Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

[Lidl Drip]

You’ve ignited a particular strain of hate in me. I hate rekeita so fucking much it’s legitimately unreal this nasty faggot built an entire career hating women and posting about that misogynistic heard v depp triAl and building an woman hating incel audience yet is so fucking cucked about race politics it’s insane. The black man he hangs out with goes on the most unhinged rants about women and nick gives zero fucks, but is so fuckimg quick to call null a racist and simp for BLM meanwhile he has a wife and a fuckimg daughter and even that hasn’t given him any basic empathy for women. he doesn’t tell his audience or stop being misogynistic, he doesnt tell that shitskinned mra he’s friends with to stop being an incel. Literally nothing will make men empathize with women. Leftist men that are super racially and sexually progressive but still hate women are truly some of my most despised people

Same. I actually used to think that Nick Rekieta was "wholesome" cause he seemed to have his life together, seemed happy in his marriage and was pretending to be this wholesome family man who loves his wife and kids soooo much. Pretty blackpilling how that all turned out.

 

[Spud]

GTA6 having a female protagonist was rumored, a bunch of speds on this site all sperged about how much they would hate it because the very thought of a woman punching out someone's lights out, and stealing their car, even in a fucking videogame, was too "unrealistic", and "immersion breaking"

Cause we all know that she's not going to be a well written interesting nuanced character but rather a blank slate for the developer to insert their current year politics into because they can't come up with unique and interesting female characters compared to the "Sexist" devs that gave us Lara Croft, Samus and Bayonetta. Also suspension of disbelief only goes so far and seeing a 100lbs 5ft1 whamen fighting a 6ft6 250lb man cracking quips without breaking a sweat pushing it to point where you can't suspend your disbelief anymore. Throw in magic powers and it all goes away cause magic but GTA is a parody/simulation of reality so seeing this dynamic and knowing how it would really go down you can't pretend that's how it would go.

violent like carjacking someone, or beating them up?

Whamens don't have the same test levels as men, as well it just comes off as "Girls can play the game just as well as the boys" then when put on a fair playing field with the boys proceed to get demolished due to biological differences. Women were given one of the most important gifts on this planet and it's strange to see then want to cast it aside cause they want to play the role of the drunk frat boy instead.

 

[Chandelier]

Why do some men think women are incapable of doing anything violent like carjacking someone, or beating them up? Don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to make this a "both sides" thing.

I'm just asking this because when the mere possibility of GTA6 having a female protagonist was rumored, a bunch of speds on this site all sperged about how much they would hate it because the very thought of a woman punching out someone's lights out, and stealing their car, even in a fucking videogame, was too "unrealistic", and "immersion breaking" for their poor, porn-rotted minds to handle, and ever since then I have not been able to fathom how the fuck a single person, let alone multiple people, could be so fucking autistic.

Saints Row already had that when you could pick between a male or female character. You could make your female character jacked as hell to make it realistic.

I've heard plenty of "lmao you're weak and don't stand a chance against us" from Redonkulas and Better Bachelor's comment sections. I used to be subscribed to the former years ago, but unsubscribed because the content and fanbase was so hostile to women. Everything from Eve eating the apple to them being an abusive piece of shit was the woman's fault.

The one I still remember though is this MRA casually saying his mother and sister were terrified of him once he got into fights with his brother and how it was only the father who could break them up. He apparently didn't understand he was a violent psychopath.

 

[Dyn]

Cause we all know that she's not going to be a well written interesting nuanced character

GTA6 is set in Miami, in the 1980's. In that time, and that place, the most notorious and feared narcotrafficante was a woman called Griselda Blanco. She was also the narco with the most interesting and nuanced story on the entire Caribbean corridor, except maybe for Carlos Lehder.

Did you consider for even a second that maybe the devs do intend to put effort into making a well written, interesting, nuanced character, and maybe they spent a long-ass time deep diving into narco lore, and maybe the very first thing that jumped out at them when they looked into the criminal lore of 1980's Miami was this larger-than-life supervillain character that completely dominated the era, and dominates it even more in pop culture history of the era, and they immediately got ideas for a female protagonist that would reference and pay homage to her?

