2023-09-23 - Nitasha Tiku: conversationMedia request for comment from The Washington Post

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you still print that rag on paper? If so, please send a physical copy of your smear piece to the PO box listed on the website so I can frame it. Thanks

cloudflarekiwi.png

In all seriousness...take a bow, king. They'll never admit it, but the mere existence of this article is an admission of defeat.

Make no mistake: troons still run the show. They have sympathetic eyes and ears all over. Their word carries far more power than it should. The future of Kiwi Farms remains uncertain, but one thing is abundantly clear:

They thought they had the power to snuff this website out and be done with it. They were wrong. A year later, Lucas Roberts is no proud crusader. He's only known as an addict and a scam artist. He's fallen so far out of grace and relevance, that this thread is the first time I've even thought about that disgusting groomer in months.

They will never admit it. The mere existence of this thought in their mind probably has them up at nights. And yet, incontrovertibly, it remains: they never expected this website to still be alive. The mere continued existence of this site is such an accomplishment that they cannot help themselves but write about it. Their condemnation falls flat because the truth is obvious: they wanted this site dead, and beneath all of their hate, they are impressed that Null managed to keep this going. Lucas, Jones, and all the rest of his disgusting groomer ilk hurled everything they could at Kiwi Farms, but like the flag waving over Fort McHenry that motivated America's national anthem, it's still there.

This upcoming smear piece gives proof through the night that Kiwi Farms is still here.

Cheers @Null
 
A journo writing a smug e-mail like that right before they publish their smear piece on the site isn't shocking at all.

What's more shocking to me is the sheer amount of people in this thread that not only had the thought that perhaps it's worth writing something meaningful to those lumps of carbons.

No, some of you motherfuckers wrote paragraphs of mock-up responses as if you've assumed that would do anything.

You're better off just not responding to their e-mails at all. Nothing you'd write would help you.

I cannot believe that some of you motherfuckers are on this site and are still completely oblivious like a fucking toe sucking toddler towards how these parasites operate.

Shame on you you fucking braindead retarded nigger monkeys.
 
One year had passed and we're still here, we have our own independent anti-DDoS solution (and a very good one at that - the DDoS attacks on KF are more inefficient than ever) and our userbase keeps on growing despite the niggerfaggots taking away our domains every once in awhile.
I don't think people like Nitasha over there would be celebrating anything.

Also a*y f*ggot th*t ty*es l*ke th*s d*serves * p*nch t* t*e te*th.
Some of them do it to prevent it from showing up on searches. Which, given that it was found anyway, seems kinda pointless.
 
I hate Pajeets so much.
I find with Pajeets it's a bit of a mixed bag. You get some of them that can be somewhat based on occasion, which coincidentally most of the time happen to be Sikhs who are just as racist as the next guy. But for a lot of them, I find that it's within their nature to follow the status quo in order to get ahead in society. The ones that mindlessly obey have no real sense of personal convictions. Their paymasters tell them to jump and they ask, "how high?". They are the ultimate yes man cattle. They take orders and don't ask questions. If society one day goes through major shifts in power and the "current thing" becomes something antithetical to what it is now, they will follow the new thing just as they have the old thing.

Personally I don't hate them, but I can't ever finding myself trusting my life to a pajeet when it comes down to it.
 
Last edited:
But for the for a lot of them I find that it's within their nature to follow the status quo in order to get ahead in society. The ones the mindlessly obey have no real sense of personal convictions. Their paymasters tell them to jump and they ask, "how high?". They are the ultimate yes man cattle.

This is my experience too. Complete with I've only ever seen Shikhs buck the trend.

Indians are also always saying yes. You could come to them with utterly outlandish demands and they'll just say "yes". If you go to the average Indian and say "I want you to jump from the earth to the sun next week. Can you do it?" They will nod shake their head and say "Yes".

Part of this is Indian "do your best" culture. I had a Indian supervisor for a while that I had to be transferred from because he complained I was "overly negative" when I told him what he was planning/asking was unrealistic and a terrible diea. He didn't want to hear it wasn't going to be possible to find, buy, and stand up a new warehouse in two weeks. He wanted to be told yes, a best effort made, and then to yell and scream at everyone when it wasn't done and until it was.

If you are in authority over them you can yell, scream and (if outside of CONUS) beat them and they'll meekly take it; It was an unpleasant surprise to my Indian boss when I yelled back. Its the same at my new company, and the Indians in the company I'm working for are some of the top-tier ones.
It doesn't mean I dislike them, we get along quite well, but the devolve to total yes men cattle when pressed.

A large portion of my previous job was getting on conference calls with my Indian teammates and telling other teams "No, fuck off, we aren't taking responsibility from you until you complete all things you said you'd do" because they'd tell this other teams yes, take hand over of the project because they were doing what they were told.
 
Well, if it's exactly as they say it is, it might be a decent reporting. Not high hopes, though.
So much cynicism in this thread. I am hopeful that despite any personal comments about her in this thread, she will be fair and impartial nonetheless. I'll be happy so long as she addresses in her article that the "threat to life" was some old and obscure account, probably stolen, suddenly activating, making a threat then leaving it up juuuuust long enough to take a screenshot but not long enough for null to deal with it or for it to be anything referred to law enforcement.
Thank you for the autism.

For me, the article will be better the more it quotes Null. Bonus points for the rag response. Extra bonus points if they "dox" the PO box address in the article.
 
I'd argue that all media coverage is good media coverage when it comes to KiwiFarms since it raises awarness of our existance and allows people to come here and personally find out the other side of the story.

We win if transparancy and a free and honest debate is allowed to prevail,where as they can only win through censorship and intimidation.

The journoscum probably know this,but their self-righteousness and desire to raise their social-justice credit by participating in the smear campaign against KF prevents them from doing what would be the smart thing based on their interest,namely to mention us as little as possible while hoping that the TRA:s harrasment against ISP:s and DDoS attacks keeps the site offline and in obscurity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back