Jackie Singh / Jacqueline Singh / Jacqueline Anne Stokes / Jax / @find_evil / HackingButLegal / @HackingButLegal / piggytomlinson - Cybersecurity "expert," wannabe journoscum, former "hacker"; gunt guards Patrick Tomlinson, currently picking a fight with ONA Forums, GNAA Groupie

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I am at a complete loss for words how someone who uses the username "fuck kiwi farms" and posts seething comments about us followed up with comics advocating fucking violence against the people on this website (by mischaracterizing them as neo-Nazis, which is still not justification for arbitrary violence), then immediately hides his tweets the second anyone looks at him cross. I guess he's trying to review his entire history to make sure there's nothing he's said that is super profoundly retarded.

This pink-haired walking liability sack of shit is going to run his gob and cry to the org about how mean the forum is when he's demanding that my fundamental human right to say what I want to say on my own fucking website should be taken away. And they're going to listen to him because he's so sniveling and pathetic it warrants pity.
 
That comic doesn't even make sense, I don't think knee capping your opponent would be considered a legitimate move in the contest. They didn't kill the Nazi so he presumably can still win the contest, or win by default since they opted out from it, and therefore "legitimately" kill the antifa-hairs family. It also sounds like the crowd will not respect the invalid action of the antifa-hair.

There's also a secondary philosophical component to this, the killing of the antifa-hair's family "if I win" is simply a claim of the Nazi. We have no evidence that this is an actual legitimate reward for winning the contest, it may be simply the boast of a criminal to be. The necessity of having rights placed outside of the standard political process, a position I assume our "anarchist" rejects since he's against freedom of speech and due process, keeps the Nazi's actions from being legitimate even if he legitimately wins the contest. The antifa-hair rejects this for violence which means they accept the legitimacy of the Nazi's claim to kill their family. This is the war of all against all that Hobbes said the state is meant to prevent, but we can be less extreme and say simply that society does not consider it legitimate and to consider it so is to reject society itself. This is an interesting position for antifa-hairs to take as they also make quite clear they are marginalized and under threat from the powerful majority and hierarchy, by rejecting the peaceful terms of society, and concepts like constitutional or human rights, they are essentially consenting to their own destruction within the humanity-wide violence they advocate for.

It's remarkable how many "political activists" choose to be ignorant of politics rather than study it (or even just think about it) in hopes of mastery.
 
Last edited:
The O&A admin had this on the header.
Screenshot 2023-08-31 2.24.37 AM.png
Here is the earliest archive of the article:
https://archive.li/bpp97
Here are all the instance of the the article being archived: https://archive.li/https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/torswats/

Just posting because the only response on the other forums is a web.archive.org link and we all that becasue of Taylor Lorenz info archived on that site can be removed by request. Archive.org also removed all archived KF tweets and I believe you are unable to archive O&A posts on it.
 
View attachment 5302154

Threatening a specific person with a specific action unless they do something you want is actual textbook extortion and they would be within their rights to file a criminal complaint.
Oh wow look at that, seems like Cloudflare set the new standard for deplatforming by giving in to Fong-Jones and #DropKiwifarms. Now idiots like Singh are emboldened to start threatening execs to get things they don't like taken off the internet, in as much direct, expressly threatening language as possible.

What a great decision.
@Null I know you’re aware of the EFF losing its mind over the site but I hadn’t seen such direct networking between these “researchers” before.
View attachment 5303992
View attachment 5303995
(Credit to @Need For Sneed for screenshots and archive)
Feels really great to know that the EFF stands for nothing anymore, and won't dare fight or speak up against the active, destructive campaign of censorship that's currently eating away at the infrastructure that allows the internet to remain a free and open platform. All that huffing and puffing about net neutrality means fucking nothing now that its absence is being weaponized against people that the politically fashionable side dislikes.

The fact that any employee at the EFF is posting shit like this already shows that any impartiality or nuance from their organization is gone as well. KF uses vulgar language and slurs that'd get you banned off mainstream advertiser friendly sites (kinda like how most, if not all of the internet spoke 15 years ago)? That means it's equivalent to a neo-nazi site, somehow!
 
