Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.8%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 94 14.1%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 208 31.3%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.3%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 65 9.8%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.7%

  • Total voters
    665
Yeah that's why I put "(grooms?)" in there.
You're still muddying the waters with a child rape accusation. Don't be like Nick. Don't accuse degenerates of child rape without actual evidence.

I can already hear Drexel running to his Discord to excitedly type "JOSH FARMS ACCUSIN MAH OF RAPE AN SHIET. I DON NEEDA RAPE NO ONE NO HOW CAUSE HOW BIG MUH DICK! SHIEEEEEEEET."
 
You're still muddying the waters with a child rape accusation. Don't be like Nick. Don't accuse degenerates of child rape without actual evidence.

I can already hear Drexel running to his Discord to excitedly type "JOSH FARMS ACCUSIN MAH OF RAPE AN SHIET. I DON NEEDA RAPE NO ONE NO HOW CAUSE HOW BIG MUH DICK! SHIEEEEEEEET."
I didn't accuse anything, I asked if I missed anything in my post, that would include if Drex is a confirmed rapist or just a confirmed groomer, which is why I mentioned both.
Stop sperging that a cow might lie about what kiwifarms says about them, they already do, and literally are in the video/stream being talked about.
 
I caught a couple of minutes of Rackets' stream yesterday. I haven't watched him for at least 6 months, but is it just me or just it look like has he aged at least 10 years since the start of 2023? If he keeps going like he is, he's going to look like Stuttering John by the end of next year.
 
It's in the past. What a stupid pedantic argument. Yes nigga I can only complain or judge things in the past not in the future or in the present.

Drexel still talks about being a degenerate right now in his discord server. His sidepieces are even in the discord wtf. I never heard a Drexel story where he reflects on what he did and says he was wrong.

It's always the same thing.
/Drexel voice/
Look here's the thing Nick, those beta cucks male.. deep down they need the BBC. I used to fuck their whore wife because they need the BBC you know what I mean Nick come one. Look Look Nick the BBC when a bitch sees the BBC she starts drowling.

Also Nick said he does not care about the racism at all so you guys should feel free to call Drexel a nigger. (because he acts like one)
 
Like he’s trying to set some kind of stage, a la “look at how CANDID this is, how VULNERABLE I am, naked in my tubsky” and that could be setting the stage hoping you’d overshare something.
now you just have me remembering nulls little mocking of yani getting stuck in the bath tub and calling the fire department. his whole speech of

hey big fire man I m just having a soak with all these candles and I cant get out of the tub uwu. I need a big strong man to help pull me up.
 
I didn't accuse anything, I asked if I missed anything in my post, that would include if Drex is a confirmed rapist or just a confirmed groomer, which is why I mentioned both.
Stop sperging that a cow might lie about what kiwifarms says about them, they already do, and literally are in the video/stream being talked about.
My bad, I thought your post was a rhetorical statement. Regardless, I think I answered your question in my first response. Drex isn't currently accused of raping anyone, only grooming and seducing the daughter of an older "friend" sometime after she reached age of consent.

Edit: Move a quote
 
My bad, I thought your post was a rhetorical statement. Regardless, I think I answered your question in my first response. Drex isn't currently accused of raping anyone, only grooming and seducing the daughter of an "older friend" sometime after she reached age of consent.
Yes, you did answer my question, thank you for correcting me, I edited my post too.
 
Maybe I'm MATI for going here, but after watching his absurd and dishonest missive about Null, I'm now sorta hoping Nick loses his Locals contract if not gets thrown off the platform completely.

I know it's somewhat antithetical to hope for that, given that it's provided so much tard cum, and deplatforming is usually bad, but it's really irritating for how he castigates Null for how he's run the Farms, and trying to connect the hosting and domain name difficulties to things Josh has done or failed to do. Insinuating things would be different if people weren't "manipulating" him. All while knowing full well the real issue is that the backbone of the Internet is run by PC faggots who are way too receptive to the dregs of society bleating at them about how this is an evil hate site. He even had Null on to discuss the Keffals situation and the problems the Farms had to endure from that. He never had a problem with Josh or the Farms before this thread were moved, and nothing has changed on KF's end.

