Starfield - Bethesda's new space IP: will probably be full of fun and easily trackable bugs

[Swingletonthesimpleton]

The worst part is Obsidian fans will still suck off their short, barely replayable game by comparing it to Starfield.
At least with Starfield I'll feel like I got my money's worth. TOW was so short it felt like an Indie game.
Hot take: Obsidian has been shit after NV

Obsidian has always been shit. Only avellone and the rest of the team that made new vegas was good and they're gone now. The rest of that company has and will forever be shit.

I'm still pissed at chris for killing off the talking deathclaws. Gorris deserves better

 

[xXx: State of the Union]

Even Avellone is shit. He just got lucky with NV cause Fallout 3 was shittier writing wise.
Bull and the Bear, Bear and the Bull, Bull and Bear, Bear and Bull, Bull Bull Bear Bear, Bear Bull Bull Bear *tries to nuke last of civilization to to start new nation*

 

[Tsukasa Kadoya]

Obsidian has always been shit. Only avellone and the rest of the team that made new vegas was good and they're gone now. The rest of that company has and will forever be shit.

I'm still pissed at chris for killing off the talking deathclaws. Gorris deserves better

Which is why retards wanting New Vegas 2 wouldn't be happy even if it came out.
For one, a side would have to be chosen, and all the variables associated with the endings (killing/sparing the Boomers, telling the Great Khans to fight/escape the battle, etc) would be insanely difficult to program in. A lazy choice would have to pop up with a new playthrough asking "Did you choose NCR, House, Legion or Yes Man?" and would suck the fun out of the world. The writing would be subpar because the people writing would make the NPC all bluster and no substance (hey, like TOW)
Also, as an aside, I fucking love how the old school fans cope and seethe when the games don't take place in the Mojave. We've had 3 fucking games there, I'd kill for a new location, like Florida, Texas, or even Hawaii.
Whatever, NV nerds will keep pumping out shit mod after shit mod to masturbate to while saying Fallouts 3 and 4 were unoriginal.

 

[xXx: State of the Union]

I want a New Vegas 2 mostly so actual Fallout fans can point to it and be like "Hey, it's better than New Vegas 1!" and make New Vegas fags seethe.

I'm sure they won't actually make "New Vegas 2" though, so it just won't be the same

 

[Tepes Thot]

Which YouTuber they had in cyberpunk?

They’ve got a lame troon streamer coming in the DLC. I don’t know if he has a YouTube channel too but probably.

 

[blablabla]

Cyberpunk’s biggest problems were the bugs and glitches. With those gone it was a decent game Cyberpunk Far Cry game that has risen to being a pretty damn cool game.
With Phantom Liberty and 2.0 coming out in September, it’s only going to get better. So idk what you’re talking about here.

i still see people posting this shit. no, cyberpunk isnt a good game despite some faggy anime and cdpr patching a game that was fucking incomplete at launch. and even if the game ran fine (still doesnt) still is a shit game with a railroaded story

 

[TVB]

Cool bro

Thank you.

But in all seriousness (and to properly answer your question here), it might be some loon troon on Twitch by the time DLC came out

 

[Just Some Other Guy]

i still see people posting this shit. no, cyberpunk isnt a good game despite some faggy anime and cdpr patching a game that was fucking incomplete at launch. and even if the game ran fine (still doesnt) still is a shit game with a railroaded story

People complain about the dick sucking bg3 gets, and yet cp2077 still gets unironic shilling to this day.

 

[xXx: State of the Union]

Cyberpunk and No Man's Sky were shit and still are shit. I say this as someone who bought both at release and got fucked.

No matter how much they add or "fix", you don't magically become not shit from hoodwinking your most loyal followers for a launch buy.

 

[Just Some Other Guy]

Cyberpunk and No Man's Sky were shit and still are shit. I say this as someone who bought both at release and got fucked.

No matter how much they add or "fix", you don't magically become not shit from hoodwinking your most loyal followers for a launch buy.

Imagine being this guy:

 

[xXx: State of the Union]

People are looking into the preload files and it really looks like space magic is going to be dragon shouts, based on names such as "Grav Dash" and "Void Form"

 

[Super Hans v2]

People are looking into the preload files and it really looks like space magic is going to be dragon shouts, based on names such as "Grav Dash" and "Void Form"

...people thought otherwise? I thought it was so obvious I'm wondering why you're putting it behind spoilers.

 

[CyrusHowler]

You guys are Silly Billies sometimes I swear.

 

[LightDragonman1]

I mean, wasn’t that kind of hinted at near the end of the Direct Showcase?

 

[Gravityqueen4life]

Even Avellone is shit. He just got lucky with NV cause Fallout 3 was shittier writing wise.
Bull and the Bear, Bear and the Bull, Bull and Bear, Bear and Bull, Bull Bull Bear Bear, Bear Bull Bull Bear *tries to nuke last of civilization to to start new nation*

to be fair, i did like his work on KOTOR 2. he hated the way the star wars universe was build and set out to tear it a new asshole.

 

[LightDragonman1]

Apparently, Starfield's launch version is v1.6.35.0. By comparison, Fallout 4 launched as v1.1.0.0.

Wonder how the game will perform compared to other Bethesda games at launch.

 

[Übertroon]

Apparently, Starfield's launch version is v1.6.35.0. By comparison, Fallout 4 launched as v1.1.0.0.

Wonder how the game will perform compared to other Bethesda games at launch.

Version number means nothing because game devs have realised that inflating the patch number makes players think more is being done.
v1.8.50.0 is way more exciting than v1.2.0.0

 

[Rei is Shit.]

So this is gonna be trainwreck of the year, yeah?

 

[Jasper2K]

Man, this game has a lot riding on its shoulders.

Given how both Microsoft and Bethesda haven’t exactly garnered the best reputations as of late given their many disappointing recent releases, and with games like TOTK and BG3 winning over many critics and gamers in the “open-world” department, this game really needs to at least be enjoyable.

I will say this though. While the game has been getting a good marketing push, they haven’t been over-the-top with it. Nothing on the level of Cyperpunk 2077’s for example. Heck, they’ve even tried to temper expectations by explicating deconfirming some aspects. That, for me at least, is a relief.

All starfield needs to be is an 8/10 and the bethesda hype will carry the rest. At least it's not a fucking live service game.

 

[TVB]

So this is gonna be trainwreck of the year, yeah?

Calling Starfield this year's trainwreck is giving it too much credit honestly. We've seen the same shit with No Man's Sky, Cyberpunk and even one of Todd Howard's last games, Fallout 76. Starfield is just going be just as much of a failure as these, and then RKO outta nowhere like Randy Orton, the game will be fixed and then the consoomers will finally say "it's good again" as if they have amnesia and have never remembered anything that was terrible and buggy about the game in the first place. It's the same song and dance number we've seen before.