Retard uprising in the "Mad at the Internet" thread over being told women should be considered in far-right politics

I know this is a Mass Debates thread and there's no "winning"a conversation here, but the murders thing is kind of legalistic: If you consider non-medically-necessary abortions murder (and many do), women vastly outdo men in the murder category provided the victim cannot physically retaliate. Subtract the 8,000 from the extrapolated estimate of abortion due to ectopic or otherwise medically hazardous pregnancy and rape, and you have 879,000 abortions in the US in 2019. Take the 26,000 murders and assign 83% of them to men and you have a split of 17098 male-perpetrated murders in the US for 49% of the population and 882,502 female-perpetrated ones for 51% of the population. Abortion essentially inverses the murder statistic and then some, having 51% of the population (women) commit 98% of the murders.
>But the doctors that perform the procedure
Let's not forget the political system has actively tried to make it illegal for doctors not to be an accomplice to a woman's decision to kill her child.

Anyway that's not relevant to anything and especially not OP's lamenting where have all the tradwives gone, it's just something neat to point out when people teamsports the atrocities of men. Women as a demographic kill more per year than men do per decade outside of literal war, and some of those guys that killed someone probably have a better reason than some of the women that got abortions. Food for thought. Or rather, food for the next incendiary comment thread you join in on or something.
 
When Josh talks about a woman he doesn't like he often takes on a lot of the tactics of the people he is supposedly against in his opinions. There is this extreme setup of "oh Pearl fucks black dudes and shoe is now 30 and I'm going to make the whole stream about it." He could just detail the inconsistencies and hypocrisies like he would for any male lolcow.

It frankly seems like he is looking for ways to bag on women that he won't take flak for bagging on.
Josh is an ODD nigger-sayer. He's blunt, abrasive, and generally unconcerned with how he looks to other people. If he just wanted to shit on women, he'd be indiscriminately shitting on women and telling anyone who had a problem with it to go fuck themselves. I think it's entirely consistent that he doesn't couch anything he says to avoid people construing it as misogyny, and I think that if he was genuinely misogynistic we'd have plenty of examples of him dragging ugly women who aren't hold themselves out to the public as anti-feminist tradwaifu icons.
 
Josh is an ODD nigger-sayer. He's blunt, abrasive, and generally unconcerned with how he looks to other people. If he just wanted to shit on women, he'd be indiscriminately shitting on women and telling anyone who had a problem with it to go fuck themselves.
Oh come on that's not true Josh is not completely unaffected by public opinion being abrasive and contrary is just how he deals with it.
 
Welcome to Kiwi Farms, you must be very new here.
"People who react impulsively and emotionally to stuff aren't affected by that stuff"

ok

Actually I have even just remembered that with Dick Masterson and more recently Nick Rekieta he specifically mentioned he didn't appreciate them reacting to their threads and picking fights with users cause it made him feel at odds with his site and that the site is basically his peer/friend group. He clearly puts some stock into at least what a few people say here.
 
Last edited:
"People who react impulsively and emotionally to stuff aren't affected by that stuff"

ok

Actually I have even just remembered that with Dick Masterson and more recently Nick Rekieta he specifically mentioned he didn't appreciate them reacting to their threads and picking fights with users cause it made him feel at odds with his site and that the site is basically his peer/friend group. He clearly puts some stock into at least what a few people say here.
What exactly are you trying to argue here? Dragging some ho on stream isn't an impulsive, emotional reaction, but being annoyed that people on his side of the political aisle refuse to show a baseline level of respect to 50% of the population probably is. Is that what you're actually upset about?

I know that your conclusion is "Josh bad", but the arguments you're using to get there don't feel like you actually believe them. I don't think you're coming at this from a genuinely feminist angle, I think you read the thermostat on this thread and tried to craft a narrative where Josh is actually a hypocritical misogynist because you know that coping and seething about being told to not hate women won't be well received, but it just doesn't land because you clearly don't know basic feminist viewpoints well enough to craft a solid argument from that direction, and if you did you wouldn't be spouting nonsense like "pickme is an anti-female slur".

I don't think that Josh has ever made any indication that he secretly hates women, and I think it's absolute cope that you'd ever try to argue that Joshua "fuck your shithole country" Moon would be afraid of being openly misogynist, especially to the tranny-hating white-nationalist incels that seem to make up the majority of his fanbase.

Just say what you really think, and say it with your chest.
 
This is so funny. If Josh "You Stupid Fucking Cunts Need to Suffer" Moon is one of the more pro-woman voices of the far-right, your movement is well & truly fucked.

The far-right is repulsive to women. White unmarried women of childbearing age, in particular, who the far-right is so thirsty to convert into tradwives, especially fucking hate you.

Why would any self-respecting woman want to be a part of a political faction where, whenever someone like Josh has a mild stance like "Hey maybe women aren't all braindead disgusting lying whores and we shouldn't push them out of our movement," it becomes a Mass Debate?
 
"People who react impulsively and emotionally to stuff aren't affected by that stuff"

ok

Actually I have even just remembered that with Dick Masterson and more recently Nick Rekieta he specifically mentioned he didn't appreciate them reacting to their threads and picking fights with users cause it made him feel at odds with his site and that the site is basically his peer/friend group. He clearly puts some stock into at least what a few people say here.
Dude, you've been sperging out for pages now, please explain to me why it is so important to you what Null has to say on anything and especially when it comes to him critiquing men and women, in your eyes, differently. You go off on other users with "your e-daddy this, your e-daddy that" but you seem more invested in shit that comes out of his mouth than anyone else ITT. I'm honestly interested why that is. Did you expect fair, nuanced and well-balanced takes on Kiwifarms, of all places?
 
I don’t see how going to men will help with his one singular woman problem. He got his heart broken, so why would he want to get his ass broken?
He said he doesn't like the gay buttstuff but at least he knows the gay guy will never leave him. Which is part of why I think this guy is a troll. I know not all gay guys are promiscuous, but gay hookup culture is WAY worse than straight hook up culture. Gays cheat and leave partners all the time for new ass.

If OP isn't a troll, I wonder what his plan is gonna be when he finds out his boyfriend has been cheating on him or eventually leaves him for a less whiny and toxic piece of ass.
 
I don't think you're coming at this from a genuinely feminist angle,
Do I need to come from a feminist angle to see an obvious hypocrisy?
Dude, you've been sperging out for pages now, please explain to me why it is so important to you what Null has to say on anything and especially when it comes to him critiquing men and women, in your eyes, differently. You go off on other users with "your e-daddy this, your e-daddy that" but you seem more invested in shit that comes out of his mouth than anyone else ITT. I'm honestly interested why that is. Did you expect fair, nuanced and well-balanced takes on Kiwifarms, of all places?
Why are you so concerned that I am so conerned? Did calling people out for treating Josh like an e-daddy offend you?
 
He said he doesn't like the gay buttstuff but at least he knows the gay guy will never leave him. Which is part of why I think this guy is a troll. I know not all gay guys are promiscuous, but gay hookup culture is WAY worse than straight hook up culture. Gays cheat and leave partners all the time for new ass.

If OP isn't a troll, I wonder what his plan is gonna be when he finds out his boyfriend has been cheating on him or eventually leaves him for a less whiny and toxic piece of ass.
At least Don’t tread on me have us the wondorous experience of having the pleasure to truly call OP a capital Faggot.
 
please explain to me why it is so important to you what Null has to say on anything
A lot of the time I want to hear Null mispronounce relatively common words and/or have zero background information on a topic I would have expected him to have knowledge of because it amuses me.
 
Back