Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

[tu quoque]

You don’t deserve a man

I wouldn't wish a man on my worst enemy. Fuck off, faggot.

 

[Dyn]

They remember Wonder Woman raping a man because she needed some pipe.

Men can't be raped by women we can just take our boners down if we don't want sex.

 

[Generic Anime Girl]

OP is an incell or femcell. You don’t deserve a man if you think so lowly of us. Cope and seethe bitch!

What are your opinions on women, then, huh?

 

[Dyn]

What are your opinions on women, then, huh?

I bet he's too afraid to reply here. Men always act big and strong until a woman actually talks back to them.

 

[Chandelier]

This thread has awaken the lurkers too. Yes, I'm talking about decline and co. Just your average mouth frothed faggots. It's either incel to troon pipeline, incel to faggot pipeline or incel to pedo.

Spoiler: thread tax

I used to know a guy in his 30s who is a MIDDLE SCHOOL dropout. Living with his mom. Huge consoomer (notably Nintendo franchise). No job, on welfare, yet he spends his welfare on limited edition shit that cost hundreds. This guy, I shit you not, doesn't know how to even handle a knife, let alone cook. He once cut himself with a potato peeler. He cooks meat in the microwave . He hates fruits and veggies. he'd eat junk food all the time. Absent father, neglectful mom. Imagine being a huge burden on society and being perpetual manbaby that buys toys all the time with no intention of getting out of this shit.

Men will tell us to get back in the kitchen and that our place is in the home while all professional cooks are male. Sushi chefs are male dominated, because women's palms lose heat too quickly (as fucked up as it sounds, it's somewhat true) and ruin the fish. So if men want to bitch about our uselessness, they can do the cooking.

They always act so helpless when asked to do dinner if it isn't a barbecue. They expect you to be a second mother, not their wife. This seems to be a universal concept.

Are people here too young to remember all those Moral Majority types getting busted cornholing, or getting cornholed by another man? Soliciting prostitutes? Engaging in the same glutinous consoomerist materialism that the modern "lefty" male does? I think not. I think they're just desperate to have appeared virtuous at one point.

It's still going on. The best examples have to do with anti abortion types wailing about "baby murder" while A) never adopting those kids and B) their wives getting abortions behind their backs. It's around 60% or more of Evangelical women getting abortions, it's hilarious. It's not murder when Jesus ain't looking, eh?

The stereotype of the guy virulently hating faggots being one was true for William F. Buckley. Gore Vidal knew what was up. (That said the "if you hate gay people you're really gay is still a pervasive insult, for these people it really does seem to be the case. True disgust means you want nothing to do with them.)

 

[Generic Anime Girl]

It's still going on. The best examples have to do with anti abortion types wailing about "baby murder" while A) never adopting those kids and B) their wives getting abortions behind their backs. It's around 60% or more of Evangelical women getting abortions, it's hilarious. It's not murder when Jesus ain't looking, eh?

you made a solid point but I'm willing to debate the abortion thing because you come off as one of those snarky deathfat types

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

The shit about men always losing in family court is also just made up bs btw.

It's garbage, pure fantasy to justify being butthurt.

Most civilized humans end up with about an equal split in assets (by value) if they are around equivalent earners (which, btw, means that if you have children, the mother is usually worse off long-term, because even with supposedly equal parenting time/joint custody, the real facts are that women still do most of the childcare/care-giving. And let's not talk about the typical career height/impact of being a mother, which is far more negative than for a typical father).

In the case where there are minor kids and the mother was at home during the marriage or worked for much less, she may end up with child support* (which is the kids', not hers, a point this brand of sourpuss men forget) or sometimes actual or seemingly greater assets (often the home for the kids' sake) (which home, btw, is usually mortgaged and thus requires her paying for what's left on the mortgage, taxes, upkeep, etc., not to mention the stranglehold of having most of her worth highly illiquid). It's not an unearned windfall.

*woefully inadequate

Alimony is on a rapid decline (and has been for decades); and when awarded it is most often for a limited period of time - theory in some jurisdictions being that it be only long enough for her to get herself into the workforce and become self-sustaining...even while in most of those scenarios she has any minor children >50%. Women with career-type jobs don't get alimony much, unless you're talking super- high income/net worth level folks.

