Retard uprising in the "Mad at the Internet" thread over being told women should be considered in far-right politics

incidentally, i agree with @Diamond Homonculus. null does assault the appearance of women more readily than that of men (unless they're troons), and that is hypocritical,

I don't think it's hypocritical. I think it's Men and Womens different weakpoints. What's more likely to upset them?

Mens:
Success in Workplace
Success with Women
Emotional Weakness or Instability

Womens:
Visuals
Weight
Promiscuity
 
I don't think it's hypocritical. I think it's Men and Womens different weakpoints. What's more likely to upset them?

Mens:
Success in Workplace
Success with Women
Emotional Weakness or Instability

Womens:
Visuals
Weight
Promiscuity
Are you still complaining my dude?
Complaining males are boring and never score pussy.
Learn to embrace the unpleasant and take a dive into stoicism. Things will get worse.
 
I don't think it's hypocritical. I think it's Men and Womens different weakpoints. What's more likely to upset them?

as i clarified with the remainder of the sentence that you quoted incompletely, the hypocrisy lies in the fact that he has repeatedly stated that he doesn't like to insult people for things that they can't change, yet he does so anyway, more frequently with women than with men. i also explained why i believe that he chooses to do so with women, and it's not about their weakpoints.
 
as i clarified with the remainder of the sentence that you quoted incompletely, the hypocrisy lies in the fact that he has repeatedly stated that he doesn't like to insult people for things that they can't change, yet he does so anyway, more frequently with women than with men. i also explained why i believe that he chooses to do so with women, and it's not about their weakpoints.
That's why it's better to call whiny women online fat, because they can change that, and 70% of the time it's true.

You said "unless they're troons" though, so are we going with the narrative that TWAW? You can't say "He insults women's appearance more than men, except all the times he very aggressively insults men's appearance, those times don't count".

Also the idea he insults women's appearance because he's trying to avoid being shipped is kind of a reach. He's insulted Brittany Venti consistently since he first talked about her and it never stopped anyone from making the frankly grotesque assertion that they should get together.
He'd be dumb for completely changing his behavior simply to avoid retards online making bad jokes.

If anything the fact he insults trannies is a strong point for the idea that it is about people's weaknesses, or at least their perceived values.

Idk, I'm just going by what everyone else is saying here; I don't pay that close attention to his wording unless he says something silly or says the N word.

 
If anything the fact he insults trannies is a strong point for the idea that it is about people's weaknesses, or at least their perceived values.
I wouldn't say that follows cause then Josh would go in on every soyboy for not being Jacked.

To take a step back from this whole thing you are saying that Josh's most unreserved ire goes to women and men who dress like women. Men presenting as men still aren't given the same treatment but in the opposite fashion. Even gay men who would typically be ripe for this kind of treatment if picking at a weakness is the goal dont really seem to be given the same kind of judgemental vitriol at all.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: Lake and Seafarer
That's why it's better to call whiny women online fat, because they can change that, and 70% of the time it's true.

which i addressed in my original comment as a valid argument.

You said "unless they're troons" though, so are we going with the narrative that TWAW? You can't say "He insults women's appearance more than men, except all the times he very aggressively insults men's appearance, those times don't count".

no, troons are not women. i stated that he assaults the appearance of women more readily than that of men (unless they're troons), which is to say that when null does choose to insult a man's appearance, without insulting any other aspect of the man, it is because that man is presenting a caricature of a woman.

also, i can say whatever i'm damned well please ... but i didn't say what you're insisting that i cannot say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diamond Homonculus
Are you still complaining my dude?
Complaining males are boring and never score pussy.
Learn to embrace the unpleasant and take a dive into stoicism. Things will get worse.

I believe people have different resilience levels. Which why you often hear the phrase "I don't understand you, come on bud, think positive, just pull your socks up, like I did"

You hear the phrase "damaged girl" but then for guys he's just not trying hard enough to overcome.
 
Last edited:
I believe people have different resilience levels. Which why you often hear the phrase "I don't understand you, come on bud, think positive, just pull your socks up, like I did"
Yeah, but "people" are not in the trenches, people are at most just horny and lonely, which are basically irrelevant 1st world pseudo-issues.
 
