Like all things Russ, it's halfassed and a waste of his money.
This seems counter-intuitive. You pay $500 to $1000 extra... to have your ad placed for a few seconds on a digital billboard which you're sharing with a bunch of other ads? As opposed to the traditional billboard, which guarantees that it'll have the best chance of actually being seen by every motorist?
Hasn’t the interview been posted here already?
It could've been, I've only been on here sparingly when KF was just available using Tor, so I might have missed it when skimming through the thread.
here you go, Its where you see how much weight he has piled on. NINJAED!
His face looks like it's swollen from getting the shit kicked out of him.
Wow, that is cheap. Less than the cost of paying a woman to pretend to like him for a couple of hours in Olive Garden. This latest scheme might actually happen, for one billboard at least.
That April person is a little worked up over a pre-recorded segment on a local news show. The show is specifically for covering local issues. And like @The Great Citracett said, it was saved for a very slow news day. It's not like the channel made Hookers4All their leading story every night. It was a 3:53 long segment. I'm surprised Russ didn't try to argue with her/threaten to sue her/hit on her/all of the above.
Yeah, she seems like a Boomer who falls for rage-bait "articles" that gets shat out from Facebook's agro.
Ah. That makes a lot more sense. It seemed that having an actual physical billboard poster printed and installed should cost wildly more than just sending a JPEG that gets put in some cycle. But if all of those costs are "extras" then it would explain why the price seems so low. Although it's ridiculous that they're not just included, or at least as a base package where actual "extras" will add to the cost (I mean like installing anything other than a basic printed poster - shapes that extend past the natural edge of the billboard, lights/displays, stuff like that).
