Not At All A Lizard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That battle took 10 months of grinding fighting; the incompetence of the regular Russian army could now see it handed back in about 10 weeks.
As much as I would love to see Poland's military curbstomp a bunch of lightly armed PMCs and light trucks I doubt anything will happen. I find it very hilarious there are ziggers that think they found some kind of loophole where not only Poland would somehow be unable to invoke Article 5, but the Polish military would be unable to destroy a Wagner Expeditionary group with a modern military.Opinion piece.
Hate to tell you this bro, but Trump supporters are not renowned for caring about looking hypocritical.I hope all these people who say they don't want to give Ukraine weapons don't suddenly change their stance when Trump wins in 2024 and possibly keeps the weapons flowing to Ukraine.
That video of Biden bragging about blackmailing the Ukrainian government was pretty damaging and was worth investigating. For what it was worth, Ukraine finally received US weaponry during the Trump Administration as the prior Obama Admin was scared of crossing that line. I feel with the Biden Administration and the leaders appointed by him we're fighting this war the same way we fought Vietnam, with self imposed limitations to our own detriment. I'm interested to see if a Second Trump Administration would go full tilt and send in heavy equipment to end this war sooner. The current administration is behaving too slow for my tastes. The MAGA crowd will follow whatever the pro Trump talking heads say on twitter anyway, hypocritical optics or not this war needs to be ended as soon as possible on favorable terms to Ukraine.Hate to tell you this bro, but Trump supporters are not renowned for caring about looking hypocritical.
Another factor is how much of a favour a re-elected Trump owes to Putin. 2016 was clearly achieved with Kremlin help. Trump put effort into squeezing the Ukrainians and tried to make military support conditional on them smearing Biden.
Perhaps the debt has already been settled using that stolen intelligence, but who knows.
It was clearly nothing of the sort. Russia put out ads for Hillary as well. The intent of their actions wasn't to support one candidate, but to create discord and confusion within US society and its political machine. Russian's MO is to create paranoia and mistrust amongst its enemies, with disinformation, lies, and false flags, in order to prevent them cooperating against its goals.2016 was clearly achieved with Kremlin help.
to create discord and confusion within US society and its political machine. Russian's MO is to create paranoia and mistrust amongst its enemies, with disinformation, likes, and false flags, in order to prevent them cooperating against its goals.
I don't doubt for a second that Kremlin tried to fuck with US elections (and will keep doing so), but that doesn't mean it's why Trump won, as lefties want everyone to believe.I don’t disagree with that, but of the two candidates, Hilary was well known to be hawkish towards Russia, whereas Trump was constantly seeking to do business and get his hotels established there, and had multiple connections with shady oligarchs.
I don’t want to derail the thread but have to dispute the idea that there was no preference or no targeted support.
This was all investigated at great length and such interference was found.
Russia engaged in extensive attacks on the U.S. election system in 2016
- Russian interference in the 2016 election was “sweeping and systemic.”[1]
- Major attack avenues included a social media “information warfare” campaign that “favored” candidate Trump[2] and the hacking of Clinton campaign-related databases and release of stolen materials through Russian-created entities and Wikileaks.[3]
Maybe not at the moment, but there was an open goal in 2016 and they pretty clearly took it.Simply sowing doubt in the core institutions of US is beneficial to Kremlin, they could easily do that, but I don't think they have the capability to outright change the outcome.
Russia's goals are not propping up an ideology or candidate, but to create unrest and destabilization. It is coincidentally accurate that Hillary, as an animal of the neolib/neocon system, was more keenly aware of Russia's ambitions and sought to limit them. It's also true that Trump is pretty stupid and various dictators can get him to be friendly towards them, as long as they play to his ego with various praise and "edgy" anti-system takes.Maybe not at the moment, but there was an open goal in 2016 and they pretty clearly took it.
Do read through the report or at least the summary. Now that the heat has subsided, and with some hindsight it’s really quite revealing. And no one can paint Mueller as a lefty journo.
You can tell the Romans did some pretty horrendous and unjustified things during the Punic Wars by how badly they attacked the Carthaginians for their own alleged atrocities. In fact the Romans performed human sacrifice for the last time during the second one, it was that bad for them after Cannae. The only real evidence we have for child sacrifices by Carthage/Phonecians are stories from their mortal enemies, the Israelites and Romans.Carthagians might disagree, if there were any around.
And what better way to do that, than to assist into power a corrupt, highly divisive narcissistic kleptomaniac, who you can control through both greed and fear!They hate America, and the more powerful and stable it is, the more they hate it. So whatever might chip at its strength.
IIRC, there was a study by the government on Russian interference in the election media and Russia was behind a push on Tumblr for Bernie Sanders. There was also a conflict of interest with the Clinton email server scandal due to the CEO of Crowdstrike being the former head of the CIA under Clinton. Some of the spooks at defcon think several people had access.Maybe not at the moment, but there was an open goal in 2016 and they pretty clearly took it.
Do read through the report or at least the summary. Now that the heat has subsided, and with some hindsight it’s really quite revealing. And no one can paint Mueller as a lefty journo.
This reminds me of a quote from Goebbels about the Katyn Massacre:Kind of like Russia towards Ukraine in fact, except the Roman Republic during the Punic Wars had a robust constitutional government and capable military with little corruption or disloyalty.
"Unfortunately, we have had to give up Katyn. The Bolsheviks undoubtedly will soon 'find' that we shot 12,000 Polish officers. That episode is one that is going to cause us quite a little trouble in the future. The Soviets are undoubtedly going to make it their business to discover as many mass-graves as possible and then blame it on us".[53]
ArchiveIn the second half of 2023, Ukraine will take delivery of two cutting edge Skynex air defence systems, including airburst munitions. The Skynex systems will be mounted on new Rheinmetall HX 8x8 military trucks.
As an armchair private who has played video games, I've been wondering if we'd see more old school anti air to help deal with drones. Like whatever the modern version of a Flak cannon is, which I guess this device might be.Rheinmetal confirms they're sending "Skynex" to Ukraine:
This is one of the systems I've been hoping would get tested in combat soon; if it works as advertised, it'll be a huge step up in drone defenses.
They've had lots of old Russian 23mm, 37mm, and some larger, along with Bofors 40 & 57mm cannons for a while; I know they've been pulling older systems from use on the front too, as more modern weapons arrive to replace them. So lately the skies over Kyiv have been looking more like Baghdad than Sarajevo.As an armchair private who has played video games, I've been wondering if we'd see more old school anti air to help deal with drones. Like whatever the modern version of a Flak cannon is, which I guess this device might be.