I have known some men who, through the experience of divorce, are hard-hit emotionally (understandable), but deal (or don't deal) with it either by a) walking away from "everything" [not really all, but a lot], or going into irrational rage mode to the point that they spend a meaningful amount of whatever money they do have being vindictive in court - and those do often wind up quite a bit worse off post-divorce. (Own Worst Enemy Syndrome, which of course is the woman's and the anti-male system's (lol) fault).

Some men stop even working out of spite so they can't pay child support (and to be fair, some women delay getting a job as long as possible if they didn't already have one).

Divorce is expensive. It sucks. Theoretically children are supposed to maintain the same standard of living they had before the parents divorced. For 95% of kids, that's not quite how it works out, because you can't really divide 1 by 2 and expect to get 2 (unless your 1 was so big no one really feels the split).

So parents have to sacrifice - and that's another place this butthurt comes from - there and from the disbelief that they've had an actual setback, which MUST mean someone (else) is to blame. MGTOWs and their ilk seem to have a fantasy that all ex-wives are sitting around on their asses when they're not lunching and meeting for 10 am tennis (or clubbing every night, or fucking every man within a 50-mile radius, or whatever was their benchmark). They seethe at the idea that they didn't fucking own that bitch, that "somebody" didn't recognize that they were 1000% right and justified, and that all the real and theoretical women in the world didn't have to eat dirt and bow down to recognize their immanent "rightness."

Reality is this: most divorce outcomes don't turn on who is a "better" person, or who was more "wronged." In most places judges do not want to hear that shit if they can avoid it. Work it out in therapy or mediation and then come back. 95% of divorces are about the dry job of attempting an equitable (or equal, depending on state) division of material assets, and, where children are involved, what is best and most sustainable for them - not some righteous crusade or a final determination of W vs L. And it's a fantasy to expect that that won't come with some pain. Where this brand of bitter man operates, though, they see only their own hurt and they think that just because their a woman bears her pain with a modicum of dignity, she must be cackling with glee. "She's laughing at me, that bitch."

If I were a man I'd be embarrassed to ally or align myself with men who don't know how to take a beating without crying out to mama anyone who will listen and tell them that yes, she is a crazy bitch and yes the entire world is arrayed against you; you didn't have a chance; it's not your fault or your failing, it's {{everyone else}}. Maybe it's because they've always gotten what they wanted and assumed that was the Divine Order, and the reality check that oop, you're not entitled to a guaranteed win is just too much to comprehend. Broken by the reality of being just as vulnerable as everybody else. Welcome to Earth, Icarus. Here's a petard; hoist yourself.

And to be clear, I'm not mocking anyone reeling from a huge setback. Arrogance doesn't belong to men alone, and many, if not nearly all, people will have reckonings in life that may bring them to their knees. But there's a difference between enduring awful things and coming out humbled but wiser, and enduring awful things and coming out shrunken and permanently ugly and angry. MGTOW definitely choose their path, and it's a small, contemptible one.

 

[Dyn]

I'm not mocking anyone reeling from a huge setback.

I will. Women don't randomly divorce men for no reason. If you get divorced it's because he did something wrong and I think society should come together and do more to make divorced men embarrassed and ashamed of their failure.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I will. Women don't randomly divorce men for no reason. If you get divorced it's because he did something wrong and I think society should come together and do more to make divorced men embarrassed and ashamed of their failure.

If you would like someone to set up your new 501c3, Men Shaming Men (tagline: Reinventing MSM), I can hook you up.

 

[Bunny Tracks]

Also suspension of disbelief only goes so far and seeing a 100lbs 5ft1 whamen fighting a 6ft6 250lb man cracking quips without breaking a sweat pushing it to point where you can't suspend your disbelief anymore.

This is fragile masculinity at its peak.

GTA can have flying tanks, laser guns, and jetpacks, but a woman taking on a man, and winning is what breaks the suspension of disbelief for you? Really? Are you serious?

 

[Lurker]

I will. Women don't randomly divorce men for no reason. If you get divorced it's because he did something wrong and I think society should come together and do more to make divorced men embarrassed and ashamed of their failure.

this is why we need to get rid of no-fault divorces, because it's the woman's fault she's not doing her wifely duties.

 

[DJ McHamfist]

Men are fucking stupid. Women are fucking stupid. Everyone in this thread is fucking stupid and everyone not in this thread is fucking stupid. This thread is stupid, I can't even tell if it's serious or not. Everyone's just stupid, but I approve of mocking the stupid.

