Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 103 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 164 40.1%

  • Total voters
    409
I'm gonna be totally honest and say I haven't read every single log from the Locals or watched the show at all, but has Nick ever addressed the continued existance of Still-Born?
He addressed it obliquely on one of his streams. The gist is that he doesn't think Still-Life is actually making death threats.

He also thinks that (at the time, two, but now three) 4Channers who were arrested and charged for threatening to kill Sheriff Chitwood are innocent too.

He's likely full of shit. Unless you wanna believe that he knows more about criminal law than a prosecutor. He, the guy who admits he plea bargains out all his clients. Nick's legal analysis often turns out to be worthless dogshit.

He seems to view Still-Life as a test of his twisted lolbertarian principles. You'll get thrown off his platforms for making fun of him, but yeeting Still-Life would be some egregious crime against freeze peach. Basically he runs his Locals shithole the exact opposite of how Kiwi Farms is moderated.
 
Damn I was about to post my own screenshot for that. Really makes ya think that the Locals isn't doing all that well. I wonder how significant of a dropoff there has been in subscribers if they're begging old members to come back with two whole months for free.
Locals commonly gives two months off for free if you sub for a year. For example, you can join Potentially Criminal's locals for the low-low cost of $30 / year.

1691703727208.png 1691703749077.png

Additionally, Sean is given out a free month as a trial, so you can dip your toe in and see if you like it.

Enough shilling, the point is the free months aren't necessarily an indicator of desperation, and I've seen the annual discount pop up occasionally in emails and other local comms. If it was Rackets initiated (the emails maybe are?), that could be a greater portent of sub issues (outside of the bedroom).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you're saying racking up 30k views in 1 hour while the stream has 700 live number is realistic because people came and saw the stream and then left? That's not a good thing for Nick's end cause he can't keep any interested eyes stay interested.

Also not a good thing for rumble if nick is getting his views cause of rumble promoting him to front page cause then anyone starting from scratch gets no stepladder what so ever. There's no reason for any small time creator to get excited about rumble and grow along side with rumble.

Rumble still smells like "fake it with your investors money till you make it" to me.
I mean, realistically, the first hour of his show is rambling and super chats while he stream to YouTube, and the second hour is when he gives his 20 minutes of content. So I can believe people waiting for the stream to be over so they can skip all the super chats, toasts, ramblings etc. this wouldn’t be a thing if he knew how to structure a show to keep engagement
 
Additionally, Sean is given out a free month as a trial, so you can dip your toe in and see if you like it.
Don't tempt me man, Sean's one of the few that I can still respect as a person but I'd rather not put Locals back on my phone. I barely used it when I did sub to Nick.
Locals commonly gives two months off for free if you sub for a year.
Ah okay, so I just misunderstood what it meant by "two months free". That makes a lot more sense than, as I'd assumed, giving two extra months if you sub for a year as a bonus à la VPN sponsor deals.
If it was Rackets initiated (the emails maybe are?), that could be a greater portent of sub issues (outside of the bedroom).
It could easily be a Locals thing to try and get people who already had a foot in the door to come back inside. I can't imagine it working though based on the many, many testimonials in this thread of people who stopped because of Nick's shitty behavior. They'd honestly be better served sending advert emails of "check out some of our other creators".
Then again, if it is a push from Nick it's absolutely pathetic and only proves just how much he needs that steady income to survive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixieland Buckaroo
It's fairly amazing to think a mere year ago, this jackass could instantly swing 5K subscriptions for getting booted from YouTube and now nobody would give a fuck.
He instantly swung 5k subscribers, and the social media firestorm lead to YouTube rushing to contrive some excuse to reverse the banning, and he spun the controversy into a paid deal with Rumble/Locals.

Don't think any of that would happen now.

Enough shilling, the point is the free months aren't necessarily an indicator of desperation, and I've seen the annual discount pop up occasionally in emails and other local comms. If it was Rackets initiated (the emails maybe are?), that could be a greater portent of sub issues (outside of the bedroom).
I thpight I read something at some point where Nick told people not too long ago to hold off subscribing for Locals, since he was working with Locals staff on setting up some sort of deal.

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu is that correct?

It would be something else if it turned out that they ended up giving him the same deal they let every creator use. It might potentially give him a hint about the extent they're willing to devote developer time to keep him happy these days.
 
Don't tempt me man, Sean's one of the few that I can still respect as a person but I'd rather not put Locals back on my phone. I barely used it when I did sub to Nick.
Ah! Another refugee! Excellent. Welcome!

There's cookies and punch on the table in the corner.

You may already know @Kalea. She was recently excommunicated by the "Lawpope" for inquiring about some gay Jamaican nigger that Nick claims to not know (but totally does).