Or did your tiny male brain just shut down in seething outrage because "wahman"?

 

[Bloitzhole]

have you ever heard of men faking orgasms to make women feel better about being a crap shag?

From my own experiences and some of my male friends', it's mostly not necessary because if you don't have an orgasm, a lot of women just see that as a bonus and assume that if he/you wanted to, he/you would've - probably because they've experienced dudes who will blow the moment they sense a vulva in a 10 foot range. (Some) men meanwhile base their entire ego in bed on it and will get all pissy about it, to the point where it's so fucking annoying you'd rather fake an orgasm than deal with his whining from what I gather.
I know, being left at a sort of medium-high and unsatisfied unfortunately happens to women all the time (and far more frequently), but it's sad in general - everyone should be invested in their own and their shag's enjoyment.

Men are genuinely retarded when it comes to realizing they are shit in bed though. I feel some women just don't really consider their ability to please their lay at all, assuming men are happy if they can fuck literally anything, even if it's just a human starfish (which a lot seem to be ngl), but men will legitimately assume they are king cock based on evidence pointing in the complete other direction. Case in point: I recall my ex telling me her (now) husband was utterly nonplussed when she started talking to him about how she wasn't getting what she wanted out of intimacy. His reasoning was that he had had SO many one-night stands, he must be doing "it" right. It never occurred to him that maybe there was a fucking reason women never called him back for a round 2.

Unironically, I think A&H has made me hate guys more. Does that count?

I'm a guy, and A&H has made me hate guys more. Bust most of all, A&H has made me hate A&H more.

The black man he hangs out with goes on the most unhinged rants about women and nick gives zero fucks, but is so fuckimg quick to call null a racist and simp for BLM meanwhile he has a wife and a fuckimg daughter and even that hasn’t given him any basic empathy for women.

I started out thinking it's just a wholesome relationship where both partners were so comfortable with each other, they could insult eachother's sex, not take themselves seriously and it was just a joke - the more I listened to him and the company he keeps, the more I felt like he genuinely thinks women are "lesser" overall. Really disappointing.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

GTA6 is set in Miami, in the 1980's. In that time, and that place, the most notorious and feared narcotrafficante was a woman called Griselda Blanco. She was also the narco with the most interesting and nuanced story on the entire Caribbean corridor, except maybe for Carlos Lehder.

This is fascinating, thanks!

the more I listened to him and the company he keeps, the more I felt like he genuinely thinks women are "lesser" overall. Really disappointing.

I don't get why it took so long for some people to see that man's true colours. The moment I first learned about that hustler's involvement in the Victor Mignogna lawsuit, I knew he was a fraudster whose primary concern was shilling his own name, the client be damned. You can't win 'he said, she said' cases (unless you have Depp's money and your opponents are flailing retards with even more useless representation than yours) - the best advice for you is to deny, apologise anyway and keep a low profile for a while.

 

[Dyn]

This is fascinating, thanks!

40 murders is very conservative, she's officially linked to 250+ and most sources put her at 2,000+. That's a very dry article that doesn't even mention the wilder stories, like how she kidnapped and murdered a child when she was 11, or how she'd regularly slit men's throats in bed for having subpar pipe game, or how she murdered a teenage girl's entire family for breaking up with her son, or how she whacked Pablo Escobar's niece on a random whim and then laughed at him about it, or how she named her dog 'Hitler' and fed people to him.

But yeah, a female GTA6 character in 1980's Miami? Utterly unreasonable and unrealistic.

 

[𝕺𝖑' 𝕯𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖞 𝕱𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖔]

GTA6 is set in Miami, in the 1980's. In that time, and that place, the most notorious and feared narcotrafficante was a woman called Griselda Blanco. She was also the narco with the most interesting and nuanced story on the entire Caribbean corridor, except maybe for Carlos Lehder.