Last edited:
It's remarkable how many "political activists" choose to be ignorant of politics rather than study it (or even just think about it) in hopes of mastery.
Why put in effort? 'Us good, them evil' gets them where they want most of the time. You're rewarded less in their social spheres for anything resembling nuance and thought. Tribalism and othering pays in the currencies of attention, money, and victimhood.

Studying politics is for losers who want solutions. Political activists of all stripes are only interested in personal gain, otherwise they might care that there's no way to tell the difference between the retarded and those who are only pretending.

That Jackie even has a hint of a career still is just one in a very long line of lolcows who prove this point: if you have no shame, trying is for chumps. Putting thought in is like proof-reading your scam emails; you might look more professional, but it just wastes your time because the real paydays only come from people who will ignore all your errors because they like the underlying premise too much to care you're full of shit.
 
Who watches this shit?
A. People who are delusional enough to buy the midwit host’s faux-intellectual act just because he has a funny accent.

B. People who are retarded enough read the host’s claim to be “unbiased” and “objective” and not detect the horse shit.

C. People like me who enjoy laughing at fat losers LARPing as members of the intelligentsia.

That host ranks so highly in his own estimation (and no one else’s) that I can’t help but feel embarrassed for him. That said, at least he’s not morbidly obese with ashy black labia, knees and elbows.

Speaking of Jackie, I wonder how many times her two youngest poppadums have had to fend for themselves while this deadbeat Dalit tweets uninterrupted for 17 hour stretches. Now that they’re enrolled in preschool, at least they’ll have regular interaction with mandated reporters until she loses visitation rights. I hope for the kids’ sakes they look nothing like her.

IMG_5892.jpeg
 

Gosh Jackie it is like you have no respect for the rule of law. Hopefully her attack on the EFF will bring more attention to her past associations and actions.


From the article:

So we were concerned when we started hearing from multiple sources that Hurricane Electric, a Tier 1 ISP, is interfering with traffic. Confirmation of the details has been difficult, in part because Hurricane itself has refused to respond to our queries, but it appears that the company is partially denying service to a direct customer, a provider called Crunchbits, in order to disrupt traffic to a site that is several steps away in the stack. And it is justifying that action because activity on the site reportedly violates Hurricane’s “acceptable use policy”—even though Hurricane has no direct relationship with that site. Hurricane argues that the policy requires its direct customers to police their customers as well as themselves.

Crunchbits? As mentioned only once in total retard war?

Further reading:

The affected site is an almost universally despised forum for hateful speech and planning vicious attacks on vulnerable people: Kiwi Farms.
 
hateful speech
The only people we genuinely hate are child abusers, animal abusers, and rapists. Why would that be a problem for trannies?

planning vicious attacks on vulnerable people
Last I looked, this is still against the site's rules. As Null has said: watching someone trip on the sidewalk and get irrationally angry is funny; pushing them over is not.

I am at a complete loss for words how someone who uses the username "fuck kiwi farms" and posts seething comments about us followed up with comics advocating fucking violence against the people on this website (by mischaracterizing them as neo-Nazis, which is still not justification for arbitrary violence), then immediately hides his tweets the second anyone looks at him cross. I guess he's trying to review his entire history to make sure there's nothing he's said that is super profoundly retarded.
If he wasn't such a basic bitch leftist, he'd be a perfect candidate for the Internet Tough Guys subforum.
 
If he wasn't such a basic bitch leftist, he'd be a perfect candidate for the Internet Tough Guys subforum.
This guy has a weird mohawk thing going on though
Opera Snapshot_2023-08-31_101140_www.eff.org.png
And look at the people working at the EFF. You really think they want to save the internet or some such nonsense?

Opera Snapshot_2023-08-31_101351_www.google.com.png
He also seems to have only one suit.
Resume from 2012. Why do you people insist on keeping this public and cry when people find stuff like this?
Opera Snapshot_2023-08-31_103714_www.yumpu.com.pngOpera Snapshot_2023-08-31_103736_www.yumpu.com.png
Other sites are picking up since it's on his website and being shared as a pdf.

From 2015. Things changed a lot.
 
Last edited:
Gosh Jackie it is like you have no respect for the rule of law. Hopefully her attack on the EFF will bring more attention to her past associations and actions.


