Terrorist Ex-Councillor Samuel Collingwood Smith / Vordrak / Sam Smith / BenvolaStar / Matthew Hopkins News - Convicted defamer, vexatious litigant, actual terrorist, GamerGator, stalker, extortionist (Prosperous Software Consulting Limited)

Ginger Piglet said:
Hello again everyone. I've not been posting on here because I'm working away from home and will be until the middle of next week and have had to suffer intermittent hotel Wi Fi that I've only just managed to make less shite.

Funnily enough, I'm seconded to a firm in Hertfordshire this fortnight. That's the same county Vordy lives in. I was wondering why I've felt fully 10% more autistic this week than normally. But I digress. And no, I'm not going to show up on his doorstep in Welwyn Hatfield because that would be abject weenery.

Anyhow. Vordy, Vordy, Vordy. What are we going to do with him?

"Britain's Highest Court." "Pillar of the community." More like pillock of the community. And it's not Britain's Highest Court, that is to the Supreme Court (formerly the House of Lords). And Sam allegedly passed his LPC. Though to be fair, that's not difficult. I managed it, for one.

So suppose Samuel Collingwood Smith takes it upon himself to file yet another lolsuit against Null and/or Lolcow LLC. And suppose by some fluke, those worthies think it's worth actually defending it this time. One of the things with defamation is that you have to have a reputation that is lowered in the minds of right-thinking people by the false statements made about you. I'm not sure that Vordy's reputation could be lowered any further. It is a matter of public record that he accused his political opponents of child abuse, falsely. It is a matter of public record that he falsely accused Amy Lee and their record label of hosting child porn on their forum, floated said rumour to Perez Hilton and other tabloid sites, and legal action was only averted because he signed an undertaking from Schillings, representing Evanescence and friends (source: his own admission). It is also likely to be a matter of public record, if said lolsuit is filed, that he harassed a 17 year old girl electronically and then threatened her with further legal action if she spoke out about it. Not to mention those times he falsely accused Null and Dyn of hosting child pornography and being into "hurtcore."

Put simply, the man has a reputation as a person who falsely accuses people he doesn't like of child molesting and has done so over several years.

I think it's at least arguable that such a lolsuit should be dismissed summarily as an abuse of process. He has a track record of using legal threats to silence his critics, usually in the context of autismal internet slapfights, which are only of interest to a very small number of people comparatively. There are cases (Jameel -v- Dow Jones and Liberty Fashion Wares Ltd -v- Primark Stores Ltd) which indicate that where the likely readership of an allegedly defamatory publication is small and little to no damage to the reputation of the claimant can be shown, actions should be dismissed as an abuse of process.

But suppose it goes to a full trial, and Null / Lolcow LLC have proper representation and suchlike. Vordy is going to have to give evidence and be cross examined about how he took umbrage to a thread poking fun at him on a fourth-rate internet forum. He's going to have all his dirty washing exposed in public. He will do more damage to himself than he ever could do to Null. I don't know Null or his life, but I'd say he has less to lose than Vordy. Vordy appears to own his own home (must remind self to check with the Land Registry on that - anyone want to lend me three quid to check?) and seems to want to become a solicitor himself. If he does end up battling a protracted lolsuit against people for, effectively, sneering at him on the internets, he's going to make himself even less attractive to employers. And if he wins - well, it's trivial for Null / Lolcow LLC to put any assets they have beyond the reach of any enforcement, so he will get nothing. If he loses, he stands to lose his home when Null's costs are awarded against him, and they will be large, oh yes. (It helps that property is one of the easiest assets in the UK to enforce a judgement against.)

A bit of background here. You don't magically become a TRUE AND HONEST solicitor in the UK upon completion of the LPC. You have to do two years of a training contract with a law firm. This is basically on the job training. They are extremely competitive. When I did my LPC (tw: powerlevelling) in 2008, there were roughly 20,000 LPC graduates, full and part time, across the whole country, but only 5,809 training contracts offered across the whole country. So the roughly 14,000 LPC grads who didn't get a TC were stuck till the next year to try to get one. But then along came another 20,000 LPC grads competing for roughly the same amount of training contract places. So Vordy has got to beat, I would estimate, about 8 to 10 other candidates just to get a foot in the door. Not bloody likely.

Oh, and here's the best bit. Guess how much Vordy is likely to have paid for his Legal Practice Course he'll never use?

Probably £15,255, if he went to BPP or the College of Law, or around £12,000 for one of the other providers.
Click to expand...
So, let's just say that, against all odds, Sam would get a license to practice and a training contract:

How long would it take for them to kick him to the curb after receiveng information about his past misdeeds?
 
Luminous Being said:
So, let's just say that, against all odds, Sam would get a license to practice and a training contract:

How long would it take for them to kick him to the curb after receiveng information about his past misdeeds?
Click to expand...