Did you consider for even a second that maybe the devs do intend to put effort into making a well written, interesting, nuanced character, and maybe they spent a long-ass time deep diving into narco lore, and maybe the very first thing that jumped out at them when they looked into the criminal lore of 1980's Miami was this larger-than-life supervillain character that completely dominated the era, and dominates it even more in pop culture history of the era, and they immediately got ideas for a female protagonist that would reference and pay homage to her?

Or did your tiny male brain just shut down in seething outrage because "wahman"?

I heard they were basing it on Bonnie and Clyde. Which I actually posted about being a fun idea in the thread before that rumor came out so I was pretty excited to hear it. Either way the gta series has a lot more gun fighting than melee so its pretty retarded to say WOMEN SMALL CANT FIGHT BIG MAN

I'm just kind of bummed they said no more punching down jokes because GTA always came off as making fun of everyone equally to me anyway.

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

Why do some men think women are incapable of doing anything violent like carjacking someone, or beating them up? Don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to make this a "both sides" thing.

I'm just asking this because when the mere possibility of GTA6 having a female protagonist was rumored, a bunch of speds on this site all sperged about how much they would hate it because the very thought of a woman punching out someone's lights out, and stealing their car, even in a fucking videogame, was too "unrealistic", and "immersion breaking" for their poor, porn-rotted minds to handle, and ever since then I have not been able to fathom how the fuck a single person, let alone multiple people, could be so fucking autistic.

Because they've never been to Scotland lol

 

[Pilgrim of Grace]

Did you consider for even a second that maybe the devs do intend to put effort into making a well written, interesting, nuanced character, and maybe they spent a long-ass time deep diving into narco lore, and maybe the very first thing that jumped out at them when they looked into the criminal lore of 1980's Miami was this larger-than-life supervillain character that completely dominated the era, and dominates it even more in pop culture history of the era, and they immediately got ideas for a female protagonist that would reference and pay homage to her?

Hm. You've omitted the immutable, demonstrable fact that writing in media has tanked in the last few years. Writing quality has degraded so preposterously that writers and actors were shocked to discover large swathes of the general population simultaneously did not support their strike and hoped the current strike would cause Hollywood to burn down. These items might factor into why people have "no faith" in media writing anymore.

Another item you may have forgotten: women are written poorly. A list of many examples can be generated, but two recent iterations would be She-Hulk, Velma and Wonder Woman. Strange, seeing as how the majority of these frankly offensive and sexist stereotypical characters are written by other women.

 

[Dyn]

I'm just kind of bummed they said no more punching down jokes because GTA always came off as making fun of everyone equally to me anyway.

Everyone should be bummed about that. GTA's humour was edgy, and once an edgelord says 'Okay I'll make fun of everything else but X demographic is off limits' they're ruined.

Hm. You've omitted the immutable, demonstrable fact that writing in media has tanked in the last few years.

Rockstar's last release was RDR2, which is still universally held to be the best writing in a video game, possibly ever. Literally nobody in the fucking world was talking about concerns that GTA6 might be written poorly until they found out there'd be a female protagonist. At least be honest and just say "I don't want to play as a woman because I don't respect women".

Another item you may have forgotten: women are written poorly. A list of many examples can be generated, but two recent iterations would be She-Hulk, Velma and Wonder Woman.

If you want well-written characters then maybe stop watching movies about fucking cartoons and comic books lmao.

 

[Catloaf]

This thread has awaken the lurkers too. Yes, I'm talking about decline and co. Just your average mouth frothed faggots. It's either incel to troon pipeline, incel to faggot pipeline or incel to pedo.

Spoiler: thread tax

I used to know a guy in his 30s who is a MIDDLE SCHOOL dropout. Living with his mom. Huge consoomer (notably Nintendo franchise). No job, on welfare, yet he spends his welfare on limited edition shit that cost hundreds. This guy, I shit you not, doesn't know how to even handle a knife, let alone cook. He once cut himself with a potato peeler. He cooks meat in the microwave . He hates fruits and veggies. he'd eat junk food all the time. Absent father, neglectful mom. Imagine being a huge burden on society and being perpetual manbaby that buys toys all the time with no intention of getting out of this shit.

