US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure I follow the M2 thing? So the fed is desperately trying to undo the money printer, but the system is handling that naturally to an extent, and there's a real likelyhood the fed will vastly overcorrect?
The feds won't be a part of it outside of the already done interest hikes, but the stagnation in everything else is already making people not buy things outside of the necessities like soaring food prices. Look at home prices and sales being just put in limbo for the past month or two. This will likely cause an "unexpected" shock, probably not in terms of stocks but in quarterly GDP, so at the end of September we might see "unseen" issues they will blame on a) ukraine b) global warming and/or c) COVID returning.

And from talking with people this weekend over the holiday, it seems we are in another supply crunch on things, likely stemming from the competency crisis, so expect a push for amnesty under the lie it will "lower your grocery bills."
 
I agree that the WEF wants to start WWIII, but the reason why the US has to use Ukrainians drafted off the street is because America has trouble sending boots on the ground to contribute to an unjust war where the middle management are total Nazis. They have a demoralized, atomized, materialistic culture, so they can't be used to get into the meat grinder, so the US has to sell weapons because to actually use them personally will get them hurt and the US, like the bully that it is, doesn't want to fight anyone who can possibly hurt them. Look at your average Reddit Battalion. They were all fine with killing Russians and consuming MSM goyslop, but then a missile hit their base once and they cried about how unfair it is that Russians are killing them. That's how the US would actually fight WWIII, cry and whine whenever the enemy wins a battle and then resort to nukes because we can't beat them otherwise.
Americans would be willing to fight in a war if it was to defend or benefit are country. However it's hard to sell patriotism when you're constantly telling it's native citizens that they're to blame for all the problems in the world it's also hard to get recruitments when the sequel to,the fall of Saigon happened. Now you throw in the Obesity epidemic and the drug epidemic. You start to lose a lot of able-bodimen. And that's just the beginning. to really scratch the surface on why we can't get young men and women to sign up for the United States military. There's no real benefit
 
In a way it annoys me that people blame this on boomers. Not because they don't deserve it, they absolutely do. But because a lot of the ring leaders are, quite simply, older than boomers.

Pelosi was born in 1940, before France had fallen to the German army. Mitch was born in 1942, before the Battle of Midway had even happened. George Soros was born in the early 1930s. So was Rupert Murdoch, 1931. The younger Koch brother is from 1940.

In a way this makes sense. They were in charge of creating the boomers as we understand them. The trail blazers of the boomer race.

Ah yes, because when I want hot political takes and information, the FIRST thing I think of is SPORTSBALL

It fits the M.O. of the retards in charge. They are working on a severely distorted idea of what the USA is and what the regular people are like that is straight out of a corporate report made by someone who hasn't touched a middle class person since 1993.
 
Saying that the Fed will overcorrect implies the Fed's actions correct anything at all besides siphoning money out of the middle class and industries into the parasitic financial and political classes' pockets.
Not that I'm a huge advocate for the Government or anything, but most of that money from spending goes to everyone through entitlments. The actual money the "parasites" take is nothing, barely even a tiny percentage. Yes, the elites are douchebags but the American populice is at fault for the debt situation we're in, everyone benefitted from the money printing. America really has become that expensive to run and people refused to let the easy times end when they should have.

The Feds are mostly doing the rate hikes to try and force Congress to stop spending money because that is the heart of the issue and the rate hikes can't fix that on their own. When the Feds habe to return to QE to fund Congress again inflation will shoot right back up. Right now the rate hikes are utterly murdering banks which is intended so the banks can light a fire under congress to fix spending.

The Federal Reserve and really all branches of the Government are not in cahoots with each other, they all actively fight each other to either make their jobs easier or get more power and it was deliberately designed that way as a way to keep the Federal Government in check. The Federal Reserve's only job is to try and fund Congress without breaking the dollar and at the end of the day Congress are still the ones who make the spending decisions.
 
In a way it annoys me that people blame this on boomers. Not because they don't deserve it, they absolutely do. But because a lot of the ring leaders are, quite simply, older than boomers.

Pelosi was born in 1940, before France had fallen to the German army. Mitch was born in 1942, before the Battle of Midway had even happened. George Soros was born in the early 1930s. So was Rupert Murdoch, 1931. The younger Koch brother is from 1940.

In a way this makes sense. They were in charge of creating the boomers as we understand them. The trail blazers of the boomer race.