Minus two years. This is because you only qualify on completion of the two year training contract and his training contract would fall through before he even started once the SRA discovered all this and decided he failed the character and suitability requirements and didn't advance his membership. A track record of harassment and baseless legal threats against online enemies for perceived slights would tend to diminish the confidence of the public in the profession, wouldn't you say?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Super Collie, Portajohn, Army Burger and 5 others
Ginger Piglet said:
Minus two years. This is because you only qualify on completion of the two year training contract and his training contract would fall through before he even started once the SRA discovered all this and decided he failed the character and suitability requirements and didn't advance his membership. A track record of harassment and baseless legal threats against online enemies for perceived slights would tend to diminish the confidence of the public in the profession, wouldn't you say?
Click to expand...

Samuel Collingwood Smith seriously fucked up by letting his freak flag fly before getting his license, because while it is well nigh impossible to lose a law license just for being a psycho (look at how long it took Jack Thompson to get disbarred), the bar is actually rather high to get a license. Samuel Collingwood Smith's behavior throughout his entire career of evil is clearly disqualifying. He has already cast the practice of law into disrepute without even actually practicing. Great jerb, Samuel Collingwood Smith.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: keksz, Don't Call Anybody, Marvin and 8 others
Fucker can't help himself: https://archive.is/5siV0

vord_11aug.png


"this is an ethical blog"

"My local police have been served with the restraining order against Dynastia and are currently having a formal investigation into one officer as a possible accessory to Dynastia’s campaign of harassment against me."
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
  • Informative
Reactions: DadaistVizor, Marvin, José Mourinho and 9 others
LulzKiller said:
I was just about to post that when you edited the post. MUH ETHICS.
Click to expand...
Sorry bby.

Anyone here remember this piece: https://archive.is/WLXRx
I have decided to refocus this blog more ethically based on feedback from KiA and elsewhere. There will be more law and factual pieces with fewer hitpieces along with a slightly gentler style. I will be posting the new style stuff under my real name, with occasional harder pieces by ‘Matthew Hopkins’ for old times’ sake.
Click to expand...
The link to http://vordrak.com/ is dead.

https://samuelcollingwoodsmith.wordpress.com/ is empty save for one introductory post.

http://samuelcollingwoodsmith.blogspot.de/ is completely empty, but the title for the page is "Not quite null" lol.[/quote]
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Bernard, Randall Fragg, Portajohn and 3 others
Why doesn't he sue Null beyond knowing he'd lose?
Suing Dynastia was a Pyrrhic victory. He may as well have sued the wind. He knows Null's identity, he'd have a real case.
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Bernard and Super Collie
Who is his target audience at this point? I've already shown that I don't intend on getting a normal job again and no one on this webzone buys his bullshit. So what's he trying to do?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Super Collie and Portajohn
Null said:
Who is his target audience at this point? I've already shown that I don't intend on getting a normal job again and no one on this webzone buys his bullshit. So what's he trying to do?
Click to expand...
  1. Rage against a forum that is used by anonymous people
  2. Threaten lawsuits against anonymous people
  3. Threaten the owner of the website
  4. Continue to rage ad nauseam
  5. ?????
  6. Profit
Honestly, if I were in your position I'd be tempted to find legal representation in the UK and sue him just to air his :briefs:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Super Collie, Portajohn, Army Burger and 5 others
Null said:
Who is his target audience at this point? I've already shown that I don't intend on getting a normal job again and no one on this webzone buys his bullshit. So what's he trying to do?
Click to expand...
I would say "himself" but let's be real here, he probably deludes himself w/ the idea that hundreds of thousands follow him and are waiting for his victory in this underdog story where he battles the evil Kiwi Farms and that he'll knighted if takes us down
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Portajohn
Luminous Being said:
Fucker can't help himself: https://archive.is/5siV0

View attachment 123060

"this is an ethical blog"

"My local police have been served with the restraining order against Dynastia and are currently having a formal investigation into one officer as a possible accessory to Dynastia’s campaign of harassment against me."
Click to expand...


Welp, he's extending his craziness into the police force. Sure to make him some friends there.

Null said:
Mmm, costs money. I should run a Kickstarter or GoFundMe full of his details just so he'd try to shut it down and end up advertising his own failures more.
Click to expand...
What he really wants, as shown by his email to Null, is for this to just go away. He wants public respectability. He wants to sweep his hate group and its domestic terrorism under the carpet. He wants to get back into politics. He wants authority. He wants respect, you can feel this in every pompous self-serving word he's written.

We have to bring this dangerous creature into the light. He is a vampire and we must hunt him like Van Helsing.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Jill Kews, Marvin, Randall Fragg and 10 others
chekovia said:
What he really wants, as shown by his email to Null, is for this to just go away. He wants public respectability. He wants to sweep his hate group and its domestic terrorism under the carpet. He wants to get back into politics. He wants authority. He wants respect, you can feel this in every pompous self-serving word he's written.
Click to expand...
Not even, because if that were the case, he'd had offered apples for apples. Instead he wanted sites even tangentially related to me to go down in exchange for articles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back