Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 103 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 164 40.1%

  • Total voters
    409
As far as Nick's current public position is concerned, contrasting with the clip above with Nick's current "I don't know" position (possibly to provide himself with "wiggle room") actually has him "wiggling" closer to accepting MAP/NAP types than he did previously. Make of that what you will.
Breaking MAP.
 
As far as Nick's current public position is concerned, contrasting with the clip above with Nick's current "I don't know" position (possibly to provide himself with "wiggle room") actually has him "wiggling" closer to accepting MAP/NAP types than he did previously. Make of that what you will.
Yep, if you listen to some of the stuff he says post vacation, especially regarding trans stuff in school, it feels like he is gunt guarding the troon predator teachers. A difference of views he says iirc. Definitely prepping his audience for a left turn.
 
I would have totally apologised and sent him at the very most £20 for a night out. All this $10,000's of nonsense is insane. Fuck off USA with your crazy litigious system.
OK, but calling someone a pedo can have drastic negative impacts to person's business, especially for a lawyer, when the business is essentially them and them alone. And the impact can be many 10ks, depending on what you are earning. It's no joke; calling someone one an idiot is nbd and can be explained away as a dumb feud, but calling someone a pedo is not so so easily explained and completely ruin one's livelihood, especially when your business turns on your reputation.
I don't get why Nick chose Randazza with how expensive he is. It just seems like a way to burn money at a rapid rate for a case that's probably not that interesting all things considered.
Because he's stupid and has no discernment, no professional contacts, and is operating in every case to try to make news?
 
Imagine being on a crossroad:

To your left there is a path of a swift pain but short suffering, you can give 50k to Montegraph for him to fuck off and never bother with him again. All you lost is a small bit of money and some of your image.

To your right there is a long and winding path full of thorns, you will be giving 200k to Randazza over the course of months if not more only to have a chance of maybe not losing to Montegraph.

Choose wisely.
Now imagine a series of crossroads before that.

Do you repeatedly call a vengeful and resourceful person something that you know is defamation per se and literally dare him to sue you, or do you just not engage at all? When you choose the thorny path, do you hire possibly the most expensive lawyer on the subject you can find, or do you reach out to your network of local lawyer friends to maybe defend yourself at a discount? When you choose the thorny path again, do you continue to repeat the insults and add more against the opposing lawyer, or do you not do that and save yourself the trouble of defending against them in future filings and ethics complaints? When you choose the thorny path yet again, do you go for the Hail Mary of trying to throw out very recent and explicit jurisprudence on your state's anti-SLAPP (reasoning you used to agree with), or do you save the money to mount another kind of defense? Then we get to this crossroads.

Now imagine a series of crossroads after that.
 
Do you repeatedly call a vengeful and resourceful person something that you know is defamation per se and literally dare him to sue you, or do you just not engage at all?
Yeah, the discussions we're having here about settlements would moot if that first domino hadn't have fallen.

Everybody knew Monty was a lolcow due to his spats with Metokur. Null created his thread back in 2019. Rekieta throwing his hat into the ring, in the specific way he did, was completely unnecessary and ham-fisted.

In the end, this whole thing started with an entirely avoidable social faux pas, and not a legal error. Don't call people pedos without evidence. Simple as.
 
Everybody knew Monty was a lolcow due to his spats with Metokur. Null created his thread back in 2019. Rekieta throwing his hat into the ring, in the specific way he did, was completely unnecessary and ham-fisted.
Beyond that, I don't think Nick really knew what kind of person he was dealing with. Regardless of Montagraph's other eccentricities, he is very resourceful and clever. He is someone who has hidden his identity for decades, sending potential doxers down rabbit holes of pre-prepared false names and addresses. If I am remembering correctly, he somehow obtains and routinely calls the personal cell phone numbers of sitting politicians ranging from mayors to senators and gets them to chat with him for extended lengths of time over random topics. He also seems to show a readiness to bring people into prolonged legal fights when they slight him.

I do not think it is a coincidence that he chose to hire Nick's personal Skordas, not even considering that defamation is not one of his listed practice areas outside of general personal injury. I think it is possible that he showed back up to try to bait Nick into saying something that he could go after him for, and Nick opened wide and closed his whole mouth around the hook with statements that were likely defamation per se. And then he went and hired $1,000/hr Randazza because he didn't understand the nature of the battle he was fighting.

I think Nick just expected more Eggkieta photoshops to be the worst that would come from interacting with him again.
 
Last edited:
I don't think Nick really knew what kind of person he was dealing with.
Which there’s no excuse for, since all of the content Nick was commenting on at that time was about Monty hauling people into court and being extremely sue-happy. Imagine being such an out of control drunk that you dare an extremely litigious creep to sue you for comments you know to be defamatory per se. (Or at least Nick should know that about pedophilia accusations, considering his career as a legal “expert.”)

Nick is a garden variety drunk whose life has become unmanageable because of his alcoholism. It wouldn’t be quite so pathetic if he wasn’t also a father of five children. Grow the fuck up, faggot.
 
Yep, if you listen to some of the stuff he says post vacation, especially regarding trans stuff in school, it feels like he is gunt guarding the troon predator teachers. A difference of views he says iirc. Definitely prepping his audience for a left turn.
Nick had some weird shit last summer where he was stanning for a "trans friendly" summer camp that was ran/facilitated by a family member of his. He has always given out weird hints that he might actually be ok with transing kids. Back when I wanted to like him i tried to not look into that shit to hard, but at this point I'm waiting to find out that he has some Desmond Naples looking molestation victim nephew that he pretends is doing great.
 
I would have totally apologised and sent him at the very most £20 for a night out. All this $10,000's of nonsense is insane. Fuck off USA with your crazy litigious system.
It's funny, because during the Weeb Wars days, Rekieta defended the extreme cost of litigation in the US and said that the way these extreme costs force opposing parties to get together and settle is an intentional mechanism of the system. I remember thinking he was such a kike after that.
 
It's funny, because during the Weeb Wars days, Rekieta defended the extreme cost of litigation in the US and said that the way these extreme costs force opposing parties to get together and settle is an intentional mechanism of the system. I remember thinking he was such a kike after that.
It's entirely reasonable to encourage absolute retards in fights over utterly trivial bullshit to settle their griefs. It's too bad Nick didn't take his own advice.
 
Despite Nicks costs being $1000 per hour for Randazza, surely Monty's costs are in the $300 per hour ball park?
Unless Monty somehow knew Schneider hated Nick and would prosecute the case for funzies and for free? How did Monty know about this strip-mall law firm in Spicer anyway?
 
I would have totally apologised and sent him at the very most £20 for a night out. All this $10,000's of nonsense is insane. Fuck off USA with your crazy litigious system.

You're missing the point which was really just that Nick could have settled for whatever it cost Monty at that point. If he'd only spent $20 then yes, I'm sure he'd have settled for $20.
 
You're missing the point which was really just that Nick could have settled for whatever it cost Monty at that point. If he'd only spent $20 then yes, I'm sure he'd have settled for $20.
I dont think he wouldve settled for $20 and a public apology. First because he wouldve to accept he was wrong and second because i think he really believed he could make more money with content associated to the lawsuit and crowfunding
 
Do you guys know where is the clip of Drexel saying something along the lines of, "what is a man supposed to do nick, when a young woman tries herself up and asks you to fuck her, not fuck her?", followed by Nick laughing. This was in regards to the grooming allegations (he explained that when the friend's daughter was 21, she reached out to him to get involved in BDSM).

Edit: found the post that has the link to clip.

 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Diamond Homonculus
Back