It fits the M.O. of the retards in charge. They are working on a severely distorted idea of what the USA is and what the regular people are like that is straight out of a corporate report made by someone who hasn't touched a middle class person since 1993.
They're the Silent Generation, the last generation where most of it's members were competent. It's not surprising that they were able to hold on to power when every generation after became increasingly imbecilic, in great part thanks to their intentional actions.
 
The feds won't be a part of it outside of the already done interest hikes, but the stagnation in everything else is already making people not buy things outside of the necessities like soaring food prices. Look at home prices and sales being just put in limbo for the past month or two. This will likely cause an "unexpected" shock, probably not in terms of stocks but in quarterly GDP, so at the end of September we might see "unseen" issues they will blame on a) ukraine b) global warming and/or c) COVID returning.

And from talking with people this weekend over the holiday, it seems we are in another supply crunch on things, likely stemming from the competency crisis, so expect a push for amnesty under the lie it will "lower your grocery bills."
What's a depression again? -10% GDP?

If we hit a depression after two years of them trying to redefine away a recession, I'm gonna laugh and start hoarding ammo.
 
Not that I'm a huge advocate for the Government or anything, but most of that money from spending goes to everyone through entitlments. The actual money the "parasites" take is nothing, barely even a tiny percentage. Yes, the elites are douchebags but the American populice is at fault for the debt situation we're in, everyone benefitted from the money printing. America really has become that expensive to run and people refused to let the easy times end when they should have.

The Feds are mostly doing the rate hikes to try and force Congress to stop spending money because that is the heart of the issue and the rate hikes can't fix that on their own. When the Feds habe to return to QE to fund Congress again inflation will shoot right back up. Right now the rate hikes are utterly murdering banks which is intended so the banks can light a fire under congress to fix spending.

The Federal Reserve and really all branches of the Government are not in cahoots with each other, they all actively fight each other to either make their jobs easier or get more power and it was deliberately designed that way as a way to keep the Federal Government in check. The Federal Reserve's only job is to try and fund Congress without breaking the dollar and at the end of the day Congress are still the ones who make the spending decisions.
The increase in monetary supply that's produced by money printing (oh, excuse me, "quantitative easing") directly causes inflation except for the first beneficiaries of this money, i.e. the state and big banks. By the time it reaches normies like you and me, it's value has already been diluted and so has all of your other money.

Inflation is a tax on the population so we can "afford" these entitlement programs. So no, we are not benefiting from money printing, we're actively being hurt by it. Massively so. It's a scam to keep those luxurious and unaffordable entitlement programs going just a liiiittle while longer. Worse, it all creates misallocation of resources at both the macro (e.g. most of Big Tech doesn't generate the revenue to warrant their stock valuation) and micro levels ("sheeeeit why would I git educated and work nigga I got my section 8 and EBT!").

Do you really think that the Fed, whose mandate is set by Congress and has already been modified in the past (in the 70s to add the employement mandate), will not be called upon to save the government when US debt goes out of control? If Congress has to chose between saving the dollar or saving the US government by massively devaluing the currency to make debt servicing possible, what do you think a bunch of sociopathic politicians enamored with their own power will do?
 
The only reasonable and cohesive response to the abortion issue is repealing the 19th Amendment though.
yes, yes. it's very fun to edgelord post that women are dumb and shouldn't be able to vote in the right wing hugbox of A&H. in the real world, though, politicians are being elected by the general public. and out of the three main political groups of the general public (democrat, independent, republican), only one of those wants to be super strict on abortion
 
yes, yes. it's very fun to edgelord post that women are dumb and shouldn't be able to vote in the right wing hugbox of A&H. in the real world, though, politicians are being elected by the general public. and out of the three main political groups of the general public (democrat, independent, republican), only one of those wants to be super strict on abortion
Women were given the right to vote and put in positions of power by the elite only because it was politically advantageous to have them there.
 
The increase in monetary supply that's produced by money printing (oh, excuse me, "quantitative easing") directly causes inflation except for the first beneficiaries of this money, i.e. the state and big banks. By the time it reaches normies like you and me, it's value has already been diluted and so has all of your other money.