From the article:

So we were concerned when we started hearing from multiple sources that Hurricane Electric, a Tier 1 ISP, is interfering with traffic. Confirmation of the details has been difficult, in part because Hurricane itself has refused to respond to our queries, but it appears that the company is partially denying service to a direct customer, a provider called Crunchbits, in order to disrupt traffic to a site that is several steps away in the stack. And it is justifying that action because activity on the site reportedly violates Hurricane’s “acceptable use policy”—even though Hurricane has no direct relationship with that site. Hurricane argues that the policy requires its direct customers to police their customers as well as themselves.

Crunchbits? As mentioned only once in total retard war?

Further reading:

The affected site is an almost universally despised forum for hateful speech and planning vicious attacks on vulnerable people: Kiwi Farms.
Planning what attacks? It’s all so tiresome. These retards will clutch pearls and screech to the hills because we say nigger and faggot but are happy to turn the other cheek when niggers and faggots do the things that draw the ire of society. Only a fraction of the population yet responsible for half the crime? Another tiny minority of gay men yet responsible for a substantial amount of childhood molestation? They sleep. Call them niggers and faggots and these same people will chimp because words are violence. Pay no mind to the actual violence and harm being done. Ugh rope for them all.
 
The affected site is an almost universally despised forum for hateful speech and planning vicious attacks on vulnerable people: Kiwi Farms.
Hateful speech? I see their point, but it's still speech. Planning vicious attacks on people however is not legal and any time I've seen someone discussing some "le epic trolling" plans they are swiftly btfoed. I see this more as a community of amateur anthropologists and archivists and website archives like this will be essential resources in a century or two in understanding early internet culture.

But fruit website bad so don't think don't understand just hate fruit website and updoot all who hate fruit website too.
 
Hateful speech? I see their point, but it's still speech.
I think that's a point that needs to be driven home a lot more often. Free speech can be horribly repulsive, ugly, and downright evil. But that's part of the beauty of it all. If you are truly a supporter of free speech, you will hear and see some shit that will make you want to cut your ears off and stick knives in your eyes. Or perhaps it'll make you want to do that to the speaker. But you don't do that because it's more valuable to hear other ideas and decide for yourself whether you agree with them or not. That's how you grow as a person.

Some niggers, faggots, and streetshitters just don't understand that *sigh*
 
I see this more as a community of amateur anthropologists and archivists and website archives like this will be essential resources in a century or two in understanding early internet culture.
I've said this before, but a lot of posters here could be literally regarded as journalists - except that would be insulting them with the comparison. Fact-checking, tracking down and considering sources, corroborating information all using legal methods and then reporting it in text and pictures, all the hallmarks of the concept of investigative journalism. Just most journalism nowadays doesn't give a shit about any of that stuff.

Far more than any other gossip site, Null and the Farms cares about evidence, archived and accurate, so the mockery can be a spot on as possible. The receipts are what makes here the biggest target of them all, proving that there's nothing some people want to avoid as much as the truth. With the added, hilarious, point that none of them would come to our attention if they didn't put their whole ass out online in the first place.

Who doesn't have threads here? People offline. People who don't overshare on the internet. People who can restrain themselves with regards to what they share and who they share it with. Keep some shit private and the journo archivists here would not only not find all the bills you owe, your time in the GNAA or the details of all your lies and contradictions, but they wouldn't even care.

Someone like Jackie wants to be able to make shit up online and have no one call her out on it. The Farms exists to disagree with that idea, both proving that she's lying and make fun of her for it, along with all her many, many other failings. This wouldn't be such a big deal if actual fact checking wasn't so rare nowadays that the Farms is one of the very few places to do it. When the community notes on Xitter is the next closest thing, rather than any major news outlet, that's a terrible sign.
 
Who doesn't have threads here? People offline. People who don't overshare on the internet. People who can restrain themselves with regards to what they share and who they share it with.

You can be online, make a public ass of yourself, get a thread here and if you are not making a public ass of yourself on the regular that thread won't see posts to the thread or may never make it out of the prospering grounds.

Most cases you have to go some to get a thread. And then KEEP going some.
 
Back