US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
So beyond just there now being direct witness testimony that Joe Biden was taking calls for Hunter's Influence selling business... as President, not Vice President or Senator... Lots of happenings this month so far.

From the 2023 Bank Run Watch thread:
1690228784533.png
Super Nemesis 64 said:
I just saw this screenshot of a tweet from the FDIC. Sadly, because of Musk I cannot verify the authenticity of the image.
View attachment 5230567
However, the webpage linked in the tweet is, in fact, real.

Estimated Uninsured Deposits Reporting Expectations
(archive)

Bros, words cannot describe how big of a red flag this is. Banks are suddenly unwilling/unable to give correct information to the FDIC? Well, let us see what games the banks are playing...

For example, some institutions incorrectly reduced the amount reported to the extent that the uninsured deposits are collateralized by pledged assets
Click to expand...
Additionally, some institutions incorrectly reduced the amount reported on Schedule RC-O by excluding intercompany deposit balances of subsidiaries.
Click to expand...

I think it wont be long before this thread becomes active again.
Click to expand...


It's a real post.

The banks are starting to be unwilling or unable to give accurate data to the FDIC, to the point that the FDIC has had to make a public statement about it. That means their attempts to settle this under the table failed, or it's systemic to the point they need to both call them out for it AND give a warning to the powers that be that the banks are having a serious problem.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: indomitable snowman, babadook, Confused Doggo and 21 others
HTTP Error 404 said:
The banks are starting to be unwilling or unable to give accurate data to the FDIC, to the point that the FDIC has had to make a public statement about it. That means their attempts to settle this under the table failed, or it's systemic to the point they need to both call them out for it AND give a warning to the powers that be that the banks are having a serious problem.
Click to expand...
Won't deny this doesn't sound interesting, but as per usual, till I see any form of consequences, I sleep.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: babadook, Afinepickle, Sexy Peach Emoji and 10 others
What in question is spearheading the banks to not report as required? I have not heard something like this since the last recession.
 

During testimony before Congress last week, Air Force Academy Superintendent Lt. Gen. Richard Clark declared that he fully supports programs that are pushing gender ideology, including ‘demi-gender’, but then admitted that he doesn’t know what on Earth that even is.

Under questioning from Congressman Matt Gaetz, Clark revealed that he cannot define the gender ideology terms that are being encompassed in active training programs.

Pinpointing one program supported by the Air Force called the Brooke Owens Fellowship, which is supposed to be for women, Gaetz noted “you’re literally pushing a program in the academies that says, if you’re a cisgender woman, a transgender woman, a non-binary, a-gender, bi-gender, two-spirit, demigender — what’s demigender?”

Clark replied “Sir, that’s a - that’s a term of the people that are eligible for that particular scholarship that it’s available in person to - it’s a person who looks at their gender in a, in a different, a different way than I do, sir.”

Right. Dude admitted he doesn’t even believe in demi-gender, apparently without knowing what it even is.

When Gaetz repeated the question “what’s demigender?” Clark responded “I’m not really sure, sir.”

For those who care to know, demigender is apparently a non-binary identity but with a partial connection to certain gender… or something.

Clark also admitted he doesn’t know what ‘agender’ is either. It supposedly means having a lack of any gender, because as we all know gender is merely a social construct.
Click to expand...

 
  • Lunacy
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: indomitable snowman, Confused Doggo, Corpun and 20 others
Is Daddy Blompf still the most desirable El Presidente to have in this thread?
Thought I would drop off some diversity!
Leftoids are seething cause some anon posted a pro DeSantis "ad" that has a sonnenrad and it got retweeted, ooops, I meant reexed, by some staffer.
Horrible, I know!
Screenshot 2023-07-25 004943.png
Archive!
 
  • Informative
Reactions: The Nothingness and spaztocate9000
AgendaPoster said:
I am not a nigger, hence I do not vote,
Click to expand...
:story:

The dumbest possible option to pick, well done.

Guess how that works for places like Venezuela?
AgendaPoster said:
and I heavily despise Internet daddies and strong men of any sort
Click to expand...
Yes, because picking an option that is viewed as the least shit is equivalent to slavering support.

And a self-admitted authoritarian saying he doesn't like "strong men" is fucking gold.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Larry Potterfield, derpherp2, The Womb Ripper and 8 others
LurkTrawl said:
:story:

The dumbest possible option to pick, well done.

Guess how that works for places like Venezuela?

Yes, because picking an option that is viewed as the least shit is equivalent to slavering support.

And a self-admitted authoritarian saying he doesn't like "strong men" is fucking gold.
Click to expand...
I only like one authority on this planet.
You're welcome to find my posts here sucking up to and/or defending any rich powerful fuck, left, right, center, irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: Larry Potterfield, derpherp2, The Womb Ripper and 2 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back