Kiwifarms Incel Thread

No, that's fair. What's good for the moid is good for the femoid, and we should all be playing by the same rules.

I'll agree to only shit up your thread and make fun of you and act like an obnoxious seething retard until the jannies forcibly prevent me from doing so. After that I'll leave your thread alone.
I allow all trolling of this thread, and I think it's fair to allow trolling of the BP too.
What's your angle?
 
suddenly the gallant knights of the Beauty Salon rode across this middling thread, attempting to raze it to the ground.

The point of my sperging is this, safe places for one, means safe places for all, any logic otherwise is hypocritical. While I am fine with debating opposing view points, I challenge the Beauty Salon crowd to either: allow the same shitposting that they are perpetrating here on their threads; or, return to your safe spaces and seethe about threads like this in parts of the site that cater to you. I have to repeat myself: this is a challenge and not a demand, please don't misunderstand.
This is the "Mass Debates" forum, though, so.

And also - apples and oranges. @Lidl Drip didnt post in the Mass Debates forum. And the OP explicitly asked for debate; her thread did not. I deliberately asked the OP if he wanted debate, or a safe space, because within his first 3 posts he said both. He proceeded to debate.

And I shouldn't and won't speak for anyone else, but I would bet a dollar that, rather than seething, a majority of the other women reading this are just as amused as I am at the spatting (though a little bored at the lack of rigor so far, maybe). Though I may be alone in also caring that young men don't fall down the easy doom-holes.

How is it not true? Do you have any data to back up your claims like I do?
:story:
Where was that? Assertions are not data.

in traditional society, people did not have kids out of wedlock; they could not raise
You sweet summer child.

the 1960s sexual revolution caused incels that simple
Dude, your parents probably weren't even born in the 60s. Tf do you know?

And tbh neither was I, but I was born a lot closer to them than you, and yet I never encountered one single "incel" (by label or warped, ahistoric, unscientific, unreal perspective) until a something over a decade ago. Aka, at that point 40 years after the end of the 60s. Change is not equal to inevitable slide, and effective reaction to and incorporation of change (adaptability) is a primary marker of survival.

Again, I get it: these ideas are pasted together with what sounds at first blush, if you don't actually know anything, like cogent links and analysis. They appeal to common concerns and offer an off-the-shelf, "simple" synthesis. And the more you hear it repeated, and the more people in your circle who find mental salvation in it, the more it sounds legit. But they are laaaaahhhs. Lies by people who gave up, give up, and want someone to blame for their own failure to thrive - as well as a whole bunch of junior recruits to keep the circle-jerk going.

It's unfortunate that there are so many who mistake an awkward phase, or some hyper-calculated measurement that literally no one else analyzes, for destiny; I agree that that mindset and susceptibility is a problem that needs a solution (and the solution lies within).

I'd urge you to see past the bullshit, though the one thing I've observed in a long time of observing and interacting with self-described "incels" (by which I mean those subscribing to this nonsense you've spat out, not simply romantically lonely or struggling people) is an astounding dogmatic clutching on to these "incel /pilled" ideas that render them/others in similar or or "lesser" situations as (in their minds and, eventually, their lives) forever alone and forever losers. That's the one thing I can't figure out: it's like a fetish, almost, that their very existence (philosophically/ mentally, not physically, though maybe that, too) depends on these 9th-grade-level manifestos being incontrovertibly true. It's a weirdly willful drive toward eternal misery (and fantasized "revolution"). And incels seem compelled, intensely and relentlessly, to be willing to die on that hill, every time. You can do better.

It breaks my heart knowing I missed the boat on her, but life goes on.
Werther, stahp. If you have your personal shit together more or less, you'll have many, many opportunities with women.

And you can't go back and find her? Either way, as @Osama Bin Laden said, there are plenty of fish in the sea.
 
I honestly like the old term loveshy better, but people insist on incel, so I use it
Loveshy implies a kind of inability to accept oneself as emotionally available to women, which is not uncommon or necessarily frowned upon. Incel implies that one sees women has walking sex toys only worth as much as their ability to make men cum.
@Osama Bin Laden, I'm what would be called a volcel, and I'm not the one struggling with women. Your other point was the usual red pill/self-improvement stuff: take a shower, go outside. While these things are good, they do not make you an instant chick magnet. There are tons of men who try that and fail. The part about another man caring does not matter because women do care. The last one you did not refute, so you basically say I would not have sex with you.
Volcel and Incel are mutually exclusive terms. If one is an Incel, they believe that sex is something they are owed but was not granted due to the involuntary nature that is brought about from nature and nurture. Volcels have voluntarily accepted that they will not get sex and therefore should have nothing to say on the subject of sex due to their chosen stance. If you want sex than you can't be a volcel, if you choose not to have sex than you can't be an Incel thus have no right to complain.
The hope is they overthrow the government, but most likely people will just chimp out, and they will pass anti-terrorist laws unless they are BLM. then thats different.

I'm a tall guy, but you're right. I am extremely autistic and struggle to talk to women, but she does not work there anymore, sadly. That being said, once again, I am not the inceldom victim here; if I were not autistic, I would be showered with women.

the uncomfortable truth
The idea that short terminally online porn addicted mild mannered-sociopaths who barely leave their house's will even come close to overthrowing the most powerful government/military industry complex to ever exist is easily the funniest thought worthy of a comedy from tragedy movie featuring Kevin Hart. You aren't going to do shit, and your discord server of manlets won't either so drop the faux macho pretext.