I just think it would be really poetic if Locals came to him in the near future and said "Look man, you're not pulling in the money we thought you would, and our lawyers are sick and tired of fielding inquires from law enforcement in relation to the death threats. GTFO." Maybe it would deflate some of his arrogance.

I don't condone anybody working to make that happen, but if it does, I wouldn't say one word in his defense now. Fuck Nick.

I can already hear Drexel running to his Discord to excitedly type "JOSH FARMS ACCUSIN MAH OF RAPE AN SHIET. I DON NEEDA RAPE NO ONE NO HOW CAUSE HOW BIG MUH DICK! SHIEEEEEEEET."
That's good, but it needs more "BIX NOOD."
 
Last edited:
What, you people are going to tell me you don't keep a highly curated folder of extremely out of context Null sound bytes and screencaps to blackmail him into doing your bidding while constantly terrorizing him with the idea of publicly releasing them?

I remember that time I started dangling this particularly damning one where he talked about what he'd to to that animal crossing character "Isabelle", then in a masterful move worthy of a holywood movie I leveraged it into Null convincing Nicholas Rekieta that livestreaming wearing red short shorts and a white shirt like he was a "gay90s hooters themed night waiter" and behaving like the most flamboyant man alive was indeed a great idea.

For proof, find both clips attached, please remember these were both part of a mastermind plot and not at all something either party did on their own with little to no external input.

JoshxIsabelle


Male Thot
 
now he's going to warp it the other way and make it sound like I was offering and he declined, when the reality is I was preemptively making sure he knew that was not on the table.
I can just hear his obnoxious fake laugh when you asked him what posts to delete. "HAHAHaaaa nooooooo..." CryingCoomerWithLaughingMask.jpg
 
The funniest thing about Nick's recent address to Null is how he continually insists he has nothing against Josh, and still likes him.

He's done this exact thing in the past with Cynthia, Elissa, Hydro etc. In each case he would state how the person in question was being "really weird" or "turned on him for no reason", but he has no problems with them and despite everything still likes them.

But due to PerceptionChek's DMs we can now confirm what was always suspected. (Full DM leak)
discord1.png


HE HATES THEIR FUCKING GUTS.

No amount of canned laughter, gay little toasts, or fake sincerity can undo this admission. It has all gotten under his skin from the very beginning.

Stay mad faggot.
 
Last edited:
I'm gone for a couple weeks to save the white race
Brown women can be a lot of fun. Double the drama tho.
Same playbook. Nick baited the bridge burning by Legal Bytes while portraying himself as above the fray. After that, it came out there was all sorts of drama behind the scenes that he was being informed about.
Looks like Legal Bytes was more right than wrong. Too bad her husband didn't get to Kick Nick's ass.
He loved his thread when it was in Multimedia, most people who posted in his thread sucked his dick, and those that criticized him before the move got dogpiled (I'm sure @feral cat #6385 can speak to that).
It's impossible to be the resident contrarian now with what he has become.
Yeah, it feels like it. I don't serve a purpose to him anymore but he wants to basically demean me in public and private while saying "BUT I LOVE NULL AND KIWI FARMS" so that if I say anything back it's my fault.
Imagine how he treats his poor wife. No wonder she is on so many prescription drugs. A mentally abusive partner is worse than a physically abusive partner.
 
Brown women can be a lot of fun. Double the drama tho.
I wouldn't know and God willing never will.

Josh kneels before his Noseliness and from his lips he speaks: "Hail, my liege! Pray, may I inquire, what tidings shall I cleanse from thy noble forum discourse?"
- Rekieta's perception of reality, probably.
I really hope whoever does the Joshcore songs is willing to do dramatic Shakespearean readings with Null's voice.
 
I WAS RIGHT, Nick literally said this, that Null is obligated to agree and talk about whatever the farms says, also I find extremely funny that everything Rekieta is saying about Null can be said about himself and what he is doing currently regarding Masterson/Vito and Eric July.
Nick is so fucking predictable, I can't believe I nailed it

EDIT: apparently Null is terrified of us... oh no. Now after this victorious speech, Rekieta will go back to suck off Vito the pedo.