Edit: wanted a second opinion so asked my wife. She said this thread was stupid, of course men are stupid. Then she said most women she knows are pretty stupid too. I love her.

 

[Pilgrim of Grace]

Men can't be raped by women we can just take our boners down if we don't want sex.

X cannot be raped is not an attractive take. But you know that and it's why you say it; to get a rise out of people.
That degree of thinking will not garner you widespread support. It will isolate you to radical spaces, much like wignats to theirs and AF'ers to their own.

This is the part where you say you don't need help so fuck anyone who doesn't like it: You may stick to those guns, while in the year of our lord 2023 trans-women literally invade and dominate your sports, dressing rooms and dictate your reproductive rights to you.

 

[community member]

X cannot be raped is not an attractive take. But you know that and it's why you say it; to get a rise out of people.
That degree of thinking will not garner you widespread support. It will isolate you to radical spaces, much like wignats to theirs and AF'ers to their own.

This is the part where you say you don't need help so fuck anyone who doesn't like it: You may stick to those guns, while in the year of our lord 2023 trans-women literally invade and dominate your sports, dressing rooms and dictate your reproductive rights to you.

I actually agree with you. But Dyn is male

edit: wait. I'm not sure if you realize he's male, because he's stating it in his post but you're saying "dominate YOUR sports" as if he's female, kek

 

[Dyn]

X cannot be raped is not an attractive take.

Men literally cannot be raped by women. It's a physical impossibility.

 

[community member]

Men literally cannot be raped by women. It's a physical impossibility.

I mean, they can, a woman can shove something up their asshole especially if they're intoxicated first, but I have never heard of a woman actually doing this because we aren't so inclined toward that kind of psychopathy. But it's theoretically possible and I'm not sure zero women who have ever existed on planet earth have ever done it. That I'm thinking of this as a matter of how many decimal places might exist before the first non-zero number is phenomenal though

 

[Pilgrim of Grace]

This thread is stupid, I can't even tell if it's serious or not.

We should all operate under the assumption this is like one of those exercises that married couples do when they pretend to be each other. That's how I'm approaching it anyway.

Men literally cannot be raped by women. It's a physical impossibility.

Not even if they say no?

 

[Dyn]

Not even if they say no?

Just take the boner down if you want to say 'no'.

I mean, they can, a woman can shove something up their asshole especially if they're intoxicated first, but I have never heard of a woman actually doing this because we aren't so inclined toward that kind of psychopathy. But it's theoretically possible and I'm not sure zero women who have ever existed on planet earth have ever done it. That I'm thinking of this as a matter of how many decimal places might exist before the first non-zero number is phenomenal though

Okay that's fair. In a bizarre, hypothetical scenario a woman could do that, or maybe even hold a man at gunpoint and be like "Don't you take that boner down or I'll shoot you". That's fine. Maybe it's even possibly happened, like one time in the bronze ages or something.

But even if it can happen, is it really a big deal? Somebody upthread already pointed out we clearly don't have the emotional capacity to process trauma or bodily violation like women do, so if I was walking down a dark alley or whatever and some mentally insane, completely anomalous and statistically improbable female rapist jumped out at me with a strap-on, am I really going to be psychologically affected? Like, worst case scenario is I maybe get some cuts and bruises and I have to watch TV standing up that night. If anything I'm just gonna have an ego boost that a woman thought I was handsome. That's how low-functioning we truly are. Maybe if I was an unenlightened misogynist I'd have some kind of minor temporary male ego upset, but apparently all it takes for those is for somebody to announce a female protagonist in an upcoming video game.

It's just not the same thing at all, and it's straight-up gaslighting for men to come in here pretending that it is.

 

[community member]

when they pretend to be each other

There is a lot of genuine rage women have regarding common male behavior and framing it like a married couple's spat is way fucking off base. Like I said before, I agree with you about the rhetoric, but there is male psychopathy targeting women at magnitudes so great that this "everyone is stupid" line (which has conveniently made itself far more prominent in this specific setting of enraged women than I ever see in the spaces of enraged men) is.... how you say..... retarded

 

[Dyn]

"everyone is stupid" line (which has conveniently made itself far more prominent in this specific setting of enraged women than I ever see in the spaces of enraged men)

Just imagine going into a moid space where they're seething about one of their made-up oppression olympics problems and saying "women sometimes also get made fun of online". Even if you try "both side bad" with problems that provably affect women far more than men, they're going to chimp out like absolute fucking sasquatches.