Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate & Woman-Hate Thread-Hate Thread

no army in the world with the will to win will let women anywhere near the frontline
Hmmmm.
1692054067568.png
 
Godless commies are known for this shit. But only 5% of the entire Red Army was female. And more than half of those were involved as doctors, nurses, the other half as paper clippers.

The number of combat active personnel was negligible though commie agitprop did like to blow it out of proportion because it was part of their ideology. That doesn't mean that I disparage the deeds of the women who actually did serve in combat roles. But their overall contribution was tiny. Men did 99.9% of the killing.

Woman had a larger involvement in the partisans, but even there a so small number saw actual combat for it to be negligible.

The RA is the best example that when faced with a truly serious situation - defensive position in a war of annihilation - you can't afford to have women on the frontline.
 
Godless commies are known for this shit. But only 5% of the entire Red Army was female. And more than half of those were involved as doctors, nurses, the other half as paper clippers.

The number of combat active personnel was negligible though commie agitprop did like to blow it out of proportion because it was part of their ideology. That doesn't mean that I disparage the deeds of the women who actually did serve in combat roles. But their overall contribution was tiny. Men did 99.9% of the killing.

Woman had a larger involvement in the partisans, but even there a so small number saw actual combat for it to be negligible.
We should probably keep women out of the logistics companies then, I doubt their tiny feminine muscles could move goalposts that much.
 
We should probably keep women out of the logistics companies then, I doubt their tiny feminine muscles could move goalposts that much.
Without power leveling too much I can give it to you on paper, signed, that this is the case.

No goalpost has been moved here. Unless you read my argument as 'no women have ever been in a trench' which would make you retarded.
 
Now that children are carrying smartphones, and can record conversations and photos sent to them. The Pussy Pass is taking a bit of a beating.

View attachment 5272060


But if they are worried about that. They can do other things. Just don't try to monetize it.
View attachment 5272076
Are you absolutely sure you're a man and not a feminist in these threads trying to seem as lame and whiny as possible so people are embarrassed to be on the side making fun of women?

Even if cherry picking screenshots wasn't dumb, let's face it, nobody's as offended by female teachers screwing male students because it isn't the same.
We all know women are in large part valuable for their sexuality so if a male teacher screws a female student he's taking something from her, she's damaged goods. A girl tells you her male teacher had sex with her you're going to be weirded out by that.

A female teacher has sex with a male student, he's not losing nearly as much. You could grow up and tell people your lady teacher jerked you off as a 15 year old and nobody's going to think less of you for it, it won't hurt your prospects.

Would that maybe be a troubling experience? Sure, when you're a young man you're fed the line that you must be gay if you turn down sex so there's some level of social pressure there and later you might feel a little weird about it, but ultimately it doesn't matter as much when women do it.

I know you're A&N brained, but if you want to criticize women as a broad category you're going to have to come up with something more creative than defaulting to calling them child molesters.
 
We all know women are in large part valuable for their sexuality so if a male teacher screws a female student he's taking something from her, she's damaged goods.

Which is why Women never tell you their sexual history.

A female teacher has sex with a male student, he's not losing nearly as much. You could grow up and tell people your lady teacher jerked you off as a 15 year old and nobody's going to think less of you for it, it won't hurt your prospects.

So you basically arguing the only damage from student teacher sexual relations is reputational.

I know you're A&N brained

As soon as people throw out their pet names. "Moids" "Foids" "ThunderDomers" "scrotes" "Holols" "Vatniks" etc.... I know they aren't worth talking to.
 
No goalpost has been moved here. Unless you read my argument as 'no women have ever been in a trench' which would make you retarded.
No I read your argument as "no army in the world with the will to win would allow women anywhere near the frontlines" and then I said "soviets did", and then you scrambled so hard to move those goalposts you'd think they were factories headed east of the Urals.
 
No I read your argument as "no army in the world with the will to win would allow women anywhere near the frontlines" and then I said "soviets did", and then you scrambled so hard to move those goalposts you'd think they were factories headed east of the Urals.

I see that you are really that retarded.

When I said "no women" I did not mean literally zero women. I meant that the amount of women in active combat roles is irrelevant to the entire war effort and that women are not targeted for recruitment or conscription for combat roles.

Obviously if you have 15 million people under weapons there is bound to be a women somewhere in the trenches, because they are blessed with divine eyesight or whatever or because they just happened to end up there for some reason.
 
When I said "no women" I did not mean literally zero women.
Obviously.
1692058266235.png

There is no excuse for me not empathing whatever walked-back goalpost-shifted points you're making from your original one, which was that "no army in the world that has the will to win will let women anywhere near the frontlines ", and which you were apparently so happy with that you repeated it word-for-word several times. I should have known you didn't mean it, and you actually meant something entirely different, because words are just meaningless shapes that have no way of accurately conveying our thoughts.

Next time when you say something retarded and wrong, I'll ignore your actual words and pretend you were saying something more reasonable, and then I'll respond to that instead.
 
I see that you are really that retarded.

When I said "no women" I did not mean literally zero women. I meant that the amount of women in active combat roles is irrelevant to the entire war effort and that women are not targeted for recruitment or conscription for combat roles.

Obviously if you have 15 million people under weapons there is bound to be a women somewhere in the trenches, because they are blessed with divine eyesight or whatever or because they just happened to end up there for some reason.
War is how retarded males solve conflicts because they aren't big enough bois to talk things out. The modern US military does most of the hard work of killing innocent kids for daring to have been born in the same village where some turrurist is hiding out from behind a screen in a cushy desk chair anyway. No reason a woman couldn't do the work except we have a thing called a conscience getting in the way
 
Letting half of the user base attack the other half probably isn't great for the forum's ecosystem but it sure is funny to watch.
I'd say the split is 90% of the thread's (passive) userbase laughing at 4% seething retards that 6% are actively making fun of.

War is how retarded males solve conflicts because they aren't big enough bois to talk things out.
I agree with the underlying sentiment - but I always think it's important to add "using other males", because the retards deciding to go to war are never those having to foot the bill with their lives.
----

One thing I tend to mildly take issue with in these discussions is when someone makes statements about the system overall being male-oriented while addressing the circumstances of an individual: a system can be (and usually is) male-rigged, but still stomp on a shitton of men in different, but nonetheless horrific ways, just as it does women. The type of man who benefits from the rigging, is conceivably not at all the one you're addressing in the debate.
 
I see that you are really that retarded.
Dyn is a legendary shitposter. Show some respect and take notes instead of being wildly autistic and mistakenly thinking you're in good company.
I'd say the split is 90% of the thread's (passive) userbase laughing at 4% seething retards that 6% are actively making fun of.
Was being hyperbolic for brevity's sake. It's a small amount of women attacking every male user. The small amount of men who can't handle a small amount of women processing their obvious trauma by sperging about "moids" should be mocked though.
If they were remotely capable of taking power they'd be in charge instead of being feminists. Let them seethe into the void, it's as close as they'll ever get to putting a man in his place.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pomegrenade
Back