Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

[Wy4M]

Once again this fucking pervert displaying his interpretation of the word "consent" is very different to everyone elses.

He seems to miss the basic concepts about what is right and wrong.

Imagine if someone would say "Crap, yesterday my wife was raped by 3 men"
And then someone would reply: "Have you ever considered that some women do actually have rape fantasies and do enjoy it to be filled simultaneously in each hole? Bigot! "

 

[Procrastinhater]

He seems to miss the basic concepts about what is right and wrong.

Imagine if someone would say "Crap, yesterday my wife was raped by 3 men"
And then someone would reply: "Have you ever considered that some women do actually have rape fantasies and do enjoy it to be filled simultaneously in each hole? Bigot! "

He a low functioning sociopath.
He's completely morally blank, he has no sense of right or wrong at all.
He's not even a whole person, not really.
By his own admission he has no intenal narrative.
He's a literal NPC, he doesn't think, he can't ponder deep philosophical questions like "is it right to get off watching women be suffocated?" or "is it wrong to force myself on my unconscious co-worker after they said no?" he just operates on instinct like an animal.

 

[Neil]

After doing a quick Google image search, I have a furry related suspicion:

View attachment 5253000
View attachment 5252999

Brick face, brick body, brick shoulders, brick for a brain. Elliot's parents should've named him 砖 instead of 甄.

May 2021, Lefty journalist Robert Evans tweeted "my official stance is that we should normalize wearing kink gear at absolutely all times"
Elliot thinks that if 'normies' can have wedding rings, then he can wear a choker.
The other tranny loves to wear something that symbolizes a bond with someone you love.

Elliot's reply to that: "I think the nuance is bystander consent, and whether other people are being involved in a scene without their consent. for me the boundary of bystander consent is "does this directly evoke an intimate act" (e.g. it would definitely NOT be okay to wear a gag around my neck)"

View attachment 5256846

https://archive.is/VSedB

View attachment 5256864

https://archive.is/JbI0w

>comparing a wedding ring, something that symbolizes a deep connection and a lifelong commitment to "kink gear"
How does Elliot still even manage to remember to breathe air? He's so fucking stupid.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Imagine if someone would say "Crap, yesterday my wife was raped by 3 men"
And then someone would reply: "Have you ever considered that some women do actually have rape fantasies and do enjoy it to be filled simultaneously in each hole? Bigot! "

That's literally what he did. The original context of "have you ever considered that some women have rape fantasies and enjoy it" was in response to an article about Pornhub having videos of women who were literally being raped and definitely not actually enjoying being raped.

 

[Tiggletown]

He a low functioning sociopath.
He's completely morally blank, he has no sense of right or wrong at all.
He's not even a whole person, not really.
By his own admission he has no intenal narrative.
He's a literal NPC, he doesn't think, he can't ponder deep philosophical questions like "is it right to get off watching women be suffocated?" or "is it wrong to force myself on my unconscious co-worker after they said no?" he just operates on instinct like an animal.

Tranny Jaws

 

[Prince Vegeta]

I'm late on this but... you don't have a G-Spot Eliot because you're not a woman. You lack the internal anatomy. They did not magically build a clitoris into your pelvis.

 

[The Morning Visitor]

Imagine if someone would say "Crap, yesterday my wife was raped by 3 men"
And then someone would reply: "Have you ever considered that some women do actually have rape fantasies and do enjoy it to be filled simultaneously in each hole? Bigot! "

That's just intersectional politics and the progressive stack in a nutshell. Can't say "woman" to mean adult human female because .1% of the male population decided to play dressup and it would be rude to treat a statistical anonmaly what it is. Can't say "humans are bipeds" because a small percentage of people are missing at least one leg. Can't say "normal" because some people can't accept that they're abnormal. And you better believe that the moment you cry out rape, these people will stop and ask you if you asked about the rape victim's kinks. Because if you're not constantly adjusting for every single outlier, you're only thinking about yourself.

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

May 2021, Lefty journalist Robert Evans tweeted "my official stance is that we should normalize wearing kink gear at absolutely all times"
Elliot thinks that if 'normies' can have wedding rings, then he can wear a choker.
The other tranny loves to wear something that symbolizes a bond with someone you love.

Elliot's reply to that: "I think the nuance is bystander consent, and whether other people are being involved in a scene without their consent. for me the boundary of bystander consent is "does this directly evoke an intimate act" (e.g. it would definitely NOT be okay to wear a gag around my neck)"

View attachment 5256846

https://archive.is/VSedB

View attachment 5256864

https://archive.is/JbI0w

my official stance is that if someone comes within 50 feet of me wearing "kink" anything, I'm going to Minecraft them with a blunt object on general principle and argue self-defense.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

May 2021, Lefty journalist Robert Evans tweeted "my official stance is that we should normalize wearing kink gear at absolutely all times"
Elliot thinks that if 'normies' can have wedding rings, then he can wear a choker.
The other tranny loves to wear something that symbolizes a bond with someone you love.

Elliot's reply to that: "I think the nuance is bystander consent, and whether other people are being involved in a scene without their consent. for me the boundary of bystander consent is "does this directly evoke an intimate act" (e.g. it would definitely NOT be okay to wear a gag around my neck)"

View attachment 5256846

https://archive.is/VSedB

I'm not sure, I imagine a survey would return results that most people would prefer you're wearing a gag than a choker.