 

[BULLY HUNTER_78]

View attachment 5272654
it do be like that

Big thanks to the kiwisisters of this thread for posting their honest opinions. Very thunk-provoking. I think anonymous forums like this are a perfect place to have these sorts of discussions because you're safe from the whims of our moid rage. No woman IRL would give men this kind of untempered feedback because of the very real threat of violence if we are criticized this harshly to our face.

Now that I've had a chance to reflect and look at modern society a little more objectively, I've come to the conclusion that modern society has leveled the playing field between the sexes to a large degree, since the state has a monopoly on sanctioned violence.

Much of our history has been dominated by competition between men because men are biologically more disposable. Men have been under an evolutionary pressure for generations to be strong and violent. Women have been under evolutionary pressure to be submissive and compliant. When the men are done fighting their tribal war and the survivors roll up on your village, the game of violence that the men of your village just died playing isn't exactly a winning strategy for survival. If the strongest of your village just lost, you have exactly zero hope for victory. This means that women had to learn how to manipulate others into doing what they want as an innovative survival mechanism. While men were focused on only becoming faster and stronger, women were quietly building their emotional intelligence.

Due to the exponential progress of technology, our species has found itself in a modern industrial society in an evolutionary instant. The system (if you'd like to know more about the system, read the works of Dr. Theodore Kaczynski) has a monopoly on violence. This means that anyone who wants something needs to learn how to manipulate the system to meet their needs, rather than violently bashing their head against it because that only results in imprisonment or an early grave. This means that women, with an emotional intelligence that they've been building for generations, are simply better equipped to navigate the pitfalls of modern society.

This leads me to my theory of where the modern impotent moid rage comes from: a deep-seated frustration that they can't just shoot, stab, or intimidate their way into getting what they want anymore. All the men I know IRL that are most into the MGTOW, incel, and MRA communities have undergone a particularly nasty divorce. Divorce (which the system takes great pains to ensure is equitable) has become a major sore-spot for moids because it requires a high level of emotional intelligence to navigate. Every MGTOW, incel, and MRA channel I know of constantly whinges about how biased and unfair divorce is to men. The thought has never occurred to them that the discrepancy in outcomes might be a skill issue. I am beginning to think that the men who get raked over the coals in divorce and become MGTOW/MRA afterwards simply got outplayed in a competition between who has the highest emotional intelligence and can manipulate the system most optimally to get their desired result.

As an extension of this theory, maybe the discrepancy in prison sentences between the genders in general is more a result of women's greater emotional intelligence. A woman is simply much less likely to chimp out in court like a moid would. Since women take the court more seriously, it's reasonable to conclude that they could achieve their desired outcomes more often.

 

[Lidl Drip]

As an extension of this theory, maybe the discrepancy in prison sentences between the genders in general is more a result of women's greater emotional intelligence. A woman is simply much less likely to chimp out in court like a moid would. Since women take the court more seriously, it's reasonable to conclude that they could achieve their desired outcomes more often.

No women are just less likely to have a criminal history of previous violent offenses and also more likely to have mitigating circumstances and on top of that are more likely to accept a plea deal instead of thinking they are going to win their case despite a bunch of evidence against them like a retarded scrote would.

The shit about men always losing in family court is also just made up bs btw.

 

[Roccosmoderndeath1]

As an extension of this theory, maybe the discrepancy in prison sentences between the genders in general is more a result of women's greater emotional intelligence. A woman is simply much less likely to chimp out in court like a moid would. Since women take the court more seriously, it's reasonable to conclude that they could achieve their desired outcomes more often.

This is a very interesting point, I've always said that a lot of men "get fucked" in family courts because they are simply too stunted to make and go to appointments on time without a woman to do it for them. This is also the reason most divorces are filed by women, men can't bother to do the paperwork. As more women are getting incarcerated, more research is being done on women in the system. Many brainless moids and pickmes blame women for this - that our increased societal gender equality has caused western women to fall.