Similar to how Nick claimed to be representing Pippa because Phase was holding her hostage and wouldn't let her speak her own mind. Nick also claimed he still liked Pippa while actively damaging her brand and hating on her fans. Apparently, Nick thinks he can speak for a lot of people.

It's the same song and dance routine he's done elsewhere with others. It didn't pay off then, and Nick is an idiot for thinking it will pay off now.

- Drexel's stories are not contemporary, (so they aren't bad).

Nick is attempting to apply some kind of statute of limitations on unrepentant actions that Drexel simultaneously chastises women for and encourages men to partake in; degeneracy.

Last I checked Drexel still had T as his sub (was going to bring her on as a defense since he was still seeing her). and acting as though his view of the "real world" is current/accurate and therefore relevant. It is against Drexel's personal interests to appear out of touch with the scene.

I have watched many videos of ex-pornstars using their experiences as cautionary tales. None of them involved laughing while showcasing texts of marriages they have compromised or people they have hurt.

At 18, our discussion is about the Death Penalty. He's anti-death penalty and I am pro-death penalty. I think, especially in regards to sex offenses, we should kill more people and that Kennedy v. Louisiana should be overturned. He believes that the non-zero risk of innocent people being killed means there should be no Death Penalty, I disagree.

His attempt to extrapolate this into some sweeping statement about the forum and myself is gay and cringe.

Sounds like Nick is trying to conflate having a KF thread with the death penalty. This is insane.

If he were asking for a reasonable amount of moderation, I think he might have a leg to stand on here. An example would be if somebody here were talking about how they were trying to hack his accounts, or get any of his business contracts cancelled, or if running a gay op and posting fake gay "evidence." All of those are examples of things that are against site rules and can and have led to moderation activity.

Instead, he's hinting at you using two very particular examples: The Hedonism trip, and Drexel. There is very compelling evidence here that a lot what is being said here about both topics is true and honest, and discussion about those subjects hasn't involved a violation of site rules. Only a violation of Nick and Drex's ego. Hence, censorship.

Agreed. Nick isn't looking to correct the speculation. Nick is looking to hide evidence, which is why he chose the two things that there is a mountain of evidence for.



Also, had fun making this:

MATI LOL.jpg
 
oh I didn't even see this

Nick's messages to me are incredibly dismissive and belittling. He repeatedly called me autistic for not understanding what the fuck he wants from me in these bizarre conversations. When he messaged me immediately after my stream this time I just told him flat out that our conversations are not productive and I don't like his fucking attitude so there was nothing to be discussed.

He's definitely trying to get me to cross some bridge but refuses to say what it is. Chances are it's not something I can think of on my own because it would literally even occur to me to do it without someone explicitly suggesting it.
Nick and Dax are going through what all egotistical cows covered on this site go through. KF is a space where people can criticize people as harshly as possible without having an automated system to hide their opinions or jannies to censor anything besides what's outside of the limits of the law.

Hundreds and hundreds of pages of unfettered criticism bothers narcissists like nothing else in the world possibly could, so they start looking for ways to control the conversation. Fong-Jones, Keffals and other trannies try to control KF by getting it deplatformed and further isolated from the rest of the internet by using their connections in tech and news media.
Dick, Ralph and now Rekeita try to use their online "friendship" with you to get you to chastise the portions of the site that make fun of them or repeat uncomfortable truths, and then gradually inch themselves towards passive hostility to full on active hostility when you inevitably tell them no.

Dick and Ralph are both in the active hostility region, no matter how much Dick wants to repeat that he "likes" Null. Rekeita's diving deeper into the passive aggressive region and is now hoping that Null makes the decisive aggressive action to burn the bridge and bare the fault for the bridge being burnt down.

Same goal (make that KF google search result a little less scathing/critical), different coat of paint.

Edit: Ralph and Dick also started off with the "I like you Josh but I hate your forum"/"Null is afraid of his own forum" shit too before reaching the point they're at. What was that about history and rhyming?
 
Last edited:
Back