- Joined
- Jan 23, 2019
Elon is right. The current system makes no sense. I can see you being able to block someone from replying to your posts, but being able to block them from even seeing your content is fucking retarded.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Especially when you can just go to private browsing mode, copy/paste the URL, and are able to see the Tweet if the faggot who blocked you hasn't privated their account. The entire feature makes no sense.Elon is right. The current system makes no sense. I can see you being able to block someone from replying to your posts, but being able to block them from even seeing your content is fucking retarded.
Elon is right. The current system makes no sense. I can see you being able to block someone from replying to your posts, but being able to block them from even seeing your content is fucking retarded.
Correct me if I assume incorrectly. The difference between a REPLY and a QUOTE TWEET is that: a reply is part of the conversation, informing those who are reading the thread, while a quote tweet is the beginning of its own seperate conversation.Just have block mean the person can't post a direct reply and that you aren't notified of when they quote tweet you
Yeah, a reply goes under the original tweet, a quote tweet puts it on your timeline as if it's just a tweet you're making and quotes the tweet as if you inserted an image or video or whatever. They could just have it not notify the person if they've blocked you, then the person has to willingly look at the quote tweets to see if anyone they hate quoted it. All the people bitching like Alex, Michael Hobbes, etc. intentionally look at them around their own blocks to get upset anyway.Correct me if I assume incorrectly. The difference between a REPLY and a QUOTE TWEET is that: a reply is part of the conversation, informing those who are reading the thread, while a quote tweet is the beginning of its own seperate conversation.
Or Keffals, who unblocks people to get upset at them to block them again.Yeah, a reply goes under the original tweet, a quote tweet puts it on your timeline as if it's just a tweet you're making and quotes the tweet as if you inserted an image or video or whatever. They could just have it not notify the person if they've blocked you, then the person has to willingly look at the quote tweets to see if anyone they hate quoted it. All the people bitching like Alex, Michael Hobbes, etc. intentionally look at them around their own blocks to get upset anyway.
I thought the guy that murdered the woman was her brother? This is why sometimes removing the block feature isn't such a bad idea. These troons spill out miss info and no one can correct them or oppose them.View attachment 5288685
This is a very dangerous game you are wanting to play here Big Al. There is a similar degree of proof that troon Covenant School shooter Audrey Hale is a Big Al fan and that YOU were the catalyst that directly inspired the shooting with your frequent autistic sperg outs about "right wingers" and the Christian church.
Likewise, in this latest episode of "Alex Can't Read"...... 81 people allegedly heard about a thing.
View attachment 5288838
Methods
From October to December 2022, mental and physical health gender-affirming care providers from across the United States completed a survey including open-ended questions about the kinds of harassment they experienced (i.e., method and messages of harassment) and its impact on their lives and practices. Thematic analyses were used to analyze their responses.
Results
In total, 117 providers completed the survey and 70% shared that either they, their practice, or their institution had received threats specific to delivering gender-affirming care. The most common experiences were threats via social media or mailed letters. Several received death threats. Providers described how targeted harassment impacted their psychological well-being and required them to reassess clinic safety. Additionally, providers expressed the need for a more accurate representation of gender-affirming care in media and stronger advocacy from institutions and organizations emphasizing the importance of this care.
Adolescent Providers' Experiences of Harassment Related to Delivering Gender-Affirming Care
There's no difference between races, there is between the sexes. You do realize that you "progressive" guys were arguing that women deserve special unequal treatment in the law until like five seconds ago, right?Apologies for the double post, but the world's dumbest troon lawyer has struck again.
View attachment 5290784
Dumbfuck Alex has confused the Virginia Military Institute case actually cited in the opinion with Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court case about interracial marriage. What an idiot!
Lol, lmao even. Great photo they picked, from the one time he got completely assblasted by a based republican:Also, how did I miss that this faggot now has a Wikipedia entry?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alejandra_Caraballo
You know what I have seen a lot? People replying to me at length in anger after I politely corrected something false they said then blocking me
If this freak wants to prevent his son from rape threats at school, he should stop dressing him up like a girl
You're assuming good faith and that this troon is telling the truth about rape threats. I guarantee that no rape threats were ever made.what a psycho
View attachment 5292105
archive
If this freak wants to prevent his son from rape threats at school, he should stop dressing him up like a girl
Holy fucking shit, and the VMI case is a leading case on intermediate scrutiny, establishing a new standard of review, written by Ginsburg. Even fucking Rehnquist concurred (in the judgment if not the reasoning). This is 1L con law shit.Apologies for the double post, but the world's dumbest troon lawyer has struck again.
View attachment 5290784
Dumbfuck Alex has confused the Virginia Military Institute case actually cited in the opinion with Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court case about interracial marriage. What an idiot!
Your mistake was thinking that this retarded troon knows anything about the law as it's actually applied. I don't know what law school gave this retard a JD, but the mere fact that they did says that they should lose their accreditation immediately.Holy fucking shit, and the VMI case is a leading case on intermediate scrutiny, establishing a new standard of review, written by Ginsburg. Even fucking Rehnquist concurred (in the judgment if not the reasoning). This is 1L con law shit.