Race superiority is fucking dumb

Whiteness is a shibboleth
Marge, stop being so Jewish for just a bit.
Why are you so focused on deconstructing whiteness? Deconstruct blackness and Jewishness. Deconstruct Asianess. Explain to us how Asians are not a thing, because of the insane differences between Filipinos and Han and Japanese and Koreans.
You won't do any of that, and we all know why.
You only fear ONE racial group gaining a racial consciousness. You only actively oppose ONE racial group's attempts to collectivize. You are silent or tolerate all others.
Stop this shit, you might fool some of these local nerds that are busy sucking up to GOP and blumpf, but you ain't fooling people that are used to selective deconstruction and progressive maneuvers.
You're better than this.
 
Marge, stop being so Jewish for just a bit.
Why are you so focused on deconstructing whiteness? Deconstruct blackness and Jewishness. Deconstruct Asianess. Explain to us how Asians are not a thing, because of the insane differences between Filipinos and Han and Japanese and Koreans.
You won't do any of that, and we all know why.
You only fear ONE racial group gaining a racial consciousness. You only actively oppose ONE racial group's attempts to collectivize. You are silent or tolerate all others.
Stop this shit, you might fool some of these local nerds that are busy sucking up to GOP and blumpf, but you ain't fooling people that are used to selective deconstruction and progressive maneuvers.
You're better than this.
This post emits father energy
 
I really do not know where to begin with this. This @Stan fellow actually seeks to equivocate the epidemic of black violence and racial violence by citing school shootings. School shootings, although become more common because of the copycat phenomenon and an increasingly dystopic "society" that drives more and more people past the brink insanity, are exceedingly rare. Black violence is an every day fact of life in Amiland, particularly places like Chicago, Baltimore, St Louis, etc, etc. It happens every hour of every day.
TFW you can’t figure out why we need better gun control laws
Then he makes appeals to matters like Arbery matter, Eric Garner, even including wikipedia articles to Emmit TIll and Saint Martin Luther King Jr.
Jared Taylor, John Derbyshire, and many others have offered very persuasive rebuttals on the convention wisdom of these cases.
I don’t really care what other bigots think of the MLK assassination or the murder of Mr Arbery; the only miscarriage of justice I see here is an epidemic of cops shooting black people for having busted tail-lights and expired vehicle registrations.
It woud be an all day chore to marshall all the links and articles to rebut this Young Turks tier level willful ignorance about matters of race and I just do not have time or the inclination. I may post any edition of the Insomnia Stream covering Emmit Till if I find it in a quick, cursory review of his excellent catalogue.
“Emmett”. It’s spelled “Emmett”. And sure, I’ll listen to the bloviations made a century after the fact from bigoted jerks with the preconceived notion that all blacks deserve to be treated with violence. Not.
Also, @Stan you would be right to assume I am racist because I would never deny the claim. I will deny that I thought the deaths were justified due to race, simply the ones I listed placed themselves with their own actions in circumstances that resulted in their deaths. Funny thing is I'm more of a Malcolm X fan than an MLK one, X was closer to the answer of racial unity than King.
This is an awfully roundabout way to say “they deserved it”.
You have literally not provided a single link supporting Jared Diamond's thesis, you have not even made any real arguments, whereas I have provided actual rebuttals and real links to studies. The onus is on you to support your laughable idol.
What’s awfully interesting is that when you look at the Wikipedia page for guns germs and steel, the same study you cite as a counter example comes up. So is it just this one research group that hates Diamond, or do you just do all your homework on Wikipedia?
 
Their deaths weren't deserved, they were granted by their own actions and choices. Avoiding criminal pursuits is a really novel concept and I hope my black bruddas and my inbred white brethren will avoid such ventures. @Stan you really should tone down the New York side of you a bit.
 
Last edited:
Marge, stop being so Jewish for just a bit.
Why are you so focused on deconstructing whiteness? Deconstruct blackness and Jewishness. Deconstruct Asianess. Explain to us how Asians are not a thing, because of the insane differences between Filipinos and Han and Japanese and Koreans.
Nobody is asking me to. But now that you have:
The Han Chinese conquered their neighbors and imposed their culture and genetics on nearly every adjacent nation. East Asian genetics are extremely homogenous for this reason, and they probably have the best claim towards having a unified and historically coherent race.
You won't do any of that, and we all know why.
You only fear ONE racial group gaining a racial consciousness. You only actively oppose ONE racial group's attempts to collectivize. You are silent or tolerate all others.
I think whites are plenty racially conscious, they just also think they’re superior to other races and bigoted white males in particular believe they have some god-given right to white women, and white kids. Whites have dominated US society since inception so I think the white supremacists are the real fraidy cats. You’re so terrified that if other races came to power they’d start passing Anti-White Exclusion Acts and trading white people as property; that they would treat whites as badly as whites historically treated them. I think that’s unlikely to come to pass, and being that America has no claim to native whiteness (our natives were American Indians, and uh, the white man killed almost all of them) I don’t really see why whites need to be afraid of a society in which they’re a mere plurality instead of an outright majority.
Stop this shit, you might fool some of these local nerds that are busy sucking up to GOP and blumpf, but you ain't fooling people that are used to selective deconstruction and progressive maneuvers.
You're better than this.
You’re talking like I’m trying to pull one over on you, but if anything I think you guys are trying to pull one over on me. You hate blacks, I get it. If you were more honest about why then perhaps a discussion to be had there.
 
What’s awfully interesting is that when you look at the Wikipedia page for guns germs and steel, the same study you cite as a counter example comes up. So is it just this one research group that hates Diamond, or do you just do all your homework on Wikipedia?
Wow, ONE study I link is on Wikipedia as well, what a complete and utter debunking, How can anyone refute such a thing. Still waiting for an actual argument, but by this point I have given up on receiving one.
 
Why don't you just move? I hear that's the usual advice for people stuck in shit conditions.

That's what a lot of people do, when they are stuck in a neighbourhood full of brown people. They move out, if they can.

Maybe because they are racists, or maybe because they are tired of the crime, violence, vandalism and abysmal levels of reading and math skills in schools.
 
If you were more honest about why then perhaps a discussion to be had there.
I was always honest with my views in these forums.
I think there are statistical biological difference between subgroups of the human species and that peoples deserve homelands, and yes, I am exclusionary.
IDGAF about America though, besides wanting it to help in Ukraine. I am from a people that was enslaved by 3 empires - Ottoman, Russia and Austria-Hungary. I never made any claims of purity, in fact I refer to myself as a Euro mutt often, cause that's what I am. Nor any claims of superiority.
As you can see, for me, your American slavery BS is nearly irrelevant, as NOBODY cares that parts of my family were once kidnapped as children and forcefully converted to Islam, only to be returned to kill the ones that remained Christian. Ethnic conflict is eternal and there is no changing that.
I want nations that can keep outsiders, foreigners out as desired.
"hating blacks" is a low IQ gruggservative position. I am not conservative, nor trad, nor anything of the sort. I care for reality and social cohesion and stable, cozy societies, with welfare and good wages, and corporations kept in check.
However, at least you admit that you fear whites, as expected. I understand why. We pogromed you for centuries.
Shit happens, and I feel as sorry for that as you feel for the Ottomans and Russians pillaging the Balkans.
 
Last edited:
Saying my name isn’t actually going to prove me wrong dude
Wow, ONE study I link is on Wikipedia as well, what a complete and utter debunking, How can anyone refute such a thing. Still waiting for an actual argument, but by this point I have given up on receiving one.
It’s just that it’s the only critical study. So it seems cherry-picked to me.
I’m not a massive Jared Diamond fan (this is the only work of his I’ve ever read), but it won the Pulitzer Prize, and the study you showed me did not appear to be about the long-term anthropological consequences of resource diversity but something instead to do with Early Modern era European settlers in a variety of different countries. Those people would have all had access to modern tech; which is irrelevant to what I’m talking about. I’m trying to explain why European countries dominated in the global age of sailing, and I find the explanation that Europeans having better food, more domesticable kinds of animals, knowledge of metallurgy and access to metal ore a very satisfactory answer. I think I said something really similar when you first introduced the study and you just ignored it.

Shit happens, and I feel as sorry for that as you feel for the Ottomans and Russians pillaging the Balkans.
You didn’t ask me what I think of Russian aggression, so I didn’t volunteer it, but I’m against it. I’m also against pogroms and I think I the crusades were a mistake. If I am hung up on defending black people specifically, it’s because this thread is extremely focused on black people, not because I have tunnel vision with regards to white on white racism.
 