I think this uprising has enough legs to term it a rebellion now....

So while we're at it what up with the babytalk on MATI? "Oopsie doodles, owie, bum bum, Hewwo" Josh seems to use an infantile version of many words or phrases and I feel as though the use of these has increased over time.
 
That's a lot of virgins.
There were always a lot of virgins. The info that "it used to be you could just get a wife" is largely a myth.
Women were always highly treasured property (don't seethe at me true&honest womxn, we're talking history). Dads protect(ed) daughters from adventurous young men like they were diamonds. States and tribes protect(ed) their females as one of the most treasured possession, guaranteeing tribal growth.
Only men that were in "good standing" had access to women, and it was almost always granted on specific conditions. Nobles and the rich were exceptions just as they are today.
The plebe and working class usually only had more access to women during prosperous periods where it was easier to build the conditions needed for familial growth from one job or some trade, field work etc. When conditions become shitty, like they are now, women become choosy and reluctant to invest themselves into relations.
There is much to say about all this but it's pointless. Pussy is gatekept. If you're sneaky and smart, you might score some, even a lot, even in these shitty conditions. If you expect government mandated GFs, that won't come, MRA types have ZERO political representation. Best to acknowledge reality and move on.
 
There is much to say about all this but it's pointless. Pussy is gatekept. If you're sneaky and smart, you might score some, even a lot, even in these shitty conditions. If you expect government mandated GFs, that won't come, MRA types have ZERO political representation. Best to acknowledge reality and move on.

I'm fine with acknowledging reality. I just to the explore the factors as to exactly why relations between Men and Women are where they at now. We're supposedly at this advanced egalitarian society, but we so easily fall back on 'lol fat woman' 'lol tiny dick man'.

I really don't think we've evolved at all to catch up with all the changes and technology in society today. It feels like everything is window dressing.
 
We're supposedly at this advanced egalitarian society, but we so easily fall back on 'lol fat woman' 'lol tiny dick man'.
Do you know where you are? Are you lost or something? This is a gossip site where we make fun of people. I don't believe for a second any of you have a genuine issue with Null calling pedophilic cunts like Amanda Ralph an ugly bitch who looks like she got hit in the face with a shovel.

There is much to say about all this but it's pointless. Pussy is gatekept. If you're sneaky and smart, you might score some, even a lot, even in these shitty conditions. If you expect government mandated GFs, that won't come, MRA types have ZERO political representation. Best to acknowledge reality and move on.
This. Men need to get over the fact that not everyone gets to reproduce and that you are not entitled to a woman. It's not just like this in human society but all over the animal kingdom. Women chose who gets to carry on their genes to the next generation and for the good of the gene-pool, some losers just don't make the cut. Get the fuck over it and buy a sexdoll. Men have never been this fucking entitled ever in human history and I think a lot of it has to do with watching so much porn and not being able to come to terms with the difference between fantasy world and reality.
 
Do you know where you are? Are you lost or something? This is a gossip site where we make fun of people. I don't believe for a second any of you have a genuine issue with Null calling pedophilic cunts like Amanda Ralph an ugly bitch who looks like she got hit in the face with a shovel.
I'm talking about general discourse between members, not lolcows.
 
>why does jewsh shits on women's appearance more than men?
Have you considered that Dear Leader, being apparently both heterosexual and autistic, might not be as attuned of men's beauty (or lack thereof) than women's?

Yeah he might claim to not want to derive joy out of taking some cheap shots like that but that's always came off more in the sense of admitting it's a bit of a guilty pleasure.
 
Do you know where you are? Are you lost or something? This is a gossip site where we make fun of people. I don't believe for a second any of you have a genuine issue with Null calling pedophilic cunts like Amanda Ralph an ugly bitch who looks like she got hit in the face with a shovel.
Whoa there Null I don't want to put words in his mouth but I think he was talking about broader society and that comment did not appear to be directed solely at anyone. Why are you so sensitive?
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Lake
Back