Starfield - Bethesda's new space IP: will probably be full of fun and easily trackable bugs

How do you think Starfield will turn out?

  • Total voters
    971
I mean the game sounds like it will be more entertaining than the outer worlds so ill eat the egg on that one

But the guild 'soft-faction' system sounds kinda gay but whatever I guess it really is just gonna be like skyrims jank ass system.
 
Moths said:
I mean the game sounds like it will be more entertaining than the outer worlds so ill eat the egg on that one

But the guild 'soft-faction' system sounds kinda gay but whatever I guess it really is just gonna be like skyrims jank ass system.
Click to expand...
It will probably be better than the outer worlds writing wise and I'll probably like it more than NMS gameplay wise but the last one is more down to personal preference I know.
I'm guessing it will probably be a 7 out of 10 for me, a fine game with alot of flaws story wise, probably slightly more rpg elements than fallout 4 but pails in comparison in that front to New Vegas or Baldur's Gate 3. But as someone who always loved space it will probably be the only modern space game I semi jive with.
that being said journos will still give it 10/10s and it will win awards and probably get a GOTY edition down the line with a shit ton of reviewer quotes plastered on it from small outlets like fallout 3.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, There Is Light At The End, Moths and 2 others
Rotollo 2 said:
journos
Click to expand...
People care far too much about game reviewers and journalists. They're literally lower on the totem pole than even movie reviews. And the only thing Lower than faggots who review movies and games are People who do toy reviews. So I'm not sure why people get unironically twisted over them.

I mean I've certainly spergged about them. And I certainly agree it can be exhausting seeing all the sites rate every single game somewhere between 8-10 no matter how good or bad they think it actually is because they're being paid, but again they're irrelevant and don't matter.

Rotollo 2 said:
probably get a GOTY edition down the line
Click to expand...
This is basically every single game that's been made since like 2006. Particularly "triple a" games. Fuck I've seen games I've literally never heard of that have a GOTY edition. It means nothing. Game awards in general don't mean anything. GoTY just means the devs/publisher paid enough money to win or they just slap whatever good reviews they can find on a box and call it GoTY. Because no one other than blind comsoomers give a shit about meaningless rewards.
Rotollo 2 said:
New Vegas
Click to expand...
Is nothing more than an expansion pack for 3, sold separately. Other than the dogshit faction system that was hilariously easy to game, it really didn't have more rpg elements than 3 did. Certainly not enough for people to still be circlejerking it as the objectively best rpg in the series. I'd honestly say NV is closer to the "fallout theme park" experience that people claim 3 and 4 to be. Because at least 3 and 4 weren't constantly bashing you over the head with fallout 2 memberberries. Which also happens to be the game that went hardest on the pop culture references and lolz so whacky humor that 3 and 4 are bashed for imo. Getting fucked/raped by a supermutant cause you lost an arm wrestling match, making a porno and getting and std/having a kid, talking dethclaw etc. It's a very silly game.

I think new vegas is a very good game, but its not anything special. It's not better than the original 2 and is at most on par with 3 when comparing the base games. It absolutely had the better dlc though and is better than 4. But that's not exactly high praise.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
Reactions: More AWS-8Q Than You, Kerr Avon, Total Annihilation and 4 others
Hiphopopotamus said:
Another lie from Todd? Must be Tuesday.
View attachment 5295927
Click to expand...
It's not a lie. It's just Todd and Emil being disingenuous shits again. They are correct in that you can technically walk from one end of the planet to the other. People took this to mean that walking around the planet is seamless. Todd just forgot to mention that it wasn't seamless and loads in cells as in other Creation Engine games. Fucking embarrassing.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed) and Rick The Stick
Super Hans v2 said:
Come the fuck on. A literal mongoloid could have written a better story than Emil did for 3. You have to be purposefully fucking up to make the protag and antag to have the exact same goal.
Click to expand...
And everyones goal in NV is "take control of Vegas/Mojave". Not exactly breaking ground or miles ahead of "use Purity to kill everything but the enclave or use purity to kill actual mutants". Unless Yes-Mans Chaotic Neutral/Failsafe for retards option is supposed to give it the edge? Did you work on NV or something? You seem awful mad that I don't think it's much better than 3 outside of the DLC
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: name68126988, More AWS-8Q Than You, likeacrackado and 4 others
Rick The Stick said:
And everyones goal in NV is "take control of Vegas/Mojave". Not exactly breaking ground or miles ahead of "use Purity to kill everything but the enclave or use purity to kill actual mutants". Unless Yes-Mans Chaotic Neutral/Failsafe for retards option is supposed to give it the edge? Did you work on NV or something? You seem awful mad that I don't think it's much better than 3 outside of the DLC
Click to expand...
The difference is that the factions in NV had more depth to them than good guys vs. bad guys, to the point where people constantly debate which would be the best to side with. In 3 it's just like, "kill everyone vs. don't kill everyone". That applies to the blow up Megaton decision too, either kill everyone for no reason or don't. In other words 0 depth besides "look, you can take the evil path, technically".
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: name68126988, Vecr, SiccDicc and 6 others
Rick The Stick said:
And everyones goal in NV is "take control of Vegas/Mojave". Not exactly breaking ground or miles ahead of "use Purity to kill everything but the enclave or use purity to kill actual mutants". Unless Yes-Mans Chaotic Neutral/Failsafe for retards option is supposed to give it the edge? Did you work on NV or something? You seem awful mad that I don't think it's much better than 3 outside of the DLC
Click to expand...
3 was a terrible fallout game but a good shooter. NV was a half decent shooter but the best Fallout game since tactics. Fallout 4 wasn't even fallout and was a fucking abysmal game and massive middle-finger to fans.

The worst part of Fallout 4 was that if Bethesda had split it into two games; a single player fallout game and a co-operative/online modern version of Fallout:Tactics 2 - complete with base building and unlocks via factions, they would have created two masterpieces.

Seems as bethesda know next to fuck all about fallout, they shit the bed on 4 then shit all over the floor with 76.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Lunacy
Reactions: name68126988, Vecr, SiccDicc and 7 others
Smaug's Smokey Hole 2 said:
Predict what the Metacritic review scores will be one week after release!

I think... Well, BG3 just came out, hm... But...

93/100
Click to expand...
84 metascore entirely because that will cause the most sperging and the universe loves some sperging:

meta.PNG

meta2.PNG
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vecr, Whoopsie Daisy, AspieNextDoor and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back