I think there is a big difference between recording your sexual intercourse and then making it public to harm the other person and providing unfavorable commentary about something that was published with all involved parties consenting to the publishing.
Yeah and I said as much in the post but the intent is the same. Ralph would've released gator's nudes if he had them[thank god he didn't] but only Josh is setting up multiple show segments to go over how much black cock women he doesn't like are taking.
So were now at the point of the conversation where it's no longer "Josh doesn't do this" it's "Josh does this but it's ok because..."
How would you characterise the central, fundamental purpose of this website?
I get it but I just wish Josh wouldn't act so holier than thou when he obviously still has some issues with women as well.
Further to my point I have barely heard about this woman but the first time I do Josh is immedaitely pulling up no makeup selfies to critique and mentioning her Black ex-boyfriend.
I don't think expecting people to treat women with the barest modicum of respect afforded to fellow human beings feels particularly "holier than thou", and I don't think putting Serena Joy on show for failing to live up to her own professed values belies any issues with women.
I'm sure it could be presented better, but at the end of the day I don't think I've ever seen him tearing down any woman's appearance or sexual history who hadn't tried to deliberately appoint themselves as a moral authority on the appearance and sexual relations of all other women.
Wasn't the reason why Josh shown pics of Shoe with her black ex-boyfriend is due to her trying to hide this info so desperately to the point she even tried to memory hole her donating money for her ex's funeral, because she wanted to appear "based" and appeal to manosphere, /pol/ and other right leaning online circles aka people who don't take kindly to interracial realtionships?
Well I mean what is the whole "pickme" thing if not a socially acceptable form of hating women? Again we are at the point in this convo where you guys are saying "Yeah Josh does this but it's ok because..." and I will remind you that Josh himself denied he did it whatsoever. As far as I Know also June hasn't done that kind of stuff since she was in a relationship with Greg for whom she regularly embarrassed herself for.
"Josh does it but it's ok because..."
Fat sex should be illegal.
There is no denying that he says mean things about people, but in Pearl's case I don't find it disturbing because I don't think that it is unjust or unfair. If I could see she was genuinely a nice person, I would be upset by hearing him tear her apart.
And you could say absolutely the same thing about many of the women Ralph or whoever Josh is clutching his pearls[no pun intended] over this week is talking about. Even the manosphere who an say some genuinely offputting things about women will often end up talking about women who actually have done something wrong or are despicable.
The issue isn't that they're shitty people. If somebody's being a cunt and you immediately focus on her appearance and sexual bodycount as a vector of attack, then from a feminist standpoint you're reinforcing the misogynist viewpoint that women's worth is tied solely to physical appearance and sexual purity. The difference here is that Pearl isn't just a shitty cunty person, she's a redpill talking head who actively and outspokenly promotes that viewpoint herself.
Yeah but when Cons dunk on Bernie they dont rail against the 1 percent to do it and when some waify twink calls out conservative politicians for sucking dick he doesnt hold a "god hates fags" sign over his head to do it they just say it.