Inflation is a tax on the population so we can "afford" these entitlement programs. So no, we are not benefiting from money printing, we're actively being hurt by it. Massively so. It's a scam to keep those luxurious and unaffordable entitlement programs going just a liiiittle while longer. Worse, it all creates misallocation of resources at both the macro (e.g. most of Big Tech doesn't generate the revenue to warrant their stock valuation) and micro levels ("sheeeeit why would I git educated and work nigga I got my section 8 and EBT!").

Do you really think that the Fed, whose mandate is set by Congress and has already been modified in the past (in the 70s to add the employement mandate), will not be called upon to save the government when US debt goes out of control? If Congress has to chose between saving the dollar or saving the US government by massively devaluing the currency to make debt servicing possible, what do you think a bunch of sociopathic politicians enamored with their own power will do?
I should say more people benefit from money printing than you would think. People who collect entitlements definitely do benefit from it, for example the boomers and their social security scales with inflation. You're right that there will be bagholders there is no debating that. Inflation does eventually hurt the Government though just not as quickly as the bagholders which is why Boomers are blamed for alot of the issues with debt right now.

In terms of debt undoubtedly the Feds will have to do a bailout but that can only work for so long until the inevitable happens. Realistically what could be cut to meet the nearly two trillion dollar deficit, some things like the intreset rate payments have to be made.
 
Women were given the right to vote and put in positions of power by the elite only because it was politically advantageous to have them there.
Look i am going to leave this historical fact here.

In 1919, German women got the vote. By 1933, women, of whom there were millions more than men – Berlin had 1,116 women for every 1,000 men – voted in roughly the same percentages as men for Hitler and National Socialist candidates.

Khm.


Make of it what you will.
 
And much like the British and their infinite sandnigger works we're going to have to tear this shit out physically by the roots, they're not going to go willingly. And the longer we wait, the harder and more painful it's going to be.

I don't see how it's going to be possible. Many of the higher ups in academia usually end up coming from wealthy families. Remember when the two firebombers were arrested and it turned out they were well-to-do law students? The antifa admin at wikipedia, turns out her grandfather wrote Charlottes Web, they're loaded. The Democrat Whip's son was arrested during the Antifa attacks, using female pronouns of course.

All these rich kids like to LARP as street level revolutionaries, then go back to mom and dads mansion to do blow after they've firebombed the plebs homes and businesses. They've never faced consequences in their lives. They probably think it's a grand old time.
 
Look i am going to leave this historical fact here.

In 1919, German women got the vote. By 1933, women, of whom there were millions more than men – Berlin had 1,116 women for every 1,000 men – voted in roughly the same percentages as men for Hitler and National Socialist candidates.

Khm.


Make of it what you will.
Proving my point, thank you.

Also,
ARCHIVE YOUR SOURCES, BITCH.
 
I don't see how it's going to be possible. Many of the higher ups in academia usually end up coming from wealthy families. Remember when the two firebombers were arrested and it turned out they were well-to-do law students? The antifa admin at wikipedia, turns out her grandfather wrote Charlottes Web, they're loaded. The Democrat Whip's son was arrested during the Antifa attacks, using female pronouns of course.

All these rich kids like to LARP as street level revolutionaries, then go back to mom and dads mansion to do blow after they've firebombed the plebs homes and businesses. They've never faced consequences in their lives. They probably think it's a grand old time.
I'd assume they would end up like the hippies where they waste their youth doing nothing and end up old and alone in the end. The Larpers think they will always be 20 and make zero plans for the future.
 
Americans would be willing to fight in a war if it was to defend or benefit are country. However it's hard to sell patriotism when you're constantly telling it's native citizens that they're to blame for all the problems in the world it's also hard to get recruitments when the sequel to,the fall of Saigon happened. Now you throw in the Obesity epidemic and the drug epidemic. You start to lose a lot of able-bodimen. And that's just the beginning. to really scratch the surface on why we can't get young men and women to sign up for the United States military. There's no real benefit
Why the hell would the usual military base join when the military's made it clear they're not wanted?
What's a depression again? -10% GDP?

If we hit a depression after two years of them trying to redefine away a recession, I'm gonna laugh and start hoarding ammo.
They're going to try to redefine a depression too.
 
So, Tucker apparently interviewed a guy who claims he had sex with Barack Obama in 1999 and did coke and smoked crack with him. I love Tucker but this is retarded on multiple levels unless this guy has tangible receipts, which judging from the teaser he doesn't.


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back