You have a lot of posts that aren't worthy for quoting so I'll mention most of them in one big post. Viewing sex for only procreation is the quickest way to get yourself cockblocked. Further there is no reason to whine like a little bitch about not getting laid if you only want to knock up woman and run a tyrant household. Since its pretty obvious you want sex for pleasure than you have to treat women like human beings rather than fleshlights in order to get it. I know its a strange concept to you, but women experience the same highs and lows of daily life as you do and are not some mystical creature that needs to be dominated. For every banal daily human experience you have had, woman have experienced the same. The moment you view women as anything less than equal to yourself is the moment that fail to understand why women run away from you like your diseased. Women also don't want to return to the 1960's where they couldn't vote, divorce abusive husbands, own bank accounts or generally be treated as less than human. If that's what you want out of opposite sex than you want a slave who can't fight back rather than a partner.
Sure, there are schizocels, but that's a strawman you have constructed.
ox02kn6uod1a1.jpg
I think it's okay to respect women and treat them like actual human beings.
You have a clear as day humiliation fetish from misandrists and want a femdom to kick your balls so far up your taint that even trannies wonder which gender you are.
 
You have a clear as day humiliation fetish from misandrists and want a femdom to kick your balls so far up your taint that even trannies wonder which gender you are.
If this was true why doesn't he just act like all the other incels on this site to try and piss women off into yelling at him to go kill himself? Instead he is the most popular boy in my thread and nobody has anything but warm words to say about our dear Dyn. Not really succeeding in being femdomed and humiliated there.
 
If that's what you want out of opposite sex than you want a slave who can't fight back rather than a partner.
I mean, if my slave cooks, cleans, and sucks, my dick slavery does not sound too bad to me. LMAO
If this was true why doesn't he just act like all the other incels on this site to try and piss women off into yelling at him to go kill himself? Instead he is the most popular boy in my thread and nobody has anything but warm words to say about our dear Dyn. Not really succeeding in being femdomed and humiliated there.
The incels and feminists will unite to bully. @Lokenstien
 
If this was true why doesn't he just act like all the other incels on this site to try and piss women off into yelling at him to go kill himself? Instead he is the most popular boy in my thread and nobody has anything but warm words to say about our dear Dyn. Not really succeeding in being femdomed and humiliated there.
Being femdomed or being into humiliation doesn't necessarily mean degraded. Humiliation fetishists want to prostate themselves in front of their "masters" because total and undying submission to an ultimate power is erotic to them. Being praised as the most popular boy among a bunch of man haters is a true heave for some one who wants to be humiliated by women because it means that they have achieved a peak form of submission from a dominate force. Further Dyn has had more than enough humiliation brought upon them by other male and female users due to being contrarian so they are really are playing both sides by getting insulted by men and praised by men hating women.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: WebLurker
You have a clear as day humiliation fetish from misandrists and want a femdom to kick your balls so far up your taint that even trannies wonder which gender you are.
Who's kicking my balls? They're all treating me perfectly well. You give respect to get respect, friend.
 
After reading this thread I'm glad I'm not an incel. I can drive 12 hours to the nearest Nevada brothel and pay by the hour.
hookercels do not count
Being femdomed or being into humiliation doesn't necessarily mean degraded. Humiliation fetishists want to prostate themselves in front of their "masters" because total and undying submission to an ultimate power is erotic to them. Being praised as the most popular boy among a bunch of man haters is a true heave for some one who wants to be humiliated by women because it means that they have achieved a peak form of submission from a dominate force. Further Dyn has had more than enough humiliation brought upon them by other male and female users due to being contrarian so they are really are playing both sides by getting insulted by men and praised by men hating women.
You seem to know a lot about that, and I think this is a projection.
 
You seem to know a lot about that, and I think this is a projection.
I'm not sure, I think if it was projection it would make more sense. I'm not even sure who he thinks I'm trying to be degraded by, misandrist femdoms or misogynistic men. I think he might just have some women issues of his own that prevent him from understanding that some people actually do interact with women for reasons other than their own sexual gratification.
 
Being femdomed or being into humiliation doesn't necessarily mean degraded. Humiliation fetishists want to prostate themselves in front of their "masters" because total and undying submission to an ultimate power is erotic to them. Being praised as the most popular boy among a bunch of man haters is a true heave for some one who wants to be humiliated by women because it means that they have achieved a peak form of submission from a dominate force. Further Dyn has had more than enough humiliation brought upon them by other male and female users due to being contrarian so they are really are playing both sides by getting insulted by men and praised by men hating women.
I won't deny that there is the possibility of Dyn secretly being a sexpests, he is a man afterall. But he's remained totally respectful in all interactions we had and I have no reason to believe he secretly wants me to torture his cock and balls.

Honestly assuming that a man can not possibly act out of motivation other than "it makes my pp hard" is pretty misandrist.
 
I won't deny that there is the possibility of Dyn secretly being a sexpests, he is a man afterall. But he's remained totally respectful in all interactions we had and I have no reason to believe he secretly wants me to torture his cock and balls.
You're not my type though, I only like women with tattoos and borderline personality disorder.
 
I won't deny that there is the possibility of Dyn secretly being a sexpests, he is a man afterall. But he's remained totally respectful in all interactions we had and I have no reason to believe he secretly wants me to torture his cock and balls.

Honestly assuming that a man can not possibly act out of motivation other than "it makes my pp hard" is pretty misandrist.
if you tortured my cock and balls i would no longer be an incel
You're not my type though, I only like women with tattoos and borderline personality disorder.
SAME
 
Back