War Why Republicans are turning against aid to Ukraine

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article/Archive


Adam Kinzinger is a CNN senior political commentator and a former Republican congressman from Illinois. He served 10 years on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Kinzinger is also a lieutenant colonel and pilot in the Air National Guard. The opinions expressed in this commentary are his own. Read more opinion at CNN.

After two months of grueling combat, Ukraine’s counteroffensive in its war against Russia is finally showing some signs of progress.

The Ukrainians are slowly retaking territory lost when Russia invaded in February 2022, and last week a waterborne drone attack crippled an important Russian warship.

Now, a majority of Americans — and a more sizable number of Republicans — want to abandon the fight, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS. It’s a bad idea that’s gathering steam at the worst moment and marks a low point for the party of Reagan.

In the CNN poll published Friday, 55% of all respondents said that Congress should stop authorizing new military aid for Kyiv. Worse, from my perspective, is the shameful fact that Republicans are far more likely to favor an end to aid than Democrats.

The survey found that 71% of Republicans told pollsters Congress should stop sending more assistance. Among Democrats, 62% favor more funding for Ukraine.

From where I stand, the poll’s findings reveal that many in my party would turn their backs on friends who are risking their lives in a fight for democracy. They would do so just when Ukrainians are beginning to push the Russians out of the areas they occupied early in the war. Little could be more demoralizing for an army and a country that has fought so valiantly for nearly 18 months and depends on US aid.

Two factors seem to be at play here. The first is the slow progress Ukraine is making on the battlefield. Hopes that Kyiv’s summer counteroffensive would see its forces taking back huge swaths of territory have crashed against the reality of Russian fortifications. Instead of “shock and awe,” we’re seeing the trench warfare of World War I.

The second factor driving Republican sentiment could be called “the Trump effect.” Now campaigning to return to the White House, the former president so dominates the party’s consciousness that his doubts about Ukraine aid have had an enormous effect on Republicans as a whole.

Before Donald Trump, Republicans were not the type to abandon a fight for a strategic partner’s democracy, handing a potential victory to Russian President Vladimir Putin. We were the warriors of the Cold War who brought about the collapse of the Soviet Union.

With Trump, who has embraced Putin, some Republicans are learning to let go of America’s role as the bulwark of democracy and freedom. These Republicans are choosing, instead, the tragic isolationism of those who opposed joining the fight against Hitler. Back then, radio priest Charles Coughlin had a powerful voice among do-nothings. Today, they find comfort on Fox News.

Trump has framed his position in a way that is typical of his petty approach to policy. He said he would threaten to halt war funding to get documents from the federal investigation into the business dealings of President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter. The US should “refuse to authorize a single additional shipment of our depleted weapons stockpiles,” Trump said last month, until “the FBI, DOJ and IRS hand over” evidence in congressional Republicans’ Biden family investigation. He also has said the US should prioritize school safety over Ukraine aid.

The idea that, somehow, school safety and Hunter Biden should have anything to do with helping Ukraine is, on the surface, absurd. But in making these statements, the former president pressed on two hot-button issues that would make his followers take notice.

From my conservative Republican point of view, I find it remarkable that, as the CNN poll shows, Democrats are standing firmly behind Ukraine. It reflects a longer-term trend of the left becoming more comfortable with America’s military.

In 2022, Dominic Tierney, a political science professor at Swarthmore College, noted in The Atlantic that during the Trump administration, Democrats adopted a more favorable view of the military because it stood with the rule of law and tradition. Tierney’s argument is speculative, but I tend to agree with him.

Certainly, the CNN poll suggests a measurable level of Democratic support for military solutions to geopolitical crises.

As a former member of Congress who focused on US obligations abroad, and an Air National Guard pilot who served in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, I have seen how America helps stabilize the world in a way isolationists don’t appreciate.

Through treaties, foreign aid and trade, we help others develop solid and prosperous societies. Our direct military aid was especially vital in Afghanistan, where, in our absence, the repressive Taliban have returned to power. Our withdrawal was bad for the people of Afghanistan and for the world.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Trump’s chief rival for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, said in March that America has no vital interest in Ukraine and called the war a “territorial dispute.” DeSantis walked back the comments about the territorial dispute, but as I see it, GOP voters understand he’s skeptical about funding the war.

This position may spare him the boos that another Trump rival, former Vice President Mike Pence, received last month when he told a conservative gathering in Iowa he supported helping Ukraine. Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie was in Kyiv on Friday, where he showed his support for the fight. However, it’s unclear if anyone may be listening to him.

Official opposition to Ukraine aid is most significant in Congress, which does play a role in what happens to the flow of assistance. In July, 70 House Republicans voted to cut off Kyiv entirely. This number is not enough to change things yet, but the opponents come from the party’s extreme right wing, which plays an outsize role in primaries. This power means candidates are being pressured to join the anti-aid crowd.

With the rank and file of my party losing faith in the fight for democracy, I see yet another example of how the conservatism I once knew, and that America relied on, is disappearing.

Gone is the party of Reagan, which was steadfast in its stand against tyranny. In its place is rising a GOP that seems immune to the world’s need for American leadership and uninterested in the suffering of a country we should aid until the fight is over.
 
