- Joined
- Sep 22, 2021
This has been something that I've long thought, and speculated about way near the beginning of the thread.The people responsible for setting things in motion in the 40s-50s are likely dead.
The people who implemented the stigma response might have been doing so with reasonable intentions. They understood at the time that humans couldn't directly control or even mostly confront this phenomenon, so why get people worked up?
I don't think anyone thought it would be so strong that this societal "immune response" would still be going hard almost a century later. Now, we might need to face it head on for reasons that aren't clear yet, but we need to unwind this societal aversion to even looking at the issue.
One thing that upsets me is the similarities between how child abusers and the government/phenomenon interact with humans that they have power over. A lot of times the victims of horrible childhood abuse end up not taken seriously when they try to tell their stories because they are broken, crazy addicts who can't even communicate what's been done to them. It's just a weird connection I came up with when reading some of Gabor Mate's work on attachment and addiction.
We're brushing up against it with Grusch's allusions to murder being done in the name of these secrets, and those are the things people will want to hear about the least but may be the most important.