However, as more research is being done in the modern era, that doesn't seem to be the case. Here is just one study from the UK talking about criminality in women you can read for yourself:
Double Standard - Centre for Women's Justice UK
Highlights:

At least 57% of women in prison and under community supervision are victims of domestic abuse. The true figure is likely to be much higher because of barriers to women disclosing abuse. Of 173 women screened at HMP Drake Hall, 64% reported a history indicative of brain injury and for most this was caused by domestic violence.

It is recognised in statutory guidance on coercive and controlling behaviour that victims may be coerced by their abuser to commit offences. These offences can also relate to women’s attempts at survival and subsistence in the context of financial abuse. Women are more likely than men to commit an offence to support someone else’s drug use (48% to 22%).

Female Offenders Quick Facts - ussc.gov
Additionally, stats on female US federal offenders show that out of 8,204: half are drug trafficking, and then the rest are about equally split between Fraud, Immigration, and Other crimes. So, vast majority is non-violent and without a person victim.

My conclusion is that women do not tend to have any inherent criminal or violent tendencies, unlike men. Women who do end up in prison end up there more than half the time because they were abused by their domestic partner, who is most likely a man. They get literal brain damage, which causes them to act more impulsively and violent. Overlapping with that, just under half the time, women are only doing crime on behalf of someone else (again, more likely than not a domestic partner). The majority of all female crime is men's fault. Of the remaining slice, of course, women are still susceptible to drug use and mental illness, but many are also doing things as a last resort to care for their children.

TL;DR When women commit crimes, a man likely at fault.

not bothering to archive b/c the actual reports are giant PDFs, sorry

 

[Generic Anime Girl]

the threads have gotten so funny at this point

View attachment 5272707

What is this I see? trouble in freedom of speech paradise??

I tried to debate that nigga but he kept throwing out the same statistic without backing it up

 

[Alligator Alcatraz]

I once had a conversation with a male friend online where we talked about things that scared us. He had mentioned he was scared of monsters, ghosts, and demons. I said I was scared of men. He thought this was funny, but I was serious. I'm not afraid of the supernatural, but men scare me because they are a real threat to my life every day. A man hurting me doesn't have to come from anything negative, it doesn't have to be instigated or with any cause.

The story of Jeffery Dahmer interested me because it is a case of a serial killer who attacked men the same way men attack women. Dahmer killed several young men, some teens, because he was sexually attracted to them. He killed one despite not being attracted to the man at all. He gave no reason for his actions in court, he showed no emotion during proceedings. Cold blood. To me, it feels gratifying for men to experience the same violence women typically fear and face. I hope there more serial killers like Jeffery Dahmer. I want men to feel the same fear women do.

 

[AmberHeardSupporter]

Cause we all know that she's not going to be a well written interesting nuanced character but rather a blank slate for the developer to insert their current year politics into because they can't come up with unique and interesting female characters compared to the "Sexist" devs that gave us Lara Croft, Samus and Bayonetta. Also suspension of disbelief only goes so far and seeing a 100lbs 5ft1 whamen fighting a 6ft6 250lb man cracking quips without breaking a sweat pushing it to point where you can't suspend your disbelief anymore. Throw in magic powers and it all goes away cause magic but GTA is a parody/simulation of reality so seeing this dynamic and knowing how it would really go down you can't pretend that's how it would go.

Whamens don't have the same test levels as men, as well it just comes off as "Girls can play the game just as well as the boys" then when put on a fair playing field with the boys proceed to get demolished due to biological differences. Women were given one of the most important gifts on this planet and it's strange to see then want to cast it aside cause they want to play the role of the drunk frat boy instead.

shut the fuck up piece of shit, primordial, less than human male. Dumb nigger can’t even use the word women he’s so fucking asshurt and deranged about women. cockhavers like you should be shot in the back of the head

Hm. You've omitted the immutable, demonstrable fact that writing in media has tanked in the last few years. Writing quality has degraded so preposterously that writers and actors were shocked to discover large swathes of the general population simultaneously did not support their strike and hoped the current strike would cause Hollywood to burn down. These items might factor into why people have "no faith" in media writing anymore.

