- Joined
- Jun 6, 2019
He also talks about tactics a lot, so perhaps his ‘live and let live’ attitude is slyer than it seems. Impressive if true, although it never worked for JK Rowling and likely wouldn’t for Katie either.
Megathread Jesse Singal Derangement Syndrome - jsingal69 vs TroonWorld
- Thread starter Tard Whisperer
- Start date
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2022
Jesse called into Majority Report today. I have only been able to listen to a couple mins so far, but it's already infuriating
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=ZSiDvY0QHvA&t=6626s (@1:50:00)
Summary from r/blockedandreported (link). Apparently Emma backs out of coming on BAR lol of course.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=ZSiDvY0QHvA&t=6626s (@1:50:00)
Summary from r/blockedandreported (link). Apparently Emma backs out of coming on BAR lol of course.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
In Defense of Torture, by Sam Harris (archive)
Sam Seder: world champion headline-reader. Body text, not so much.
Sam Seder: world champion headline-reader. Body text, not so much.
(Also Sam Seder: world champion of getting mad when somebody says "hey! we're damaging innocent childrens' bodies and minds over here!")Sam Harris said:
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Why'd she stop ignoring him in the first place? Just to make a fool of herself?
Dalkgalbi
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
Why did she bother with the "out schedules don't match up" excuse when she had already agreed to go on BAR pod?
I saw that Jesse responded to the WaPo article about Kiwi Farms, mostly just "this is a bad article with bad journalism, please fact check the assertions made by your interviewees" but it was heartening to see.
I saw that Jesse responded to the WaPo article about Kiwi Farms, mostly just "this is a bad article with bad journalism, please fact check the assertions made by your interviewees" but it was heartening to see.
Maginot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2020
For the sake of appearances because if you completely silo off from outside criticism, your wrong-think havers can point this out. Now that they blustered over it they can just ignore it like the rest of the information that they normally do.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2020
These people truly do live in an alternate reality. Saw this comment at 1:53:56, about a minute into the call (unfortunately, as an ex-Sam Seder fan it was too painful to go further)
At this point Sam has said virtually nothing. He has claimed that Jesse "distorts the importance of this issue [trooning out children]... and are so fervent at pointing out the minutiae... in the face of what is actually happening on the ground" and promised to bring up an example that doesn't involve Jesse, oh, and also Sam made a snide comment about Jesse being TAHXIC. That's a fat nothingburger. Even without actually engaging with what Sam said, there's nothing there yet. Not that what he said was intelligent. He seems to have a problem forming an actual sentence, but I guess his point is that Jesse is focusing on what Sam considers edge cases of youth transition going wrong, but even if those were edge cases (which Sam takes for granted because the trans activists tell him that they are), 1 in a hundred children being mutilated by a treatment is still too important to ignore. Trans policies obviously negatively impact a tiny part of the population, but there's no way in hell that they'd accept an argument that it only affects tiny part of the population.
Sam used to be a lot better and used to have better chemistry with the crew. I don't really remember Emma being on the show back when I used to watch it, but goddamn she's just horrible and I don't know why she's clearly being groomed to be the next host. It's not a show for everyone, but as a smug liberal it was a guilty pleasure.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
I think you're making a mistake about the purpose of it for the audience. I would consider it similar to The Daily Show or whatever back in the day, or John Oliver more recently perhaps, the higher brow critique that sometimes surfaces in the work is irrelevant to the mass of the audience who just wants to see people they hate called stupid and awful. The audience knows that Jesse Singal is Bad and that The Majority Report crew is Good and they come to not just see Good defeat Evil but Good defeat Evil so simply and easily that it's trivial. They don't want a fair fight, they don't want content that challenges them, they don't want to have to reconsider that which causes their cognitive dissonance, they want to feel like they've won because the team they support has won. They want to win so much they get tired of winning.These people truly do live in an alternate reality. Saw this comment at 1:53:56, about a minute into the call (unfortunately, as an ex-Sam Seder fan it was too painful to go further)
At this point Sam has said virtually nothing. He has claimed that Jesse "distorts the importance of this issue [trooning out children]... and are so fervent at pointing out the minutiae... in the face of what is actually happening on the ground" and promised to bring up an example that doesn't involve Jesse, oh, and also Sam made a snide comment about Jesse being TAHXIC. That's a fat nothingburger. Even without actually engaging with what Sam said, there's nothing there yet. Not that what he said was intelligent.
Jesse could never have addressed their complaints about him because the complaints aren't about him, they're about the fact that BAD PEOPLE ARE DOING BAD THINGS. Jesse's relevance is the fact that he won't wear the ribbon which makes him fair game to bully. Who the fuck does Jesse think he is? Thinking he's better than everyone and can just "evaluate the evidence" and "question obvious mistakes" when the only hope we have against the powerful evil forces is our solidarity in our faith. Does Jesse not realize what his "questions" might do to someone's soul if they take it seriously?
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
According to Jesse, he was still emailing her about a time, gave her a couple of options and said "one of these will work for me, just not the first date you suggested."
Maybe he should call Joe Lavery? He's always up for a debateHAHAHAHA.
Sam is still sniping at him via Michael Hobbes.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
Audio only since there wasn't anything too interesting going on visually, but For The Archives:
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2022
a bit more context that makes this even worse — the OCD child in question from Jamie Reed’s affidavit was sent to the gender clinic and given hormones was not identifying as trans.
Jesse and Jamie Reed are “garbage human beings” for questioning whether this is appropriate treatment for a mentally ill child
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
Sam Sneeder's still cranky at Jesse today.
(from Ed Gentry on Twitter.)
Edit; some screencaps from Jesse on twitter (archive)
(from Ed Gentry on Twitter.)