He instantly swung 5k subscribers, and the social media firestorm lead to YouTube rushing to contrive some excuse to reverse the banning, and he spun the controversy into a paid deal with Rumble/Locals.

Don't think any of that would happen now.
I don't think he's getting another contract, but I guess we'll see.

Like I don't see the point. 5K seems like a REALLY low sub count. I think they thought it would grow from there, but that hasn't happened.
 
He instantly swung 5k subscribers, and the social media firestorm lead to YouTube rushing to contrive some excuse to reverse the banning, and he spun the controversy into a paid deal with Rumble/Locals.

Don't think any of that would happen now.


I thpight I read something at some point where Nick told people not too long ago to hold off subscribing for Locals, since he was working with Locals staff on setting up some sort of deal.

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu is that correct?

It would be something else if it turned out that they ended up giving him the same deal they let every creator use. It might potentially give him a hint about the extent they're willing to devote developer time to keep him happy these days.
For reference, I've seen multiple Locals creators offer the annual discount at various points. Viva and Barnes were maybe the first I remember, and they have since raised their monthly and annual rate, although still offered a discount on black Friday.

I would assume the take home is about the same, as paying annually has 11 less chances in a year of either a chargeback or a bounced card for whatever reason. It also makes it harder to back out, paying for a year up front.

While I follow (subscribe? whatever the free level is) to a number Locals creators, the only one that might tempt me to pay (outside of Sean) would be if they set up Null. Get on it, Locals.

In spite of my historic skepticism to Rackets, I did consider doing an annual sub last year because it did feel a bit bullshit, his youtube ban. I was so glad a few months later that I decided not to.
 
My suspicion is he didn't make it much past 5k before growth turned negative.

I'm always so affronted by censorship that when YouTube banned Rekieta, I immediately signed up to his locals channel to attempt to lend some support -- even though I hadn't been subscribed to his YouTube channel.

I was there about five minutes before I realized that the whole thing was a cash grab aimed at separating moronic pay-pigs from their hard earned dollar. You couldn't sign up without giving them your email account, and my account was immediately flooded with begging letters suggesting I might want to send him money.

And while you could see the comments, you couldn't participate unless you sent in your $5 a month. Now, I might be dumb but I'm not THAT dumb. Within a day or two, I was unsubscribed and these fuckers were blocked/sent to spam. As much as I might care about censorship, I'm not in the business of sending free money to trust fund lawyers to listen to them chatting shit on the internet.
 
Enough shilling, the point is the free months aren't necessarily an indicator of desperation, and I've seen the annual discount pop up occasionally in emails and other local comms. If it was Rackets initiated (the emails maybe are?), that could be a greater portent of sub issues (outside of the bedroom).
I agree. I think this type of offer is standard for Locals, although the length of free membership may be an indicator of a creator's eagerness to hold on to subs.

I had originally signed up for a monthly RekietaLaw Locals sub after the YouTube ban (I wisely didn't do an annual subscription), and was ready to bail within a month. On canceling, I was immediately offered a free month for any renewal, monthly or annual.

This was a couple weeks before the Discord rebellion, so he was likely already seeing decline due to all the unwanted sex talk, but the real underwear party inspired collapse in viewers hadn't started yet. Messaging was pretty similar to what you're showing, so I don't think it gives any insight.

Also, to tweak the discount amount, Nick would actually have to put some effort into managing his Locals, and that seems... unlikely.
 
What would Branca say?🤔

Branca always advocates for retreating even when not required to by law in video breakdowns, theoretical situations and personal anecdotes.

Branca is a purist. He may play Internet tough guy, but he understands IRL that the safest way to avoid jail is to leave self defense interpretations out of a jury's hands.

The fact that Kurt hasn’t starved to death is proof that our court system is irredeemable.

A Locals member not understanding that Kurt, like something like 99.5% of America lawyers, was never intended to see the inside of a courtroom as a patent reviewer.

Finally, a comma. Again with the "people". Also, we know you can't just talk to Nick. It's a miracle if this message is a true and accurate copy of Locals communication, because Nicky the Nose actually responded to a message! Everything is very one-way with Balldoman.
Nigger, you're getting made fun of because the internet is "open", you're the faggot who wants a "closed" internet

It's like Schrodinger's DM.

Kurt was just bitching last week that Nick is impossible to coordinate with because he ghosts correspondence with his fellow YTubers the majority of the time.

Nick's MO to alogs is to plead for civility by bringing the discussion offline to hash out in private while his allies seethe that he won't actually return any of his business messages.

New Bio and Panel Details:

For a lawyer who definitely doesn't run a legal channel, Nick sure is schizophrenic with writing his own bio describing all the legal content his channel doesn't broadcast.