 

[teriyakiburns]

I'm not sure, I imagine a survey would return results that most people would prefer you're wearing a gag than a choker.

Or the choker they're imagining looks a little different.

 

[FinnSven]

I'm late on this but... you don't have a G-Spot Eliot because you're not a woman. You lack the internal anatomy. They did not magically build a clitoris into your pelvis.

If he still has his prostate then some people describe that as the male “g-spot”.

Oddly enough he doesn’t strike me as a taker though.
He definitely seems the sort to use uncomfortable and unsuitable props as a giver.

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

He a low functioning sociopath.
He's completely morally blank, he has no sense of right or wrong at all.
He's not even a whole person, not really.
By his own admission he has no intenal narrative.
He's a literal NPC, he doesn't think, he can't ponder deep philosophical questions like "is it right to get off watching women be suffocated?" or "is it wrong to force myself on my unconscious co-worker after they said no?" he just operates on instinct like an animal.

and yet he's cogent enough to furiously seethe over a website where a thread with his name on it is mostly filled with shitposts making fun of him on a Dr. Seuss level.

like, I've been on a number of message boards over the past three decades where *I* was on the receiving end of the sorts of piss-taking that's in this thread, and at some point it's like "shit, that's funny." if you ask me, that's the true mark of a sociopath. dude has literally no sense of humor whatsoever.

 

[FinnSven]

and yet he's cogent enough to furiously seethe over a website where a thread with his name on it is mostly filled with shitposts making fun of him on a Dr. Seuss level.

like, I've been on a number of message boards over the past three decades where *I* was on the receiving end of the sorts of piss-taking that's in this thread, and at some point it's like "shit, that's funny." if you ask me, that's the true mark of a sociopath. dude has literally no sense of humor whatsoever.

No sense of humour and Fatrick Tomlinson levels of ego and self importance.

If he was just a dull twat he would probably have moved on and forgotten about it, but he really can’t stand people not either obeying his every demand or if they don’t, not being able to fire or silence them.

Sociopathic and controlling. Probably the most Troon of all Troons.

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

Shower thought for the day: Do you think Dongless would put out an actual, no-shit hit on Null if he knew where he lived?

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

Shower thought for the day: Do you think Dongless would put out an actual, no-shit hit on Null if he knew where he lived?

no, but he would harass the living fuck out of him

Elliot (*literally*) doesn't have the balls to have anyone of substance killed. although I wouldn't put it past him to strangle someone to death during a "consent accident"

 

[GettrGriftr]

Shower thought for the day: Do you think Dongless would put out an actual, no-shit hit on Null if he knew where he lived?

(Ling ling) Herro, can you go kirr Nurr? He hut feerings. Me ruv you rong time. Gurr tark!

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Shower thought for the day: Do you think Dongless would put out an actual, no-shit hit on Null if he knew where he lived?

Yes. Even if he didn't do it himself, he knows troons who're crazy enough to do it for free. He'd probably contact Null's old friend Greta Gustava to do the deed.

 

[The Morning Visitor]

and yet he's cogent enough to furiously seethe over a website where a thread with his name on it is mostly filled with shitposts making fun of him on a Dr. Seuss level.

like, I've been on a number of message boards over the past three decades where *I* was on the receiving end of the sorts of piss-taking that's in this thread, and at some point it's like "shit, that's funny." if you ask me, that's the true mark of a sociopath. dude has literally no sense of humor whatsoever.

The ching-chong herro shitty wok cannai takya ordah stuff is pretty lowbrow and easy to ignore, but we have a rape confession. That could have consequences a few years down the road when society starts deciding to hold deviants accountable again.

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

The ching-chong herro shitty wok cannai takya ordah stuff is pretty lowbrow and easy to ignore, but we have a rape confession. That could have consequences a few years down the road when society starts deciding to hold deviants accountable again.

all the same, he posted that stuff himself so his attempts to shut us down are just bizarre. screenshots are the most viral thing on the web

 

[FinnSven]

Shower thought for the day: Do you think Dongless would put out an actual, no-shit hit on Null if he knew where he lived?

no, but he would harass the living fuck out of him

Elliot (*literally*) doesn't have the balls to have anyone of substance killed. although I wouldn't put it past him to strangle someone to death during a "consent accident"

I agree, he doesn’t respect human life, but is too chicken shit cowardly to put out a hit.

Mostly because he isn’t as stupid as most cows and knows that if he actually had Null ended, random unhinged people whom he has no idea who they are and what they look like might go and attack him in real life.

I am not advocating that anyone should, just pointing out that his face is well known and thanks to his own blogs, publications and employment, plenty of internet randoms could track him down, kiwifarms or not.

Also if it backfires as in fails or the hit-“person” gets caught, then the risk that there could be now credible evidence that he is involved in such things is too much for his reputation and career.

Sure he can use the diversity hire angle now, but being a known or suspected killer tends to make board members, investors and fellow authors distance themselves.

Plus he is a soft fucking spoiled wealthy fucker. Sure he has the money, but putting a hit on someone in another country, especially to do a US national resident somewhere like Serbia requires some proper connections.
This isn’t find some crack/meth heads and offer them money and drugs to stab and beat someone making it look like a simple mugging gone wrong.

This will require either connections in the Serb underworld, or someone good enough that the serb underworld wouldn’t misinterpret their presence and get them before they finish the job.
Fong Jones won’t have anyone remotely like that on the payroll.