Edit; some screencaps from Jesse on twitter (archive)
Jesse Singal said:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Jesse didn't go hard enough at this, Hobbes is apparently stating that his position is that you don't need any evidence to do something. Might as well treat the humors and miasma.Sam is still sniping at him via Michael Hobbes.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
Destiny watched the Jesse vs Sam Sneeder debate on his stream today. Don't know his clip schedule but some redditor or another found an alternative link.
edit: timestamp is 1h34m57s if the link doesn't skip to it automatically.
edit 2 dogwhistle boogaloo: up on one of Destiny's clip channels:
edit: timestamp is 1h34m57s if the link doesn't skip to it automatically.
edit 2 dogwhistle boogaloo: up on one of Destiny's clip channels:
Last edited:
TheMonkeyMan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2015
Jesse has officially left Twitter again, we'll see how long it lasts this time.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2020
I think that today's episode of Blocked and Reported officially confirms that Katie does not regularly read Kiwi Farms, but Jesse might.
(Katie apparently had to find KF's current URL from Jesse)
(Katie apparently had to find KF's current URL from Jesse)
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
I'm not sure if she knows what TLDs are.
Edit: here is them talking about it behind the paywall. Being this positive about the site (not a single throat-clearing condemnation of the "racism" and "slurs" that can allegedly be found here) definitely won't help his reputation with the Twitter troons.
Katie might be the only internet dramatist who doesn't keep close track of KF at all times, or at least she thinks using Tor and Telegram requires advanced technical skill beyond the reach of all but the most autistic computer-obsessed trannies.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
Trace got into it with Walmart Mike (Mike Paulauski) who had a problem with Trace's "When Punch A Nazi Goes Wrong" substack article. Between Walmart Mike blocking everybody (although this time around, it was Walmart Mike who got blocked) and Twitter not cooperating with archive sites, it's kind of a pain in the ass to follow.
Here's Walmart Mike's thread on nitter, where Trace's tweets aren't displayed. Trace's side of the argument requires an individual nitter link for each tweet, so in as close to chronological order as I can figure out, here we go:
1) To clarify: do you think someone participating in edgy roleplay in a video game half a decade ago justifies the label “Nazi” for his boyfriend and wide-scale celebration of physical assault?
2) I understand you have made no claims about the assault—I think you should! People were spreading rumors en masse to justify assault on the basis of a demonstrably false idea that the victim was a Nazi. Do you see that as a problem or something to encourage?
3) I agree that Skaard seems to have been an anti-“SJW” edgelord in 2017. It’s absurd to claim on the basis of that alone that he deserves a “Nazi” label in 2023, particularly one that people eagerly apply to his boyfriend.
4) Nobody needs to do anything, but dodging around the question suggests a lack of courage in your convictions. Did Renn deserve the label “Nazi”, the assault, and the large-scale celebration of that assault?
5) “He’s a Nazi” and “he used to participate in edgy furry roleplay servers” are very different claims! I’m surprised by your implication that posting all the evidence under examination makes my assertions less credible. “Nazi” is an extreme label that merits weighty evidence.
6) It’s a simple question, posed after I’ve presented full context for the event under examination. If you dispute my framing—fine. Do you think he should have been hit with a megaphone and derided as a Nazi across the internet?
7) As entertaining as this sort of deflection is, I find it hard to take your outrage seriously without a direct answer here. If you support the assault, have the conviction to say it directly. If you oppose it—as you should—it will strengthen your case to say so.
8: Oh, I understand your issue with my reporting perfectly. What I also understand is your reluctance to commit loudly to a facially abhorrent position (Renn deserved to be assaulted) or to look as if you agree with me on anything by acknowledging that the assault and its celebration were bad. I get why you’re dodging the question, the reason just isn’t terribly flattering for you.
I don't think this shows up in any of the nitter links, but fucking lol dude:
Here's Walmart Mike's thread on nitter, where Trace's tweets aren't displayed. Trace's side of the argument requires an individual nitter link for each tweet, so in as close to chronological order as I can figure out, here we go:
1) To clarify: do you think someone participating in edgy roleplay in a video game half a decade ago justifies the label “Nazi” for his boyfriend and wide-scale celebration of physical assault?
2) I understand you have made no claims about the assault—I think you should! People were spreading rumors en masse to justify assault on the basis of a demonstrably false idea that the victim was a Nazi. Do you see that as a problem or something to encourage?
3) I agree that Skaard seems to have been an anti-“SJW” edgelord in 2017. It’s absurd to claim on the basis of that alone that he deserves a “Nazi” label in 2023, particularly one that people eagerly apply to his boyfriend.
4) Nobody needs to do anything, but dodging around the question suggests a lack of courage in your convictions. Did Renn deserve the label “Nazi”, the assault, and the large-scale celebration of that assault?
5) “He’s a Nazi” and “he used to participate in edgy furry roleplay servers” are very different claims! I’m surprised by your implication that posting all the evidence under examination makes my assertions less credible. “Nazi” is an extreme label that merits weighty evidence.
6) It’s a simple question, posed after I’ve presented full context for the event under examination. If you dispute my framing—fine. Do you think he should have been hit with a megaphone and derided as a Nazi across the internet?
7) As entertaining as this sort of deflection is, I find it hard to take your outrage seriously without a direct answer here. If you support the assault, have the conviction to say it directly. If you oppose it—as you should—it will strengthen your case to say so.
8: Oh, I understand your issue with my reporting perfectly. What I also understand is your reluctance to commit loudly to a facially abhorrent position (Renn deserved to be assaulted) or to look as if you agree with me on anything by acknowledging that the assault and its celebration were bad. I get why you’re dodging the question, the reason just isn’t terribly flattering for you.
I don't think this shows up in any of the nitter links, but fucking lol dude:
