Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Let's be real, he's a lazy fuck and doesn't want to pay the 200 dollar stamp tax
And hes such a consoomer he couldnt wait the 6-8 months to get the stamp plus it mightve been denied because of the whole threatening to kill your wife and unborn child thing.
 
Sorry, while you are gun sperging, and I take it you are from the USA, is it standard or mandatory for a gun safe to be required for any firearms in the US?
In the EU and Britain, while I can’t speak 100% for every country, it’s common that a gun owner has to have the guns stored in a safe while not using.
British law clearly stipulates too that ammunition has to be stored in a separate safe and said safes have to be behind an additional locked door.

I realize that with things like open/concealed carry and people who live in rented accommodation in the US, this wouldn’t be practical for all forms of gun ownership, but are certain weapons subject to additional regulation?
Please Dm if you don’t want to further Sperg or derail the thread.
Some states are pushing for safe storage laws, but as far as I am aware no states have mandated it yet.
If you own NFA items (short barreled rifles/shotguns, suppressors, machine guns, AOW), there is a stipulation that they should be kept secured away from anyone that isn't included on the paperwork, unless it is under your supervision.
 
"Wrong in every detail, Child, my father was also an avid mushroom enthusiast and my mom loved smoking herbs. They taught me everything I need to know to enjoy the wilderness. You have been instructed to vacate my campsite immediately."
"Wrong baby infant hobo child, those three cans are mine. I need those fifteen cents to buy bum wine. Yes I'm still a successful author and no, I haven't been giving handies behind the walmart for a fiver. No you're not going to shank me, those are your delus- ACK"
Let's be real, he's a lazy fuck and doesn't want to pay the 200 dollar stamp tax
Yeah, but he's also such a fucking bootlicker that he'd probably love to give the ATF his deets just to be a good responsible gun owner or some shit.
 

Dan's back home and says he'll drop the docs before the podcast. I assume he deletes tweets/plays it a bit coy to avoid people like Jackie trying to get his Youtube banned. I like that he's a better journalist than anyone who covered Pat besides Javier.

Capture.PNG
 
If you own NFA items (short barreled rifles/shotguns, suppressors, machine guns, AOW), there is a stipulation that they should be kept secured away from anyone that isn't included on the paperwork, unless it is under your supervision.
It's a bit off-topic from the usual patposting, but I will expound on NFA a little bit, there are two classes of firearms in the United States, Title II firearms are the above short barreled rifles/shotguns, suppressors, machine guns, and AOW (which is just firearms that don't fit into a neat category, like cane guns, things like that). You have to undergo a separate background check process and receive specific approval on top of paying a $200 tax stamp for each item. It's a more involved process overall and private transfer without paying the tax stamp and going through the process to transfer the item is illegal.

Other guns that don't fit into any of the above categories are Title I, normal background check and restrictions apply and there isn't a tax stamp involved. My trap shotgun with a 26 inch barrel is a Title I firearm. If you cut the barrel way down to like 10-12 inches, it becomes a Title II firearm and becomes subject to the National Firearms Act and thus, safe storage rules apply.
 
Why is she outright lying?

To my knowledge, Dan has not once threatened or even implied a threat towards Pat, let alone got violent with him.
If he was actually harassing Pat in the courtroom, then no matter what Fat was doing or saying, the Judge and court security would have told him to behave or just simply removed him.

Dan should sue her for defamation, and get someone to claim that they were going to pay him a large sum of money but have now rescinded the offer on the basis of her tweet.

That way he can sue for damages too.
 
Thank you for the explanation.

Am I correct in thinking however that being shot with a typical 12 gauge firing shotgun, at the kind of range a homeowner would do, even if wearing any kind of body armor would still be enough to put them down?

Sure they will probably be still alive, but with some horribly busted ribs?

Bullets don't impart much energy into targets wearing armor. Go onto youtube and search Second Chance body armor. The owner has videos of him shooting himself with .357 rounds, .308 rounds, etc. Barely flinches.
 
Why is she outright lying?
Because it fucking works, my man.
Random troons on Twatter lied about the Farms, then journalists took those lies and gave them credibility, and then it became "consent" on Wikipedia.
If you screech loud enough at companies, and are on the right side of history, you get what you want. Eventually.
 
Yeah, but he's also such a fucking bootlicker that he'd probably love to give the ATF his deets just to be a good responsible gun owner or some shit.
Its worse than that, Pat is such a fucking toad he would probably jump at the chance to report his neighbors to the ATF, or even, and may Allah forgive me for mentioning them, the IRS.
 
Bullets don't impart much energy into targets wearing armor. Go onto youtube and search Second Chance body armor. The owner has videos of him shooting himself with .357 rounds, .308 rounds, etc. Barely flinches.
I'm not a scientist or anything but highschool physics says to expect an equal and opposite reaction. So the projectile hitting has to be equal to or less (energy lost during transit) than the recoil of the firearm. If the gun isnt sending the shooter flying, then the impact of the projectile will not.