You didn’t ask me what I think of Russian aggression, so I didn’t volunteer it, but I’m against it. I’m also against pogroms and I think I the crusades were a mistake. If I am hung up on defending black people specifically, it’s because this thread is extremely focused on black people, not because I have tunnel vision with regards to white on white racism.
Yeah we get it, you just hate whites more.
 
Saying my name isn’t actually going to prove me wrong dude
Nope, but that's not the only thing I said. I prefer to maintain good relations with progressives in these forums. I don't hate them, don't accuse them of being groomers and don't wanna "argue" with them for 15 pages based on memes and pointless accusations.
I made my point. Reality comes first. Social stability after. Lying is not cool, not even for the sake of what you think is "social progress". Inclusion, diversity are not God given net goods that are sacred.
Crusades were neutral. It was a competition between two empires/civilizations. What is today Israel was NOT the property of whatever caliphate was in charge then. Those lands were conquered by Muslims through endless bloodshed. Before that, they belonged to Rome, Byzantium, Egypt/Persia and hell knows what other local proto-imperial BS. The whole thing is neutral and just how the world works. You fail to defend against big, predatory fish, fish swallows you.
 
“Emmett”. It’s spelled “Emmett”. And sure, I’ll listen to the bloviations made a century after the fact from bigoted jerks with the preconceived notion that all blacks deserve to be treated with violence. Not.
Corrected, but I actually used a correct spelling which is the standard, mainstream spelling of the name. Given that English is not my only language, well. . ..

Edit @Friend of Dorothy Parker a variant is still a correct spelling. The two Wikipedia articles on Emmett and Emmett have an equal number of notable persons. Jesus fucked ng Christ....


Screenshot_20230910-155931_Chrome.jpg

And you actually used the word not. Are you an adolescent girl who time travelled from 1991?
TFW you can’t figure out why we need better gun control laws
How about we simply instigated a national divorce because guns are not the common denominator, blacks and brown skinned mestizos are. The United States, at least until the defund the police, BLM nonsense and fentanyl crisis had a much lower crime rate than Europe if you factored out the ultra high crime, ultra violent areas that comprise a very small percentage of places in America. Ie the ghettoes, where the blackies and mestizos live.
I don’t really care what other bigots think of the MLK assassination or the murder of Mr Arbery; the only miscarriage of justice I see here is an epidemic of cops shooting black people for having busted tail-lights and expired vehicle registrations.
Yeah, that's your modus operandi. Instead of engaging in arguments from figures like Jared Taylor, or Gregory Hood, the late Colin Flaherty, or my personal favorite, Devon Stack, just brand them racists and bigots and declare yourself the winner.
Incidentally, the epidemic of "cops shooting blacks" is an absolute, bona fide lie. Tucker Carlson did a video a couple years ago talking about each case in one year where there was a credible allegation of shooting an "unarmed" black.





Of course, if a nigger is built like Michael Brown or Mike Tyson (or really man of size and stature of military fighting age) or anyone driving a car to commit vehicular homicide, "unarmed" sort of loses its meaning. It also loses its meaning when police officers and civilians alike cannot divine through powers of telepahty whether someone is armed or not.
 
Last edited:
Say you're right and they tend to. Not every one. Just as I can find shit heads I can find smart people among every race. There may be a lot of behaviors like niggery, but that can be overcome; plenty of black cops in the world that love nothing more than to put gangbanging crack dealers in jail and beat their own "brothers" because they grew up with that noise and said "fuck this shit".
Not all argument is leftist propaganda. It's bout ratio, and ratio wise most groups outside of Asians, and certain sects of Jews are more pleasing to live around aside from whites. I know a muslim woman who condemns Jihadist, and even she acknowledges 75% of muslims are extremist at least. The same is true for many races, ethnicity, sex, and more.
ashkenazi jews tend to have a higher IQ than whites on average, then it turns out it doesn't matter for some reason...
Funny how Israel IQ tests last I checked didn't pan this out, fancy that. Even if it did, you're taking the lower amount of a group compared to the larger.
Counterpoint: you aren’t stabbed, you’ve never been stabbed, and if you are in the future it’s most likely going to be a white assailant (violent crime is more commonly intraracial than interracial.)