Ah okay, so I just misunderstood what it meant by "two months free". That makes a lot more sense than, as I'd assumed, giving two extra months if you sub for a year as a bonus à la VPN sponsor deals.

My autism is still unsatiated.

Does "2 months free" mean 12 months for the price of 10 (ie. Two months deducted off the price)

Or does it mean you still are on the hook for the full 12 but in effect get 14?

To me, Option A seems like a better deal.

Less money, less commitment.
 
Edit: Looking again under "Guests and Hosts", other than Nerdrotic and some other unknown Youtuber with an AOL sign on, D MAN 1954, there's no other Youtubers actively listed... there is however a Youtube icon on the full map so they still have the area:
Meatcanyon is still listed as a guest. Much bigger Youtuber but not in any way adjacent to the Rackets clique. I would guess Drinker either had to back out due to some last minute obligations or just decided he didn't want to get involved with Rekieta any further.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chibitzen
He addressed it obliquely on one of his streams. The gist is that he doesn't think Still-Life is actually making death threats.

Yep. Nothing to see here:

OH NO! YOU FOUND IT!

1687306490721.png


--Still-Life--​
Guess Who's Horny?!?!??!
--Still-Life--​
I got my THIRD ban guys!

1687306490721.png


--Still-Life--​
I did, Three Bans BABY!
--Still-Life--​
Like a boss!

--Still-Life--​
It's fucking hilarious

--Still-Life--​
Viva la Free Speech! Ban number FOUR here I come Baby!

JimSatala​
WTF is that for? What are they claiming you did?

GrouchyOldGeezer​
he'd post it, but he'd get a 5th ban then

--Still-Life--​
That's for my plan to kill Mike Chitwood.

--Still-Life--​
Do you like it?
.
 
We have some DMs from DEC2022-JAN2023 boys! There's no new info in it obviously but still amusing! IIRC (huge emphasis on IIRC) PerceptionCheck is a woman who was active in Nick's discord/yt chat/twitch/what have you and was often in Nick's Live Chat Wednesday (Nick's old offering of weekly chat with people who paid for patreon for access to discord).

Below was posted out of order and I've tried my best ordering it by date without touching the pic. If it's low res, that's because it was posted like that.

Screenshot_20230810_121041_Discord.jpgScreenshot_20230810_122023_Discord.jpgScreenshot_20230810_122038_Discord.jpgScreenshot_20230810_121041_Discord.jpgScreenshot_20230810_121548_Discord.jpgScreenshot_20230810_121600_Discord.jpgScreenshot_20230810_121606_Discord.jpg

Screenshot_20230810_131304_Discord.jpgScreenshot_20230810_122058_Discord.jpg

Bonus: I think this was when Nick got notified by Spectre that someone is posting gore in his discord while he was in a Twitch watch party. He went in there to check things and got met with this. This might be the moment when he thought "ah fuck, even my discord found out about my cuckery and turned on me. Time to nuke"

nickcuck1.PNG
 
Last edited:
We have some DMs from DEC2022-JAN2023 boys! There's no new info in it obviously but still amusing! IIRC (huge emphasis on IIRC) PerceptionCheck is a woman who was active in Nick's discord/yt chat/twitch/what have you and was often in Nick's Live Chat Wednesday (Nick's old offering of weekly chat with people who paid for patreon for access to discord).

Below was posted out of order and I've tried my best ordering it by date without touching the pic. If it's low res, that's because it was posted like that.

View attachment 5263997View attachment 5263994View attachment 5263995View attachment 5263997View attachment 5264000View attachment 5264005View attachment 5264006

View attachment 5264016View attachment 5264014

Bonus: I think this was when Nick got notified by Spectre that someone is posting gore in his discord while he was in a Twitch watch party. He went in there to check things and got met with this. This might be the moment when he thought "ah fuck, even my discord found out about my cuckery and turned on me. Time to nuke"

View attachment 5264022
He gets to the real reason he is mad eventually in there. "I worked my whole life for independence..." You certainly didn't work very hard balldo man. Daddy was your boss and now the internet is your boss, you will find that you would have preferred the former. He is coping super hard about not wanting to fuck his fans. You wanted to shove your balldo in Mandy's asshole balldofag and you absolutely would have if people hadn't talked about it. As for people calling your wife a whore perhaps you shouldn't have exposed her and your cuck behavior to the internet if you didn't want that to happen especially with everything that was coming out at the time. If your personality makes such a dramatic shift every few years you are probably mentally ill. That's not normal at all. (also probably a lie considering he has been married for like twenty years and still retains friends from decades ago.
I guess this is one fan who didn't get to play hide the fish head with ol limp dick rekieta.
Butthurt Status: fish heads steaming
Truth Status: 0%
Cope Status: more cope than niggers that have pozzloaded your neghole balldo man.
 
Back