requiring them.
Click to expand...
My board has one but I turned it off in EFI specifically to make sure M$ couldn't install Windows 11 on my system. How does this shit benefit me in the least? It seems to benefit anyone but me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rusty Metal Skull Gun
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back