Come live with us in reality it’s nice here
I've been assaulted plenty of times, and each time or attempt wasn't from a white grandma or hillbilly. Fancy that.
Plenty of ghetto white cities in the rust belt where you can get threatened by white meth addicts. Go live in one of those and tell me things are awesome just because it’s a white city. I here the fentanyl in Philly is lovely this time of year
I've lived in actual trailer parks when I was younger, and funny enough it was a hispanic and black resident visiting one of my family members that assaulted me and not the druggy white guys living there.
I told you you’re an idiot if you said “Jews” but you could not resist
What makes them an exclusive subject, exactly. Let's not pretend George Soros doesn't have tied with ADL who both support antifa. Even if you argue that's a lie, funny how two Jewish-linked people/organizations defend similar notions. Either proves a conspiracy or Jews have a bias issue against white people. (both also support blm and are against whites hmm....) We can also look into their history, but I'm sure you'd discount everything proving you wrong as you already have.
The mainstream media is not biased against whites
Stop lying. Dylan Roof one of those examples you used had two copy cats who were black and the news never mentioned them, how come Waukesha incident never blamed his social media for why he did the attack where said perpetraitor said he wanted to kill white people yet the news acted ignorant of it. Funny.
I'm a big fan of objective facts and the truth, as opposed to made-up bullshit and bigotry. I'm a big fan of arguments based in civility and fact instead of assertations that your pie-in-the-sky stories "raped [me] in the butthole, Bubba-style." I'm pretty sure if you feel the need to say things like that, you are not winning the debate. At least that's what they taught me in debate club.
Stop lying. You're a fan of trying to feed us bullshit and thinking we're like your low IQ mong friends and going to buy into your deceptive rhetoric. Insults and mockeries have nothing to do with losing a debate. If you say 2+2=5 and I say 2+2=4 you idiot, and you go "Ha you called me an idiot I win." No you just look like a retard. Your debate club lied to you about how debates are won, insults don't mean dick.
TFW you can’t figure out why we need better gun control laws
To disarm people you don't like, specifically white people. That's why you advocate for it. Be honest.
I think whites are plenty racially conscious, they just also think they’re superior to other races and bigoted white males in particular believe they have some god-given right to white women, and white kids
Funny because studies have shown whites have less in group preference than others. Also nice subtle implication of you wanting whites to be victims of genocide.
ou’re so terrified that if other races came to power they’d start passing Anti-White Exclusion Acts and trading white people as property; that they would treat whites as badly as whites historically treated them. I think that’s unlikely to come to pass, and being that America has no claim to native whiteness (our natives were American Indians, and uh, the white man killed almost all of them) I don’t really see why whites need to be afraid of a society in which they’re a mere plurality instead of an outright majority.
These other races don't even treat their own kindly, you brought up slavery but ignore who ended it in western countries and tried to force it on other non-western countries. Funny how blacks still enslave their own kind and worked in other slave trades and even claim they were "Kangs" and how they enslaved Jews for 1000 years, even though they weren't. They even dream of doing abhorrent things to other races on average.
You’re talking like I’m trying to pull one over on you, but if anything I think you guys are trying to pull one over on me. You hate blacks, I get it. If you were more honest about why then perhaps a discussion to be had there.
No. You're just a two bit hack lying about your claims and being called out on your nonsense. Not even particularly good at it. Also who doesn't hate blacks other than posters like you with a black dick in your mouth from moment of account creation? Do tell.Why don't you ask hispanics, asians, Jews, etc. why they have a problem with blacks so much, you can admit it you just hate white people why you make up these bullshit arguments you made. Then maybe we can get somewherein figuring out why delusional weirdos like you exist unless you are black (or one of those Jews who think it's stupid to place credit where credit is due) then it's self explanatory.
 
I don't need to tell you that the Irish were considered nonwhite not 125 years ago.
For the entirety of the existence of the United States the Irish were considered "White" both by custom and law.
Are they white or not?
"White" means European descent. So yes, a slav from Bulgaria is "white" even if he has black hair and a swarty complexion and the fairest Morrocan isn't because he or she is North African.
Both North Africa and the Levant had complex interactions with White people and their ancestors since the Neolithic but they're seperate groups.
 