Edit: fucking hollywood strikes again...
 
Dan should sue her for defamation, and get someone to claim that they were going to pay him a large sum of money but have now rescinded the offer on the basis of her tweet.

That way he can sue for damages too.
Hey Dan, hmu I want to place a very large order of sinks on behalf of thousands of sink-disadvantaged families, bulk order, big bucks.

EDIT: Hang on, apparently your a felonious stalker child according to international googling sensation Jackie Singh, cancel that you bad, bad man.
 
I'm not a scientist or anything but highschool physics says to expect an equal and opposite reaction. So the projectile hitting has to be equal to or less (energy lost during transit) than the recoil of the firearm. If the gun isnt sending the shooter flying, then the impact of the projectile will not.

Edit: fucking hollywood strikes again...
Thats why people when they get shot either just drop or don't notice for a few seconds, instead of getting blown off their feet like 80's Action movies.
I've seen pictures of bad bruises from people who have been hit with higher caliber rifle rounds that were stopped by armor, normally pistol caliber rounds don't have much force.
I still wouldn't want to get hit with a .308, or 7.62, let alone something like a .338 LM, or a solid 12 gauge slug.
That guy who gets people to shoot him to test his armor is fucking nuts.
 

Here's a vid of the guy shooting his buddy with a .308 FAL. Doesn't hurt a bit.
Rather him than me :story:
Now lets see him do that with a .50 Raufoss.

In all seriousness it does make sense, a 200 pound guy isn't gonna get knocked through the air like the bad guys on Commando from a bullet.
He's got more faith than I do though to put himself in front of it for a live test. My luck I'd get the plate that slipped through QC while Miguel was at the coffee machine...
 
Did the judge address the screaming at dan at all?

Pages ago, but I wanted to answer this. I think it provides necessary context since there is not going to be any audio/video from inside the courtroom.*

No, the mini-rant was not addressed by the judge, simply because the oinking took place before Sosnay walked in. Once the judge was present, Patso didn't say shit. Matter of fact, I think the only three words he uttered on the record were "Yes, Your Honor" towards the end when asked if he understood the morning's agreements. All the other talking on record was between the judge and the lawyers.

So, fire up your best AI voice generators and please do have fun. Here it is to the best of my recollection:

OBSERVER #1 enters the courtroom and sits in the front. At the bench are the DEPUTY CLERK, the BAILIFF, and the COURT REPORTER; at the Plaintiff's table is ATTY. PAWLOWSKI; at the Defendant's table are ATTY. MCCABE and PATRICK S. TOMLINSON. Nobody else is present and the room is quiet. Patrick, having been facing forward, turns around toward the door.

DEPUTY CLERK: Are you here for the hearing?
OBSERVER #1: Yes.
PATRICK: (turning to McCabe, in a low voice but obviously audible over the loudspeaker): Who is that guy?
D.C.: Can I have your name?
OBSERVER #1: [Summer of George].
MCCABE: ... (trying to think of how to tell Patso in the most succinct way that it's a public proceeding, but she never gets the chance, because...)

OBSERVER #2 enters the courtroom and sits in the back. He is wearing a Coof Mask, because he totally isn't Dan Mullen he wants to provoke a Pat outburst demanding he show his face he wants to prevent the spread of disease in a public place. Pat turns around toward the door again. He is getting visibly annoyed that more people are starting to show up and already appears to be ramping up to something.

D.C.: Are you here for the hearing / can I have your name?
OBSERVER 1: Dan--
FATRICK: (at a slightly elevated volume) I want that man arrested immediately.
ALL OTHERS: ...
D.C.: ...and your last name?
DAN: Mullen.
FATRICK: (slightly louder still) That man has committed multiple felonies against my family. I want him arrested immediately.
ALL OTHERS: ...
MCCABE, to Pat: (inaudible whispering)
FATRICK, to McCabe: He is surreptitiously recording all of us. Right now.
MCCABE: (inaudible)
FATRICK: In his pocket. I guarantee it.
MCCABE: There's nothing we can do.

FATRICK repeats his felony/arrest line perhaps once or twice more, loudly at first, but his tone gradually tapers off to a mumble. All others pretend not to hear him, and the room is again quiet. JUDGE SOSNAY enters the room, shortly followed by OBSERVER #3 aka Big Dick Andrew. BDA takes a seat in the back next to Dan, Sosnay proclaims that court is in session, and the record begins.

____________
*Not from me, anyway, and I will be very surprised if there is any from Dan. If there is, it's going to be shitty muffled pocket audio anyway - that's the best which could've possibly been done. I wasn't gonna try my luck after all we'd read about Sosnay's strict nature.
 
Last edited:
“P
God damnit Dan just upload the whole fucking thing dawg
View attachment 5293205
“Plaintiff and/or his agents or apparent agents” hahahaha. What a bizarre phrase to have to include in a legal filing. What a paranoid loon. Trust me judge Quasi controls the actions of every person on the internet who laughs at me!
 
Back