Another item you may have forgotten: women are written poorly. A list of many examples can be generated, but two recent iterations would be She-Hulk, Velma and Wonder Woman. Strange, seeing as how the majority of these frankly offensive and sexist stereotypical characters are written by other women.

nasty prostate havers once again seething over poorly written female characters as if every male character is written well. Kys

. I hope there more serial killers like Jeffery Dahmer. I want men to feel the same fear women do.

Support Aileen Wuornos nigga

 

[Lidl Drip]

40 murders is very conservative, she's officially linked to 250+ and most sources put her at 2,000+

They hate to see a girlboss winning.

 

[BULLY HUNTER_78]

No women are just less likely to have a criminal history of previous violent offenses and also more likely to have mitigating circumstances and on top of that are more likely to accept a plea deal instead of thinking they are going to win their case despite a bunch of evidence against them like a retarded scrote would.

My conclusion is that women do not tend to have any inherent criminal or violent tendencies, unlike men. Women who do end up in prison end up there more than half the time because they were abused by their domestic partner, who is most likely a man. They get literal brain damage, which causes them to act more impulsively and violent. Overlapping with that, just under half the time, women are only doing crime on behalf of someone else (again, more likely than not a domestic partner). The majority of all female crime is men's fault. Of the remaining slice, of course, women are still susceptible to drug use and mental illness, but many are also doing things as a last resort to care for their children.

I should probably clarify that, while you are correct that women are less violent in general and thus receive less prison time overall, when comparing the prison sentences of men and women charged with the same crime, women receive more lenient prison sentences. Here are a few MSM sources:

Spoiler: Same crime, lower prison sentence for women

https://journalistsresource.org/criminal-justice/courts-lenient-sentencing-bond-women/

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/women-arent-always-sentenced-by-the-book-maybe-men-shouldnt-be-either/

https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/demographic-differences-sentencing

https://scholarworks.utep.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=gang_lee

So, while there are less women murders overall and thus women are much less likely to serve jailtime for murder, between a man and a woman murderer, the woman tends to get less jailtime.

I've always said that a lot of men "get fucked" in family courts because they are simply too stunted to make and go to appointments on time without a woman to do it for them. This is also the reason most divorces are filed by women, men can't bother to do the paperwork. As more women are getting incarcerated, more research is being done on women in the system. Many brainless moids and pickmes blame women for this - that our increased societal gender equality has caused western women to fall.

My thoughts exactly, I think we can also extend this logic to criminal court as well.

The shit about men always losing in family court is also just made up bs btw.

Regardless of whether or not the statistic itself is made up, the angriest moids I've seen IRL are divorced. Look at the MGTOW/MRA channels that are popular - I'm willing to bet a large portion of them are divorced. Better Bachelor comes mind as an example.

I am willing to bet that there is actually an element of truth to the MGTOW/MRA talking point. I used to chalk it up to men being statistically higher earners and the global homo wanting their cut from the divorce but now I'm starting to realize that it might just be because we're the niggers of gender and can't stop ourselves from chimping out in the legal system. As an example, look at how Ethan Ralph or Vickers conduct themselves in the court system. Compare that to the ex of Ralph's who he legally can't mention her name anymore (I forget her name). I'm willing to bet that she was way less of a chimp in court and thus got exactly what she wanted.

I once had a conversation with a male friend online where we talked about things that scared us. He had mentioned he was scared of monsters, ghosts, and demons. I said I was scared of men. He thought this was funny, but I was serious. I'm not afraid of the supernatural, but men scare me because they are a real threat to my life every day. A man hurting me doesn't have to come from anything negative, it doesn't have to be instigated or with any cause.

This is a very rational fear. I've noticed that women are less interested in the supernatural/fantastical than men in general. It's probably because women already live in a world dominated by monsters in disguise and always need to be on the lookout for red flags. I've also notice there's an unspoken sisterhood between nearly all women. If a Samaritan woman sees another woman on the street with a man and she looks like she's in distress, the Samaritan woman will walk up and lie on the spot to get her away from that man, even if she's never met the distressed woman in her life.

Men, on the other hand, are confident in our control over this planet, so we obsess over threats that might lie in the shadows.