Actual republicans have been against aid to ukraine the entire time. Only RINOS and Faggots have been in favor of it. Zelensky needs all your fish heads comrades.
 
I don't know a single conservative that actually gave a rats ass about the war other than we shouldn't be getting involved in any way.
 
You were an Air National Guard pilot. You didn't see the Red state kids coming home in boxes or without their legs or skin.

Even then, GWOT wasn't for muh democracy. It was for drugs and oil.

Fight your own damn wars if your precious Ukraine is so damn important to you. It's not my fucking problem.

From where I stand, the poll’s findings reveal that many in my party would turn their backs on friends who are risking their lives in a fight for democracy.
Ukraine is not a "friend". Zelensky is on Zelensky's side.
 
Why give taxpayer dollars to a Jew running a country he doesn't give a fuck about when you could just give it to Israel directly?
 
I don't know a single conservative that actually gave a rats ass about the war other than we shouldn't be getting involved in any way.
Same here. I live in a very conservative area and everyone agrees we shouldn't be involved. The only people who seem to be in favor of it are rinos and leftists who have been salivating for a war with Russia for years.
 
Ukraine’s counteroffensive in its war against Russia is finally showing some signs of progress.

The Ukrainians are slowly retaking territory lost when Russia invaded in February 2022
Or... they're strategically withdrawing into their incredibly elaborate defensive lines to continue the nightmarish meat grinder against Ukraine that has already worked so well.

But nah, Ukraine must be just about to go on the final push that crushes the Russians once and for all. Without any air support. That is a likely explanation.
 
I didn't care until that fucking kike kept getting pushed in my face everywhere. Now I hope Russia dirty bombs Kiev.
 
As a former member of Congress who focused on US obligations abroad, and an Air National Guard pilot who served in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, I have seen how America helps stabilize the world in a way isolationists don’t appreciate.
I can't stand this neocon fuck. Any stability Iraq had was smothered in the crib because we decided we were tired of fixing the mess we created so now it gets to enjoy being Iran's bitch. I don't think I need to comment further on Afghanistan.

Kinzinger must love having yesterday's code pink, moveon dick-sucks as todays chicken-hawks.
 
Or... they're strategically withdrawing into their incredibly elaborate defensive lines to continue the nightmarish meat grinder against Ukraine that has already worked so well.

But nah, Ukraine must be just about to go on the final push that crushes the Russians once and for all. Without any air support. That is a likely explanation.
Just Two Weeks ™️ to take Crimea.
 
Let's all sit down and listen to deep insights from a kvetching kike who is not only so fucking brain dead he fell for the Ghost of Queef meme, he fell for the "Sam Hyde is the Ghost of Queef" version too. Does this absolute nigger still have #NAFO in his twatter bio?
 
The Russo-Ukrainian war has been one of the most retarded conflicts in a long time and while. Nobody is going to win that cluster fuck.
 
Adam Kinzinger is one of the most pathetic faggots alive and he thinks he's going to go down in history as some hero for whining all the time that we aren't yet an authoritarian state.

Gone is the party of Reagan, which was steadfast in its stand against tyranny.
And this is laughably false, the Reagan administration was less interventionist than the administrations before it and after. It looked the other way about tyranny as long as it could strangle the Soviets economically and force them to the negotiating table. Reagan would have called Kinzinger an anti-American faggot because he is.
 
These Republicans are choosing, instead, the tragic isolationism of those who opposed joining the fight against Hitler.
Oh yes, the "tragic" isolationism of not wanting to get caught up in another one of Europe's tantrums. Over 400,000 dead American boys. Truly a worthy sacrifice of America's youth. And when we had "liberated" western europe in the name of democracy, did we push on till moscow? No, killing anti-democracy commies is a step too far for the likes of commie FDR.

God, I hate rinos.
 
Of course Kinzinger is simping for the Ukronazi regime, this is the same guy who cried about Feds posing as Nazis getting beaten up. He is a colossal piece of shit and should be shipped to the front lines of Ukraine ASAP.
 
the world’s need for American leadership
The world can't stand America. They can't stand American globalization; destroying their children and seducing them to abandon their cultures, traditions, and customs to celebrate American neoliberal ideals and views.
America is the Great Satan to many nations.

The only people who want American leadership are politicians.

uninterested in the suffering of a country we should aid until the fight is over.
Should've aided Germany in the fight against Russia 80 years ago, I swear to God.
"Look you mustachioed faggot, surrender the gooks to us, and in exchange we'll hand you the crumpets, frogs, and commies on a platter."
 
Oh yes, the "tragic" isolationism of not wanting to get caught up in another one of Europe's tantrums. Over 400,000 dead American boys. Truly a worthy sacrifice of America's youth. And when we had "liberated" western europe in the name of democracy, did we push on till moscow? No, killing anti-democracy commies is a step too far for the likes of commie FDR.

God, I hate rinos.
Mostly the richer someone is, the more likely they support escalation with Russia due to the money to be made off stonks and being able to buy themselves out of the draft or being old for the draft. And most likely their kids will not join.
 
Back
Top Bottom