It’s just that it’s the only critical study. So it seems cherry-picked to me.
I’m not a massive Jared Diamond fan (this is the only work of his I’ve ever read), but it won the Pulitzer Prize, and the study you showed me did not appear to be about the long-term anthropological consequences of resource diversity but something instead to do with Early Modern era European settlers in a variety of different countries. Those people would have all had access to modern tech; which is irrelevant to what I’m talking about.
I literally provided two studies and a book, you are the one cherry picking because you can only be bothered to read the one paragraph abstract of a single paper. If you actually read them it encompasses the history of the world from ancient civilizations. You want more? You can read the responses of actual acclaimed figures in the field such as William McNeill, David Landes, and Niall Ferguson.
Those people would have all had access to modern tech; which is irrelevant to what I’m talking about. I’m trying to explain why European countries dominated in the global age of sailing, and I find the explanation that Europeans having better food, more domesticable kinds of animals, knowledge of metallurgy and access to metal ore a very satisfactory answer. I think I said something really similar when you first introduced the study and you just ignored it.
As did China or India, cf. expeditions of Zheng He. Or even the Islamic world following the expansion to Aden. Or even just on the Conquest of the Americas alone, Chapter 3 is a travesty, portraying Cortez and Pizzaro as the typical outcomes, overrelying on Spanish accounts, downplaying other factors, and straight up getting facts wrong such as Cajamarca. But enough, I'm done, no use arguing with someone who actually takes Diamond seriously.
 
You literally listed a bunch of dindus who were killed because they were violently resisting arrested, George Groid died because of the cocktail of drugs he consumed, Banana Taylor was collateral damage in a gun fight her drug dealing boyfriend started with the police, half the people in the mob who killed Emmit Till were black according to a black witness, and MLK was a drunken rapist who worked for the Russian communists so nothing of value was lost. But it's funny how you had to go back like 60 years to find two examples of white on black violence because it's exceedingly rare. Please remove the nigger dick from your mouth before posting again.

You are like one of those cucks who go to a BLM protest and get hit with a brick while proclaiming "WAIT I'M ON YOUR SIDE!"
 
I think as CRISPR and other tech really kicks into gear we're gonna see a new species, not a new race but something as intellectually superior to us as we were to the neanderthals.

With these post-humans who will be able to overthink us at anything it will be hard to not call them a superior species, tho its likely they wont care what we think.

After all do you care about chimps opinions?
 
And you actually used the word not. Are you an adolescent girl who time travelled from 1991?
No I’m Borat. Jagshemash!
How about we simply instigated a national divorce because guns are not the common denominator, blacks and brown skinned mestizos are.
I think a certain subset of US states tried this in 1864 but go ahead and try again if you must, I doubt the outcome would be different a 2nd time
I've been assaulted plenty of times, and each time or attempt wasn't from a white grandma or hillbilly. Fancy that.
Deets plz. Post scars or gtfo
I've lived in actual trailer parks when I was younger, and funny enough it was a hispanic and black resident visiting one of my family members that assaulted me and not the druggy white guys living there.
I lived in an actual trailer and it was full of mice QED mice are the greatest threat to trailer parks.
Let's not pretend George Soros doesn't have tied with ADL who both support antifa. Even if you argue that's a lie, funny how two Jewish-linked people/organizations defend similar notions. Either proves a conspiracy or Jews have a bias issue against white people. (both also support blm and are against whites hmm....) We can also look into their history, but I'm sure you'd discount everything proving you wrong as you already have.
Amazing! A Jewish capitalist would have ties to the Anti-Defamation league. This is even more surprising than when I learned Mr. Cronin was part of the Irish-American Brotherhood. I mean who would have thought, an Irishman associating with Irish?
Dylan Roof
Dylann Roof, his name is spelled “dylann roof”. Ib4 “only black people give their kids stupid misspelled names”
To disarm people you don't like, specifically white people. That's why you advocate for it. Be honest.
No, I support gun control because the only reason anyone has to own a handgun is to use it against other people. You don’t hunt deer with a Glock, the range sucks too much, you don’t put snakes down with a Glock, cause a point-blank shot will give you powder burns, but you do kill people with a Glock.

If you want to know my gun control beliefs:
1. Long guns only unless you have a real reason to own a pistol. Eg you are a policeman, security guard, P.I.
2. You have to complete a firearms safety training class before getting a license to carry.
3. Licenses are not recognized interstate. Leave your guns at home when you travel.
4. Dense urban centers should be able to ban guns for all but people in point #1, because of the risk of firearm accidents richocheting through you window into the next apartment.
And… that’s why I’m going to ignore you from here on out.
If you actually read them
If you actually linked the full study instead of the abstract, I would have. I told you that before
 
Back